GCSE RELIGIOUS STUDIES: HOW TO ANSWER 12 MARK QUESTIONS (AQA)

Ben Wardle
26 Feb 202327:04

Summary

TLDRIn this GCSE religious studies revision video, Ben Wardle offers a comprehensive guide on tackling 12-mark questions to achieve top grades. He emphasizes the importance of evaluation, presenting arguments for and against a statement with supporting religious evidence. The video outlines a structured approach to answering, including presenting two religious arguments for agreement, two for disagreement, and concluding with a justified personal stance. Wardle also advises on the effective use of religious teachings, the relevance of evidence, and the importance of a strong conclusion to demonstrate a deep understanding and secure full marks.

Takeaways

  • 📚 The video is a GCSE religious studies revision guide focused on answering 12-mark questions effectively.
  • 🎯 To achieve full marks, students must provide a balanced evaluation, including arguments for and against the statement, supported by evidence and a justified conclusion.
  • 🔑 The keyword for answering is 'evaluate', which means to consider both sides of an argument before reaching a conclusion.
  • 📈 Half of the marks in AQA GCSE exams come from 12-mark questions, emphasizing their importance.
  • 💡 Including religious teachings and linking them to the argument is crucial for scoring high marks.
  • 🕒 Students should allocate around 15 minutes for a 12-mark question, including planning and proofreading.
  • 📝 The answer should be structured with at least three paragraphs: arguments for agreement, arguments for disagreement, and a concluding paragraph.
  • 📈 The video suggests using specific religious sources like scripture, teachings of religious leaders, or catechisms to support arguments.
  • 📑 It's important to be specific about religious denominations or schools of thought when presenting arguments.
  • ⏱ The video provides a recommended structure and timing for each part of the 12-mark answer to ensure comprehensive coverage within the time limit.

Q & A

  • What is the main focus of the video?

    -The main focus of the video is to provide guidance on how to answer 12-mark questions in GCSE religious studies, aiming to secure top marks.

  • What does the term 'evaluate' mean in the context of the video?

    -In the context of the video, 'evaluate' means to give both sides of an argument before reaching a justified conclusion.

  • Why are 12-mark questions important in AQA GCSE exams?

    -Half of the marks in AQA GCSE exams come from the 12-mark questions, making them crucial for achieving high scores.

  • What are the three key ingredients needed to secure 12 out of 12 marks in a 12-mark question, according to the video?

    -The three key ingredients needed are: presenting two religious arguments to agree with the statement with evidence, presenting two religious arguments to disagree with the statement with evidence, and reaching a justified conclusion.

  • What does AQA suggest for structuring a 12-mark answer?

    -AQA suggests including two different points of view, religious teachings relevant to the argument, and a strong justified conclusion.

  • How much time should be spent on a 12-mark question according to the video?

    -The video suggests spending around 15 minutes on a 12-mark question, including planning and proofreading.

  • What is the minimum number of paragraphs recommended for a 12-mark answer?

    -The minimum number of paragraphs recommended for a 12-mark answer is three, with one paragraph for agree arguments, one for disagree arguments, and one for the conclusion.

  • Why is it important to include religious teachings in the 12-mark answers?

    -Including religious teachings is important because it shows the examiner that the candidate is knowledgeable about religious sources of wisdom and authority, which is essential for an RE exam.

  • How should non-religious arguments be used in the 12-mark answers?

    -Non-religious arguments should be kept to a minimum, with no more than 20-25% of the 12-mark answer being non-religious.

  • What is the significance of the conclusion in a 12-mark answer?

    -The conclusion is significant because it shows the examiner that the candidate has considered both sides of the argument and has made a judgment, which is essential for achieving top marks.

Outlines

00:00

📚 Introduction to GCSE Religious Studies Revision

Ben Wardle introduces a GCSE religious studies revision video focused on answering 12-mark questions effectively. He emphasizes the importance of mastering this question style as it accounts for half the marks in AQA GCSE exams. The video aims to guide students to achieve full marks by understanding the command word 'evaluate,' which requires presenting balanced arguments with evidence before reaching a justified conclusion. Ben encourages students to utilize religious teachings and wisdom to impress examiners with depth and strength in their conclusions.

05:02

📝 Structuring the Perfect 12-Mark Answer

The video outlines the structure for a high-scoring 12-mark answer, which includes presenting two religious arguments for and against a statement with supporting evidence. It stresses the importance of a justified conclusion that reflects a personal stance after considering all arguments. Ben advises on the use of scripture and other authoritative sources, linking them back to the question to demonstrate a deep understanding. He also discusses the marking scheme, focusing on level four responses, and provides tips from AQA on writing effective answers within a 15-minute timeframe, including planning and proofreading.

10:03

🕒 Time Management and Paragraph Structure

Ben suggests a time management strategy for answering 12-mark questions, advocating for a minimum of three paragraphs: one for arguments to agree, one for disagree, and a concluding paragraph. He advises against spending more than 15 minutes on these questions, including planning and proofreading. The video provides a rough guide for the number of words and paragraphs, emphasizing the quality and relevance of content over quantity. Ben also highlights the importance of evaluation and a strong, justified conclusion to demonstrate a high level of understanding and reasoning.

15:04

📖 Evidence and Logical Reasoning in Exam Answers

The video discusses the importance of including evaluation in answers and finishing with a strong, justified conclusion. It explains the significance of logical chains of reasoning and the need for a clear judgment on the arguments presented. Ben encourages students to be specific in their references to religious teachings and to paraphrase rather than copy texts verbatim. He also advises on the inclusion of a variety of sources of wisdom and authority, and the relevance of different denominations' beliefs to strengthen exam answers.

20:04

📝 Crafting Effective 12-Mark Responses

Ben provides examples of how to structure a 12-mark response, including an introduction, agree and disagree arguments, and a conclusion. He shares an AQA exemplar response and offers his own structure, emphasizing the importance of relevance, evidence, and clear linking back to the question. The video also touches on the use of non-religious arguments and the need to keep them minimal, ensuring the focus remains on religious teachings and their evaluation. Ben concludes with tips for securing top marks by demonstrating a deep understanding of the evidence's strength and its impact on the conclusion.

25:04

🌟 Achieving Top Marks with Evidence Evaluation

In the final part of the video, Ben emphasizes the need to evaluate the strength of the evidence presented in 12-mark answers to achieve top marks. He provides examples of how to discuss the significance of biblical teachings and their impact on a Christian's agreement or disagreement with a statement. Ben encourages students to justify their conclusions by selecting the strongest argument and presenting it confidently. The video concludes with advice on being specific in references to religious denominations and beliefs, and a reminder to believe in oneself and aim for high marks.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Evaluation

Evaluation in the context of the video refers to the process of considering both sides of an argument before reaching a justified conclusion. This is a key concept in answering 12-mark questions in GCSE religious studies, as it demonstrates critical thinking and the ability to weigh evidence. The video emphasizes that to secure full marks, students must not only present arguments for and against a statement but also evaluate the strength of these arguments and conclude with a personal stance, as exemplified by phrases like 'I personally agree or disagree with the statement for this reason.'

💡Religious Studies

Religious Studies is the academic discipline that the video is focused on. It involves the examination of religious beliefs, practices, and scriptures. In the script, the video aims to help students excel in GCSE religious studies exams, particularly in answering 12-mark questions that require a deep understanding of religious texts and doctrines. The video provides strategies for referencing religious teachings and authorities to support arguments.

💡GCSE

GCSE stands for General Certificate of Secondary Education, which is a key stage 4 qualification in the UK education system. The video is a revision guide specifically tailored for students preparing for GCSE exams in religious studies. The term is used to set the context for the type of examination the advice is applicable to, and the script frequently refers to GCSE to emphasize the relevance of the strategies discussed.

💡Evidence

In the script, 'evidence' pertains to the religious texts, teachings, or authoritative sources that students use to support their arguments in an essay or exam response. The video stresses the importance of providing evidence to back up both agree and disagree arguments, such as references to scripture or teachings of religious figures. For instance, the video suggests using phrases like 'This is shown in the Bible which teaches that...' to introduce evidence effectively.

💡Argument

An 'argument' in this context refers to a set of reasons or evidence presented to support or refute a particular statement or proposition within a religious studies exam question. The video outlines the need for students to provide both sides of an argument, with evidence and explanations, to demonstrate a comprehensive evaluation. The script gives examples of how to structure arguments and how to link them back to the question to ensure relevance.

💡Conclusion

A 'conclusion' in the video script refers to the final part of an essay where the student summarizes their evaluation and states their personal stance on the statement in question. The video emphasizes the importance of a justified conclusion that reflects a careful consideration of the arguments presented. It is highlighted as a key component in achieving top marks, as it shows the examiner that the student has reached a judgment after evaluating the evidence.

💡Scripture

Scripture in the context of the video refers to the sacred texts of a religion, such as the Bible or the Quran, which are used as sources of evidence in religious studies exams. The video advises students to reference scripture to support their arguments, showcasing their knowledge and understanding of religious teachings. For example, the video suggests that students might say 'This is shown in the Bible which teaches that...' to provide a strong religious argument.

💡AQA

AQA stands for Assessment and Qualifications Alliance, which is an examining body in the UK that sets and marks GCSE exams, including those in religious studies. The video references AQA guidelines and exemplars to provide students with an understanding of the standards and expectations for answering 12-mark questions effectively. The script uses AQA's criteria to explain what constitutes a high-scoring response.

💡Denominations

Denominations refer to different groups or branches within a religion that have distinct beliefs, practices, or organizational structures. The video encourages students to be specific about which denominations or schools of thought they are referring to when making arguments. This specificity adds depth to the analysis and shows the examiner that the student has a nuanced understanding of religious diversity, as illustrated by the video's advice to say 'some Catholic Christians may agree with the statement because...'

💡Justified Conclusion

A 'justified conclusion' is a conclusion that is supported by the arguments and evidence presented in the essay. The video stresses that a strong conclusion is essential for a top-scoring response, as it demonstrates the student's ability to evaluate the arguments and make a judgment. The script provides guidance on how to craft a justified conclusion, such as by using phrases like 'In conclusion, after considering both sides of the argument, I personally agree/disagree with the statement for this reason...'

Highlights

Introduction to the GCSE religious studies revision video by Ben Wardle.

Emphasis on the importance of 12-mark questions in GCSE exams, which contribute to half of the marks.

Explanation of the term 'evaluate' and its significance in answering 12-mark questions.

Guidance on structuring responses to achieve full marks, including presenting arguments for and against a statement.

The necessity of using evidence from religious texts and sources of wisdom to support arguments.

Advice on impressing examiners with depth of explanation and strength of conclusions.

Details of the marking criteria used by examiners to grade 12-mark answers.

Recommendation to focus on level four of the marking scheme to secure top marks.

Three key elements required for a perfect 12-mark answer: agree arguments, disagree arguments, and a justified conclusion.

AQA's advice on writing 12-mark answers, including the need for two different points of view.

The importance of including religious teachings and explaining their relevance to the argument.

Advice on the structure of the answer, including the number of paragraphs and the use of planning and proofreading time.

The significance of a strong, justified conclusion that demonstrates the evaluation of arguments.

How to use phrases to evaluate the strength of evidence and arguments presented.

The value of being specific about religious denominations and schools of thought when presenting arguments.

Examples of how to structure a 12-mark answer, including the use of an introduction and alternating agree and disagree points.

Ben Wardle's personal structure for approaching 12-mark questions, with suggested timings for each section.

The importance of linking evidence back to the question and using phrases that show the implications of the evidence.

Encouragement to refer to the strength of the evidence to secure a grade nine in the exam.

Closing remarks, offering luck and confidence to students preparing for their GCSE exams.

Transcripts

play00:00

uh low to you I do hope you're well

play00:02

welcome to this GCSE religious studies

play00:05

revision video I'm Ben Wardle and today

play00:07

we are talking about how to answer 12

play00:09

Mark questions so we are going to cover

play00:12

everything you need to know in order to

play00:14

secure the top marks to get 12 out of 12

play00:16

in your 12 markers now remember half of

play00:19

your marks in your AQA GCSE exams come

play00:23

from the 12 Mark questions and so it's

play00:25

really important we are experts at

play00:27

answering this style of question and

play00:30

remember this question is all about

play00:31

evaluation the key command word as I've

play00:34

written on the screen there is to

play00:36

evaluate and evaluate simply means to

play00:38

give both sides of an argument before

play00:40

reaching a Justified conclusion so in

play00:43

order to secure 12 out of 12 you're

play00:46

going to explain reasons to agree and

play00:48

disagree with the statement and you're

play00:49

going to use evidence there before

play00:51

reaching a Justified conclusion and it

play00:54

is so important at the end of your 12

play00:56

markets that you are reaching that

play00:58

justified conclusion that you are saying

play01:00

to The Examiner that in conclusion after

play01:02

considering both sides of the argument I

play01:06

personally agree or disagree with the

play01:08

statement for this reason so this is a

play01:11

really brilliant opportunity I think to

play01:13

show The Examiner you're a Grade 9

play01:15

student because you can Dazzle them with

play01:18

your references to scripture and other

play01:20

sources of wisdom and authority and you

play01:23

can really impress them with the depth

play01:25

of your explanations and with the

play01:27

strength of the conclusion you then

play01:29

reach so let's see this as an

play01:31

opportunity to secure lots of marks so

play01:34

we can get that grade nine and to really

play01:36

show The Examiner we are a top Grade 9

play01:39

re student so here is the marks theme

play01:43

that the examiner will be using to mark

play01:46

your 12 markers and as you can see it's

play01:48

split into four levels we are of course

play01:51

going to focus on level four because we

play01:53

are all aiming for at least 10 out of 12

play01:56

in our 12 markers so we want to be

play01:58

securing those top marks and here on the

play02:01

right of the screen I've put what I

play02:03

think are the three things you need to

play02:05

do in order to secure 12 out of 12. so

play02:08

in your 12 Market you need to present to

play02:11

me two religious arguments to agree with

play02:14

the statements with evidence so for

play02:16

example references to scripture and

play02:18

other sources of wisdom and authority

play02:20

and to then explain that evidence in a

play02:24

way that links back to the question you

play02:26

need to give two religious arguments to

play02:28

disagree with the statement again with

play02:30

evidence and explanation that links back

play02:33

to the statement before reaching that

play02:35

justified conclusion at the end of your

play02:37

12 marker so you're going to say at the

play02:40

end of your essay in conclusion having

play02:42

considered both sides of the argument I

play02:45

personally agree or disagree with the

play02:48

statement because you're then going to

play02:50

reach that clear Justified conclusion

play02:53

which will confirm to The Examiner that

play02:55

you are a Grade 9 candidate that your

play02:58

essay deserves 12 out of 12 Health now

play03:01

here is the advice that AQA give us in

play03:04

terms of writing our 12 Mark answers so

play03:06

they tell us that a 12 Mark answer

play03:08

should number one include two different

play03:11

points of view and that's why I've said

play03:13

you need to include your reasons to

play03:14

agree with the statement and then

play03:16

include your reasons to disagree with

play03:18

the statement because if you just give

play03:19

one side of the argument you're not

play03:21

going to get any more than six marks and

play03:23

that is not what we want is it we want

play03:25

to be aiming for 12 out of 12. and so

play03:28

the key Point here is that you need to

play03:30

give both sides of the argument whenever

play03:32

you're evaluating you are considering

play03:34

both sides of an argument before

play03:36

reaching a Justified conclusion so make

play03:39

sure in your 12 Mark if you are giving

play03:41

both sides of the argument you also need

play03:44

to include religious teaching and

play03:46

explain how it is relevant to the

play03:47

argument being made and that is why I've

play03:50

said you need to include

play03:51

um your evidence for example scripture

play03:54

or it might be a quote from Pope Francis

play03:55

or it might be something from the

play03:57

catechism of the Catholic church for

play03:59

example and then you you need to link

play04:01

that back to the question you need to

play04:04

say to me really clearly why this would

play04:07

mean someone agrees with the statement

play04:09

or why it would mean someone disagrees

play04:11

with the statement and remember if you

play04:14

only refer to non-religious views so if

play04:16

you only gave secular responses you

play04:19

would be capped again at six marks this

play04:21

is an Ari exam so make sure you're using

play04:24

as much religious evidence and as many

play04:27

religious examples as you possibly can

play04:29

as I say see this question as a chance

play04:32

to show The Examiner that you are a top

play04:34

marks Grade 9 re student that you know

play04:37

your scripture that you know your

play04:39

sources of wisdom and authority and

play04:42

really leave this opportunity to show

play04:44

The Examiner that our next key point

play04:46

then is that you need to be detailed as

play04:48

I say explanation is absolutely crucial

play04:51

for securing 12 out of 12. as I've

play04:54

mentioned to you the a02 questions for

play04:56

your 12 markets accounts are 50 of the

play04:58

total Mark the AQA status spend actually

play05:01

up to 15 minutes answering these

play05:03

questions now I don't think you should

play05:05

spend 15 minutes writing I think that

play05:08

should include maybe one or two minutes

play05:09

of planning time beforehand and again

play05:12

one or two minutes after you've written

play05:14

it to proofread it because remember

play05:16

spelling punctuation and grammar is

play05:18

assessed in this question but as a Rough

play05:21

Guide we are saying 15 minutes for your

play05:23

12 markers including planning and

play05:25

proofreading you also need to make sure

play05:28

you use a minimum of free paragraphs and

play05:31

of course that means giving one

play05:33

paragraph where there are arguments to

play05:35

agree with the statement and you're then

play05:37

giving obviously your arguments against

play05:39

the statement and then you're reaching

play05:41

that final conclusion so they are the

play05:43

three key ingredient for your agree

play05:45

arguments your disagree arguments and

play05:47

then your final conclusion now AQA say

play05:50

that as a guide this could be around 250

play05:52

words you don't actually need to write a

play05:55

lot in order to secure 12 out of 12. it

play05:58

really is about the quality and the

play06:00

relevance of what you're writing making

play06:03

sure that everything you're writing is

play06:05

clearly linked back to the statement

play06:06

don't just go off on a tangent

play06:09

um you know telling me all about the

play06:11

quote that you've used show me why that

play06:14

quote would mean someone agreed or

play06:16

disagree with the statement our next key

play06:19

point then is to ensure that the answer

play06:21

includes evaluation and it finishes with

play06:23

a strong Justified conclusion it is so

play06:25

important that you are ending year 12

play06:27

markets with that clear conclusion that

play06:29

shows the examiner that you've

play06:31

considered the agree argument you've

play06:33

considered the disagree and then you've

play06:34

actually made a judgment and now they

play06:36

tell us that judgments on the arguments

play06:38

are essential for the top level so don't

play06:41

just present to me the arguments to

play06:43

agree with the statement and the

play06:45

arguments to disagree with the statement

play06:46

you then need to make a judgment and

play06:48

that's why the conclusion's so important

play06:50

isn't it because it shows you making a

play06:52

judgment whether you thought that the

play06:54

agree arguments or the disagree argument

play06:56

was Stronger so AQA say we could use

play06:59

phrases such as this argument all this

play07:01

evidence is robust you could say that

play07:04

this argument or evidence is strong weak

play07:06

inconclusive insubstantial that it's

play07:09

convincing and then telling the examiner

play07:11

why so you're not just presenting

play07:14

evidence but you're actually then

play07:15

evaluating it so for example for a

play07:17

Christian if something's from the Bible

play07:19

then that's going to be really strong

play07:21

evidence for them isn't it because they

play07:22

might believe you know that if the

play07:24

infallible inerrant word of God and so

play07:26

with some things in scripture then

play07:28

that's going to be very strong very

play07:31

substantial evidence for them and and

play07:33

this will also help they're fed to

play07:35

address the logical chains of reasoning

play07:37

now all that that means is that there is

play07:39

a really clearly developed chain of

play07:41

reasoning in your answer and all you

play07:43

need to do to secure that is present

play07:45

your agree arguments present your

play07:46

disability argument and then reach your

play07:49

conclusion after considering both sides

play07:52

any references to religious teaching

play07:54

this is important guys can be

play07:57

paraphrased AQA you're not expecting you

play07:59

to copy out entire verses from the Bible

play08:02

or the Quran or to be copying out entire

play08:05

pages of Pope francis's encyclicals and

play08:08

and so you can paraphrase the teachings

play08:11

also you don't need to cite specific

play08:14

references in your answers you don't

play08:16

need to be saying in Genesis 1 verse 24

play08:19

you can just refer to the the text or to

play08:22

the source and now I would actually say

play08:25

in order to secure 12 out of 12 I do

play08:27

want you to be specific I don't want you

play08:29

to be saying in the Bible it says please

play08:32

tell me what book in the Bible for

play08:33

example you know please do be specific

play08:36

in that sense but you don't then need to

play08:38

be giving me exact minute details and

play08:42

remember as well that other sources of

play08:44

wisdom and authorities such as religious

play08:46

leaders that prayer hymns the catechism

play08:48

and other religious figures are also

play08:51

credit worthy and you will the my

play08:52

revision videos we don't just focus on

play08:54

the Bible and the Quran we do talk about

play08:56

Pope Francis we do talk about the

play08:58

catechism you know make sure you are

play09:00

bringing in all those different sources

play09:02

of wisdom and Authority we want to see

play09:05

you know that really strong evident

play09:08

faith in your 12 markers so you know do

play09:11

bring those different opinions in do

play09:13

bring those different sources of wisdom

play09:15

and Authority in if you think of course

play09:17

that they're relevant to either agreeing

play09:19

or disagreeing with the statement and

play09:22

finally last but not least your answers

play09:24

can draw on the beliefs of different

play09:26

denominations or schools of thought so

play09:28

one of my pet hates when I'm reading 12

play09:31

Marcus is when students write some

play09:33

people may agree with the statement I

play09:35

want you to be more specific than that I

play09:37

want you to tell me some Catholic

play09:40

Christians may agree with the statements

play09:42

or some Quaker Christians May disagree

play09:44

with the statement really be as specific

play09:47

as you can talk about those different

play09:49

denominations talk about the different

play09:51

schools of thought for example the

play09:53

inclusive mosque initiative and whenever

play09:55

you're talking about homosexuality in

play09:57

Islam is a great specific example yeah

play10:00

one group within Islam that actually

play10:03

have quite a clear opinion and it's

play10:05

actually one of the only opinions that

play10:06

could support

play10:08

um homosexual relationships for example

play10:10

so really try to be as specific as

play10:13

possible you don't want to be assuming

play10:15

that every single Christian in the world

play10:17

or every single Muslim in the world

play10:19

believes exactly the same thing so try

play10:22

to be specific try to refer to different

play10:24

denominations and different schools of

play10:26

thought a quick note as well that you

play10:28

can use non-religious arguments in your

play10:30

themes paper answers but please please

play10:33

keep them to a minimum please make sure

play10:35

that no more than you know 20 25 of your

play10:39

12 markers on the themes paper are ever

play10:42

non-religious arguments we need to

play10:44

remember we're getting our marks for our

play10:46

religious teachings and our explanations

play10:48

of those teachings we are doing an re

play10:50

exam after all so what I want to do now

play10:54

is show you two examples from AQA of how

play10:58

to structure a 12 marker I am then going

play11:01

to share with you my structure which you

play11:03

might like to use and I've included on

play11:05

their timings as well for each section

play11:07

of your answer now this first AQA

play11:10

Exemplar is very interesting because it

play11:13

is three paragraphs which remember is

play11:15

the minimum requirement from AQA so I've

play11:18

had a look at this question in response

play11:20

to the statement a loving God would not

play11:22

send anyone to Hell evaluate this

play11:24

statement for 12 marks plus of course

play11:26

your spelling punctuation and grammar so

play11:28

it's really important that you are

play11:29

proofreading your answers after you've

play11:31

written them now they have as we say

play11:33

given three paragraphs they've given

play11:35

their paragraph of really well explained

play11:38

agree arguments with great references to

play11:41

um scripture and then they've given

play11:42

their disagree arguments again with

play11:45

really excellent level of explanation

play11:47

and really great examples before

play11:49

reaching a really clear conclusion so

play11:52

hey please have a read of this by the

play11:54

way please have a read through but I'm

play11:55

not going to read it to you don't want

play11:57

to send you to sleep but what what can

play11:59

we say about this well this student has

play12:01

chosen to write one detailed agree

play12:03

paragraph one detailed disagree

play12:06

paragraph and then they've reached a

play12:07

fully Justified conclusion which is

play12:10

really important make sure you always

play12:11

end with a fully Justified conclusion

play12:13

each of their paragraphs includes

play12:15

evidence for example they've referred to

play12:17

scripture they've given examples of

play12:19

Jesus's conduct and remember that's

play12:21

great evidence for Christians because he

play12:23

is the key role model he is the key

play12:25

Exemplar he's not just a moral teacher

play12:27

he is the Incarnate Son of God so if

play12:29

he's doing something Christians are

play12:31

going to take that seriously aren't they

play12:32

that's going to really influence whether

play12:35

they agree or disagree with that

play12:36

statement if it's in alignment with what

play12:39

she's the third and of course what Jesus

play12:40

did in the gospels and they also include

play12:43

really good explanations of their

play12:45

evidence so the phrase this shows for

play12:48

example is one that I particularly like

play12:50

because it's where you're saying okay

play12:52

here my evidence but then you're

play12:54

actually saying what that shows what its

play12:56

relevance is to the statement and that's

play12:59

really really important for securing the

play13:01

marks here and it is always always in

play13:04

both paragraphs clearly linked back to

play13:06

the question you must always be linking

play13:09

back to the question guys they've

play13:10

written therefore a benevolent God

play13:12

wouldn't sentence anyone to such an

play13:14

unloving life as hell so a really clear

play13:17

link back to the question

play13:19

um now what did AQA say about this they

play13:21

said this is a high level response

play13:23

despite it times being less concise than

play13:26

it could be so they've said actually it

play13:28

could be even shorter than this it is

play13:30

well argued relevant and has reasoned

play13:32

consideration of different points of

play13:33

view because you've got you agree really

play13:35

detailed arguments and then you've got

play13:37

your disagree really detailed arguments

play13:39

the reasoning leads to judgments which

play13:41

is supported by knowledge and

play13:42

understanding of relevant evidence and

play13:44

information so they've made sure that

play13:46

they're giving evidence why a Christian

play13:49

would agree with the statement they're

play13:50

then giving evidence why Christian would

play13:52

disagree with the statement their

play13:54

reference to religion is constant and

play13:56

accurate and so they've said this is an

play13:58

easy maximum for students at this level

play14:00

so this is all they could ever expect

play14:02

from you at GCSE now I'm going to be

play14:05

really honest with you I think that's

play14:06

pretty easy to write yeah I think that's

play14:08

a really easy thing for you to do in the

play14:11

exam in the time that we have available

play14:13

to us all that I would say is that you

play14:16

do need to know your teachings of course

play14:18

and that you do need to be ready to

play14:21

explain the teachings and obviously link

play14:24

them back to the question so they've

play14:25

given that one 12 out of 12. I want to

play14:28

now give you a second example from AQA

play14:31

and as you can see they've taken a

play14:33

slightly different approach haven't they

play14:34

they've written shorter paragraphs now

play14:37

they still achieve 12 marks but as they

play14:39

say they've actually broken those

play14:41

paragraphs down what they've also done

play14:43

which is quite interesting is they've

play14:45

alternated their agree and disagree

play14:47

points so they've actually done an agree

play14:49

disagree and then they've gone back to

play14:51

agree and then they've gone back to

play14:53

disagree now again you know there is a

play14:55

lot of flexibility here in terms of what

play14:58

approach works for you so for this

play15:00

student as they say they've chosen to

play15:01

write two agreed paragraphs and two

play15:03

disagree paragraphs followed Again by a

play15:06

fully Justified conclusion I really like

play15:09

this conclusion because they've written

play15:10

that in conclusion after assessing both

play15:13

sides I disagree with this statement and

play15:16

I think that's really powerful in terms

play15:18

of showing the examiner that you've

play15:20

considered both sides of the argument

play15:21

before reaching that conclusion I think

play15:24

that's really impactful and because it

play15:26

you know it's showing as well that

play15:28

you've not just then suddenly thought of

play15:29

another argument and you've decided to

play15:31

write that as your conclusion you're

play15:32

actually showing the examiner that you

play15:34

have weighed up both sides and that that

play15:36

has informed the Judgment you've now

play15:39

made

play15:40

so their arguments are again supported

play15:42

by relevant evidence for example they've

play15:44

got their Bible quotes in there they've

play15:45

refer to key beliefs of the religion

play15:47

such as purgatory and they've explained

play15:49

them so they've used the phrase which

play15:51

means so again a really powerful phrase

play15:53

to be using they have again clearly

play15:55

linked back to the question then surely

play15:58

they deserve to go to hell and there is

play16:00

nothing God can do to prevent it so

play16:02

again you're seeing aren't you the same

play16:04

key ingredients that there is evidence

play16:06

that is explained and clearly linked

play16:09

back to the question they are I have to

play16:12

tell you guys the key ingredients for

play16:14

securing 12 out of 12. so here's what

play16:16

AKA did say this is a very articulate

play16:19

response and it is easily deserving of

play16:21

bull marks again I don't think that

play16:23

they've done anything particularly

play16:24

special in the nicest possible way to

play16:27

whoever wrote this I just think that

play16:29

they have really clearly understood what

play16:31

it means to evaluate that they're fully

play16:33

engaged with that particular statement

play16:34

that they've given that evidence they've

play16:36

explained it and linked that back to the

play16:38

question and there you go you at the

play16:40

12th Mark and the fetty is mildly

play16:43

repetitive at times but the content is

play16:45

impressive clear knowledge and

play16:46

understanding is shown throughout with

play16:48

good use of religious Concepts to argue

play16:50

and come to judgments it's well argued

play16:53

different points of view are addressed

play16:54

and the chains of reasoning are

play16:56

demonstrated so again a level 4 12 out

play17:00

of 12 response so for the grand finale

play17:03

of today's video guys I want to share

play17:05

with you my structure for approaching

play17:08

these questions and it brings those two

play17:10

answers together

play17:12

um now an interesting question I often

play17:14

get asked is do I need an introduction

play17:16

now as you saw if I just go back that

play17:19

Exemplar included an introduction uh you

play17:21

know they told us in one sentence what

play17:23

hell is and then they actually asked us

play17:25

a question always like to see a question

play17:27

in your 12 markers by the way they're a

play17:29

really great tool for developing your

play17:31

evaluation however the original one did

play17:34

not have a standalone introduction so it

play17:37

is you know very much a personal choice

play17:39

thing here I think my advice is if

play17:41

you're going to write an introduction do

play17:43

not spend more than 30 seconds writing

play17:45

it so you might want to if you do want

play17:47

that introduction there just have a

play17:49

keyword definition so whatever the

play17:52

keyword or the key concept is in the

play17:53

question give me a 30 second definition

play17:57

of it so just to start the essay to show

play18:00

The Examiner that you understand the key

play18:01

concept but here's the thing guys this

play18:03

is an aoq question you are being

play18:06

assessed on your evaluation not on your

play18:09

knowledge and so don't worry too much

play18:11

about showing the examiner you know that

play18:14

that knowledge of the concept the most

play18:16

important thing is that you are

play18:19

evaluating the statement and of course

play18:21

your knowledge will come through in your

play18:23

written response there so what I would

play18:25

then say is to write agree argument one

play18:27

I want you to make a point you're going

play18:29

to think you know Catholic Christians

play18:30

may agree with the statement because

play18:32

you're then going to give evidence why

play18:34

they would agree with the statement you

play18:36

know in the Bible in the catechism

play18:37

Francis says you're then going to

play18:39

explain this means this shows that and

play18:43

you're going to include in there a link

play18:45

back to the question you know therefore

play18:47

they would agree with the statement

play18:48

therefore they would strongly agree with

play18:50

the statement

play18:52

um so you're making sure that what

play18:54

you're writing is relevant it always has

play18:56

to be relevant guys this is one of the

play18:58

things that loses people marks they

play19:00

start going off randomly on

play19:02

you have to make sure everything you're

play19:04

writing is completely relevant that

play19:07

everything you're writing is about

play19:08

either agreeing or disagreeing with the

play19:10

statements that's paragraph one that's

play19:13

going to be a two and a half minutes

play19:15

we're going to be really specific about

play19:16

our timings here of a point evidence

play19:19

explanation with a link back to the

play19:21

question you're then going to do the

play19:23

same thing you're going to put your

play19:24

second agree argument on the page so

play19:27

you're going to give me a really strong

play19:29

points you might say you know Quaker

play19:31

Christians would also agree with the

play19:33

statement because and then again you're

play19:35

going to give me your clear evidence and

play19:37

then that needs to be explained this

play19:39

means that this shows this teaches

play19:41

Quakers that and that explanation is

play19:43

going to include a link back to the

play19:45

question as well again you've got to be

play19:47

always linking back you'll need to show

play19:50

The Examiner that you're evaluating this

play19:52

particular statement you need to show

play19:54

them why the evidence you've given is

play19:57

relevant

play19:58

I would then move on to my disagree

play20:00

argument so again I'd be spending two

play20:02

and a half minutes doing my first

play20:03

disagree point my point evidence

play20:05

explanation and Link and then my second

play20:07

disagree argument with my point evidence

play20:10

explanation and Link you will notice

play20:12

there then that I am saying spend five

play20:14

minutes writing your agree arguments

play20:16

five minutes writing your disagree

play20:18

arguments and I am saying to write to

play20:21

agree and to disagree so that is what I

play20:25

would be aiming for and then really

play20:28

importantly guys is that at the end you

play20:30

have got your fully Justified conclusion

play20:33

and I'm saying spend about 90 seconds on

play20:36

this this is where you're going to give

play20:38

your judgment if you're going to say in

play20:40

conclusion after assessing both sides of

play20:42

the argument I and then you're either

play20:44

going to say that you agree with the

play20:45

statement or you disagree with the

play20:47

statements because and then you need to

play20:49

explain to me why you've reached that

play20:52

judgment remember it's a Justified

play20:54

conclusion you have to justify what

play20:56

you're saying and you have to give that

play20:58

reason why you've reached that specific

play21:01

conclusion so I have then included here

play21:05

excuse me God's just starting some green

play21:06

tea

play21:08

some examples of statements that I think

play21:10

would be particularly helpful for

play21:12

crafting your 12 markers the example you

play21:15

might as of Zed want to refer to

play21:16

specific denominations when you're

play21:18

making your points so you might say

play21:20

Roman Catholics may agree with the

play21:22

statement because they believe that in

play21:24

terms of uh including your explanation

play21:27

and evidence a great way to introduce

play21:29

evidence is to say this is shown in the

play21:31

Bible which teaches that or to say for

play21:34

example the catechism of the Catholic

play21:36

Church teaches that

play21:38

um or this is been in the gospels when

play21:40

Jesus and then give me a specific

play21:42

example of something that Jesus did you

play21:45

know when he feeds the 5 000 for example

play21:47

or he you know drives out a demon or he

play21:51

you know stops the man stoning the

play21:54

adulterous woman

play21:55

um and then of course in terms of

play21:57

explaining that you're going to say this

play21:59

means that or you're going to write the

play22:01

implication of this is that Christians

play22:04

today should and then you know keep

play22:06

going this clearly shows that and again

play22:09

that's where you're actually

play22:10

um passing judgment on the arguments and

play22:13

and so you need to make sure that

play22:15

explanation is there you are explaining

play22:17

the evidence really clearly what does

play22:20

that Bible quote say you know what does

play22:22

it teach me what does it show me what

play22:24

does the catechism

play22:26

um mean you know what is the implication

play22:27

of what we've read in the catechism for

play22:30

example

play22:31

um and so then with your link back I

play22:34

would recommend using phrases such as

play22:36

this would lead to a Christian or this

play22:38

would lead to a Catholic Christian

play22:39

strongly agreeing with the statement so

play22:42

you're making it clear to The Examiner

play22:43

that the evidence you've given is

play22:45

relevant to the question so you've got

play22:47

your evidence and then you're explaining

play22:49

it with that link back to the question

play22:51

in there with that link back to that key

play22:54

statement you are evaluating in order to

play22:56

then introduce the disagree arguments I

play22:59

would use one of those really nice

play23:00

linking phrases such as on the other

play23:02

hand or contrastingly some Christians

play23:05

would disagree with the statement

play23:06

because or I might say however other

play23:08

Christians such as Quaker May disagree

play23:11

with the statement on the grounds that

play23:13

so in know you are then really clearly

play23:16

introducing the other side of the

play23:18

argument you're making it really clear

play23:20

that there is a shift in tone that there

play23:22

is a change in the direction of the

play23:23

essay that you have set out really

play23:26

clearly with excellent evidence and

play23:28

explanation the agree arguments but now

play23:30

we're shifting tone now we're actually

play23:32

going to flip the coin over and really

play23:34

go into detail with really excellent

play23:36

evidence on the disagree side of things

play23:39

and then again I would be using the same

play23:42

lines to introduce my evidence this is

play23:44

shown in the Bible for example the

play23:46

catechism teaches that or this is seen

play23:48

in the gospels and then again explaining

play23:51

it with phrases such as this means that

play23:53

the implication of this is that and then

play23:56

at the end really importantly guys you

play23:59

are writing that conclusion so you are

play24:00

going to say in conclusion after

play24:02

assessing both sides of the argument I

play24:04

either agree or disagree with the

play24:06

statement because and then you need to

play24:08

give me the strongest argument that you

play24:12

have you need to really impress examiner

play24:14

by selecting very carefully the

play24:17

strongest argument that you have for

play24:19

either agree or disagree the argument

play24:21

that has swayed you to that side of the

play24:23

argument and you've got to present that

play24:25

to me really clearly really confidently

play24:28

but also nice and succinctly we don't

play24:30

want to spend really any more than 90

play24:32

seconds on this at the end of your 12

play24:34

Mark essay now I've put here on the

play24:36

screen that if you would like to make

play24:38

sure you've got that grade nine you will

play24:40

refer to the strength of the evidence so

play24:43

it you know it's just something that you

play24:45

just add in and you know as I say you're

play24:46

not then going to be writing any more

play24:49

paragraph It's just in terms of what

play24:51

you're including in your paragraph So

play24:53

for that grade nine I'd want to see you

play24:55

referring to the strength of the

play24:57

evidence now this is actually really

play24:58

easy to do and so for example if he was

play25:02

saying this is shown in the Bible which

play25:04

teaches that and then you're giving me

play25:06

the key teaching from the Bible and then

play25:08

you're explaining what that shows you

play25:11

need to tell me why that's particularly

play25:13

important why that would lead to a

play25:16

Catholic Christian for example agreeing

play25:18

with the statement so I would say that

play25:20

the Bible is seen as the infallible and

play25:22

inherent word of God therefore what it

play25:24

teaches will be taken seriously so you

play25:26

are saying not only what the Bible says

play25:28

but actually why that would be taken

play25:31

seriously why does that matter you know

play25:34

why is it that because this book says

play25:37

this someone is going to agree with this

play25:39

statement and so just by including those

play25:41

subtle references to the strength of the

play25:44

evidence being presented you can show

play25:46

The Examiner you are a Grade 9 candidate

play25:49

because you don't just present evidence

play25:51

but you actually assess the quality the

play25:54

strength of the evidence so you know

play25:56

basically as I put there on the second

play25:58

bullet point you're showing um that you

play26:00

are evaluating the strength of the

play26:02

arguments you're presenting you're

play26:03

saying whether you think the argument

play26:05

succeeds and why so for example based on

play26:09

where that quote is from well it's from

play26:11

the Bible you know for a Christian the

play26:13

Bible is seen as in infallible in that

play26:14

inherent word of God so of course if the

play26:17

Bible is saying this then yeah they are

play26:19

going to agree with that statement

play26:20

because they don't believe that this is

play26:21

just someone's idea that they've come up

play26:23

with they believe that this is the word

play26:25

of God and so if the word of God is

play26:27

saying this then they're absolutely

play26:29

going to strongly agree with the

play26:30

statement so you know really try to

play26:33

start thinking about evaluating the

play26:35

strength of the evidence that you are

play26:38

fighting in order to secure those top

play26:40

marks so yes that is it from this video

play26:43

I do hope it's been helpful any

play26:45

questions let me know any of your top

play26:47

tips for the 12 markers please share

play26:49

them in the comments below uh very best

play26:51

of luck to you I hope everything is

play26:54

going well for you and yes be confident

play26:57

believe in yourself and let's secure

play27:00

those great lines have a great day and

play27:02

I'll see you soon bye-bye

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

相关标签
GCSE StudiesReligious StudiesExam TipsQuestion AnalysisMark MaximizationEducational GuidanceAnswer StructuringReligious TeachingsEvaluation SkillsAcademic Success
您是否需要英文摘要?