Kebijakan Iuran Tapera Terus Tuai Reaksi Keras dari Masyarakat

Summary

The Indonesian public and government are divided over the Tapera housing savings program, which mandates a 3% wage deduction for housing funds. Workers protested, citing concerns like lack of housing guarantees and excessive wage cuts amid inflation. The Minister of Public Works acknowledged the backlash and suggested a slower implementation if the public isn't ready. The President-elect is also considering reviewing the mechanism, indicating potential policy adjustments. Experts weigh in on the controversy, suggesting the policy might be withdrawn or delayed if protests persist.

Takeaways

• 🏢 The Indonesian government's housing savings program, Taper, is facing both support and opposition from the public.
• 👷‍♂️ Workers have protested against Taper, citing at least six reasons for their rejection, including lack of guarantee for housing and excessive employee deductions.
• 💼 The government, through the Ministry of Public Works and Housing (PUPR), has acknowledged the public's mixed reactions and has stated that the program should not be hastily implemented.
• 🏡 There are concerns about the affordability of housing for the public, especially with wages not keeping pace with inflation and the additional financial burden of deductions like BPJS, pension funds, and taxes.
• 🤔 The Minister of Public Works and Housing, Basuki Hadi Mulyono, expressed surprise and regret over the public's reaction to Taper and suggested it should not be rushed if not ready for public acceptance.
• 📉 The policy of Taper could potentially be withdrawn or postponed if protests continue, as unpopular policies may eventually be revoked.
• 📉 The government's decision to implement Taper is controversial and is seen as an opportunity to improve or reconsider the policy before proceeding.
• 🏛️ The government's regulation on Taper, which includes a 3% savings requirement from wages, has been criticized for potentially cutting into workers' income.
• 📉 The controversy surrounding Taper is part of a broader context of controversial policies leading up to the end of President Jokowi's term, including the UKT (Civil Servant Honorary Fund).
• 🔍 The response from the elected President Prabowo and his administration to the Taper issue will be closely watched, as it may indicate potential policy changes or evaluations.

Q & A

What is the main issue discussed in the transcript?

The main issue discussed is the public's mixed reactions to the implementation of the Tapera program, which is a housing savings tax policy in Indonesia.

What are the concerns raised by the workers regarding the Tapera program?

The workers have raised concerns such as the lack of guarantee for obtaining a house, excessive employee deductions amidst wage increases, and the low purchasing power of the community due to inflation.

What is the government's stance on the Tapera program's implementation?

The government, represented by Minister Basuki Hadi Mulyono, acknowledges the public's negative reaction and states that the program should not be hastily implemented if it is not ready to be accepted by the public.

What are the potential outcomes for the Tapera program according to the transcript?

The transcript suggests that the Tapera program could potentially be withdrawn or postponed if the protests continue to escalate, and it is also an opportunity for policymakers to reconsider and improve the policy before implementation.

What is the role of the President-elect in addressing the Tapera program controversy?

The President-elect, Prabowo, is expected to study and find the best solution regarding the Tapera program's mechanism, indicating that there might be a reevaluation of the policy based on his response.

What are the specific reasons mentioned by the workers for rejecting the Tapera program?

The workers reject the Tapera program due to reasons including no guarantee of getting a house, too many employee deductions, low wage increases that do not match the purchasing power of the community, and existing deductions such as BPJS Health, pension insurance, and tax PPH 21.

What is the percentage of salary or wage that the Tapera savings are supposed to be according to the Government Regulation?

According to Government Regulation Number 21 of 2024, the Tapera savings are supposed to be 3% of the salary or wage.

What is the role of the Social Security Administration (BPJS) in the context of the Tapera program?

The BPJS is mentioned as one of the existing deductions that workers are already subject to, which adds to their concerns about the additional deductions for the Tapera program.

What is the significance of the year 2027 mentioned in the transcript?

The year 2027 is significant as it is the year when the Tapera program is planned to be fully implemented, but the transcript suggests that the timeline might be reconsidered due to the ongoing controversies.

What are the implications of the Tapera program for the workers' income?

The Tapera program implies a reduction in workers' take-home pay due to the additional savings requirement, which is a point of contention among the workers who are already facing low purchasing power and existing deductions.