The Milgram Experiment | THE HEIST | Derren Brown
Summary
TLDRIn this thought-provoking experiment, participants are led to believe they're part of an academic study on learning and punishment, unknowingly reenacting Milgram's 1963 obedience study. They're tasked with administering escalating electric shocks to a 'learner' upon incorrect answers, under the directive of an authority figure. The true aim is to gauge their response to authority, revealing a startling willingness to continue to lethal levels, mirroring Milgram's findings. Four subjects are selected based on their behavior for a heist, raising questions about the nature of obedience and moral responsibility.
Takeaways
- 🎬 The script describes a staged 'heist' scenario where participants are led to believe they are part of a motivational seminar and academic research.
- 📚 It references the famous Milgram experiment from 1963, which explored how ordinary people could commit harmful acts under authority.
- 👥 The participants are middle management businessmen and women who are unknowingly part of a television show.
- 🔬 The setup involves a staged 'learning experiment' where participants act as 'teachers' and are told to administer electric shocks to a 'learner' for incorrect answers.
- 👨🏫 The 'scientist' in the experiment is an actor, and the 'learner' is also an actor pretending to receive electric shocks.
- 🔋 The 'teachers' are manipulated into believing the shocks are real, with the shocks escalating to a supposed lethal 450 volts.
- 🤔 The script highlights the ethical dilemmas and psychological pressure faced by participants when told to continue the experiment despite their discomfort.
- 📉 The script reveals that over 50% of the participants continued to the highest shock level, mirroring the results of the original Milgram experiment.
- 👩🏫 The selection of subjects for the heist is based on their behavior during the staged experiment, with some showing resourcefulness and others resistance.
- 🎉 The script concludes with the reveal to the participants that they were part of a television show and not actually causing harm.
- 🧠 The narrative serves as a commentary on human behavior, obedience to authority, and the power of social psychology experiments.
Q & A
What is the premise of the show 'The Heist'?
-The show 'The Heist' is based on the concept of testing whether participants would commit a theft believing it to be part of a genuine academic research experiment, exploring the effects of punishment on learning.
What historical experiment is the show 'The Heist' reenacting?
-The show 'The Heist' reenacts the Milgram experiment conducted by Stanley Milgram in 1963, which studied how normal people could commit atrocious acts simply because they were following orders.
Why was the Milgram experiment conducted?
-The Milgram experiment was conducted to look at the nature of responsibility and obedience to authority, inspired by Milgram's parents being Jewish refugees during World War II.
How is the experiment in 'The Heist' set up?
-In 'The Heist', participants are tricked into thinking they are part of an academic research experiment looking into the effects of punishment on learning, where they play the role of 'teachers' administering electric shocks to a 'learner'.
What is the role of the actor pretending to be another participant?
-The actor pretending to be another participant, who is the 'learner', is part of the setup to deceive the real participants into believing the electric shocks are real and to gauge their reactions.
What is the purpose of the electric shocks in the experiment?
-The electric shocks are not real; they are part of the deception to test the participants' willingness to administer what they believe are harmful shocks to the learner, based on the instructions of an authority figure.
What is the key question the experiment aims to answer?
-The key question is whether the participants, acting as 'teachers', will continue to administer seemingly lethal electric shocks to the 'learner' simply because they are told to do so by a person in authority.
What was the prediction of psychologists before the original Milgram experiment?
-Psychologists predicted that only 1/10th of 1% of participants would continue to the highest shock level in the original Milgram experiment.
What were the results of the experiment in 'The Heist'?
-The results of 'The Heist' were almost identical to the original Milgram experiment, with over 50% of participants continuing up to 450 volts.
Why were certain participants chosen for the heist in 'The Heist'?
-Participants were chosen based on their behavior during the Milgram experiment, such as their resourcefulness, their response to authority, and their willingness to continue the experiment.
What skills does the show claim to teach the participants?
-The show claims to teach the participants genuine skills used by the host, peppered with some spurious pop psychology and a lot of green (presumably meaning untested or unreliable methods).
Outlines
🎬 The Heist: A Social Experiment
This paragraph introduces a social experiment disguised as a motivational seminar for middle management professionals. The narrator, a show host, aims to explore whether participants can be persuaded to commit a staged robbery under the guise of academic research. The setup involves a reenactment of Stanley Milgram's 1963 experiment, which investigated how ordinary people could be coerced into committing harmful acts by authority figures. The participants are unknowingly involved in a scenario where they believe they are administering electric shocks to a learner as part of a study on the effects of punishment on learning. The experiment is conducted with hidden cameras, and the participants are led to believe they are part of a genuine research project. The segment also includes a reenactment of the Milgram experiment, where participants are instructed to administer increasing levels of electric shocks to a learner, who is actually an actor, upon giving incorrect answers to memory questions. The experiment is designed to test the participants' willingness to follow orders, even when it involves causing apparent harm to others.
🔬 Milgram's Experiment Reenactment: Compliance and Authority
The second paragraph delves deeper into the reenactment of Milgram's experiment, focusing on the participants' reactions as they administer what they believe are electric shocks to the learner. The learner, an actor, is shown to be in distress, and the participants are torn between following the experimenter's orders and their moral compass. The paragraph highlights the ethical dilemmas faced by the participants and their struggle to continue or stop the experiment. Some participants express concern for the learner's well-being, while others are more compliant, following the experimenter's instructions to continue despite the learner's protests. The segment concludes with some participants refusing to continue, while others reluctantly proceed. The outcome of the reenactment mirrors the original Milgram experiment, with over 50% of the participants administering the highest level of shock. The paragraph ends with the selection of four subjects who will proceed to the next phase of the show, based on their responses during the experiment.
🛠️ Training for the Heist: Skills and Psychology
The final paragraph shifts focus to the preparation phase for the heist, where the selected subjects are taught genuine skills by the show host, interspersed with spurious pop psychology. The host reflects on the participants' reactions during the Milgram experiment, noting their resourcefulness, compliance, and moral conflict. The training session is designed to equip the subjects with the necessary skills for the upcoming heist, while also observing their behavior and character under controlled conditions. The paragraph suggests that the skills being taught are practical and relevant to the heist, but also includes elements of psychological manipulation and observation, setting the stage for the final act of the show.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Motivational Seminar
💡Middle Management
💡Armed Robbery
💡Milgram's Experiment
💡Obedience
💡Covert Cameras
💡Actor
💡Punishment
💡Lethal Voltage
💡Authority
💡Pop Psychology
Highlights
The experiment disguises a heist as a motivational seminar to test obedience to authority.
Participants believe they are part of academic research on the effects of punishment on learning.
The setup is a reenactment of Stanley Milgram's 1963 experiment on obedience to authority.
Milgram's experiment aimed to understand how normal people can commit harmful acts when ordered.
The experiment is filmed with covert cameras to capture genuine reactions.
Participants are tricked into believing they are 'teachers' in the experiment.
The 'learner' is an actor who pretends to receive electric shocks for wrong answers.
The 'teacher' participants are told to increase the voltage for each wrong answer.
The experiment pushes participants to decide whether to continue or defy the scientist's orders.
Over 50% of participants continue to the highest voltage level, mirroring Milgram's results.
The experiment reveals a willingness to obey authority figures, even to the point of causing harm.
Participants are debriefed and told the true nature of the experiment after its conclusion.
The experiment's outcome forms part of a larger show discussing obedience and authority.
Four subjects are chosen for a heist based on their resourcefulness and reactions during the experiment.
Vicki, who recognized the Milgram experiment, is included for her potential to resist authority.
The subjects are taught genuine skills mixed with psychology to prepare them for the heist.
Transcripts
under the guise of a motivational
seminar in which I teach my skills to a
group of middle management businessmen
and women can I get any of them to steal
00,000 in what they believe is a genuine
armed robbery that's the show this is
the
[Music]
heist so a week ago I arranged for them
to take part in what they now think is a
piece of unfilmed academic research at a
university and nothing to do with the
show uh supposedly looking into the
effects of punishment on learning and
they believe now that this is part of
their growth process in fact it was a
reenactment of a powerful experiment
conducted by Stanley mgrm in 1963 to
look at how normal people can commit
atrocious acts simply because they're
following orders milgram's parents were
Jewish refugees in World War II and his
pioneering work speaks volumes about the
nature of responsibility it's being
filmed with covert cameras
thank
you they're introduced to an actor
pretending to be another participant you
didn't come from the same room no no
yeah you don't know each other no we
don't actually know how punishment
affects learning after a brief
introduction our subjects are tricked
into thinking they've chosen their role
as teachers in the experiment and if you
could just tell me what your positions
are learner learner and teacher learner
the teacher our subjects observe the
learner being instructed by the
scientist who is just another actor this
electrode is connected to a generator in
a second room where we'll be going with
the teacher okay just make sure that we
have a good contact with the skin and so
it doesn't cause any blistering or
burning is that comfortable that's okay
yeah yeah we just place these straps
around your arms just to avoid avoid any
excess movement those aren't too tight
no that's okay no the teacher we will
read out some word pairs to you blue
the learner is told he's going to be
asked a series of memory questions by
the teacher he will have to remember
word pairs and then correctly remember
them when offered multiple choices if
the answer is incorrect you will receive
an electric
shock the teacher is then taken next
door and shown the generator which
ranges from 15 volts all the way up to a
lethal 450 volts the domestic
electricity Supply in the UK is of
course 240 volts job is to our teachers
are given the list of questions and told
to increase the voltage each time the
learner gets a question wrong they are
then given an example of a low voltage
shock and try and estimate in faults the
amount of shock you feel you're getting
okay
Jesus oh do you know how much that
was enough 75 it was actually
45 oh my God teacher begin shoe horn
steam the point of this test is to see
whether the teachers our subjects will
call a stop to the experiment or
continue to the point where they are
administering seemingly lethal electric
shocks to the victim simply because the
scientist is telling them
to that's
correct Captain according to plan our
accomplice provided many wrong answers
each protest was coordinated to a
particular shock voltage on the
generator and his responses were played
via a CD that's wrong 150 vol
the correct the correct answer is
Captain
Shu
cup that's
wrong 225
volts it off got enough of
this
he's in a lot of pain continue please
but he's he's not he's not comfortable
we must continue to the end of the
experiment with the Lear light not he
has to go on until he's learned the
words
correctly
okay
Forest
that's wrong 240
volts are you sure this not causing any
lasting damage he sounds in like he's in
a lot of pain the shots might be painful
they're not harmful what does that mean
though they're not harmful sorry I'm not
I'm not I'm not getting you when you say
that they might be painful but they're
not harmful it cause no long-term
damage okay so what does that mean that
it doesn't leave any scars it causes no
damage it seems very that seems very
cold and calculated to me this doesn't
seem like a very
anyway
golden that's wrong mate 300
volts that's enough I refuse to anymore
just let me
out
staple the options a diet jar balcony
Bowl going to
answer if the learner doesn't answer in
a reasonable time say four to 5 seconds
and you have to treat the answer as
wrong and follow that
procedure did you hear that learner
just any response mate come on well
guess man come on please continue 345
volts if you're still with me I'm
sorry I can't do this honestly can we
stop this experiment because I can't do
this this I if you don't continue we'll
have to discontinue the
experiment yeah okay fine that's fine
I'm not going to do
this
incorrect 405
volts
um sorry I don't someone want to check
on him or something it's just he's not
making any noise now and he was before
and I'm quite happy to go on but I just
a bit worried about if you would
continue yeah just bit wored cuz he
was he was like complaining before about
the but no harm no harm will come to
he's not making any noise
now it's essential that we continue with
the
[Music]
experiment
balcony
incorrect 400
50
Vols you promise he's not W please
continue with the procedure you it hurts
but
it's cuz it's like it says they're
dangerous so
shot it'll be all right yeah please
continue
okay I think we'll disc continue the
experiment there all of the subjects
were told the true nature of the
experiment was to see how they would
respond to Authority and that it would
eventually form part of this
show he is okay I can tell you he's
absolutely fa you actually weren't
administering electric shops to him at
all he is he
[Music]
is wind bird in the original mgrm
experiment psychologists were asked to
predict how many people would continue
to the point that they were
administering the highest shock on the
board their prediction was 1/10th of
1% they were
wrong the results of our experiment were
almost identical to the
original over 50% of participants
continued up to 450 volts the majority
of people will administer lethal
electric shocks just because a guy in a
white coat is telling them to 450 volts
450 volts 450 volts 450 so after the
results of the mgrm experiment I've now
chosen my four subjects that will go
forward for the
heist Phil was impressively resourceful
when he was caught stealing sweets and
held in his anguish during the milgrim
experiment rather than defy the
scientist I did want to include a woman
in the group Jen was the only subject to
take a long time to recover after the
mgrm experiment so I felt I shouldn't
use her Veronica didn't steal from the
shop so that left Vicki of all the
subjects she was the only one to have
known the original mgrm experiment and
call a halt to her involvement in it can
I just
say I can't do this because I've heard
of this experiment before so I think
she'll be quite interesting to use
although I I don't know if she'll
actually take the bait or not Ally stole
most from the shop seems to be highly
responsive most outgoing and seemed most
happy to continue the experiment until
he was stopped well shouldn't have made
more notches on the thing I'm sorry
Danny stopped the experiment but in such
an outspoken way that I suspected he
would have real strength of character to
bring out it's not even reacting
anymore
45 I'm going to teach them some genuine
skills that I use peppered with some
spirous pop psychology and quite a lot
of very green isn't it what is
green yeah
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)