New "Gun Control" Passes And On Governors Desk

Summary

In this Copper Jacket TV episode, the host discusses two new gun control bills, SB 53 and AB 2917, recently passed in California. SB 53, introduced by outgoing Senator Anthony Portantino, significantly expands safe storage requirements, mandating safe storage in any location where a firearm is present, including temporary accommodations. It also specifies that safe storage devices must be approved by the state. AB 2917 broadens California's 'red flag' laws, allowing more people to file Extreme Risk Protection Orders against individuals and extending the time frame for confiscation without due process. Both bills are awaiting the governor's signature and are set to take effect from January 1st, 2026.

Takeaways

• 😢 The video creator had to take a break due to the loss of a family member.
• 📢 The creator discusses two new gun control bills that have passed in California: SB 53 and AB 2917.
• 🏰 Despite having over 100 existing gun control laws, California is adding more restrictions.
• 🔒 SB 53, introduced by outgoing Senator Anthony Portantino, aims to expand safe storage laws.
• 🏕️ The bill requires safe storage not just at homes, but also in temporary accommodations like campsites and hotels.
• 🔐 SB 53 also mandates that firearms must be stored in state-approved safety devices, starting January 1st, 2026.
• 🚫 AB 2917 further expands California's red flag laws, allowing more people to file Extreme Risk Protection Orders against gun owners.
• ⏱️ The bill extends the time that individuals can lose their gun rights without prior notice, potentially up to ten years.
• 📈 The legislation adds numerous reasons that can be used to justify filing an Extreme Risk Protection Order.
• ⚖️ The process for filing these orders is simplified, potentially leading to more people losing their rights without due process.

Q & A

What is the main topic discussed in the Copper Jacket TV video?

The main topic discussed is two new gun control bills, SB 53 and AB 2917, which have passed in California and are awaiting the governor's approval.

What is the current state of gun control laws in California according to the video?

California already has over 100 gun control laws, including universal background checks, registration, waiting periods, and bans on certain types of firearms and capacities.

Why does the speaker mention the difficulty for California legislators to come up with new gun control laws?

The speaker mentions the difficulty because California already has an extensive list of gun control laws, making it challenging to introduce new ones without overlapping or amending existing ones.

What is the purpose of SB 53 according to the video?

SB 53 aims to expand the existing safe storage laws in California, requiring safe storage of firearms in any location where one resides temporarily, such as campsites, RVs, or motel rooms.

Who is Senator Anthony Panino, and why is he mentioned in the video?

Senator Anthony Panino is an outgoing Senator who has been responsible for some of the strictest gun control laws in California. He is mentioned because he introduced SB 53, which is one of the bills discussed.

What changes does SB 53 make to the definition of a safe storage device?

SB 53 changes the definition by requiring that any new safe storage device used must be one listed on the California Department of Justice's roster of approved safety devices, starting from January 1st, 2026.

What does AB 2917 aim to expand in California's gun control laws?

AB 2917 aims to expand California's red flag laws, also known as Extreme Risk Protection Orders, by increasing the number of people who can file them, the reasons for filing, and the duration of time one can lose their rights without prior notice.

What is the potential duration of rights loss under the expanded red flag laws mentioned in the video?

The potential duration of rights loss under the expanded red flag laws could be 1 to 5 years initially, with the possibility of an additional 5 years extension.

How does the speaker describe the process of someone losing their rights under the red flag laws?

The speaker describes the process as someone being the last to know about the loss of their rights, as it can happen without their prior knowledge until law enforcement arrives to confiscate firearms based on an approved order.

What is the speaker's opinion on the constitutionality of the bills discussed?

The speaker believes that the bills are unconstitutional, as they impose additional restrictions and requirements that infringe upon Second Amendment rights without due process.

Outlines

00:00

🔒 California's Expanded Gun Control Laws

The video discusses two new gun control bills, SB 53 and AB 2917, that have passed in California and are awaiting the governor's approval. The host expresses his grief over the loss of his brother and his hiatus from creating content. He then delves into the details of SB 53, which is an expansion of the state's safe storage laws. This bill, introduced by outgoing Senator Anthony Portantino, mandates safe storage of firearms in any location where one resides, including campsites, RVs, and motel rooms. It also requires the use of approved safety devices listed on a state website, effective from January 1, 2026. The host criticizes the bill for being unconstitutional and burdensome to citizens.

05:01

🚨 Expansion of California's Red Flag Laws

The second paragraph focuses on AB 2917, which further expands California's red flag laws, also known as Extreme Risk Protection Orders (ERPOs). This bill broadens the criteria for filing an ERPO against an individual, allowing for more reasons to be considered and potentially extending the time an individual can lose their rights without prior notice. The host explains that these laws enable the government to confiscate firearms from citizens based on accusations and evidence that may not be concrete, leading to a loss of rights without due process. The video concludes with a call to action for viewers to stay informed about these bills and the potential impact on their rights, as the governor is likely to sign them into law.

Keywords

💡Gun Control Bills

Gun control bills refer to legislative proposals aimed at regulating the sale, possession, and use of firearms. In the video, the speaker discusses two specific bills, SB 53 and AB 2917, which have passed in California and are awaiting the governor's approval. These bills are central to the video's theme as they represent an expansion of existing gun control measures, highlighting the ongoing debate over firearm regulations in the United States.

💡Safe Storage Laws

Safe storage laws mandate that firearms be stored in a secure manner to prevent unauthorized access. The video explains that SB 53 expands these laws in California by requiring safe storage not only at homes but also in any temporary lodging like motel rooms or RVs. This keyword is crucial as it illustrates the video's focus on how new legislation can impact gun owners' daily lives and the practical implications of such laws.

💡Anthony Panino

Anthony Panino is mentioned as the outgoing Senator responsible for SB 53. His role is significant as he is portrayed as a figure who has contributed to stringent gun control laws in California. The video's mention of Panino personalizes the legislative process and provides a real-world context for the bills being discussed.

💡Red Flag Laws

Red flag laws, also known as Extreme Risk Protection Orders (ERPOs), allow for the temporary removal of firearms from individuals deemed to be a risk to themselves or others. The video discusses how AB 2917 expands these laws in California, allowing more people to file such orders and extending the time frame for which rights can be suspended. This keyword is central to understanding the video's message about the erosion of due process and the potential for government overreach in gun control measures.

💡California DOJ Roster

The California Department of Justice (DOJ) roster is a list of approved safety devices that must be used for firearm storage as per the new legislation. The video explains that starting January 1st, 2026, any new safe storage device must be on this roster to be compliant with the law. This keyword is important as it demonstrates how legislation can dictate specific requirements for gun owners and the potential financial burden it may impose.

💡Constitutional

The term 'constitutional' is used in the video to question the legality of the new gun control measures under the United States Constitution, particularly the Second Amendment which protects the right to bear arms. The video suggests that the new laws may be seen as unconstitutional by some, indicating a broader debate about the balance between individual rights and public safety.

💡Affidavit

An affidavit is a sworn written statement that may be used in court. In the context of the video, it is mentioned that gun owners might have to sign an affidavit to declare that their firearms are stored in a safe and approved manner. This keyword is relevant as it shows one of the procedural steps that gun owners might have to follow under the new legislation.

💡Trigger Lock

A trigger lock is a device that renders a firearm inoperable by locking the trigger, preventing it from being pulled. The video discusses how the new laws might require the use of such devices or other approved safety measures. This keyword is significant as it exemplifies the specific types of safety equipment that gun owners may need to acquire and use under the new legislation.

💡Due Process

Due process refers to the legal requirement that the state must respect all legal rights that are owed to a person. The video argues that the new gun control measures in California might infringe upon due process by allowing for the confiscation of firearms without immediate notice to the owner. This keyword is central to the video's critique of the bills, suggesting that they could undermine fundamental legal protections.

💡Legislative Process

The legislative process refers to the steps a bill goes through to become a law. The video touches upon this process as it discusses the passage of the bills through the California state legislature and their impending arrival at the governor's desk. This keyword is important for understanding the context in which the bills are being discussed and the potential impact they could have once signed into law.

Highlights

Introduction to the video discussing two new gun control bills in California.

Mention of the speaker's personal loss and the impact on his video production.

Description of the current extensive gun control laws in California.

Introduction of SB 53 as an expansion of existing safe storage laws.

Explanation of how SB 53 mandates safe storage in various locations, including campsites and hotels.

Discussion of the initial requirement for manufacturers to provide safes with firearms, which was later amended.

Details on the state's roster of approved safety devices for firearm storage.

The effective date of the new safe storage requirements, January 1st, 2026.

Introduction of AB 2917 and its expansion of California's red flag laws.

Explanation of how AB 2917 increases the number of people who can file red flag orders and the reasons for filing.

Discussion of the potential duration of red flag orders, which can range from one to ten years.

Critique of the red flag law process, emphasizing the lack of due process and the potential for rights to be stripped without notice.

Concerns about the broad criteria that can lead to the filing of a red flag order based on accusations rather than convictions.

The potential for these bills to be signed into law by the governor, given their alignment with his political stance.

Call to action for viewers to research the bills and the legislative process in California.

Conclusion and appreciation for viewers, with an invitation to like, subscribe, and engage with the content.

Transcripts

hey everybody how's it going welcome

back to Copper Jacket TV sorry I haven't

been making too many videos uh if you

guys are aware I recently lost my

brother and I just needed some time to

grieve before I jumped in front of the

camera but I wanted to let you guys know

about two bills two gun control bills

that just passed in the state of

California and are on their way to the

governor's desk right now so let's talk

about

it okay so let's go and talk about

what's going on here so in my mind it's

got to be difficult for California

legislators to come up with anything new

I mean as it stands right now there are

already over 100 laws on the books I

mean it's the liberal Utopia they have

everything from Universal background

checks to registration waiting periods

list of things that are approved for

sale by the state they ban capacity they

uh ban arms I mean you name it it's it's

in existence in California so there's no

excuse for anything bad to happen there

because hey they got everything that

they have been asking for pretty much so

what did they do in that state well they

decided let's just go ahead and expand

on the existing laws that we have we'll

take a couple laws we'll pick those ones

out and we'll just make them so much

worse that it'll be almost like

something new and that's what they did

with SB 53 and ab 2917 again both of

those pass and are on the way to the

governor's desk so let's start off by

talking about s sp53 Okay so so s sp53

this one is by outgoing Senator Anthony

pantino this is like his last little

parting gift to the state of California

he is responsible for some of the worst

gun control that you've ever seen in

that state so I I'm happy to see that

he's not going to be there anymore

doesn't mean that he's getting replaced

by any anybody that's going to do any

better but at least the person who is

responsible for so much will no longer

be in the California state senate

regardless Anthony Panino's bill here uh

is going to expand on so-called safe

storage laws now there's already safe

storage laws in the state of California

but this makes it so much worse I

understand that it's Sunday you guys'

time is valuable to you so we're not

going to read a bunch of the bill and

the legislation I'm just going to give

you kind of a breakdown here basically

what this bill does is it now says that

anywhere that you are there has to be

safe storage so it doesn't matter if

you're at like a campsite or in an RV or

you're in your motel room or anything

like that anywhere that you are B

basically laying your head for the night

there has to be safe storage so that

anybody who's not allowed to access it

isn't allowed to access it now we've

talked about s53 multiple times in the

past on this channel and that's because

it started out so much worse than the

final bill in the very beginning this

thing started out by saying that

manufacturers that imported anything

into the state of California had to

provide a safe with it so if you bought

a pistol it would have to come with a

lock box or a safe or or something like

that it had to come with its own safe

storage well that's since been amended

and now what they've done is they

expanded on safe storage by expanding

the number of places that you're going

to have to keep it stored so you know

campsites hotel rooms uh anywhere

basically where you lay your head at

night where anybody else could get

access to it uh it would have to be in

some type of safe storage type device

now the other thing that it does is it

expands on what California considers to

be a safe storage device so in the you

know you might have to sign in affidavit

when you go in to say that you own a

safe and that's where it's going to be

or just a simple trigger lock coming

with it would be enough but now the

state of California is going to have a

special page on their website where

you're going to be able to look up a

roster of approved safety devices and it

has to be one of those approved safety

devices moving forward from the date of

the start of this new law so it's going

to start January 1st 2026 so if you

owned a safe prior to that and it's not

on the California doj roster and it's in

that safe it's fine but moving forward

if you get anything new it has to go

into one of the approved devices that's

going to be on the roster so again it's

going to cost people a lot of money it's

completely unconstitutional and it

expands on that safe storage type

requirement okay so let's move on to AB

2917 now 2917 yet again expans on

California's already unconstitutional

and outrageous red flag laws from the

number of people who are allowed to file

them against you to the reasons that

they're allowed to use to file them

against you to the amount of time that

you could lose your rights without even

knowing that anything's happening to you

until after the fact you're looking at

one to five years but that can be

expanded so they can additionally add

five more years at a time and so

California already has a terrible laws

when it comes to that but this makes it

even worse now these are also called

Extreme risk protection orders or Heros

and the way that 2917 makes this even

worse is by expanding yet again on the

number of things that could get one of

these filed against you so if you were

to take a look at the list right now of

things that could be used to file one of

these against you it's it's fairly bad I

mean it is a long long list this is

going to add a couple dozen more reasons

that you could have one of these filed

against you and again we're talking

about 1 to five years and then possible

extension maybe another 1 to five years

and so you could be looking at a fairly

significant amount of time for simple

accusations so what they ask for is just

simply evidence of something that you

may have done or that you may possibly

do in the future it's not something that

you have concretely done okay it's not

something that you have a record of

necessarily it's just something where

somebody has evidence and again it

expands on the list of things that could

be used as evidence to get one of these

things filed against you so uh this is

basically their way of being able able

to confiscate things from people uh

without due process because again you're

the last person that knows you have one

of these things filed against you

somebody goes in they fill out an

affidavit they put down whatever reasons

and again this gives them more reasons

to put on that paper they give them all

the information that they know about you

and why they're filing it or whatever it

goes off to a judge and the judge takes

a look at what might be or might not be

and then determines whether or not to

rubber stamp that order right you're

sitting at home you're sitting there

watching your sports next thing you know

you get a knock on the door and you're

right are gone so you're the last person

to know but you can go to court

afterwards and try and prove that that

person who said those things against you

is not true and and and then you know I

mean it's obviously it's a lot more

intricate than that there's a lot more

going on and people really get screwed

over by the system here but I I know I'm

oversimplifying that but I mean the

basic premise is you're the last one to

know that you have lost your rights and

so uh 2917 is just another expansion of

what is essentially what they consider

to be legal government conf conf so I

wanted to let you guys know about that

there's there's plenty more out there I

mean if you go to the California doj

website or the legislator's website

excuse me and and you simply type in a

couple keywords you will see all of the

things right now that are currently

sitting uh at the California state

legislature that they're working on and

the list is long so uh they they're

always coming up with something new and

I wanted to you know let you guys know

about that because the chances of these

getting signed by the governor are very

high to 100% uh this is just right up

his alley so again I wanted to let you

guys know that that's coming down the

road January 1st 2026 for both of them

thank you all very much for watching I

really do appreciate it please like

subscribe have a great day

[Applause]