The self and the person in the contemporary Anthropology
Summary
TLDRThis anthropology lesson delves into the concept of the self, exploring its dynamic nature and cultural influences. It discusses how the self encompasses physical, psychological, and social attributes, with theories by Catherine Ewing and Joseph LeDoux highlighting its implicit and explicit aspects. The self is portrayed as non-static, shaped by experiences and forgetting, and is culturally constructed through self-representations that shift across contexts. The video also contrasts independent and interdependent self-construals, emphasizing the impact of culture on relationships, personality traits, achievements, and emotional expression, ultimately questioning the universality of self-perception.
Takeaways
- 📚 Anthropology is the study of humans, their evolution, and the differences among cultures over time, focusing on the cultural aspects of the human condition.
- 🤔 The concept of 'self' in anthropology is multifaceted, with various definitions and theories attempting to explain its development and nature.
- 🧠 Catherine Ewing described the self as encompassing physical, psychological, and social attributes, highlighting the interplay of biological and cultural processes.
- 💡 Joseph LeDoux emphasized the implicit and explicit aspects of the self, suggesting that our conscious awareness of self is only part of a larger, unconscious self that is constantly evolving.
- 🔄 The self is not static; it is influenced by factors such as genetic maturation, learning, forgetting, stress, and diseases, affecting both implicit and explicit aspects.
- 🌐 Katherine Ewing asserted that the self is illusory and forever shifting, with individuals constructing a series of self-representations based on cultural concepts and personal memories.
- 🏠 The self-representation is influenced by the context and culture, with people projecting different identities depending on their environment and social interactions.
- 🌟 Cultural anthropologists argue that the self is culturally shaped and infinitely variable, with cultural traditions and social practices having a profound impact on the human psyche.
- 🔍 Two main ways the self is constructed are identified: independent (typical of individualistic cultures) and interdependent (typical of collectivistic cultures) self-construals.
- 🌐 Katherine Reeve's work suggests that culture influences our views on relationships, personality traits, achievement, and emotional expression, varying significantly across different societies.
- 🏆 The definition of success and the value placed on individual versus group achievements differ across cultures, reflecting the impact of cultural norms and values on personal goals and aspirations.
Q & A
What is the definition of anthropology according to the script?
-Anthropology is the study of people, past and present, focusing on understanding the human condition in its cultural aspect. It is concerned with how humans evolved and how they differ from one another across time.
What are the two main aspects of the self according to Joseph LeDoux?
-The two main aspects of the self according to Joseph LeDoux are the explicit self, which includes aspects that one is consciously aware of, and the implicit self, which includes aspects that one is not consciously aware of.
How does Katherine Ewing define the self?
-Katherine Ewing defines the self as encompassing not just the physical organism but also possessing psychological functioning and social attributes, existing in the mind and comprised of psychological, biological, and cultural processes.
What is the concept of 'soft representations' as described by Katherine Ewing?
-Soft representations, as described by Katherine Ewing, are the illusory and forever shifting mental constructs that people create based on selected cultural concepts of a person and personal memories. These representations change with different contexts or scenarios.
How does the script explain the development of the self in relation to cultural practices?
-The script explains that cultural traditions and social practices can regulate, express, and even transform the human psyche, resulting in ethnic divergence in mind, self, and emotions. The principles of how the mind works are as varied as the cultures and traditions people practice.
What are the two types of self-construals described in the script?
-The two types of self-construals described in the script are independent and interdependent constructs. Independent construct is characteristic of individualistic cultures, emphasizing internal attributes, while interdependent construct is typical of collectivistic cultures, emphasizing the connection between the individual and the community.
How does the script relate the concept of the self to cultural differences?
-The script relates the concept of the self to cultural differences by stating that cultural anthropologists argue the self is culturally shaped and infinitely variable. Different cultures influence how individuals view relationships, personality traits, achievement, and the expression of emotions.
What is the difference between individualistic and collectivistic cultures in terms of how they view the self?
-In individualistic cultures, the self is viewed as separate from the community with an emphasis on internal attributes, traits, skills, and values. In contrast, collectivistic cultures stress the essential connection between the individual and the community, with a high sense of conformity and fear of social rejection.
How does the script describe the impact of culture on the way we view relationships?
-The script describes that culture influences how we enter into and maintain relationships, which may be voluntary or duty-based. For example, Western societies value the freedom to choose a partner, while some Eastern societies still practice arranged marriages.
What is the role of cultural traditions in shaping the self according to the script?
-According to the script, cultural traditions play a significant role in shaping the self by influencing how individuals view themselves, relate to others, and perceive their environment. These traditions can regulate, express, and transform the human psyche, leading to differences in self-concept across cultures.
How does the script connect the concept of the self to the idea of genetic maturation and learning?
-The script connects the concept of the self to genetic maturation and learning by stating that the self is not static and is constantly affected by factors such as aging, cognitive development, and experiences. This includes both the implicit and explicit aspects of the self.
Outlines
😀 Introduction to Anthropology and the Self
The script begins by introducing the field of anthropology as the study of humans past and present, with a focus on understanding the human condition through cultural aspects. It emphasizes the dynamic nature of anthropology and its exploration of how humans have evolved and differ across time. The concept of the self is highlighted as a key area of study, with various definitions and theories to be explored throughout the lesson. The self is described as a complex entity involving psychological, biological, and cultural processes, and is characterized by both explicit and implicit aspects.
🧠 The Development and Nature of the Self
This paragraph delves into the development of the self, referencing the work of Joseph LeDoux, who conceptualizes the self with both implicit and explicit aspects. The self is portrayed as not being static but rather constantly evolving due to factors such as genetic maturation, learning, forgetting, stress, and diseases. The influence of both biochemical and inorganic factors on the self is discussed, highlighting the self's dynamic and ever-changing nature.
🌐 Katherine Ewing's View on Self-Representation
The script discusses Katherine Ewing's assertion that the self is illusory and forever shifting, with individuals constructing a series of self-representations based on cultural concepts and personal memories. Each self-concept is experienced as whole and continuous, despite the shifts that occur with changes in context or scenarios. The self-representations are culturally shaped and can vary significantly across different situations, with people being able to project different identities depending on their environment.
🌏 The Self Embedded in Culture
The paragraph explores how the self is deeply influenced by culture, with cultural traditions and social practices regulating and transforming the human psyche. It argues against the universality of the self, stating that the principles of how the mind works vary as much as the cultures and traditions around the world. The self is seen as a product of society, with cultural differences influencing the development and understanding of individual personalities.
🔄 Cultural Constructs of the Self: Independent and Interdependent
This section examines the cultural constructs of the self, distinguishing between independent and interdependent self-construals. Independent self-construals are characteristic of individualistic cultures, such as North America and Europe, where the self is seen as separate from the community with an emphasis on personal attributes. In contrast, interdependent self-construals are typical of collectivistic cultures, like those in East Asia, where there is a strong connection between the individual and the community, with a focus on group mentality and conformity.
🌱 Cultural Influences on Relationships, Personality, and Achievement
The final paragraph discusses how culture influences various aspects of life, including relationships, personality traits, and achievement. It highlights that cultural differences can affect how relationships are entered into and maintained, the value placed on certain personality traits, and the definition of success and achievement. The script contrasts individualistic cultures that value independence and self-reliance with collectivistic cultures that emphasize group success and conformity.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Anthropology
💡Self
💡Catherine Ewing
💡Joseph LeDoux
💡Implicit and Explicit Self
💡Self-Representation
💡Cultural Anthropologists
💡Independent and Interdependent Constructs
💡Collectivistic Culture
💡Individualistic Culture
💡Cultural Influence
Highlights
Anthropology is the study of people past and present, focusing on understanding the human condition in its cultural aspect.
Anthropology is concerned with how humans evolved and differ from one another across timelines.
Anthropology is a dynamic field with various definitions of the self.
Anthropologists study other societies to gain a clear perspective on our own.
The self is defined as encompassing not just the physical organism but also psychological functioning and social attributes.
The self includes our ability to convey and express emotions and feelings of attachment.
Joseph LeDoux conceptualized the implicit and explicit aspects of the self.
The self is shaped and maintained biologically, mentally, and socially.
The self is not static and is constantly affected by factors such as genetic maturation, learning, and forgetting.
Katherine Ewing asserts that the self is illusory and forever shifting.
People construct a series of self-representations based on cultural concepts and personal memories.
Self-representations are experienced as whole and continuous despite constantly shifting.
Cultural traditions and social practices regulate, express, and transform the human psyche.
Cultural psychologists distinguish between independent and interdependent constructs of the self.
Independent construct is characteristic of individualistic cultures, emphasizing internal attributes.
Interdependent construct is typical of collectivistic cultures, stressing the connection between the individual and community.
Culture influences how we view relationships, valuing them as voluntary or duty-based.
Culture influences the value and perception of personality traits such as humility and assertiveness.
Achievement is defined differently across cultures, with some valuing individual success and others group achievement.
Success is defined variably, with some cultures associating it with wealth and others with personal fulfillment.
Transcripts
[Music]
so good morning everyone we will proceed
to another lesson
which is the self and the person in
contemporary anthropology
okay
first what is anthropology
what is its view about the concept of
the self
now
these two questions we will try to
answer
them
as we progress now anthropology is the
study of people past and present it
focuses on
understanding the human condition in its
cultural aspect okay so in general sense
anthropology is concerned with
understanding how humans okay how we
evolved and how we differ from one
another
across timelines
furthermore anthropology
is a
very dynamic field and anthropological
literature offers several definitions of
the self
and
as we progress in this lesson we will
know one or two theories that
try
to define okay try to explain how the
self develops
so basically guys
anthropology is the study of what makes
us human
and these anthropologists
they study other societies to gain a
clear perspective on our own
so to make it
more simpler
anthropology study the past in order for
us to help interpret
the present
so
one definition of self in modern
anthropology characterized the term in
its most general ordinary and everyday
use
particularly
catherine ewing which was
a professor and anthropologist
who described who tried to describe the
self as
encompassing
not just the physical organisms but
possessing psychological functioning and
social attributes
this definition portrayed the self as
implicitly and explicitly existing in
the mind comprised of psychological
biological and
cultural
processes you can say
encompassing physical attributes because
we are not just an organism that has
two eyes two ears one mouth that can
uh
walk run jog or swim
but we also have psychological
functioning which
is
we are able to
convey okay we are able to
express our emotions and at the same
time we can feel
okay we can feel
attachment we can feel the love
of
the people we are
interacting with
furthermore
okay another
near scientist joseph ledoux
conceptualized the implicit and explicit
aspects of the self
now here
the aspects of the self that you are
consciously aware of are
the explicit self
while
those aspects of ourselves that we are
not
uh
really conscious of
is the implicit aspect okay
now these ideas
can be traced back to the famous
psychologist
from our previous lesson which was simon
freud's okay particularly simon freud's
level of consciousness however according
to joseph ledoux
leduc's views on how the self was
developed
how the self was developed asserted that
it is
framed okay it is being shaped is being
maintained and constantly affected
biologically
as we mature
mentally our cognitive thinking and
socially our interaction with the
immediate environment
furthermore
joseph
claims that the self is not static
meaning it is not stable
it it is added to and subtracted from by
genetic maturation
as we
uh grow up as we grow old okay that's
aging
so
our self is not static because it is
constantly being affected by many
factors such as genetic maturation if i
develop them bones tissues muscles
learning okay as the person learns
from his or her experience and from the
experiences of others
the self is not static because it is
being affected also by forgetting even
stress
and diseases such as organic and
inorganic diseases such as
biochemical
neurotransmitters brain okay
inorganic diseases such as accidents
distress
too much anxiety fears
[Music]
this is true of both the implicit and
explicit aspects of the self
now the next topic would be the soft as
representation
okay for this topic we will try to
elaborate
katherine ewing's assertion about the
self
so here
katherine ewing asserted that
ourself okay the concept of our self is
illusory
it is forever shifting okay so rather
people construct a series of soft
representations that are
based on
selected cultural concepts of person
okay of a person and selected chains of
personal memories
and we will try to elaborate that
further later now each self-concept is
experienced as whole and continuous and
spontaneous at the same time with its
own history and memories that emerge in
a specific context to be replaced by
another self-representation when okay
take note when
the context changes or when a particular
scenario changes
by self-representation ewing
culturally shaped self-concept
so we try to represent
the way we see ourselves the way we
project ourselves depending on
our culture
our culture okay where we come from
and also
we try to make a symbolic representation
of ourselves depending on
our personal memories
the way we
try to present ourselves
later we will try to discuss it further
now here by self-representation even
when culturally shaped self-concepts
that one applies to oneself okay for her
it is the mental entities that are
supposed to represent the self
here according to her people from all
cultures have been observed to be able
to rapidly project different soft
representations
so across culture we have a lot of
self-representations
depending on the context of the
situation okay take note
unself accordingly gathering ewing is
illusory
and shifting okay constantly shifts from
one
self-representation to another
the person is unaware of these shifts
like i say
he or she still experiences wholeness
and continuity despite these shifts okay
so for for example
by what we meant self-representations
okay let's try to use melford spiro's
own interpretation of
the assertion of catherine ewing which
is the individual's
mental representation of his own person
okay these appear to be composed
of minimally
labels okay minimally of labels such as
beautiful daughter or clever politician
now here
the way we
present ourselves
depended on
the lugar for example within the circle
of
our family okay we try to represent
ourselves as a dutiful daughter a
dutiful son
okay
while
pagnet
outside of your family for example you
are in your office you are
within the context of your career
or your ambition okay
you will be able to represent yourself
okay you will try to project yourself as
a clever politician
okay he need a dutiful daughter
okay
so for another example would be
within the context of the school
for example
as a student okay
your uh the way you represent yourself
within the context of the school is that
you are a studious student okay but
outside the school however if you have
for example
a musical band okay
the way
you represent yourself
is a funky rocker
so the way we present ourselves across
scenarios very differently
situations
so ibang situations demand
different
representation of who we are
okay and for catherine ewing
we still experience wholeness
because a young constant when it comes
to representing ourselves
shifting
now the next one is the self embedded in
culture
so for this particular topic guys
okay
how we
see ourselves
and how we relate to other people and
how we relate to them
to our environment is
deeply
defined
and it is deeply framed by our culture
so if one finds the view that the self
is a product of society then
it is possible enough that the ways okay
that the ways of how
the self is developed are bound to
cultural differences as well
okay so as
you may have observed
about different
personalities
depend on
what type of society you come from
cultural differences
influence
different personalities of individuals
as well
singapore
[Music]
now furthermore
cultural anthropologists have argued
that the self
is culturally shaped and infinitely
variable
so for them cultural traditions and
social practices regulate
again cultural traditions and social
practices control can regulate
express and even transform the human
psyche even transform the way we think
resulting less in psychic utility for
humankind than in
ethnic divergence in mind self and
emotions now the very basic idea
is that the principles of how
our mind works okay so the principle of
how our mind works
cannot be conceived as universal we
cannot really define
uh
the self uh in a
two
sentences universal uh
in a universal two sentence
meaning or paragraph or i know two
sentences
uh definition
we
varied differently
we
come from different culture
the basic idea is that the principles
of how the mind works cannot be
conceived of as universal but that it is
okay but that it is
as varied as the culture and traditions
that people practice all over the world
about
the meaning of the self okay about
the meaning of a personality of a person
and
so here
cultural psychologists distinguish two
ways of how the self is constructed
these are independent and interdependent
constructs now these self construals
are also embedded in culture now what do
we mean by construal
now construal is an interpretation of
the meaning of something the way we
interpret okay based on the meaning of a
particular thing okay or a particular
concept
so in this sense
the meaning of self
so the independent construct is
a characteristic of an individualistic
culture
so
individualistic culture are those
uh
countries like north america and europe
so here
individualistic culture represents the
self as the stinkbug
separate from the community
with emphasis on internal attributes
traits skills and values
on the other hand
the interdependent construct is typical
of the collectivistic culture like the
philippines okay countries around
countries around east asia
wherein
there's a great emphasis okay
stressing the
essential connection between the
individual to other people between the
individual and his community
okay
so here
in an individualistic culture
okay people are considered good if they
are independent if they are self-reliant
now at the age of 18 move out
okay stand on your own
have
work
or jobs part time while studying about
items of collectivist culture
okay
35 years old you're still living with
your parents
okay you manga practices at the same
time where in details individualistic
culture
okay individuals
honor competition
okay
in in an individualistic culture
emphasis on
individual achievements rather than
teamwork
wherein
men's collectivistic culture hindi
mashadunya emphasizing individual
achievement but
team success or group mentality
and thus in a collectivistic culture
there is a high sense of
mandatory
conformity
we fear of social rejection so we can
relate uh both uh interdependent and
dependent constructs based in social
groups not in
organic and rational
so the next one
you
now let's try to
dig in deeper okay
about some aspects that
are different from culture to culture
so here we will try to know about
katherine reeve now who is katherine
reeve now she is a developmental
psychologist
who believed that culture
that
culture can influence how we view the
following
aspects okay so here again
uh catherine beef believe that
culture can influence how we view
relationships how we view personality
traits achievement
and even expressing emotions okay so
let's move to the first one
relationships
okay it says here that culture
influences how you enter into okay so
our culture influences
us how we enter
into and maintain our relationships so
for example
relationships may be as voluntary or as
duty-based but be willful but didn't
mandatory or we are obliged okay so for
example in western societies
it is
important for a person to choose whom to
marry
they are very liberated in a way that
they can choose whoever
guston
well some eastern societies okay so some
asian countries and eastern societies
still practice arranged marriage so my
duty based
okay so
i think if
other countries in the east part of the
globe still practice
arrange marriages
[Music]
but we are thankful enough that here in
the philippines
pre-arranged marriage but for some
culture of course london
and we have to respect that cause
now the second one is personality traits
culture
influences whether and how we value some
traits
like humility self-esteem assertiveness
even politeness of a person
as well as how we perceive
hardship and
how we feel about relying on others
we try to put it into more context
individualistic culture
value independence okay self-reliance
while
then of course
the more the merrier
when it comes to
when it comes to
tasks or activities
a personality
that
before we try to make a decision
we must first consult okay the advices
of our
with
the other parties like our parents our
siblings
so the next one is achievement
culturally influences how you define
success and whether you value certain
types of individual and group
achievements so you name kanina
similar to the personality traits
that are
varied across culture
that
the way we
uh
perceive achievement may vary
differently based on the culture that we
are exposed to for example so
individuals the culture and individual
achievement not trying to outshine each
other and young competition not emerge
as one
number one okay
okay no other
emphasizing how unique they are
well literally
eastern countries
asian countries
we value group achievement
that
mas maganda if
would get all the credit because a
teamwork a team effort
and also
how we define success
varies among cultural culture
so let's um try to ask yourselves guys
how um how do you define
success
so some countries okay some people
in other countries they value success as
being able to really reach
okay
reach and make your dreams come true
okay
well other countries okay other people
okay so i'm not trying to generalize but
some people from other countries try to
define
success as
the uh
depending on how much money they have in
their bank accounts
how
uh the number of their cars okay the
number of their houses okay
so for you is money equivalent to
success is power
浏览更多相关视频
UNDERSTANDING THE SELF (UTS) : LESSON 3 | THE SELF IN ANTHROPOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES
The Self, Society and Culture
UNDERSTANDING THE SELF LESSON 2 (SUMMARY)
Self-Concept, Self-Identity & Social Identity – Psychology & Sociology | Lecturio
ANTHROPOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE OF THE SELF
The Anthropological Perspective of the Self
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)