Human Being vs Human Person
Summary
TLDRThe script delves into the debate surrounding personhood and the moral worth of human beings, particularly in the context of abortion. It argues that from the moment of fertilization, a unique human being with the potential for self-transcendence exists, possessing intrinsic dignity and moral worth. This transcendent nature, the script suggests, is the basis for our fundamental human rights and the legal protection we deserve, including for pre-born children.
Takeaways
- π¬ Scientific evidence supports the existence of a unique human being at the moment of fertilization.
- π€ The distinction between 'human being' and 'human person' is discussed, with an emphasis on the latter's moral worth.
- π 'Personhood' refers to the intrinsic moral worth of human beings, which is the basis for fundamental human rights and legal protection.
- π« The argument that a human being might lack intrinsic moral worth and thus not deserve legal protection is challenged.
- π‘ Intrinsic moral worth is derived from the human capacity for self-transcendence, the ability to relate to God and experience divine love.
- π± At fertilization, a human being has the same potential for transcendence as any other person, indicating the start of personhood.
- π There is no substantial change after fertilization that would suggest the emergence of a transcendent nature at a different time.
- π Every human being with a transcendent nature is considered a person of infinite moral worth.
- π Such persons, including pre-born children, are argued to deserve equal protection under the law.
- π€° The script advocates for the legal protection of pre-born children based on their inherent personhood and moral worth.
Q & A
What is the distinction made between a 'human being' and a 'human person' in the script?
-The script distinguishes 'human being' as a biological fact that begins at fertilization, while 'human person' refers to the intrinsic moral worth and dignity, which includes the right to legal protection.
Why do some abortion advocates differentiate between a 'human being' and a 'human person'?
-Abortion advocates differentiate between a 'human being' and a 'human person' to argue that a human being may exist without possessing personhood, which they associate with intrinsic moral worth and legal protection.
What is 'personhood' according to the script?
-According to the script, 'personhood' refers to the intrinsic moral worth of human beings, which grants them fundamental human rights, including the right to be protected under the law.
What is the source of intrinsic moral worth as described in the script?
-The intrinsic moral worth comes from the human capacity for self-transcendence, which includes the ability to relate to God and to give and receive love.
At what point does the script argue that personhood begins?
-The script argues that personhood begins at the moment of fertilization, as this is when a being with the potential for self-transcendence and a Transcendent nature is formed.
Why does the script claim that there is no substantial change after fertilization that would affect personhood?
-The script claims that there is no substantial change after fertilization that would affect personhood because the potential for a Transcendent nature is established at fertilization, and no further change alters this fundamental characteristic.
How does the script link personhood to legal protection?
-The script links personhood to legal protection by asserting that any human being with a Transcendent nature, and therefore personhood, has infinite moral worth and deserves equal protection under the law.
What does the script say about the moral worth of pre-born children?
-The script asserts that pre-born children, like all human beings with a Transcendent nature, possess infinite moral worth and therefore deserve equal protection under the law.
What is the 'power for self-transcendence' mentioned in the script?
-The 'power for self-transcendence' mentioned in the script refers to the human ability to relate to God and engage in giving and receiving love, which is the basis for intrinsic moral worth.
Why is the moment of fertilization significant in the script's argument?
-The moment of fertilization is significant in the script's argument because it is viewed as the point where a unique human being with the potential for self-transcendence, and thus personhood, is formed.
Outlines
π¬ The Concept of Human Beings and Personhood
This paragraph discusses the scientific consensus on the existence of a unique human being at the moment of fertilization and challenges the notion that one can be a human being without being a human person. It emphasizes the intrinsic moral worth of human beings, known as personhood, which is the basis for fundamental human rights and legal protection. The argument presented is that personhood stems from our capacity for self-transcendence, particularly our ability to relate to a higher power and love. The text asserts that from the moment of fertilization, a human being has the potential for a transcendent nature, making them a person with infinite moral worth deserving of equal legal protection, including unborn children.
Mindmap
Keywords
π‘Human Being
π‘Human Person
π‘Intrinsic Moral Worth
π‘Fertilization
π‘Personhood
π‘Self-Transcendence
π‘Transcendent Nature
π‘Legal Protection
π‘Abortion Advocates
π‘Sperm-Egg Fusion
Highlights
A unique human being exists at the moment of fertilization, according to scientific evidence.
Abortion advocates argue that one can be a human being but not a human person.
Personhood refers to the intrinsic moral worth of human beings, which is the basis for fundamental human rights.
The question is raised whether a human being can lack intrinsic moral worth and thus not deserve legal protection.
Intrinsic moral worth is derived from the human capacity for self-transcendence, which is the ability to relate to God and give and receive His love.
Once fertilization occurs, the being has the same potential for self-transcendence as any other human.
There is no substantial change in the entity that would suggest its transcendent nature arises at any other time than fertilization.
This concept directly ties the moment of fertilization to the beginning of personhood.
Any human being with a transcendent nature is considered a human person with infinite moral worth.
Such a person deserves equal protection under the law.
This includes pre-born children, who are also considered human persons.
The transcript challenges the idea that a distinction can be made between human beings and human persons.
It emphasizes the continuous and inherent moral worth from the moment of fertilization.
The argument hinges on the potential to actualize a transcendent nature, which begins at fertilization.
The discussion is centered around moral and legal implications of personhood beginning at fertilization.
Transcripts
foreign
with healing the culture let's take a
look at the terms human being and human
person
now it's impossible to deny the
scientific evidence that a unique human
being exists at the moment of
fertilization so abortion Advocates
sometimes make the claim that you can be
a human being but not a human person
well what does that mean
personhood is the word we use for the
intrinsic moral worth of human beings
which is where we get our fundamental
human right to be protected under the
law so can there be such a thing as a
human being who has no intrinsic moral
worth and therefore is not deserving a
protection under the law to answer that
you've got to know where our intrinsic
moral worth comes from in the first
place
the only reason that human beings have a
claim to Intrinsic dignity and moral
worth is because of our power for
self-transcendence that's our power to
relate to God and to give and receive
his love once a human sperm egg Fusion
has occurred you have a being with the
same potential to actualize a
Transcendent nature as you and I have
there's no other substantial change to
that entity that would indicate that his
Transcendent nature occurs at any other
time than fertilization and that points
directly to personhood
any human being with a Transcendent
nature is a human person with an
infinite moral worth and that person
deserves equal protection under the law
including pre-born children
foreign
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)