Job Interview Conversation Practice - Job Interview Question and Answer in English

Summary

The video showcases a series of job interviews, highlighting the differences between candidates' attitudes, preparedness, and qualifications. The first candidate arrives late, is unprofessional, and unprepared, leading to a negative impression. The second candidate is polite but lacks confidence and experience. The third candidate, a woman with substantial experience, impresses the interviewer and ultimately gets the job. The video emphasizes the importance of punctuality, professionalism, and preparation in job interviews.

Takeaways

• 🕒 The first candidate, Leo, was late for his interview without a proper apology, which is unprofessional.
• 🚫 Leo showed a lack of preparation by not bringing his CV and being unable to discuss his weaknesses.
• 🏠 Leo's reason for choosing Texas Tech was proximity to his home, which may not reflect a strong commitment to the company.
• 🤔 Leo's response to why the company should hire him was self-centered and lacked a convincing argument.
• 👗 The first candidate's attire and behavior during the interview were inappropriate for a professional setting.
• 📝 The second candidate arrived early and provided his CV, demonstrating punctuality and preparedness.
• 🔍 The second candidate lacked relevant experience in JavaScript, which is a key requirement for the developer position.
• 💪 The second candidate was honest about his weaknesses and strengths, showing self-awareness.
• 🤝 Abigail, the third candidate, had extensive experience and a clear vision for her future with the company.
• 🌟 Abigail's strengths included being hardworking and able to work under pressure, which are valuable for a developer role.
• 📅 Abigail was ready to start work the following week, showing her eagerness and availability for the position.

Q & A

Why was the first candidate late for the interview?

The first candidate, Leo, was late due to rush hour traffic, which he mentioned as the reason without offering an apology.

What was the first impression of the first candidate?

The first candidate made a poor first impression by being late, not knocking before entering, and wearing inappropriate attire for an interview.

Did the first candidate bring his CV to the interview?

No, the first candidate did not bring his CV, stating that he had already sent it and thought it was unnecessary to bring a physical copy.

How did the first candidate respond when asked about his weaknesses?

The first candidate, Leo, responded by saying he couldn't think of any weaknesses at the moment, which was perceived as not a good answer by the interviewer.

What was the second candidate's reason for choosing Texas Tech?

The second candidate chose Texas Tech because the company is near his house, allowing him to wake up later, and he had found good reviews about the company.

What was the second candidate's experience with JavaScript?

The second candidate had learned JavaScript for over a year but had not yet completed any projects using it.

How did the second candidate describe his weaknesses?

The second candidate admitted that he finds it hard to work under pressure and prefers a comfortable working environment.

What were the three reasons the second candidate gave for being chosen for the position?

The second candidate stated that he is honest, friendly, and a hard worker as the three reasons why he should be chosen.

What was the feedback on the first two candidates after their interviews?

The feedback was negative for both. The first candidate was impolite and unprepared, while the second lacked experience and confidence for the developer position.

What was the final outcome for the third candidate, Abigail?

Abigail was successfully qualified for the developer position and was informed that she could start working the following Monday.

What was the reason for the interviewer's concern about the third candidate's gender?

The interviewer expressed concern because the job was mainly for men, indicating a potential gender bias in the hiring process.