What are the Types of Job Evaluation Methods?

Summary

In this video, Josh, an HR professional and founder of HR University, discusses various job evaluation methods used to determine fair pay within organizations. The video covers both internal methods like the point factor and factor comparison methods, and external methods such as market pricing. Josh also distinguishes between job evaluation and job analysis, emphasizing the importance of these processes in creating a fair compensation system. The video concludes with insights on system maintenance and the significance of transparency in pay rate decisions.

Takeaways

• 📈 Job evaluation is the process of determining a fair pay rate for different job positions within a company, ensuring internal equity and market competitiveness.
• 🔍 The International Labor Organization defines job evaluation as an attempt to determine and compare the demands of a particular job position.
• 👤 Job evaluation focuses on the relative worth of jobs, irrespective of the qualities of specific job holders, which is different from job analysis.
• 📊 Job evaluation methods can be divided into internal and external types, with internal methods further categorized into quantitative and qualitative.
• 📝 Quantitative methods, such as the point factor method, factor comparison method, and custom factor comparison method, evaluate jobs based on gathered data and compensable factors.
• 📚 The point factor method is commonly used in Europe and the US, assigning points to factors and determining the value of each job position.
• 📉 A setback of the point factor method is the need for extra time, resources, and potential biases against minorities in the standards for calculating pay.
• 🔑 Qualitative methods, like job ranking and job classification, give job definitions through observation and description, suitable for different organizational needs.
• 🌐 External job evaluation methods use market data to determine job value, important for matrix organizations or those facing skill shortages.
• 🔄 Regular reviews of external pay rates and generating accurate market data are crucial for staying fair and competitive in compensation.
• 🛠️ Conducting job evaluation involves several steps, including outlining project parameters, gathering job data, analyzing and documenting assessments, and establishing a fair hierarchy.

Q & A

What is the primary purpose of job evaluation in HR?

The primary purpose of job evaluation is to weigh different job positions within a company to determine a fair pay rate, ensuring that everyone is paid according to their worth and that different jobs have varying entry and performance requirements.

How does job evaluation differ from job analysis?

Job evaluation focuses on assessing and comparing the relative worth of different job positions, while job analysis involves writing detailed job descriptions through an examination of tasks and responsibilities.

What are the main types of job evaluation methods discussed in the video?

The main types of job evaluation methods discussed are internal job evaluation methods, which can be quantitative (point factor, factor comparison, and custom factor comparison methods) or qualitative (job ranking and job classification methods), and external job evaluation methods.

Why is the point factor method commonly used in Europe and the US?

The point factor method is commonly used because it reinforces internal equity by quantifying total points for every employee, helping determine the value of each job, and it also takes into account compensable value, recruitment benefits, job design, and more.

What is the setback of the point factor method mentioned in the video?

A major setback of the point factor method is the need for extra time, resources, and assistance from senior management. Additionally, the standards for calculating pay based on factors may have led to biases against minorities.

How does the factor comparison method differ from the point factor method?

The factor comparison method is a scientific approach that ranks job roles based on a breakdown of factors rather than the role as a whole, whereas the point factor method assigns points to compensable factors and builds a pay structure based on those points.

What is the job ranking method and when is it most suitable?

The job ranking method is a qualitative job evaluation technique that involves ranking jobs based on their overall value to the organization. It is most suitable for small companies with a limited number of specific jobs, allowing for a more straightforward evaluation process.

Can you explain the job classification method in the context of the video?

The job classification method involves an evaluator outlining a description of each job class and grading them. It covers a wide variety of jobs and descriptions, allowing one job position to belong to multiple grade levels and filtering job titles and duties based on shared skills and complexity.

What is the purpose of external job evaluation methods?

External job evaluation methods are used to determine the value of a job position based on market data, which helps organizations stay fair and competitive. This method is particularly beneficial for matrix organizations with little hierarchy or those suffering from skill shortages.

What are the essential benefits of job evaluation methods mentioned in the video?

The essential benefits include internal consistency, job assessment, adherence to federal laws and regulations for equal pay, and the establishment of a healthy work environment. Job evaluation also helps in creating a trustworthy and consistent work structure focused on a job's complexity.

What steps should be taken to conduct a job evaluation according to the video?

The steps include outlining the project parameters, choosing an evaluation system, gathering job data, analyzing and documenting the assessment, establishing a pay structure, allocating jobs to the structure, tracking system development, considering formal appeals, and ensuring employee familiarity with the decision-making process through transparency.

When is job reevaluation necessary as per the video?

Job reevaluation is necessary when there are significant changes in job responsibilities, when smaller businesses experience changes that affect upward mobility, or as part of a routine reevaluation process, ideally once every two years.

What are 'red circle rates' and 'green circle rates' in the context of job evaluation?

Red circle rates refer to salaries that exceed the maximum rate expected, while green circle rates are salaries that fall below the minimum rate. Both are in violation of general work ethics and require immediate reevaluation.

Outlines

00:00

📚 Introduction to Job Evaluation

This paragraph introduces the video, where Josh, a certified HR Professional, discusses the importance of job evaluation methods in the HR field. Job evaluation is defined as the process of weighing different job positions within a company to determine appropriate pay rates. The International Labor Organization's definition of job evaluation is mentioned, emphasizing that it focuses on the demands of the job rather than the qualities of the job holder. The paragraph highlights that job evaluation is vital for creating a fair compensation system and maintaining a company’s reputation.

05:02

🧠 Quantitative Job Evaluation Methods

This paragraph delves into the quantitative job evaluation methods, which assess jobs based on data. The methods include the Point Factor Method, Factor Comparison Method, and Custom Factor Comparison Method. The Point Factor Method breaks down jobs into compensable factors, assigning points to each factor to determine pay structure, but it requires significant time and resources. The Factor Comparison Method ranks job roles by analyzing and comparing benchmark jobs based on compensable factors. The Custom Factor Comparison Method is tailored to specific organizations but is more time-consuming and complex.

10:03

🔍 Qualitative Job Evaluation Methods

This paragraph explains qualitative job evaluation methods, which focus on observation and description. These include the Job Ranking Method and Job Classification Method. The Job Ranking Method is simple but most effective in smaller companies with fewer job positions. It involves paired comparisons and ranking based on criteria like salary. The Job Classification Method involves grading and categorizing jobs based on their descriptions, skills, and complexities, making it suitable for organizations with diverse job roles.

🌐 External Job Evaluation Methods

This paragraph discusses external job evaluation methods, which are ideal for organizations with little hierarchy or those facing skill shortages. These methods rely on market data to determine job value and maintain competitiveness. Market pricing, which uses third-party compensation surveys, is a common approach. However, the paragraph also stresses the importance of internal job evaluation for ensuring internal equity, as relying solely on external data may not cover all job positions.

⚖️ Benefits of Job Evaluation Methods

This paragraph outlines the benefits of job evaluation methods, emphasizing their role in maintaining internal consistency, job assessment, and compliance with federal laws. It highlights that a fair job evaluation process ensures equal pay, builds a healthy work environment, and establishes a trustworthy work structure. The paragraph also touches on the importance of base pay in reflecting the value of employees' roles and contributions, and the need for job evaluation methods to align with legal requirements and cost-effectiveness.

🛠️ Conducting a Job Evaluation

This paragraph provides an overview of the steps involved in conducting a job evaluation. It emphasizes the need for coordination with senior management, choosing a suitable evaluation system, gathering relevant job data, and analyzing it to establish a fair hierarchy. The process involves dividing job positions into grades, tracking system development, and ensuring transparency in the decision-making process regarding pay rates. It also mentions the importance of routine reevaluation and the need for a management team to document job content.

🔄 System Maintenance and Reevaluation

This paragraph discusses the maintenance and reevaluation of the job evaluation system. It stresses the need for regular documentation and review of the system to accommodate new job positions or those requiring reevaluation. Key steps include choosing compensable factors, assigning values, and ensuring consistency in pay policy. The paragraph also addresses potential issues with pay rates, such as red circle rates (above the maximum) and green circle rates (below the minimum), and the need for immediate reevaluation in such cases.

👋 Conclusion and Call to Action

In the concluding paragraph, Josh wraps up the video on job evaluation techniques. He encourages viewers to like the video and subscribe to the channel for more HR content. The paragraph serves as a call to action, reminding viewers to stay engaged with the content and look forward to future videos on HR topics.

Keywords

💡Job Evaluation

Job evaluation is the process of systematically assessing different job positions within an organization to determine appropriate compensation levels. It is crucial for ensuring internal equity and fairness, as it helps to establish a pay structure that reflects the relative value of each job. In the video, job evaluation is the central theme, with various methods discussed to achieve this, such as point factor method and job ranking method.

💡Compensable Factors

Compensable factors are specific job characteristics that are considered when determining an employee's compensation. These factors can include education, skills, responsibility, and working conditions. In the point factor method described in the video, jobs are dissected into these factors, and points are assigned to each, which then influence the overall compensation structure.

💡Internal Job Evaluation

Internal job evaluation refers to the assessment of job positions within the context of an organization's own structure and requirements. It often involves comparing jobs against each other to determine their relative value. The video mentions that internal job evaluation can be quantitative or qualitative and includes methods like the point factor method and job ranking method.

💡External Job Evaluation

External job evaluation involves comparing job positions to market rates or industry standards to ensure that the compensation offered is competitive. The video discusses the importance of external benchmarking for matrix organizations or those facing skill shortages, emphasizing the use of market data to determine job value.

💡Point Factor Method

The point factor method is a quantitative job evaluation technique where jobs are broken down into specific factors, and points are assigned to each factor based on its importance to the job. The total points then contribute to the job's overall value and compensation. The video script provides an example of how this method is applied, emphasizing its prevalence in Europe and the US.

💡Factor Comparison Method

The factor comparison method is another quantitative approach that ranks job roles based on a detailed analysis of factors rather than the job as a whole. It involves identifying benchmark jobs, analyzing and ranking them, and then assigning monetary values to comparable factors. The video script explains this method as a scientific process that helps in setting pay rates for new jobs.

💡Custom Factor Comparison Method

The custom factor comparison method is a tailored approach to job evaluation that allows organizations to use specific factors relevant to their unique circumstances. It requires more time and effort to align with market rates and maintain integrity. The video mentions that this method can include more factors than the standard five used in the factor comparison method.

💡Job Ranking Method

The job ranking method is a qualitative job evaluation technique where jobs are ranked in order of their perceived value to the organization. It is suitable for small companies with a limited number of job positions. The video script describes a three-stage process for job ranking, including identifying key jobs, ranking them based on salary or other criteria, and then ranking the remaining jobs.

💡Job Classification Method

The job classification method involves categorizing jobs into different classes or grades based on their descriptions and the skills and complexities they involve. It is a comprehensive process that can cover a wide range of jobs. The video script provides an example of a job classification table, illustrating how jobs are assigned to different classes.

💡Market Pricing

Market pricing is the practice of determining the value of a job position based on external market data. It is essential for ensuring that an organization's compensation is competitive and aligns with industry standards. The video script discusses the importance of market pricing for organizations with little hierarchy or those facing skill shortages, highlighting the use of third-party compensation surveys.

💡Red Circle Rates and Green Circle Rates

Red circle rates and green circle rates are terms used to describe pay rates that fall outside the established pay ranges. Red circle rates are rates that exceed the maximum, while green circle rates are below the minimum. The video script mentions these terms in the context of pay policy consistency and the importance of addressing any rates that do not align with the company's established pay structure.

Highlights

Job evaluation is the process of weighing different job positions within a company to determine a convenient pay rate, ensuring fair compensation.

The International Labor Organization defines job valuation as an attempt to determine and compare the demands of a particular job position.

Job evaluation does not consider the qualities of a job holder but assesses the relative worth of the job itself.

A fair hierarchy is vital for a company's reputation, and job evaluation helps create a fair compensation system.

Job evaluation largely depends on market pricing, which decides a job's worth in the labor market.

Job evaluation is often mistaken for job analysis, but they are distinct processes with different focuses.

Quantitative job evaluation methods, such as the point factor method, evaluate jobs based on gathered data and assigned points.

The point factor method is the most commonly used in Europe and the US and reinforces internal equity.

A major setback of the point factor method is the need for extra time, resources, and potential biases against minorities.

The factor comparison method ranks job roles based on a breakdown of factors rather than the role as a whole.

Custom factor comparison method is a specific choice for particular organizations requiring time and dedication.

Qualitative job evaluation methods, like job ranking and job classification, give job definitions through observation and description.

Job ranking is suitable for small companies and involves identifying key jobs and ranking them based on criteria.

Job classification outlines a description of each job class and grades them based on shared skill and complexity.

External job evaluation methods use market data to determine the value of a job position, focusing on external competitiveness.

Market pricing focuses on the external value of specific jobs and helps in creating effective and competitive salary plans.

Job evaluation projects include several common steps such as outlining parameters, gathering job data, and establishing a fair hierarchy.

Transparency in the decision-making process concerning pay rates is crucial and can be achieved through management-employee communication.

Red circle rates and green circle rates are violations of general work ethics and require immediate reevaluation.

System maintenance after job evaluation is essential, including documenting the system and reviewing it periodically.

Transcripts

Hey friends, Josh here, certified HR Professional and founder of HR University.

So welcome back in this video where we'll discuss a pretty important

topic in the HR field, which is the main types of job evaluation method.

But before we move on, make sure to like the video and subscribe to our channel so

you can keep up to date with everything.

Hr.

Now let's go ahead and get started and we'll start by saying that job evaluation

is the process of weighing different job positions within a company in order

to determine a convenient pay rate.

This makes sure that everyone is paid their worth and that

different jobs have different entry and performance requirements.

The International Labor Organization defines a job valuation process.

As an attempt to determine and compare the demands of a particular job position.

One good thing about job evaluation is that you don't need to worry

about the qualities of a job holder.

Relative worth is assessed irrespective of the qualities of a specific job

holder, and for most companies, different team members vary in the

responsibilities and the profit they bring to the business, and that's why a fair

hierarchy is vital for a company's reput.

A good job valuation process is the first step towards creating a fair

compensation system in every business according to the hierarchy and respons.

Job evaluation largely depends on market pricing, which decides jobs worth in the

labor market, and as a through process, it can last for a few months, so it

must be carried out by an experienced team of senior employees who should

know the roles of most job positions.

Many companies choose to hire external consultants to take care of this task.

Because they can be a little bit more objective, and job evaluation is often

mistaken for job analysis and vice versa.

Yet there is a big difference between both of these two practices.

On the one hand, job analysis is about writing job descriptions through a

detailed examination, understanding of the tasks and responsibilities included in it.

On the other hand, job valuation methods assess and compare the value of each.

And in this video, our aim is to educate HR professionals and other management

professionals on internal job evaluation methods, external job evaluation methods,

the functioning of the whole process, and the job evaluation maintenance process.

So let's go ahead and dive in.

So how can job evaluation methods be divided?

In the past, job evaluation used to be an internal comparison of just

different jobs worth only, but today it includes both internal comparisons

and external market benchmarking.

When it comes to internal job valuation methods, these can be

quantitative and qualitative.

Quantitative methods evaluate jobs according to facts based on gathered data.

In this group, we have the point factor.

The factor comparison method and custom factor comparison method.

Let's start with the point factor method.

The point factor method analyzes jobs by dissecting them into compensable factors.

HR experts assign points to the factors and assign on a paid structure.

For the position.

Statistically, this method is the most commonly used one in Europe and the us.

The method also reinforces internal equity by forcing a company to quantify

total points for every employee, and this helps determine the value of each.

And not only does it provide compensable value, but also takes care of

recruitment benefits, job design, and.

A major setback at the point factor method is a need for extra time, resources,

and assistance from senior management.

And studies have shown that the standards for calculating the pay based on factors.

May have led to biases against minorities.

And here's an example of the point factor method here.

So we have three different jobs.

These can be any job titles within your company.

Now, in the point factor method, you list down the comparable factors as

in our case, we have education skills, responsibility, and working conditions

that the employee will have once they're.

Keep in mind, it's not limited to these factors.

You can have more factors depending upon the nature of the job.

After the factors are listed, a team of experienced members, mostly the

senior members, and assign points to each of the different jobs the

company has to offer, and then a total number is calculated for each job.

The second quantitative method we'll discuss is a factor comparison method.

It's a scientific method designed to rank job roles based on a breakdown of

factors rather than the role as a whole.

The factor comparison method contains several steps to.

First it implies identification of benchmark jobs or jobs.

Responsibility shared by multiple individuals like accountants, sales

representatives, administrative assistants, stock clerks,

security guards, and others.

Next, the companies should analyze the benchmark jobs, rank them,

and decide on compensable factors.

Here, employers are supposed to compare jobs for.

Benchmarking and assign a monetary value for every comparable factor.

And finally, there is the custom factor comparison method, a specific

choice for particular organizations.

You should have in mind that it does require more time and

dedication to modular market rates and maintain integrity here.

Let's have a look at the example for the factor comparison.

For this organization has identified a few key jobs at our job, one, two, and three.

These jobs are assumed to be fairly paid.

Then there are the five important factors listed against which each of

these key's jobs points are listed.

We also have the salaries listed down for each of the three key jobs.

This helps in formulating the pay rate scale for each of the factors listed.

With the help of these factors, ratings, and the pay rates compared,

it becomes easier for HR to decide the pay package for the new job.

The same goes for the case of custom factor comparison method, but in

that case, you can have more factors listed other than the five here.

Now let's get to the qualitative job evaluation methods.

Unlike quantitative, qualitative job valuation methods give job definitions

through observation and description.

These are the job ranking method and the job classification method.

The job ranking is the easiest evaluation method, but not all

businesses will find it useful.

It's most suitable for small companies that can narrow their staff to a

hundred or less specific jobs in order to get the best out of this method.

Think about hiring an experienced compensation specialist who will

set a fair hierarchy without favor.

and job ranking is divided into three main stages.

In the first stage, you'll identify the key jobs.

This is done with the help of a paired comparison as can

be seen in the table here.

So if you have eight jobs, this means that there are 16 paired comparisons.

In the second stage of the job ranking method, you rank key

jobs based on the monthly salary.

Or we can also use some other criteria to rank these jobs.

And later on when you're done with the ranking of your key jobs, then you move

ahead and rank the other jobs remaining.

And next we have the job classification method.

The individual who evaluates is the one who outlines a description

of each job class and grades them.

This process covers a large variety of jobs and job descriptions.

So one job position can belong to more than one grade level, and job

classification also filters job titles and duties based on skill and

complexity shared among organizations.

Here's an example of how a job classification table looks like.

We can see a predetermined number of job groups listed here, and there are

jobs assigned for each of the classifi.

Let's move on to external job evaluation methods.

This method works better for matrix organizations with little

hierarchy or organizations suffering from skill shortages.

This is where many employers choose to employ market data to determine

the value of a job position.

Doing regular reviews of external pay rates as well as generating accurate

market data will allow companies to stay fair and competitive.

For instance, market pricing focuses on the external value of specific.

Makes room for effective and competitive salary plans, as well as

wise allocation of compensation costs.

This method mostly uses third party compensation surveys.

Although the market pricing method prioritizes external competitiveness,

some employers may lack reliable market data for all job positions.

As a result, internal job evaluation is crucial for keeping internal equity,

but what are the essential benefits of common job evaluation methods?

Well, job content evaluation is beneficial for internal

consistency and job assessment.

It is also vital for following federal laws and regulations By

ensuring equal pay to employees, you can build a healthy work environment

without a fair pay for performance.

And all in all, the entire job valuation process is a key factor in establishing a

trustworthy and consistent work structure and focuses on a job's complexity.

So you may be asking yourself, how do I conduct a job evaluation?

Well, many job valuations methods depend on the personal

decision of the evaluators.

They can sometimes take an individual employee's personal qualities

into consideration as leading job.

And this is why external consultants can often bring more productivity and

objectivity and weighing them here.

Base pay is a deciding factor in the employee's standard of.

and it ultimately determines how much the company values employees role, and

contributions in every work environment.

Compensation is a sensitive topic that can cause a reluctant approach to change.

So it is important that the base pay rates are appropriate for both

the employer and the employees.

Both must be aligned with federal law, cost effective, and externally.

And it's important to note the job evaluation projects include several

common steps in all companies.

First off, the employers should outline the parameters of the project and

coordination with the senior management, and based on that, they have to choose

a convenient evaluation system that works in the company's best interest.

After that, the team should gather relevant job data required

for the particular method with a reliable, trustworthy.

The collective data is then ready for analysis, documenting an assessment,

and to establish a fair hierarchy.

You want to use points and divide job positions into grades according to breaks.

Once you build a reliable pay structure, allocate the jobs to it.

Next, you should track system development and choose operating

procedures while also thinking of formal appeals and reconsidering decision.

And as a very final step, you should make sure employees are

familiar with the decision making process concerning their pay rates.

The best way to achieve this is through transparency, which

can happen through a management employee communications program.

That being said, beyond important to know when you need job reevaluation.

When it comes to smaller businesses with rare cases of upward mobility,

small changes in responsibility can make managers consider a reevaluation.

It's advisable to do a routine reevaluation of all jobs once every two.

And in a broad system, jobs often need a proper classification.

Still, you can conduct the job evaluation process with simpler

groupings instead of complex systems such as point factor evaluation, for

example, companies can combine ranking to market with whole job slotting.

In this case, a management team should document job content

and make the best use of job.

Last but not least, let's talk about system maintenance here.

When a management team finishes its job evaluation procedure,

you must document the system and review it from time to time.

This way, you have access to new job positions or those

in need of reevaluation.

The most important steps in the process include the choice of a

compensable factors, define each of their degrees, assigning a value

to every factor and degree, and applying reliable criteria to attain.

For each factor and point total and allocating each job to a particular

point range based on the point, total and base pay administration vastly

depends on pay ranges and pay increased.

Because consistency of your pay policy is important for the

reputation of your business.

It can be achieved by discussing merit pay and addressing pay ranges.

Pay rates lower than the minimum or higher than the maximum can't be problematic.

Finally, salaries that go above the maximum rate.

Expected are known as red circle rates, and those that don't reach the minimum

rate are known as green circle rates.

Still both salary types are in violation of general work ethics,

and here the employer should work on immediate reevaluation.

And there we have it.

That's all for HR job evaluation techniques.

If you found this video helpful, don't forget to give it a thumbs up

and subscribe to our channel for more HR content and I'll go ahead and see

you in some of our following videos.