BOMBSHELL NEW FOOTAGE OF 9/11 ATTACKS CONFIRMS CONTROLLED DEMOLITION OF TOWERS | Redacted News

Summary

The script discusses a resurfaced video of the 9/11 Twin Towers attack, which some claim shows evidence of a controlled demolition rather than a structural failure due to plane impacts. Ted Walter, Executive Director for the International Center for 911 Justice, analyzes the video, highlighting flashes and structural damage that contradict the official narrative. He emphasizes the significance of eyewitness accounts of explosions and the importance of seeking truth and justice for the victims' families.

Takeaways

• 🌐 A video from the 9/11 Twin Tower attacks resurfaced on Twitter, sparking discussions as if it were new footage.
• 📺 The video was not entirely new; it had been broadcast before, but a significant portion of it was previously unseen and in higher quality.
• 🔍 Ted Walter, Executive Director for the International Center for 9/11 Justice, believes the video confirms a controlled demolition of the Twin Towers and not a collapse due to plane impacts.
• 👀 The video shows flashes of light, particularly on the lower part of the South Tower, which proponents of the controlled demolition theory argue are indicative of demolition charges.
• 🔥 There is a bright flash visible on the northeast corner of the South Tower, which Walter suggests is a demolition charge, contradicting the idea of a natural building collapse.
• 👮‍♂️ Over 200 eyewitness accounts, including those from first responders and reporters, have described explosions during the collapse of the towers.
• 🏢 World Trade Center Building 7's collapse is also considered suspicious, with no evidence of it being caused by debris from the Twin Towers, and is believed by some to have been brought down by demolition charges.
• 🕵️‍♂️ The new video provides a clearer view of structural damage to the South Tower, which supports the theory of demolition charges being used.
• 📝 The video's release is historically significant as it captures the immediate reactions of witnesses who perceived the event as an explosion, not a structural failure.
• 📉 The official narrative of the towers' collapse due to fires was introduced after the event, contrasting with the eyewitness accounts of explosions.
• 🔒 There is a concern that much of the original footage and eyewitness accounts supporting the explosion theory have been suppressed or made difficult to find in official channels.

Q & A

What video surfaced on Twitter that was claimed to be new footage of the 9/11 attacks?

A video of the attacks on the Twin Towers on 9/11 was posted on Twitter, which some users believed to be new footage never seen before, although it was later revealed to be previously broadcasted material with some additional unseen content.

How much of the video was actually new content?

About 57 minutes of the video was previously unseen footage, while a segment showing the collapse of the South Tower had aired before on Sky News and a Washington DC affiliate of CBS.

What is the position of the speaker regarding the collapse of the Twin Towers on 9/11?

The speaker, Ted Walter, holds the position that the Twin Towers and World Trade Center Building 7 were brought down by controlled demolition, not by the impact of the airplanes.

What significant evidence does the new video provide to support the theory of controlled demolition?

The new video provides evidence such as visible flashes, particularly on the lower portion of the building as the top starts to go down, and a bright flash on the northeast corner of the South Tower, which the speaker suggests indicates demolition charges.

What is the significance of the flashes seen in the video?

The flashes are significant because they occur in areas of the building well above the impact zone and where the collapse is happening, suggesting the presence of demolition charges rather than a natural building collapse.

What does the speaker suggest about the bright flash seen on the northeast corner of the South Tower?

The speaker suggests that the bright flash is indicative of a demolition charge, as it cannot be explained by natural sunlight reflection and is visible in multiple videos from different angles.

What is the 'Journal of 9/11 Studies' and how does it relate to the video?

The 'Journal of 9/11 Studies' is a publication where a meticulous analysis of the video was published, confirming the presence of flashes in multiple videos, which supports the theory of controlled demolition.

What is the significance of the structural damage seen in the video near the bright flash?

The structural damage is significant as it appears in areas of the building that should not have been affected by a natural collapse, suggesting that the damage is associated with the detonation of demolition charges.

What are the implications of the video for the families and victims of 9/11?

The implications for the families and victims are that the video may provide new evidence supporting the theory of controlled demolition, which could potentially lead to further investigations and a reevaluation of the official narrative of the events.

How does the speaker describe the public's initial interpretation of the collapse of the Twin Towers?

The speaker describes the public's initial interpretation as perceiving the collapse as an explosion or demolition, rather than a structural failure caused by the airplane impacts and subsequent fires.

What is the role of the International Center for 9/11 Justice and how can people access more information?

The International Center for 9/11 Justice is an organization dedicated to seeking answers for the families and victims of 9/11. People can access more information by visiting their YouTube channel by searching 'i911' or visiting their website at IC911.org.

Outlines

00:00

📹 Resurfacing of 9/11 Video Sparks Debate

The script discusses the recent appearance of a video showing the 9/11 attacks on the Twin Towers, which was initially presented as new footage. It turns out that parts of the video had been broadcast previously, but the release of nearly an hour of unseen footage by filmmaker Case Sugimoto has reignited discussions. Ted Walter, Executive Director for the International Center for 9/11 Justice, confirms that while a segment of the video was familiar, the newly released content in higher quality provides valuable information. The video has been viewed millions of times, and the script suggests that it supports the theory of a controlled demolition of the towers, contrary to the official explanation of the collapses.

05:00

🔎 Analyzing New 9/11 Footage for Evidence of Demolition

This paragraph delves into the analysis of the newly surfaced footage, focusing on visual evidence that supports the theory of a controlled demolition. Key points include the observation of flashes of light, particularly on the lower part of the South Tower, which are not consistent with a natural building collapse. The discussion also addresses the skepticism of those who believe the flashes are merely sunlight reflecting off windows, countered by the argument that the flashes are consistent across multiple videos, suggesting a demolition charge. Structural damage to the building's corner, which would not be expected from the top's collapse, further supports this theory. The paragraph also references a paper published in the Journal of 9/11 Studies that provides meticulous analysis of these points.

10:01

🗣️ Eyewitness Accounts and Theories Surrounding 9/11

The script moves on to discuss the numerous eyewitness accounts from first responders, police officers, and reporters who described the collapse of the towers as resembling explosions or demolitions. It challenges the official narrative that the towers fell due to the impact of the planes and subsequent fires. The discussion extends to World Trade Center Building 7, which also collapsed without being directly hit by the planes, and the various government agencies that were located within it. The paragraph raises questions about the quick evacuation of the emergency operation center and the suspicious timing of fires that may have been intentionally set to provide a cover story for the building's collapse.

15:01

👀 Public Perception and the Impact of New 9/11 Footage

The final paragraph addresses the impact of the new footage on public perception, highlighting how the original interpretation of the event by eyewitnesses was that of an explosion or demolition, rather than a structural failure due to fires. It discusses how this perception was overshadowed by the media's later narrative. The script also touches on the significance of the video for the families of the victims who have been seeking the truth for years. The conversation concludes with the importance of preserving and sharing this information, as well as the dedication to seeking justice and accountability for the events of 9/11.

Keywords

💡Twin Towers

The Twin Towers refer to the two skyscrapers, World Trade Center 1 and 2, which were a part of the World Trade Center complex in New York City. They were tragically destroyed during the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001. In the video's context, the discussion revolves around the theory that the collapse of these buildings was not due to the plane impacts but rather a controlled demolition, which is a central theme of the video.

💡Controlled Demolition

Controlled demolition is a type of building demolition that is carried out in a safe and controlled manner, often used when the structure needs to be brought down without causing damage to surrounding buildings. In the video, the concept is used to suggest that the collapse of the Twin Towers was not due to the impact of the planes but was instead orchestrated through a planned demolition, which is a controversial theory that challenges the official explanation of the events of 9/11.

💡Flash

In the context of the video, 'flash' refers to a bright, sudden light that is visible in the newly surfaced footage of the South Tower's collapse. The video suggests that these flashes are indicative of demolition charges being detonated, which is a key piece of evidence presented by those who support the controlled demolition theory of the building's collapse.

💡Sky News

Sky News is a British news organization that is mentioned in the script as having previously broadcast a segment of the video in question. The mention of Sky News serves to establish the credibility and history of the video footage, indicating that parts of it had been seen before but are now being reexamined in a new light.

💡Case Sugimoto

Case Sugimoto is the filmmaker or videographer who released the footage in question. His role is significant as he is the source of the video that has reignited discussions and speculations about the events of 9/11, particularly the theory of a controlled demolition of the Twin Towers.

💡International Center for 9/11 Justice

The International Center for 9/11 Justice is an organization represented by Ted Walter in the video, who is its executive director. The center is dedicated to seeking answers and justice for the families and victims of the 9/11 attacks, and it is a key source of the alternative narrative presented in the video regarding the collapse of the Twin Towers.

💡Peace, War, and 9/11

Peace, War, and 9/11 is a documentary mentioned in the script, which is available on the International Center for 9/11 Justice's YouTube channel. The documentary is likely to explore the events of 9/11 and potentially support the theory of a controlled demolition, adding to the body of work that questions the official narrative of the Twin Towers' collapse.

💡Journal of 9/11 Studies

The Journal of 9/11 Studies is a publication where a meticulous analysis of the flashes observed in the video was published. It is an academic outlet that has been cited in the video as providing evidence supporting the theory that the flashes are indicative of demolition charges, rather than natural reflections or other benign explanations.

💡Squib

A 'squib' in the context of the video refers to an expulsion of debris and air from the building, which is seen as another piece of evidence supporting the controlled demolition theory. The term is used to describe a specific event in the video where debris is seen shooting out from the building before the top begins to collapse, suggesting a planned demolition sequence.

💡Eyewitness Accounts

Eyewitness accounts in the video refer to the testimonies of individuals who were present during the collapse of the Twin Towers. These accounts are significant because they provide firsthand descriptions of the events, with many suggesting that they heard or saw evidence of explosions, which is used to support the theory of a controlled demolition rather than a structural failure due to the plane impacts.

💡Building 7

Building 7, or World Trade Center 7, is another structure that collapsed on September 11, 2001. The video suggests that, like the Twin Towers, Building 7 was also brought down by a controlled demolition, not by damage from the falling towers as officially reported. The collapse of Building 7 is often cited as a key piece of evidence by those who question the official explanation of the events of 9/11.

Highlights

A video from the 9/11 attacks on the Twin Towers resurfaced, initially presented as new but was actually broadcast years ago.

The video was not entirely new; it included about 10 seconds of previously aired footage but also contained approximately 57 minutes of unseen footage.

The video has been viewed around 50 million times, sparking renewed interest and discussion about the events of 9/11.

Ted Walter, Executive Director for the International Center for 9/11 Justice, believes the Twin Towers and World Trade Center Building 7 were brought down by controlled demolition.

Newly analyzed video footage shows flashes of light, particularly on the lower part of the South Tower, suggesting a controlled demolition.

A bright flash seen on the northeast corner of the South Tower contradicts the idea of a natural building collapse.

Structural damage observed near the bright flash suggests the presence of demolition charges rather than natural collapse.

A meticulous analysis published in the Journal of 9/11 Studies supports the presence of demolition charges based on the consistency of flashes in multiple videos.

Over 200 eyewitness accounts, including first responders and reporters, report hearing explosions during the collapse of the towers.

World Trade Center Building 7's collapse was not due to debris from the Twin Towers, as officially stated, but likely due to demolition charges.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology concluded that the fires alone, not the debris, caused the collapse of Building 7.

Elevators in Building 7 were ejected from their shafts, indicative of internal explosions rather than external debris impact.

The video's release by case sugimoto brought attention to the original interpretations of the event as an explosion, not a structural failure.

The original interpretation of the event by eyewitnesses was that of an explosion, not a natural building collapse.

The International Center for 9/11 Justice is dedicated to uncovering the truth and seeking justice for the families and victims of 9/11.

The video and its analysis have reignited discussions and brought the topic to the forefront for millions of new viewers.

Transcripts

well last week a video surfaced of the

attacks on the Twin Towers on 911

Twitter users posted this video as if it

was brand new never seen before might

have been never seen for many of us uh

turns out that's not true it this video

was not not new at all it was broadcast

years ago on television but why was it

buried uh and what does it show us and

why has it suddenly surfaced during the

same week that President Biden steps

down from running for reelection

president Trump is nearly assassinated

and gives a speech at the RNC this news

surfaces during that same week it is

curious indeed Ted Walter he's the

executive director for the International

Center for 911 Justice he's dedicated

his life to getting answers for the

families and the victims of 911 he's

also the director of Peace war and 911

which is available on their Channel a

documentary you can watch and Ted joins

us now no better Authority on this

probably in the world to dissect this

video now the video Ted has been viewed

like 50 million times and of course it

was put out there is this is brand new

video but can you explain to our

audience is this video new or just

resurfaced yeah so as I was analyzing

the video uh I discovered that it

actually had aired before at least about

10 seconds or so showing the collapse of

the South Tower which was the first

building to go down on 911 so that

little segment has aired on Sky News and

uh a Washington DC affiliate of CBS

however the the filmmaker or the

videographer case sugimoto released

about 57 minutes of footage um and so

most of that has never been seen before

and and it contains a lot of valuable

information and and the portion of the

south tower that had been seen before is

also now we have it in a much better

quality so we can actually see a lot

more things that we couldn't see before

so it is pretty significant now we

should point out of course your position

I think our position here at redacted is

that this was a controlled demolition of

the towers and that these airplanes were

not the reason these towers came down um

is that an accurate description of your

position on

this oh absolutely 100% yeah the

evidence overwhelmingly demonstrates

that the twin towers as well as World

Trade Center building 7 were brought

down by control demolition so in this

video certainly confirms that in

numerous ways all right let's talk about

it so let's get into it so this new

video that people have never seen before

a large portion of it uh confirms a

controlled demolition of the towers on

911 can you go through some of the

points here that you'd like to make and

we can call out what what caught your

eye kind of looking at this new

footage yeah so I think I think the the

thing that stood out to most people when

they saw this was was the flashes that

are very visible particularly there's a

line of flashes um on the lower portion

of the building as the top starts to go

down um I would also love to draw

people's attention to uh a very bright

flash that occurs further up on the

building this is on the northeast corner

of the of the South Tower um and and

when you think about it there's there's

no reason for a flash a bright flash if

this is just a natural building collapse

to be occurring well above the Impact

Zone or well above where the you know

where the collapse is actually happening

um but we see this bright flash uh and

we also see structural damage uh to the

corner of the building very close to it

um and so naysayers will say well those

are just who knows what that is it's

just the sun reflecting off the windows

well we know that this is actually

something else other than that we think

that it's a demolition charge uh because

you can actually identify same Flash in

numerous videos If you line up the

videos and and you can do this carefully

and line them up uh and we actually just

published a paper two months ago in the

Journal of 911 studies that has has done

this meticulous analysis that shows that

this particular flash can be seen in

numerous videos so there's no way that

if it's a reflection from from the sun

off of a window that you're going to see

that same flash at that same moment from

numerous angles it can only be seen from

one angle um and so we we get this

bright flash uh and then and then and so

you can look at the video of that I've

provided that video so your viewers can

see it we've kind of pointed out where

that flash is and very close to that

flash kind of where the arrow is

pointing you also see structural damage

being done to the corner of the building

again if you have the top that's falling

and it's a rigid block right and the the

the damage that should be done to that

that portion of the building should be

at the bottom why is there structural

damage being inflicted upon you know a

part of the building that's you know

it's 10 or 15 stories higher right and

so we've in that paper I mentioned in

the Journal of 911 studies um by by a

researcher named Corin saurin corgard

you know he he takes it he looks at that

damage from a few different angles uh

now that we have this video we can

really see that damage even much better

you know it's basically a hole a big

hole in the corner of the building so if

it's just window light reflecting off of

Windows it's not going to cause damage

you know to that kind of damage to the

building but so we see that severe

structural damage associated with The

Flash and a couple flashes way above the

zone so so this can really confirms what

you've already seen I mean that's that's

that's powerful right I mean with even

without this video you were able to

determine that there were Charges going

off above where we were supposed to have

this Impact

Zone yes yes so the um I provided a

second video for your viewers to see

where it's another video where um the

researcher saen corgard identified this

this Flash from another angle um and

this is filmed by a guy named Anthony

Rosario and I mean you can see the flash

there very brightly um notice that you

can't see it in the um you can't see the

damage to the building as well because

it's from a different angle but what

that shows you is that this flash

actually was a very three-dimensional

event it wasn't just it was it was

sticking out far from the building right

so so the the new footage helps us

really confirm solidify what we knew and

it provides a much better view of the

actual damage and of course shows the

video to tens of millions of people

who've now who' now seen it for someone

who's just learning about this for the

first time wait a minute there were

demolition charges that brought down the

towers um there were all sorts of

eyewitnesses firefighters police

officers eyewitnesses who confirmed

explosions and demolition Charges going

off did they

not absolutely yeah so there there's

upwards of 200 eyewitness accounts of

explosions going off during the during

the collapse of the towers M Grant the

great majority of them are First

Responders such as firefighters or Port

Port Authority police officers uh but

also you know several dozen news

reporters in fact I uh co-authored a

paper where we identified 36 reporters

Who had who basically described the

collapse of the buildings as being an

explosion or being brought down by

explosives or or that sort of thing or

seeing you know explosions running down

the face of the building so there's

there's overwhelming uh wealth of

eyewitness evidence that explosions were

taking place and of course building

seven which people said oh it was it was

collateral damage basically hit by the

falling Twin Towers that's there's no

evidence of that whatsoever and that it

collapsed with again demolition charges

it appears separate from the Twin Towers

it had nothing it was not touched by the

Twin Towers collapse at all am I right

it was there was some damage done to the

to the South face of the building which

was the face of building seven that was

facing the towers uh but it was I won't

I won't call it minor damage because

that will seem like I'm trying to

downplay it uh but nist the National

Institute of standard technology which

conducted the official investigation

into the collapse of all three buildings

concluded that the damage to the

building didn't actually contribute to

the collapse the damage it was all due

to fires and that even if that damage

had not taken place if the fires had

just traveled through the same fires had

traveled through through the building

they would have brought the building

down anyway allegedly so all that the

debris from the North Tower allegedly

did was start these fires that's even a

question if for the debris could have

started those fires many researchers

believe that the fires were set

intentionally around noon in order to

have a cover story for why the building

would go down and what was in building

seven oh so good question um there there

were many government agencies uh federal

agencies as well as city a city agency

inside the building and we're talking

about you know the Secret Service uh the

FBI the CIA uh the Securities and

Exchange Commission which was at the

time conducting uh very important

investigations into the world Comm and

Enron scandals uh and then you had the

emergency Operation Center for the

office of emergency management of New

York City uh that was installed just a

couple years before 911 on the 23rd

floor and so me you know it's very

suspicious that that the emergency

Operation Center was evacuated so

quickly um on the morning of 911 and and

there's well-known um eyewitness

accounts of explosions two men who tried

to go up to the to the 23rd floor found

it deserted tried to make their way back

down and witnessed explosions when they

got to around the eighth floor of the

building and this the official story

tries to say that those that that was

actually just the North Tower collapsing

uh onto the building but we have very

when you look at the timeline for the

for their account there's no way that

they would have only made it down to the

e8th floor at 1028 when the North Tower

collapsed it clearly happened much

earlier and they both clearly reported

explosions and we have uh actual reports

of significant structural damage inside

of building seven elevator cars being

ejected from their shafts so that's not

going to be caused by debris hitting the

outside of the building you got an

elevator car sitting 40 feet outside of

its its shaft that means basically an

explosion push that elevator car out of

the shaft wow yeah it's very convenient

all of the documents and things that

were scorched in the collapse of

building 7 um in these investigations uh

very very interesting um so I want to go

back to the video here before we get you

out of here Ted and so we talked about

the flashing what else stood out to you

about this new this new footage that's

emerged yeah so um you there's other

really interesting things you can see I

think there there was a very good view

of a a squib or you know an expulsion of

debris and air that occurred just below

below the Impact Zone really before the

towers the top of the building started

come come down and my my friend and

colleague Richard Gage uh made that

observation or his team made the

observation and put it out on his social

media uh and so you can see the video of

that which I provided provided for your

audience uh and then I found a second

video once I saw that I was like Wow

found a second video of that there's

just no reason for a squib to be

shooting out of the building starting to

shoot out of the building before the top

begins to come down and really you had a

you had a massive hole in the building

right where the plane went in so there's

no reason that air would be pushed out

of nearby parts of the building if the

top starts to come down the air will

just be pushed out the hole and yet

you've got this squib shooting out of

the this the um the southeast corner of

of the South Tower right about as the

building starts to go down um so you can

see that from a few different angles I

think the other really fascinating thing

and this goes to the sort of the

historical significance of this video um

in in case sugimoto releasing it is his

friends who watched the first Tower go

down and then when people that they were

with started asking them about it they

all said oh we think it went down it was

an explosion we we think and one of the

one of the witnesses said yeah I don't

think it was the fires and and so I

think that's a real you know it's it's

another there are numerous other

examples of that people who were

recording the event but watching it

Outdoors who were not that far away who

that's that's what they perceived as

soon as it as as building came down and

you know your viewers can watch a couple

of those videos which I I also provided

um they're very powerful and I think

there there're it's significant because

it shows people oh yeah the original

interpretation of what happened the

dominant view of most people who

actually watched this event who were

close to it who were

eyewitnesses they interpret it as an

explosion or as some kind of a you know

demolition or the building blowing up

they did not interpret this as a natural

building collapse and I think that's for

people that are coming to this for the

first time it's it's it helps to realize

that this Theory quote unquote Theory

started from the second the buildings

came down and that's what most people

who are close by observed and so it's a

natural um way to interpret the event

that you're seeing and in fact the idea

that it was a structural failure caused

by fires was that was really introduced

afterwards you know in the in the in the

hours after these buildings went down

that's when you start to see the media

saying

oh it looks like it was a structural

failure it looks like the airplanes and

the fires caused it and all the

reporters who were on the ground saying

that it was an explosion their accounts

were ignored by their colleagues in the

studios and so on so um I think a lot of

those and a lot of those reporters uh

footage has been really blocked and hard

to find right so the official a lot of

these reporters who were there on the

ground at the time one of my co

colleagues at Fox News standing there on

the ground talking about about

explosions and interviewing eyewitnesses

and First Responders about explosions

that they were hearing good luck trying

to find those videos today thank God for

Twitter being able to resurface some of

them but you will not find them on the

official news websites of the of the of

the broadcast networks that initially

aired those interviews right oh yeah you

can you can't find them anywhere related

to the you know Fox News or any of the

other channels that aired them you can

find them in our website our YouTube

channel uh you can find them on the um

you know websites of of other of our

colleagues and our our our community who

are are still research researching this

and trying to get to the bottom of what

happened that day and and get the truth

out and hold some people accountable so

it is still out there in in certain

places that are preserving it I mean at

the heart of this is the families it's

the people that lost their lives and

they were they were sold a bill of goods

they were sold lies right that this was

brought down by terrorists who hijacked

airplanes and we know that nothing could

be further from the truth and this is I

think why you've dedicated your life to

getting answers for the families what

have you heard from the am um any of the

victim's families in the wake of this

new footage and what have they said

about

this you know I haven't communicated

with anybody any any family members uh

specifically about this new footage um

I've been in touch with a couple family

members for other reasons other other

projects that were working on uh

including the the inquest the the the

Campbell family the family of Jeff

Campbell trying to open a new inquest in

the UK um but not about this footage I'm

sure they've seen it and you know for

those who for those families who've been

fighting for almost 23 years to get the

truth you know this the footage for them

is nothing new but I think it it helps

to see that it it get it will encourage

them that tens of millions of people are

seeing this footage for the first time

and that's the dominant discussion you

know if you if you were if you were on X

or on another platform it's not just oh

hey we found some new video of 911 this

important event from 20 years ago it's

oh there's this new footage and the the

dominant discussion is looks like a

controlled demolition what are those

flashes you know so so that's really it

is a

positive well Ted Walter we appreciate

you joining us again he's executive

director for International Center for

911 Justice um you can go to their web

their their YouTube channel can you name

your you YouTube channel so people can

go check out some of these additional

videos if they want to do more of a deep

dive yeah I think if you if you search

i911 on YouTube you'll find us and IC

911.org is is the website where you can

also find a lot of this a lot of this

material

Ted great to see you thank you so much

for the great work as always it's great

to be with you Clayton thank you for

having me back and and thanks for all

the the work that you do as well