MEHDI HASAN OWNING EVERYBODY ON ISRAEL-PALESTINE!

Summary

The video script captures a heated debate on the conflict between Israel and Hamas, focusing on the portrayal of events in media, the role of propaganda, and the responsibility of governments and journalists. It discusses the asymmetry in reporting, the alleged misinformation from both sides, and the ethical questions surrounding the conduct of war, civilian casualties, and the quest for truth in a complex conflict.

Takeaways

• 🗣️ The script contains a heated debate about the conflict between Israel and Hamas, highlighting differing perspectives on the situation in Gaza.
• 🤔 There is a discussion about the control of information, with accusations that both sides manipulate what is seen in the media to fit their narratives.
• 👁️ The script mentions the lack of visual evidence of Hamas casualties, suggesting a possible intentional selection of what is shown to the public.
• 🔍 It points out instances where Israeli spokespeople have made false claims or shared misleading information, which were later debunked or corrected.
• 🏥 The debate touches on the issue of civilian casualties, including children, and the responsibility of both sides in the conflict.
• 🚨 There is a strong emphasis on the need for transparency and international investigations into the actions of the Israeli military.
• 🏢 The script raises questions about the Israeli government's actions and rhetoric, suggesting some statements could be seen as genocidal.
• 📈 It discusses the asymmetry in the conflict, with the power dynamics favoring Israel and the implications for the people of Gaza.
• 🏠 The debate includes commentary on the living conditions in Gaza, describing it as an 'open-air prison' and addressing the concept of collective punishment.
• 🛡️ The script addresses the issue of international sanctions and the perceived double standards in how different countries and entities are treated for human rights abuses.
• 🕊️ The debate concludes with calls for a ceasefire, a political solution, and the recognition of the humanity and rights of all people involved, regardless of their nationality or ethnicity.

Q & A

What is the main point of contention regarding the control of information during the conflict in Gaza?

The main point of contention is the alleged control of information by Hamas and the Israeli government, with accusations that each side is presenting a biased narrative to support their respective positions.

What was the false claim made by the Israeli military spokesman about the Arabic document found in a Gaza hospital?

The Israeli military spokesman falsely claimed that the Arabic document was a list of names of terrorists, when it was actually just a calendar with the days of the week on it.

What was the mistake made by Ofir Gendelman, a spokesperson for the Israeli Prime Minister's Office, regarding a tweet about Palestinians in Gaza?

Ofir Gendelman mistakenly posted behind-the-scenes footage from a Lebanese short film and claimed it was Palestinians in Gaza faking their own injuries, which was later acknowledged as a mistake.

What is the argument about the difference between making an honest mistake and deliberately exaggerating numbers for propaganda purposes?

The argument is that while honest mistakes can happen, deliberately exaggerating numbers or spreading false information for propaganda purposes is a more serious issue and should be condemned.

What was the claim made about Razan al-Najar, the 21-year-old volunteer paramedic who was shot?

The claim made was that Razan al-Najar was shot while wearing a white uniform and was allegedly holding an incendiary bomb, which is under investigation by the IDF.

What is the debate about the treatment of Gaza by Israel, as mentioned in the script?

The debate is whether the treatment of Gaza by Israel constitutes collective punishment, with some arguing that Gaza is an occupied territory where people are living in an open-air prison.

What is the argument about the control of Gaza's borders, airspace, and territorial waters?

The argument is about whether Israel has control over Gaza's borders, airspace, and territorial waters, with one side arguing that no, these are not controlled by Israel, while the other side implies that there is some level of control.

What was the claim made about the Israeli military's knowledge of where every bullet landed during the conflict?

The claim was that the Israeli military bragged on Twitter about knowing where every bullet landed, implying a high level of precision and control over their military actions.

What is the discussion about the role of Hamas in the conflict and whether it is a problem or a symptom of the problem?

The discussion is about whether Hamas is the root cause of the conflict or a symptom of deeper issues. Some argue that treating Hamas as the sole problem is misguided and that addressing the underlying issues is necessary for a resolution.

What is the controversy surrounding the Israeli government's rhetoric, with some suggesting it borders on genocidal?

The controversy is about the inflammatory rhetoric used by some members of the Israeli government, with critics arguing that language suggesting the annihilation of Gaza can be interpreted as genocidal.

What is the debate about the role of international institutions in holding Israel accountable for its actions in Gaza?

The debate is about whether international institutions are effectively holding Israel accountable for its actions in Gaza, with some arguing that there is a double standard and that Israel should be treated like any other human rights abuser.

Outlines

00:00

🗣️ Media Disinformation and Gaza Conflict

The paragraph discusses the issue of media disinformation during the conflict in Gaza. It highlights the debate over whether the lack of images of dead Hamas terrorists is due to control of information by Hamas or by accident. The speaker challenges the other party's stance on the issue, pointing out instances where the Israeli government has been accused of spreading false information, such as misidentifying a calendar as a terrorist list and sharing footage from a Lebanese film as evidence of Palestinians faking injuries. The paragraph emphasizes the importance of questioning both Hamas and the Israeli government's narratives and the dangers of blindly accepting any single source as the truth.

05:00

🏹 Sniper Attacks and the Gaza Debate

This paragraph delves into the contentious issue of sniper attacks in Gaza, focusing on the deaths of individuals like a 21-year-old volunteer paramedic and a 30-year-old journalist. The speaker argues against the notion that these victims posed a threat to Israeli snipers, challenging the justifications provided by the Israeli military. The paragraph also touches on the broader context of the conflict, including the treatment of Gaza as an occupied territory and the international community's view of Israel's actions as collective punishment. The discussion underscores the complexity of the situation and the difficulty in finding a resolution that addresses the root causes of the conflict.

10:01

🕊️ Ceasefire Advocacy and International Critique

The paragraph presents a call for a ceasefire and criticizes the international community's response to the conflict. It points out the discrepancy between the numerous UN resolutions condemning Israel and the lack of practical sanctions from Western countries. The speaker also addresses the issue of double standards, arguing that Israel should be held to the same standards as other human rights abusers. The paragraph includes a discussion of the Israeli government's rhetoric, which some argue borders on genocidal, and the need for consistent application of moral principles in evaluating the actions of all parties involved in the conflict.

15:01

📢 Disparity in Media Representation and War Crimes

This paragraph examines the disparity in how the media represents the conflict and the implications of war crimes committed by both sides. It criticizes the perceived double standard in the way Palestinian and Israeli lives are valued and the reluctance to hold Israel accountable for its actions. The speaker challenges the notion that the freeing of Israeli hostages justifies the killing of Palestinians and questions the logic behind such a trade-off. The paragraph also discusses the role of the media in shaping public opinion and the importance of consistent moral principles in evaluating the actions of both parties.

20:02

🔍 Scrutinizing Israel's Nuclear Arsenal and Regional Hypocrisy

The paragraph focuses on the issue of Israel's undisclosed nuclear arsenal and the hypocrisy of lecturing other nations on nuclear programs while maintaining its own secret program. It also addresses the broader context of regional tensions and the challenges of achieving a just and lasting peace. The speaker questions the lack of transparency and the double standards applied to Israel compared to other nations in the region, highlighting the need for a consistent approach to nuclear non-proliferation and accountability for war crimes.

25:02

🌐 International Politics and the Gaza Hostage Crisis

This paragraph discusses the political dimensions of the Gaza hostage crisis, implicating Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as an obstacle to resolving the situation. It references statements from a former spokesperson for the hostages' families and criticizes the Israeli government's approach to the crisis. The paragraph also touches on the role of international actors, such as the CIA director, in negotiations and the domestic politics within Israel that may be influencing the government's stance on the conflict.

📚 College Campus Activism and the Broader Discourse

The paragraph highlights the role of college campus activism in the broader discourse surrounding the Gaza conflict. It challenges the notion that criticism of Israel's policies is inherently anti-Semitic and points out the significant number of Jewish individuals participating in protests. The speaker also addresses the issue of selective outrage, questioning why certain conflicts receive more attention than others and the role of government funding in shaping public discourse. The paragraph emphasizes the importance of complexity and nuance in understanding the conflict and the need to engage with diverse perspectives.

Keywords

💡Hamas

Hamas is a Palestinian political organization with a military wing. It is considered a terrorist organization by some countries, including Israel and the United States. In the video's context, Hamas is a central point of discussion, with accusations of controlling information and its role in the conflict in Gaza being debated.

💡Propaganda

Propaganda refers to information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. In the script, the term is used to describe the alleged dissemination of one-sided information by both Hamas and the Israeli government to manipulate public opinion.

💡Disinformation

Disinformation is false or inaccurate information that is spread to deceive. The script mentions instances of disinformation purportedly coming from the Israeli government, such as the misidentification of a calendar as a list of terrorists.

💡Gaza

Gaza refers to the Gaza Strip, a self-governing Palestinian territory that has been a focal point of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The video discusses the situation in Gaza, including the alleged control of its borders and the living conditions of its inhabitants.

💡War crimes

War crimes are serious breaches of the laws and customs of war that give rise to individual criminal responsibility. The script contains accusations of war crimes committed by both sides in the conflict, with discussions on the legality and morality of their actions.

💡Collective punishment

Collective punishment refers to the punishment of a group of people for the actions of individuals within that group. The script mentions the concept in relation to the treatment of Gaza by Israel, with some arguing that the entire population is being punished for the actions of Hamas.

💡Human rights

Human rights are the basic rights and freedoms to which all individuals are entitled. The video discusses human rights abuses allegedly committed by both Hamas and the Israeli government, including the targeting of civilians and the denial of basic rights.

💡Nuclear weapons

Nuclear weapons are powerful weapons that derive their destructive force from nuclear reactions. The script touches on the issue of nuclear weapons in the region, with a focus on Israel's alleged possession of such weapons and the implications for regional security.

💡Terrorism

Terrorism is the use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims. The term is used in the script to describe the actions of both Hamas and the Israeli military, with debates on the definition and application of the term in the context of the conflict.

💡Hostages

Hostages are individuals who are captured and held by a group as leverage over another party. The script discusses the issue of Israeli hostages held by Hamas and the implications for negotiations and the broader conflict.

💡Ethnic cleansing

Ethnic cleansing is the forced removal of an ethnic or religious group from a given area. The script contains accusations of ethnic cleansing in Gaza, with debates on the intentions behind Israeli actions and their impact on the Palestinian population.

Highlights

Discussion on the control of information during the conflict in Gaza, with allegations of Hamas controlling what is seen.

Debate on whether Hamas or the Israeli government is more credible in their narratives, with accusations of disinformation from both sides.

Controversy over the Israeli military spokesman's claim about a calendar being a list of terrorists, which was later debunked.

The issue of civilian casualties, including children, and the responsibility for their deaths during the conflict.

The argument about whether Hamas deliberately exaggerates casualty numbers for propaganda purposes.

A journalist's admission of making professional mistakes and the call for accountability from both sides.

The role of Ofir Gendelman in sharing misinformation and the subsequent lack of correction or removal of the misleading tweet.

The debate on the use of force by Israeli snipers, with specific cases of paramedics and journalists being shot.

The differing views on Gaza's status as occupied territory and the international response to the situation.

The question of Israel's control over Gaza's borders, airspace, and territorial waters, and the denial of such control.

The accusation of Israel using collective punishment against Gaza, as stated by the ICRC.

The discussion on how to effectively deal with Hamas, with arguments against the current approach by Israel.

The potential long-term consequences of the conflict, including the creation of orphans and further resistance.

Transcripts

have you seen one picture of a single

dead Hamas terrorist in the fighting in

Gaza not one is that by accident or is

that because Hamas can control Kamas can

control the information you ask me a

question and you said you would be brief

I have I haven't you're right but I have

seen lots of children with my own Lying

Eyes being pulled from the rub because

they the pictures Kamas wants you to see

exactly the pictures Kamas there also

people your government has killed you

accept that right you've killed children

or do you deny that no I do not I do not

I do not first of all you don't know how

those people died those two Wow first of

all we don't want to see a single child

killed okay here's sing say I agree with

you I agree with you we shouldn't

blindly believe anything Hamas says but

why should we believe what your

government says either your military

spokesman on Monday pointed to an Arabic

document in the basement of a Gaza

hospital and claimed it was a guardian

list on which every terrorist writes his

name but that was false it was just a

calendar with the days of the week on it

your colleague in the prime minister's

office offia gendelman posted behind the

scenes footage from a Lebanese short

film and claimed it was Palestinians in

Gaza faking their own injuries that

tweet is still up a week later that is

endless disinformation from your

government is it not I disagree and I

think on the important issues look I

I'll give you an example Med originally

we estimated answering your question

allow me to answer your question I'm

answering your question directly if

you'll allow me but you're dodging my

question mark true why your military

spokesman on Monday point to a calendar

in Arabic and say these are the names of

terrorists on them that's false can you

accept that here and now I I I I I I'm

not aware of the the inent have the

image you have I read Arabic it doesn't

help me I have no comment I'm familiar

with spokesman you hang on I have a

question M you're a journalist have you

made a professional mistake ever not

intentionally but have you made a

professional mistake exactly and I own

up to so can can can you own up to the

mistak so if I made I've made mistakes

you've made mistakes but there's a

difference between making an honest

mistake and between Hamas that

deliberately exaggerates numbers to suit

its propaganda purposes there's a huge

difference sounds like so on you said

propaganda can we just deal with your

colleague offia gelman's tweet it's

still up 7 Days Later why is it not come

down it's a Lebanese short film we can

put it on screen it's not Palestinians

faking their own injuries can we own up

to that mistake and take that down is

that not propaganda I uh once again I

understand that that was also a mistake

and speak toer about it if you like I'll

speak to offer about it if you like he's

a friend of mine and a colleague I quite

like him he's a good man he's actually

very effective why is he effective

speaks

I agree made a mistake but let's be

let's be clear it's very good that we

have someone who can speak Arabic on in

the Arab networks to the to the directly

to Arab people so they can hear Israeli

opinions directly and is amazing at that

he's very important okay thank you Mark

I know you're short on time much more

short than me so I'm going to keep going

what threat did razan al- naar

21-year-old volunteer paramedic uh who

was shot while wearing a white uniform

in the chest 100 met away from the fence

what threat did she opposed to Israeli

snipers wait a minute this is something

I really looked into okay she I'm glad

someone yes she was having an incendiary

bomb and there is an investigation by

the IDF so she was a threat but I have

another question for why was she why was

she going into you know why she was

going because you're killing her people

and she's a paramedic you could choose

not to kill people at a fence who are

just damaging offense allegedly as the

UN the EU International lawyers have

said no other country shoots people in

this way in the back as they're running

away let me ask you this Yas M

journalist 30 years old shot in the

stomach by an Israeli sniper he was uh

250 M away from the fence why was he why

was he what knife did he had what knife

was he carrying you can quote hundreds

of names if you look at them

individually I feel bad for them and for

their families even if they were coming

to Har bad I'm asking how do you J

because they came with a harm intention

if they were your proof of that y ala

was not Hamas was journalist your

country shot him in the stomach he and

you claim he had a hurtful intention

that's outrageous claim to make someone

was dead without any evidence that's

literally smearing the dead anyone who

goes into a war zone knows exactly what

he's doing what is a war zone when they

come and attack us it's a war zone he

wasn't attacking you if you pull a gun

you aim at someone you shoot them

remember the Israeli military bragged on

Twitter we know where every bullet

landed mie you go around the circle to

the same point and the point is that we

have a border legitimate border try to

cross it is occupied territory nonsense

that you have a border is absurd Gaza is

occupied territory the people there are

living in an open air prison and saying

I beg to differ Gaza to with the United

Nations the European Union international

criminal court every Western Government

interational committee for the Red Cross

says Gaza is being treated with

Collective punishment that's the view of

the icrc can I ask a question does

Israel control gaza's borders airspace

and territorial Waters yes or no no no

no really no wow

you're going to come here and say bare

face FAL no the things so Fisher who go

beyond six miles and get shot they just

imagine the bullets hitting them and

when General zika Vogel former head of

Southern command said in April if a

child or anyone else gets close to the

fence his punishment is death you

support that death penalty for anyone

who comes near offense I I don't agree

to that except if he is holding a weapon

Muhammad Ibrahim a 14 years old was not

holding any weapon Israeli sniper shot

him in the head did he deserve to die no

one deserves to die unless why isra snip

shoot him in the unless they aim to kill

he wasn't aiming to kill so why was he

sh in head not sure I'm not sure if you

look at the if you look at the at the

facts what are the facts the facts me

you don't do there's no transparent

investigations you don't allow any

International investigators in and then

you say trust you that the nurse had a

bomb and a 14-year-old guy was going to

kill a sniper I do

trust the Israeli military I do trust

the Israeli Supreme Court which is very

much trusted by all the world Israel is

transparent is well I'm sorry that's not

what human right say I may say things

which may be Inconvenient Truth they're

also not true how else do you get rid of

Hamas if you don't go about it in the

blunt brutal manner that Israel is doing

and if you do it the way they're doing

it how do you avoid the kind of casualty

rate of people under 18 given that's

half the population so three things very

briefly number one you do it by not

deliberately targeting civilian targets

and schools and hospitals and cemeteries

and mosques and universities and

churches you don't have snipers shooting

at hospitals or Christian women inside a

church that's how you avoid the

casualties number two I don't accept the

premise of your question that this is

the way to defeat Hamas I think even if

I'm an Israeli Hawk I criticize

Netanyahu and say this is not the way to

defeat Hamas this is actually absurd to

think you can defeat Hamas in this way

we have countless episodes from history

that show us this is not how you defeat

a gorilla movement a resistance movement

a terror group as you say whatever words

you want to use in fact you have Israeli

General saying this can't be done in

this way and number three look the

reality is Hamas is a symptom of the

problem as long as you treat Hamas as

the problem rather than as a symptom of

the problem you're never going to get

rid of Hamas or if you do by some

fantasy memes get rid of Hamas you'll

just get another version of Hamas

because now you've got tens of thousands

of Orphans you've got people who have

lost their kids their spouses their

siblings what you think they're not

going to fight back in the years to come

you you think they're not going to take

that's how I feel absolute Madness to

believe I feel I feel the same way I we

agree I think you're being a little too

generous to the Israelis here and and

with the greatest respect I think your

questions reflect a little bit of a

naivity about what Israel is doing here

you're you're starting from the premise

that Israel is trying to defeat Hamas I

don't accept that premise I don't

believe that's what Israel is trying to

do you think they wouldn't be doing it

this way I think they're trying to take

back Gaza I think they're trying to

erase the resistance in Gaza I think

they're trying to get rid of the people

from Gaza I think this is their you know

they've mowed the lawn as they put it in

previous Wars this time they're going

into erase the population you know you

know there's a plausible genocide let of

Justice if you listen hold on if you

listen to Israeli officials as you know

it's laid out in the South African

petition they are very genocidal in

their approach to flattening and burning

down Gaza it's not about destroying

Hamas and if it was about destroying

Hamas why has Netanyahu and smotrich and

others talked about how Hamas is asset

to Israel why do they say that openly

bit my why is Israel singled out yeah I

don't accept the premise of the question

obviously it's interesting you should

say that Israel singled out there's a

little a going out well if you're

watching this on YouTube go back on

YouTube and see that the first

intelligence Square debate I did was not

about Israel I came here a few months

ago to talk about the Kingdom of Saudi

Arabia and its human rights abuses so

before I even turned up for Israel I

came to condemn Saudi Arabia and on and

this I get it I get it there are lots of

un resolutions uh condemning I get that

but if you look at actual practical

sanctions there are no sanctions on

Israel from Western countries for human

rights abusers there are against Syria

there are against Russia there are

against Iran there are against North

Korea so no I don't think Israel is

being singal that I'd actually like to

see sanctions put on Israel so it's

treated like other human rights abusers

consistency SLE standard I mean I would

be critical of your double standards

because you constantly criticize Hamas

for genocidal goals and I just pointed

out to you that the Israeli Finance

Minister said this week he wanted the

total annihilation of Gaza do you agree

that's genocide listen I I definitely

think some of the members of that

cabinet have used rhetoric which I think

borders on genocidal no question but

it's not as blat why not genocidal

appears why borders well okay look you

say it's genocidal anation of Gaza yeah

I would say is deeply inflammatory

rhetoric but it's not quite the same as

the Hamas spokesman saying on camera

after October the 7th we are going to

keep doing this again and again and

again that that's

different are literally doing it as we

speak they have a charter to get R much

worse K tens of thousands of people but

T thousands of pales and you and I so

does hold on hold on hold on Pi so does

the liquid party so does the liquid

party 1977 liquid party Charter what

does it say between the Sea and the

Jordan there will only be Israeli

sovereignty River to the Sea that's

liquid chter appears I haven't heard you

criticize the liquid chter Douglas

you're the guy sorry let's just be clear

you're the guy who denied earlier that

what you said in the spectator just be

the clear Contex we're October 7 October

7 5 days after October you said maybe

they will finally put an end to this

insoluble nightmare raise Hamas to the

ground or clear all the Palestinians

from that bited strip it could be a good

time to do it but you tell this audience

we can live in peace side by side not

that's a war crime ethnic cleansing is a

war crime clearing people no I said

maybe for a reason it could be a good

time to

do just

apologizing seriously as Israel's

atrocities in Gaza have become ever more

clear committed zionists have been

forced to dismiss an Ever wider range of

international institutions as Med Hassan

found out at a recent debate I want you

to also offer defense of international

institutions at this moment as it

relates to holding the state of Israel

to account I I have just one sentence to

say about that is the entire world wants

a ceasefire and the United States and

Israel and I don't know the Micronesia

and whatever else don't right the entire

world takes a very different view

unfortunately to the people in this room

and to Douglas and Natasha the

international criminal court the

international court of justice the the

unhcr UNICEF uh Doctors Without Borders

Amnesty International Human Rights Watch

Oxfam uh Christian Aid y you're booing

what does it come to when you're booing

Oxfam what does that tell you about

yourself

you're booing Ox to defend Benjamin

Netanyahu let me just deal with

something you just said you talked about

debunking propaganda first of all you

can't even get Israeli propaganda

straight the Israeli government's own

Security Agency shinb investigated what

you just said and said no we found no

evidence that workers from Gaza were

involved in the October 7th attack oh

shinb Alliance they're booing shinb the

Israeli Security Service got it the

knesset has time and again been asked

the simple question is Israel a state

that's founded on equality or is there

no equality and time and again it will

not allow a simple law that calls for

equality and the fundamental problem is

that they do not recognize my right to

exist have you ever been arrested by

Israeli police have you ever been beaten

by Israeli police have you been

ever

proba the best question to ask yes yes

yes I I really

feel you can check the bruises she's all

bruised up right let's just be clear

first you're saying that if you haven't

been beaten by the Israeli police you're

equal member of society and then when

someone says they have been beaten by

Israeli police you say where are the

bruises no no listen I'm just I'm asking

to clarify she went to school was she

denied education was she denied social

that's your definition what is your

definition hold on in in she is is just

like me black Americans during the Jim

Crow era could go to school it doesn't

mean that there wasn't massive

segregation and discrimination against

black American but there's weird but

Jews and Arabs can go to school together

and they do go to school together there

were protests on TV just a few weeks ago

Israelis were saying they didn't want to

sell a house in their town to a

Palestinian family how many and how many

Arabs that's fine did you say that's Fen

did you just say that's fine to Israeli

people protesting against the sale of a

house in their town are you okay with

that they can protest which is good are

you saying it's good your words for

people to protest against the sale of a

house to a Palestinian family to keep

the town Jewish only cuz that's what I

just said happen and you said fine and

then then you said good are you okay

with that listen you have people here

and there why do not they believe that

they are right but you would condemn

those so would you condemn those

protests because a moment ago he said

it's good that they're protesting

because it's a democratic societ RAC

protest they have to be okay with the

protest you can protest whatever you

want but you condemn those protest it's

called freedom of expression here and

I'm asking you to give us some free

speech do you condemn those protests I

condemn anything which is biased against

race religion gender condemn those

protests

Danny such or what they represent

whatever you like Dany just do something

say give me an answer I condemn any

racism okay general statement you won't

condemn those protests though I would

condemn them oh wow okay we got that in

your view is killing 274 Palestinians

including many children an acceptable

price to pay for the freeing of four

Israelis like I said I I I don't this

you want a clear answer you want to make

a you want to this black and white is

acceptable price to pay it's it's an

unacceptable price but I think it's a

price that has to be paid wow okay so

how many Palestinians would it be

acceptable to kill in order to get back

a single host what's the upper limit

with 400 when when we start talking

about human lives every single one one

life is too many and let me just I mean

274 is a price that has to be paid I'm

saying if it was a thousand would you

pay that because me because I'm in my

estimation if we if we look at if we

look at questions like this in a vacuum

of course we're going to come up with

different answers then in the context

the entire challenge of the m e because

because if we we are increasingly seen

the United States of America in

particular as unwilling to sometimes do

what's necessary to demonstrate some

strength and prevent Congress you just

said a moment ago we have a history of

killing thousands of innocent people AB

we do and my father my father died in a

war that that was so I I do need to ask

question for the value of Palestinian

life yes so if you're saying that to get

free people from the clutches of

horrible captivity hostages people

possibly being abused in captivity to

free them you have to pay a price right

it's horrible price does that ratio work

the other way how many Israelis can

Palestinians kill in order to free

Palestinian detainees who are currently

being tortured in Israeli captivity some

of them being raped to death according

to the New York Times last week can they

kill 200 Israelis hold let me finish the

question can they kill 200 Israelis to

free four Palestinians who are being

tortured in an Israeli prison I think

question that I'm sure uh Palestinians

are asking the same way as Israelis but

no but no no no you answer you answered

it for Israel I would like you to answer

it in reverse let me let me just clarify

something you just said you said

Palestinian prisoners are being raped to

death by Israel in the New York Times

last week I I don't I don't uh I don't

believe that to be true nonetheless the

question 41y old detainee said the

interrogators has made me sit on

something like a hot metal stick and it

felt like fire another he said another D

died after they put the electric stick

up his anus it's repul this is an

Israeli dungeon that CNN and New York

Times are both reported on so to free

people from that prison can you kill

lots of innocent people according to the

logic of the raid in what what I'm what

I'm trying to say is if you represent

the Palestinian people you represent the

Israeli people we look at this quite

differently I don't want to which is why

I'm asking the question Congressman I

understand that you see it differently a

lot of people watch you at home saying

why why aren't all lives equal they

should be but they're not but then but

met then let's go look I don't what I

don't want to do is get into the bet who

suffered worse whose lives by

waying innocent Palestinian lives matter

just as much as innocent Israeli lives

Muslim lives as much as Jewish and

Christian lives that's who I am now with

all that said with all that said war is

hell this is nauseating and we're try

worry about this line war is hell

because can't Hamas say the same thing

when you accuse them of War crime they

can say war is hell is that we have

rules to war we stop it from being they

can war is Hell let me just deal with a

few things that Douglas said cuz there

were a few things were said I mean it's

look it's I wasn't surprised at all I

came to a debate in Toronto to debate

Israel with two two Defenders of the

current government and so far gide and I

correct me if I'm wrong didn't call we

could have done a long list of your

apologies for genocide and war crimes

and crimes against humanity we didn't do

that but we've been called liars and

Hamas supporters and I get it neither of

us talked about Hamas we don't support

Hamas this is not a debate about Hamas I

know Douglas wants to redefine it as a

debate about Hamas great good for him

because he can't actually deal with the

arguments we're putting forward all the

Jews who are putting forward these

arguments they're all anti-semites

remember I just want to deal with one

point very important here Douglas is the

great journalist in Israel I love this

cosplaying as a journalist going into

Gaza with the IDF Douglas interviewed

Benjamin Netanyahu in January Douglas

did not you're very bothered by katar

and spunding Hamas your bosses but well

we're talking about bosses let's talk to

this you're literally paid watch I've

I've

interviewed I've interviewed Qatari

officials you can go on YouTube and

watch my interviews with Qatari official

and then you can watch Douglas interview

Benjamin Netanyahu where he asked him

pearls like is there another chapter

left in the Netanyahu biography that was

the strong question with that he didn't

ask Benjamin Netanyahu why did you work

with Qatar to fund Hamas all those years

why did you prop up Hamas all those

years why according to today's Israeli

media did you have reports that there

was going to be attack on your citizens

and completely allow that to happen

Douglas didn't ask any of those

questions instead he'd like to spray

around Hamas at the Muslim on the state

Douglas referred to ham YF the first

minister of Scotland recently as the

first minister of Gaza Muslim guy and he

said quote come to England you said

quote he has infiltrated our system

given where a debate about anti-Semitism

I find it ironic that you are throwing

out some of the most bigoted dual

loyalty tropes known to man referring to

a v a born British Muslim politician as

the first minister of Gaza so the moment

you have a pro Palestinian guest who

wants to avoid calling what herass did

an act of terrorism by terrorists I

think it's very revealing about their

mind mindset and I think it's the wrong

mindset here's my problem with that why

is that not applied to your Israeli

guests I would I would be I would be

fine peers if you had Palestinian guests

and You Begin by asking them do you

condemn Hamas war crimes because what

Hamas did on October 7th was a war crime

but then you should start with Israeli

guests and pro-israeli guests saying do

you condem Israeli war crimes which have

been documented by the UN every Human

Rights group on the planet you don't you

had naftali Bennett the former Israeli

Prime Minister on a couple of weeks ago

I watched the interview your opening

question was how comfortable are you

with the way Israel is Prosecuting the

war bit of a soft ball to start with you

didn't ask him to Israeli terrorism

Israeli war crimes Israeli genocide in

Gaza so a lot of people look at that and

they say I they get your intention but

it comes across as a bit of a racist

double standard how many nuclear weapons

does Iran have as of today right now I

hope none okay how many does Israel have

no idea no idea you were in the

government they don't tell you that

stuff no idea who do they tell no idea

I'm telling you I uh never discussed it

but it's it's irrelevant it's between

you never discussed Israel's nuclear

weapons you can say that hand on heart

you've never discussed Israel's nuclear

you're expecting us to believe that the

deputy foreign minister of Israel never

discussed Israel's nuclear deteran

seriously then all so let let me tell

you it's not all slogans and sound bites

Med I did not discuss Israel nuclear

weapons I did discuss Israel nuclear

policy there is a big difference okay

okay okay so now we've got past that

semantic evasion no no you have to how

many nuclear weapons does Israel have

because experts say it's anywhere

between 80 and 400 so what so what yeah

so what has Israel ever thre do you

recognize the hypocrisy of Israel having

a secret illicit nuclear weapons program

that it won't open up its doors to and

won't talk about and then lecturing

everyone else in the region about

absolutely not you know why AB you talk

about hypocrisy the question for me

that's caused me a moral conjury is what

is an acceptably proportionate level of

response and I don't know the answer but

I don't think you can call people

responding to an act of Terror on that

scale terrorists for responding what you

can do is hold to account the problem

the problem is if you go to Gaza if you

go to Gaza peers and you talk to

Palestinians they will say that Hamas

were responding if we play The Who

started it game we go back many decades

we need is a consist when is kill what

we need to have is hang on when did

Israel kill 1200 kill hundreds of

Palestinian civilians when did they kill

800 Palestinian civilians in one few

hour period right in the way that Hamas

killed those definition of terrorism how

many hours you do it in I can mention

many Israeli massacres going back to

Sabra and chatila which they oversaw

going back to Kia and ariiel shiron

going back to Dear Yim where rape and

violence happened the point is not to

compare atrocities the point appear is

to have a consistent moral principle

which is to say if you kill civilians

for a political cause you are a

terrorist on that basis Hamas have

committed acts of Terror and Israel have

committed acts of Terror I think that's

only fair to say that the reality is

Abby that the obstacle to a hostage deal

has always been Benjamin Netanyahu and

those are not my words those are the

words of himim Rubenstein the former

spokesperson for the hostages family who

told the Israeli press last week that

netanyahu's been the obstacle he says

that they found out there was a deal on

the table back on October 9th 10th to

get hostages released but Netanyahu hid

it from them those are the words of the

spokesperson for the Israeli families of

the hostages and he hid it from them

because he knows that if he agrees to a

hostage deal his fascist colleagues and

his coalition government will collapse

as Government this is Israeli domestic

politics Lieutenant Colonel what about

that I mean if the hostages are all

released shouldn't Israel seriously

consider ending hostilities in Gaza and

allowing for a political M that leads to

the Future yeah I'm listening to the

second edition of massan's monologue

that I saw earlier and it's not

surprising that you're parting Hamas

talking points uh really the let's put

things here in perspective we have a

terrorist organization that abducted

civilians and soldiers they're the ones

for the last 4 months have been refusing

any deal that Israel the US Qatar Egypt

and others have put forward and now when

push comes to sh and when they see

Israeli tanks lined up on their way to

RAF all of a sudden they are agreeing

they're agreeing to something that

wasn't on the table and it's quite

absurd that this is even how it's

covered and it's classic deception 101

by an organization that is very Savvy in

deception and unfortunately has

figureheads and mouthpieces all over

Western media doing their work whether

it's a Jaz or other places and getting

that message out that Israel is the

problem when Israeli civilians and

soldiers are the ones that have been

abducted I'll let Betty respond to that

so I think all of your viewers saw me

quote the spokesperson for the Israeli

hostages families and the colonel then

said I'm parting Hamas talking points

he's referring to the hostages families

as Hamas as parting Hamas talking points

cuz I quoted them I didn't quote Hamas

in fact tonight the colonel knows that

hundreds of people went to netanyahu's

house and screamed you have blood on

your hands Israeli protesters I guess

they're all Hamas right the Israeli

position now is anyone who disagrees

with the is Hamas I'm guess that

tomorrow they'll say CIA director Bill

Burns who was involved in this hostage

negotiation deal he's Hamas too

everyone's Hamas and as for deception I

mean come on the colonel was a

spokesperson for the IDF which has spent

the last 6 months lying Abby your

network has debunked multiple lies that

the Israeli military has told CNN's

Jeremy Diamond I urge all your viewers

to go and watch your colleague Jeremy

Diamond's report on 10 kids killed in

the alag gazi refugee camp last month

the Israeli said we had nothing to do

with it and yet Jeremy interviewed three

Munitions experts who looked at the

evidence said yeah Israel killed those

10 kidss so when we talk about deception

we're we're learning from the Masters

here the propositions have sprayed

around the word lie and liar so let's

return the compliment Natasha lied when

she talked about unra and terrorism the

UN set up an independent inquiry asked

the Israelis for evidence I know you

don't want to hear this the Israelis the

they asked the Israelis she's parting

propaganda for the Israeli government

the Israeli government was asked to give

the evidence they refuse to give their

evidence every Western government

including your own Canada's has

restarted funding because they looked at

the evidence and didn't see

it that's great I get it I get it I get

it but but as Douglas might have once

said facts don't care about your

feelings to come back to the other point

of light Douglas says the war would end

if Hamas gave back the hostages complete

lie the Israelis have said even if the

hostages come back we carry on the war

in fact I interviewed Abraham mun's

nephew Abraham mun is a 79y old Israeli

hostage right now poor guy tragic 79y

old in captivity should be freed of

course had to have his birthday in

captivity his nephew says that every

time he goes on the streets Ben's police

beat him they beat him and arrest him

they're arresting hostage family members

and they're coming on TV and saying why

are we being used as props by people who

support the war he doesn't support the

war he wants a deal Israeli family

members are going on the streets and

being tear Gass and water can of what

beaten by the police because they want

to deal and they want an end to the war

that Douglas and Zasha so proudly

support they keep telling us about the

horrors of October 7th I agree this side

shares the revoltion against the horrors

of October the 7th but we also share

revoltion against the horrors that came

since October 7th we don't support those

Horrors I'm opposed to the war crimes

that happened on October the 7th and the

war crimes that have happened since

October the 7th Douglas no I got to

finish this point Douglas the week after

October the 7th came out in The

Spectator and advocated for the ethnic

cleansing of Gaza which is a crime

against humanity under the Rome statute

he said now is a not true you said now

is a good time to do it Douglas ear was

telling us all about the importance of

Journalism going on the ground while

Douglas was getting awards from the

president of Israel we were actually

reporting my new news organizations ATO

from those campuses with Jewish students

in fact the most read piece on our site

is from a student called Jonathan Ben

manakum who is at Colombia and reported

from inside the encampment where they

were having a Seda where he was

protesting war crimes in Gaza which I

know the other side thinks they on a war

crimes everything we just imagine the

last eight months um what you have to

tackle tonight I'm glad we brought up

College Co campuses because again if

this ridiculous sweeping motion Douglas

says complexity we are the side of

complexity we're not the ones saying

anti-zionism across the board is

anti-Semitism you have to deal with the

fact that college protests are dispropor

there are a disproportionate number of

Jews in these protests they're all

brainwashed they're all idiots they're

all

self-hpv have come out to defend the

protest Analise or is a 65-year-old

former chair of Jewish studies at

Dartmouth she was beaten on camera by

police while she was protesting against

the war in Gaza apparently Douglas an

atheist says that she's an anti-semite

that's the debate that's what we've got

to tonight where the former chair of

Jewish studies at Dartmouth is an

anti-semite while Douglas is the

champion of the Jewish people I find it

bizarre and I'm glad we've brought up

College protest because it's the number

one evidence right now in our discourse

that actually a lot of young Jewish

people and by the way this whole

argument why didn't you protest Sudan

why didn't you protest Syria last time I

check the United States Congress does

not fund Bashar al-assad or the rsf

militias in Sudan