I Also Worked For Mr Beast, He's a THIEF!

Summary

The script details a personal account of an aspiring YouTuber's experience with a prominent content creator, Mr Beast. After being offered a job and flown out for work, the individual claims to have been misled and their creative ideas exploited without compensation. The narrative includes allegations of manipulation and a call for support, suggesting a potential GoFundMe campaign to seek justice for the unpaid work and stolen ideas that contributed to Mr Beast's success.

Takeaways

• 🗣️ The speaker claims everything they say is true and challenges any skepticism without evidence.
• 🎥 The speaker aspired to be a YouTuber and later realized they were better at editing and creating ideas for others rather than being on camera.
• 📅 In November 2018, the speaker decided to become a YouTuber and took four years to understand their strengths and weaknesses.
• 🤔 The speaker feels they were taken advantage of, manipulated, and discarded after being used for their ideas in the YouTube industry.
• 🙏 The speaker thanks Chris Tyson for providing a platform to tell their story.
• 📧 On February 2nd, 2024, the speaker received an email that they initially thought was a scam, offering a job with Mr. Beast.
• 🎬 The speaker works for well-known YouTubers, particularly in the sports niche, and has edited commercials for the 2022 NFL Playoffs.
• 🔍 The speaker posted on Facebook about the job offer and verified the authenticity of their experience with emails and social media posts.
• 💡 The speaker was given a creative task to pitch ideas for Mr. Beast's channel, choosing a dangerous trap room concept over spending $1 billion in 24 hours.
• 🚫 The speaker alleges that after working hard on their pitch and being well-received, they were told there was no job available and felt exploited.
• 📉 The speaker expresses disappointment and anger over not being compensated for their ideas, which were later used by Mr. Beast's channel.

Q & A

What was the speaker's initial goal in their career?

The speaker initially wanted to be famous and later decided to become a YouTuber in November 2018.

What realization did the speaker come to after four years of trying to be a YouTuber?

The speaker realized that they were not good at being a YouTuber themselves but were good at editing and creating ideas for others.

Why does the speaker feel they were taken advantage of?

The speaker feels taken advantage of because they believe they were lied to, manipulated, and their work was used without compensation or proper credit.

What was the purpose of the speaker's visit to Mr. Beast's company?

The speaker visited Mr. Beast's company for a job opportunity that they believed was genuine, based on an email they received.

What evidence does the speaker provide to support their claim of being offered a job?

The speaker provides emails, Facebook posts, and their recollection of events as evidence of the job offer and their subsequent work.

What was the speaker's role in the videos they worked on for Mr. Beast?

The speaker's role was to create ideas and concepts for videos, not to edit them, which was the initial understanding from their meetings.

What specific idea did the speaker pitch during their time at Mr. Beast's company?

The speaker pitched an idea for a video called 'the world's most dangerous obstacle course,' which included a Mario-style floating obstacle course with trusses and cranes.

How did the speaker find out that their idea was used without their consent?

The speaker discovered that their idea was used after seeing a video on Twitter that closely resembled their pitch.

What was the speaker's reaction after they realized their idea was used without compensation?

The speaker felt upset and wronged, believing that Mr. Beast, as a billionaire and influential figure, should have compensated them for their work.

What steps is the speaker planning to take to seek justice for their situation?

The speaker is planning to start a GoFundMe to raise funds for legal action and is considering releasing more evidence in a potential 'part two' of their story.