Sony ZV-E10 II vs Sony ZV-E10 - Do You NEED to Upgrade?

Summary

In this detailed comparison, the Sony ZV-E10 Mark II is pitted against its predecessor, the ZV-E10. The Mark II boasts a lighter body, improved microphone, enhanced battery life, and a premium feel. It offers a fully articulating, high-resolution touch screen, 4K 60 streaming capability, and a 26-megapixel sensor with 10bit 422 color information. Despite some drawbacks like electronic stabilization and the lack of a mechanical shutter, the Mark II delivers superior image quality and functionality, justifying its higher price for many users, while the original ZV-E10 remains a budget-friendly option with excellent low-light performance.

Takeaways

• 📷 The ZV-E10 Mark II is not much bigger or heavier than the original ZV-E10, with a slightly lighter weight without batteries due to a larger battery.
• 🔋 The ZV-E10 Mark II features an improved grip and longer battery life, with a more premium feel and a relocated on/off switch.
• 🎤 The built-in microphone on the ZV-E10 Mark II is upgraded and considered the best among Sony cameras for vlogging without external mics.
• 📼 The SD card slot on the ZV-E10 Mark II has been moved to the side for convenience, unlike the original's slot in the battery compartment.
• 🔌 The ZV-E10 Mark II has improved USB-C port capabilities, allowing for 4K 30 streaming, compared to the 720 streaming of the original ZV-E10.
• 🖥 The ZV-E10 Mark II has a fully articulating screen with better resolution and touch functionality, making it more useful for exposure judgment and menu navigation.
• 📚 The new model includes a new 26-megapixel sensor with 4K 60 recording capabilities, albeit with a small 1.1x crop, and 10bit 4:2:2 color information.
• 🌞 The original ZV-E10 holds up well in 4K modes with 8bit footage, and the image quality can be indistinguishable from the Mark II in certain situations.
• 🔄 The ZV-E10 Mark II has improved electronic stabilization with less crop than the original, and better performance for vlogging with a wider field of view.
• 💰 The original ZV-E10 offers a more affordable price point, sometimes discounted, making it a great entry point for those new to the Sony system.
• 🛠 The Mark II lacks a mechanical shutter, which the original ZV-E10 has, providing an advantage for photographers needing to capture fast-moving subjects without distortion.

Q & A

What is the main purpose of the video?

The main purpose of the video is to compare the original Sony zv E10 with the new zv E10 Mark II, highlighting the differences, upgrades, and some downgrades between the two models.

Is the zv E10 Mark II physically larger or heavier than the original zv E10?

The zv E10 Mark II is not much bigger or heavier than the original zv E10. In fact, without the batteries, it's actually lighter due to the inclusion of a bigger battery.

What are some of the design improvements in the zv E10 Mark II body?

The zv E10 Mark II has a more premium feel, an improved microphone, a better grip, a relocated SD card slot to the side, and more conveniently located ports. It also has an on/off switch and mode switch by the zoom rocker instead of a button.

How does the zv E10 Mark II handle battery life?

The zv E10 Mark II has a longer battery life due to the inclusion of a bigger battery.

What is the difference in the microphone quality between the two models?

The zv E10 Mark II has an upgraded microphone, which is considered the best in Sony cameras, making it ideal for vlogging or using without external mics.

What is the improvement in the screen functionality of the zv E10 Mark II compared to the original?

The zv E10 Mark II has a fully articulating screen with better resolution, contrast, and touch functionality, including touch to focus, track, or shutter, and swipe menus, unlike the original which has limited touch functionality.

What are the video recording capabilities of the zv E10 Mark II compared to the original?

The zv E10 Mark II can record up to 4K 60 with a small 1.1 times crop, while the original zv E10 is limited to 4K 30. The Mark II also supports 10bit 422 color information, compared to the 8bit of the original.

How does the stabilization compare between the zv E10 and the zv E10 Mark II?

Both cameras lack an in-body image stabilization system and rely on electronic stabilization. The zv E10 Mark II has an improved electronic stabilization with less crop compared to the original, which has a 1.44 times crop in active stabilization.

What are the advantages of using a gimbal with the zv E10 cameras for vlogging?

Using a gimbal provides smooth footage without the need for active stabilization, eliminating the crop factor and providing a wider field of view, which is especially useful for vlogging.

What is the price difference between the original zv E10 and the zv E10 Mark II?

The original zv E10 is priced at $698, sometimes discounted to $598, while the zv E10 Mark II is priced at $998, indicating a significant price increase for the upgraded model.

What are some of the photo capabilities of the original zv E10 that may be preferred over the Mark II?

The original zv E10 has a mechanical shutter, which is preferred by photographers for capturing fast-moving subjects without distortion or banding, and it may have more aggressive noise reduction for better low-light performance.

Outlines

00:00

📷 Camera Comparison: ZV-E10 Original vs. Mark II

The script starts with a comparison between the original Sony ZV-E10 and its upgraded version, the ZV-E10 Mark II. The narrator highlights that while the new model has some substantial upgrades, there are also a few downgrades. The ZV-E10 Mark II is not significantly larger or heavier than its predecessor, with the extra weight attributed to a larger battery, which results in a better grip and longer battery life. The Mark II also features a more premium body, an improved microphone with the best in Sony's lineup, and a relocated SD card slot for convenience. Additionally, the new model offers a fully articulating screen with better resolution and touch functionality, as well as a new 26-megapixel sensor capable of 4K 60 recording, albeit with a small crop, and 10bit 422 color information.

05:01

🎥 Image Quality and Stabilization Test

The second paragraph delves into the image quality of both cameras, emphasizing that despite the ZV-E10 Mark II having a higher bit depth, the original ZV-E10 still delivers fantastic 8bit footage. Side-by-side comparisons are presented to illustrate the differences. The script also addresses the stabilization capabilities of both cameras, noting that neither has in-body image stabilization (Ibis) and instead relies on electronic stabilization, which crops the image. The Mark II, however, offers less of a crop and improved stabilization, making it better for vlogging. The narrator also discusses the use of external stabilization tools like gimbals and software solutions for post-production stabilization.

10:03

🔧 Technical Upgrades and Kit Lens Comparison

This section discusses the technical improvements of the ZV-E10 Mark II, including better rolling shutter performance, a new quieter and smoother kit lens with optical stabilization, and the ability to maintain autofocus during clear image zoom. The narrator also mentions that the Mark II has no crops in most recording modes except for the 4K 60 mode, and it includes additional features like S-Cinetone and Cine Vlog modes for improved cinematic look, as well as focus breathing compensation and focus mapping for enhanced control over focus during video recording.

15:03

💰 Value and Low Light Performance Analysis

The final paragraph wraps up the comparison by discussing the value proposition of both cameras. The original ZV-E10 is praised for its affordability and, in some aspects, superior photo capabilities due to its mechanical shutter, which is absent in the Mark II. The narrator also touches on the low light performance of both cameras, noting that while the Mark II has a dual base ISO for better noise reduction in S-Log3 at higher ISOs, the original ZV-E10 is still competitive in low light scenarios. The script concludes by inviting viewers to share their thoughts on whether the Mark II's additional features justify its higher price point.

Keywords

💡zv E10

The 'zv E10' refers to a camera model from Sony, which is the central subject of the video. It is a camera designed for vlogging and content creation, with a focus on features like microphone quality and image stabilization. The script compares the original 'zv E10' with its upgraded version, the 'zv E10 Mark II', highlighting improvements and differences.

💡Mark II

'Mark II' signifies the second version or iteration of a product, in this case, the upgraded version of the zv E10 camera. The term is used to distinguish the new model from its predecessor, emphasizing the enhancements made in areas such as body design, battery life, and video capabilities.

💡microphone

The term 'microphone' is crucial in the context of this video as it discusses the audio recording capabilities of the zv E10 cameras. The script mentions that the zv E10 Mark II has an upgraded microphone, offering better audio quality for vloggers and content creators who may not use external mics.

💡SD card slot

The 'SD card slot' is a feature highlighted in the script that has been improved in the zv E10 Mark II. It has been relocated to the side for easier access, unlike the original model where it was inconveniently placed in the battery compartment.

💡USBC Port

The 'USBC Port' is mentioned in the context of the zv E10 Mark II's upgraded capabilities, allowing for 4K 30 streaming, which is an improvement over the original zv E10's limitation to 720 streaming. This port is essential for content creators who want higher quality live streaming.

💡articulating screen

An 'articulating screen' is a feature that allows the camera's display to be adjusted for better viewing angles. The script notes that the zv E10 Mark II has a better, fully articulating screen with higher resolution and improved contrast, aiding in more accurate exposure judgment.

💡sensor

The 'sensor' in a camera is responsible for capturing light and converting it into an image. The script discusses the new sensor in the zv E10 Mark II, which is the same as in the a6700 and fx30, offering higher megapixel count and advanced video capabilities like 4K 60 recording.

💡10bit 422

The term '10bit 422' refers to a color depth and chroma subsampling used in video recording, providing more color information and better quality. The script mentions this as an upgrade in the zv E10 Mark II, allowing for over a billion colors compared to the original's 8bit color depth.

💡image stabilization

'image stabilization' is a feature that reduces blur in photos and videos due to camera shake. The script compares the electronic stabilization of the original zv E10 with the improved stabilization in the Mark II, noting a less significant crop and better performance.

💡gyro data

'Gyro data' refers to the information recorded by a camera's gyroscope, which can be used in post-production to stabilize footage. The script mentions that both zv E10 models can record gyro data, allowing for smoothing of handheld footage in post-production using software like Catalyst Browse.

💡kit lens

A 'kit lens' is a lens that comes bundled with a camera. The script discusses the new kit lens for the zv E10 Mark II, noting improvements over the original kit lens, such as reduced noise, better focus tracking, and compatibility with high frame rates.

Highlights

The zv E10 Mark II is lighter than the original zv E10 without the batteries.

The zv E10 Mark II features a larger battery, improved grip, and longer battery life.

The new body of zv E10 Mark II feels more premium and includes an on/off switch and mode switch.

The zv E10 Mark II has an upgraded microphone, offering the best in Sony cameras.

Both cameras come with a furry wind muff to reduce wind noise.

The SD card slot on the zv E10 Mark II is conveniently moved to the side.

The zv E10 Mark II has a better USB-C port for 4K 30 streaming.

The fully articulating screen on zv E10 Mark II has better resolution and contrast.

The zv E10 Mark II screen is fully touch-enabled, unlike the original's limited touch functionality.

The zv E10 Mark II includes a new 26-megapixel sensor capable of 4K 60 recording with a small crop.

The new sensor in zv E10 Mark II is capable of 10bit 422, offering more color information.

The zv E10 Mark II has improved electronic stabilization with less crop compared to the original.

The zv E10 Mark II's new kit lens is less noisy and smoother with optical stabilization.

The zv E10 Mark II retains autofocus capabilities during clear image zoom and other features.

The zv E10 Mark II offers S-Cinetone and Cine Vlog modes for more cinematic looks.

The original zv E10 has a mechanical shutter, which is advantageous for fast-moving subjects.

The original zv E10 is priced significantly lower than the zv E10 Mark II.

The zv E10 Mark II offers improved rolling shutter performance compared to the original.

Both cameras perform well in low light, with the Mark II having a dual base ISO for cleaner images at higher sensitivities.

Transcripts

oh guys today is the day we're going to

compare the zv E10 original My Little

douge to the brand new zv E10 Mark I

that I so expertly reviewed and rest

assured you can still look gorgeous in

either camera however there are some

substantial upgrades with the zb1 Mark

II and oddly a couple of downgrades so

I'm going to have some test footage I'm

going to have some side by sides some

statistics what else would you expect

from a reviewer of my caliber so let's

get right into it

[Music]

so first let's talk about the

differences in the body and the great

news here is that the zv E10 Mark II is

not much bigger or heavier than the

original zv E10 in fact without the

batteries it's actually lighter than

this camera which is kind of crazy so

the extra weight the extra few grams

that you get on the zv E10 Mark I it's

because it has a bigger battery and that

is much better because you get a bigger

nicer beefier grip to hold on to and you

have much longer battery life the new

body does feel a little more premium and

you also have the onoff switch up by the

zoom rocker and you have a switch mode

for the photos video and snq as opposed

to a button that is on the zv E10

original the microphone is also upgraded

on the zv E10 Mark II and it has the

best microphone in any of the Sony

cameras so if you want to Vlog or just

use the microphone without any actual

external mics then the zv E10 Mark II is

the best you can do in the Sony lineup

now I would always use an external

microphone whether a lavalier or a

shotgun mic something like that but if

you want to use an on camera microphone

that is actually built into the camera

zv E10 Mark II is really good they both

come with that little furry wind muff

that da King wig that goes on top there

and that can really cut down on the wind

noise it's essential in my opinion if

you're going to go out into the world

the SD card slot thankfully is moved to

the side on the new zv E10 whereas the

original one had it in the battery

compartment which is always a chore

especially you're on a tripod something

like that or a gimbal trying to change

out your SD card is a real pain in the

butt you have the same ports on both

cameras but they are more conveniently

located on the zv E10 Mark II so your

wires don't get in the way of your

screen quite as much and also the USBC

Port is much upgraded on the zve 10 Mark

II so you can now do 4K 30 streaming

from that USBC whereas you can only do

720 streaming from the zv E10 I'm glad

there's some kind of streaming on this

camera but really if you want to start

streaming in 4k you are going to have to

use the HDMI port and use a capture card

for the original zv E10 the fully

articulating screen is much better on

the ZB E10 Mark I not only does it have

a better resolution it has $1.04 million

dots versus about 900,000 dots on this

but it's just the actual contrast the

image itself looks so much better on the

new one with the original one you just

kind of had to trust if you were in

sunny weather mode you kind of had to

trust that uh the image was going to be

fine cuz it looked blown out on the

screen no matter what exposure setting

you had it at the new one is much easier

to judge your actual exposure on the

screen itself and I think that was a

very needed upgrade and that screen not

only has better resolution is a much

more useful screen because it is fully

touch enabled you can't actually touch

the menu screen on this one well you can

touch it but it's not going to do

anything you have to use the buttons to

navigate through your menu system if you

can believe that now you can touch to

focus touch to track or touch shutter

with the zv E10 original but you

actually can't scroll through any of the

menus and the new zv E10 Mark 2 that

also has swipe menus it is a very

functional very well-laid out menu

system that is fully touch compatible

that is worth the upgrade for many

people right there and obviously in that

new body is a new sensor the same sensor

that's in the a6700 and the fx30 that

you're looking at right now which is

wonderful for people who want to get

fx30 quality on a budget then you can

get it in the new mark 2 26 megapixel

sensor this one right here in the

original one is a 24 megapixel sensor

and you can only go to 4K 30 with this

guy right here where is with the new

Mark I you can go all the way to 4K 60

there is a small 1.1 times crop but it

is 4K 60 and both cameras will down

sample from 6K except in the 4K 60 mode

that is down sampled from

5.6k but it is 6k in 4k 30 and down same

with this one right here and that new

sensor is capable of 10bit 422 so much

much more color information you can get

millions of colors on the zv E10 in 8bit

but on the new one you get over a

billion colors so when you want to use

slog 3 and get full dynamic range and be

able to color grade to your hearts

content the zv E10 Mark II will let you

do that just like the fx30 now that

being said the image quality on this

camera is still absolutely fantastic so

let me show you some side by-side images

of the zv E10 with the zv E10 Mark I and

you can see for yourself

[Music]

[Music]

now I think in the 4K modes this holds

up extremely well even though though it

is 8bit footage there are many

situations where you won't notice the

difference between 8bit footage and

10bit footage and most of the things I

shoot are those types of situations

you're doing Studio shots you're walking

around vlogging you don't necessarily

need the 10bit and you can still get

wonderful image quality out of this

camera right here at a much cheaper

price but when it comes to the 1080

footage the ZB E10 Mark II definitely

has sharper 1080 footage which also

means the 10812

if you're trying to do 120 frames per

second you have to do 1080 on both

cameras so it's going to look better on

the ZB E10 Mark I and of course that

camera has 4K 60 and this one doesn't

now what about stabilization neither

camera actually has an Ibis system

inbody image stabilization they save

costs by leaving out the Ibis and they

just try to do it electronically and the

ZB E10 the original crops in 1.44 times

in active stabilization a very Hefty

crop and uh the new one still has a

pretty hefty crop it's 1.33 times so

definitely less of a crop however it is

still a substantial crop so if you want

to do something like vlogging I would

recommend the Sony 11mm

f1.8 but even though there's not a giant

gap between the two crop factors it is

the actual stabilization the electronic

stabilization that I think is much

better on the new version of the camera

so let me show you some Vlog footage

right now and you can see for yourself

and now we are on my favorite lens for

vlogging the Sony 11

f1.8 check this out look at this nice

comfortable field of view even if I hold

it by the camera you still have a pretty

good field of view even with that active

stabilization which definitely works

quite well on this new camera check this

out look at this walking around talking

my nonsense film him a gorgeous face

while a bunch of people scream over here

so here we are on the original Sony zv

E10 with the 11 mm from Sony it is still

certainly usable with this camera even

with that active 40% crop for

stabilization because this lens is so

wide once again if I was holding it by

the camera it would be borderline too

close but it's a wide lens so you can

get away with it but with this little

selfie stick out here definitely very

usable still it's nice to have that

wider feel of view on the new mark 2

this is the zv E10 Mark I just on the

kit cleans and I'm using the active

stabilization so if you have a little

selfie stick like this and you extend it

out a little bit then uh I think this is

actually pretty doable for vlogging I

would still prefer the Sony 11 mm 1.8

for this to have a more comfortable

field of view but still this is pretty

nice this here is the zv E10 the

original on the kit lens bit too tight

for vlogging I think and even though I

had the selfie stick extended out

further if I didn't have this selfie

stick it would be right about out here

which is definitely too tight if you

extend it out this far and then push

your arm out further then but now I am

like extending my arm fully here so I

think that that is a little too

difficult and I never use the kit lens

when it comes to vlogging for the Sony

zve E10 because this active

stabilization it crops in too much on

this particular model right here I am

using the internal microphone right here

but uh that's it here you go that is the

comparison to the old versus the

[Music]

new now I certainly thought if you're

going to use active stabilization you're

much better off with the mark 2 version

however you don't have to use active

stabilization at all on either camera

because they both have gyro data you can

record the gyro data right to the SD

card and then smooth it out in post with

Catalyst browse which is free Catalyst

prepare which is a paid program and also

gyro flow which is another free program

I just use Catalyst brows for free even

though you can't do the 10bit footage

with Catalyst brows with the new ZB E10

Mark I I find it's fine for me and my

vlogging situation so often I will use

that gyro data and smooth it out in post

now that does take a long time be warned

that is not an easy process it takes a

lot of computing power and it takes a

fair amount of time but I believe the

results are worth it but you can also

isue all of those things and just simply

use a gimbal a tiny small lightweight

gimbal let me get one I actually got two

this is the xun crane M3s tiny little

lightweight gimbal for mirrorless

cameras and this is the crane m2s which

is even smaller and lighter and this

will take the zv E10 Mark I or Mark 1

with the 11 mm or the kit lens let me

show you that now now of course you

could always go get yourself a little

Gimbal and not have to worry about much

at all this is my smallest lightest

weight and cheapest skimal the xun crane

m2s it can handle the zv E10 and the kit

lens just fine along with little ND

filter that I have on there and a

microphone pack don't have to worry

about your steps being too heavy or too

light and you just get nice smooth

footage as you walk around Society

talking your

[Music]

nonsense so if you don't mind carrying

around and balancing a gimbal then you

can get a very wide feel of view with

the 11 mm and you can also even use the

kit lens to Vlog on the original zv E10

or the Mark I another reason the

handheld footage looks so much smoother

with the Mark I versus is the original

is the improvements to Rolling shutter

has the same rolling shutter on the new

one as the a6700 and fx30 and that is

somewhere in between an A7 S3 and an a74

it is definitely a good enough rolling

shutter something around 16 milliseconds

of rolling shutter of the ZB E10 Mark I

whereas the original one it's atrocious

it's as bad as it gets the rolling

shutter the Jello effect if you're

moving the camera around that's why I

did like to use gimbals or Catalyst

brows with this guy because if you are

using active stabilization you have to

be nice and smooth if you don't want to

see that Jello-O effect now if you're

just putting it up on a tripod doing

Studio shots things like that no worries

or like I said gimbal or Catalyst brows

now let's talk about that new kit lens

for a second that comes with the Mark I

versus the original kit lens and it is

much less noisy it is very smooth to use

whereas the old one rattled around a lot

and the old one as you zoom

you couldn't keep Focus tracking whereas

the new one can the new one can also

keep up with very high frame rates of

Sony cameras whereas the old lens can't

and it has a new Optical stabilization

as well so it's going to be a smoother

lens when it comes to actually

stabilizing your footage now I didn't

see a ton of difference between the two

lenses when it comes to actual Optical

quality and sharpness however the new

kit lens is definitely an upgrade over

the old one another Improvement on the

Mark I is there are no crops at all

except as mentioned the 4K 60 as a 1.1

times crop on the ZB E10 the original

there is a small crop in 4k 30 and also

there's a couple of quirks like you will

lose your ey detect autofocus if you are

connected to an HDMI monitor and you're

using 4K 30 4K 24 is fine on this camera

but 4K 30 you will lose your ey detect

autofocus also if you're connected to

the PC remote function on this camera

once again then you will lose your face

and eye detect autofocus and it will go

to a center based focus and in that same

vein when you use clear image zoom on

the old version you will once again lose

your eye and face detect autofocus and

it will go to a center based autofocus

and that is a big Advantage I think

because clear image Zoom is very useful

on the new camera you can keep your good

autofocus and then extend your lenses

you basically get more reach out of

every single lens that you are using

with almost no downside at all and the

Mark I has many other upgrades to the

original such as s cine tone it also has

the cine Vlog mode so you press one

button and it will make it look a little

more cinematic for your Vlogs switch it

to uh 4K 24 with the S CD tone and you

can have a bunch of other automatic

modes that you can slide around and

adjust these automatic modes with your

finger and you can get just better

footage coming straight out of the

camera you also have that great new

Focus breathing compensation which can

jive with compatible Sony lenses and you

have Focus mapping which I find very

useful when you are trying to obtain

critical Focus but that being said the

original zv E10 is still an excellent

camera and actually has some advantages

over the mark 2 version if you can

believe it well the first one you could

believe and that is the price this one

here is $6.98 when it's not on sale and

sometimes they put it on sale for 598 so

body alone 6.98 for the zve E10 original

and the new camera is coming in at

$998 and that is a big price jump I can

understand it with all of the ability

that the new camera has but you can

definitely get little douge for much

cheaper and as I have shown the image

quality can be absolutely Stellar

indistinguishable at times with this

camera and the new version and the

original zv E10 is probably a better

photo camera when you consider the fact

that this one has a mechanical shutter

they took out the mechanical shutter to

save costs on the zv E10 Mark I this one

can shoot 11 frames per second

mechanical shutter you can only do

electronic shutter with the Mark I which

is also at 11 frames per second so when

it comes to taking photos of things that

are moving fast a lot of times you will

get Curves in your lines like say a golf

club when it's being swung you may see a

big bend in it when you were shooting

shooting with electronic shutter or if

you're taking a photo outside of a

moving car and you see the signpost that

is curved that is the electronic shut

the rolling shutter is trying to read

from top to bottom so you get a curve

you are not going to have that with

mechanical shutter and worse than that I

find is banding so if you are in an

environment where you have different LED

lights flickering at different speeds

then sometimes you can see these

different Shadow lines going through

your photo and that is the landing and

you can eliminate that using mechanical

shutter so if you're trying to take

photos of let's say a wedding and

there's all these lights everywhere

different LEDs there is a variable

shutter and you can try to dial it in on

the zv E10 Mark II and that will help

but you'll have to actually find the

frequency that will get rid of those

lines now when you're shooting outside a

lot of times that won't be a problem but

definitely a mechanical shutter is much

preferred from photographers when it

comes to low light performance both

cameras are

pretty good in fact a lot of people will

prefer the zve E10 original because this

uses more aggressive noise reduction

from what I can tell whereas the a6700

fx30 and now zv1 Mark I it doesn't use

as much noise reduction so you are free

to reduce it yourself in post they give

you that but you'll get a less muddy

image because it's not using such

aggressive noise reduction but the zv

E10 is no slouch it's always been great

in low light the new camera will also

have a dual base ISO at least that's

what I found in my test if you're using

slog 3 and you switch over to 2500 you

will see that noise dropping right there

like the fx30 so that's another good

thing if you want to use S 3 number one

you can use 10 bit number two use that

next ISO of 2500 you can't do anything

like that on the zv E10 but just taking

it out using it in standard picture

profile walking around you are going to

see that this thing competes very

mightily with the new camera when it

comes to low light so I think for a lot

of people the extra cost will be worth

it when you consider all of the things

that you're getting with the Mark I the

10bit 422 the 4K 60 the better rolling

shutter the better stabilization you get

4k 30 USBC streaming it's just a better

screen touch fully touch functional it

is just an excellent camera but you do

have to pay substantially more than the

zve E10 original and as you can see in

this video you can still get excellent

image quality out of this guy and if

you're willing to use cataly browse when

you're doing handheld footage or use a

gimbal or maybe you're just using it as

a studio camera and then you want a

better photo camera with a mechanical

shutter the zv E10 is 698 and like I

said sometimes discounted

2598 so douge is the bargain of the

century here on the Sony lineup and they

are still selling this camera they know

how popular it is and it's a great entry

point for people into the Sony system so

they will continue selling their best

selling camera which makes a lot of

sense but they will add in the zv E10

Mark I for those people who want an

upgrade so tell me down below do you

think the extra cost is worth it of the

zve E10 Mark II or would you stick with

little douge right here and I wouldn't

blame you one bit he is a hell of a

camera and you are a hell of a person

for sitting around and watching me right

to the end I appreciate it with talk to

you again soon okay bye-bye