Bloomberg Markets 07/29/2024
Summary
TLDRこのビデオスクリプトでは、株式市場の動向とその背景に焦点を当てています。S&P 500やビッグテックの上昇、セミコンダクター業界の業績発表、そして政治と仮想通貨の関連性などが取り上げられています。特に、元大統領トランプの仮想通貨に関連した政策提言や、セクター内での企業の動向が注目されています。また、テクノロジー企業の業績予想や、株式市場における投資家の反応が分析されています。
Takeaways
- 📈 ストック市場は上升気味ですが、その勢いは少し弱まっています。
- 🏦 重要な中央銀行の決定と大きなテック企業の業績が週にわたって注目されます。
- 📊 S&P 500は約0.3%上昇し、ビッグテックは約0.7%上昇しています。
- 📊 フィラデルフィア半導体指数も約0.6%上昇しており、半導体企業の業績が出ています。
- 🚗 テスラ株価は、モーガンスタンレーが自動車部門でトップピックに選んだ影響で上昇しています。
- 🍔 マクドナルドの株価は、予想よりも小さめの売上減少を発表したため上昇しています。
- 🔑 暗号通貨関連企業の株価は、元大統領トランプの暗号通貨に関連した議論の影響で上昇しています。
- 🗣️ トランプ前大統領は、現在のSEC主席のギャリー・ゲンスラーを解任し、新しいFCC主席を任命すると述べています。
- 💡 トランプ前大統領は、アメリカが未来を築くべきでない未来を阻むべきだと主張しています。
- 💼 カーシェアーズのアメリカCEOは、アメリカに戦略的な暗号通貨 rezerve を持つべきだと述べています。
- 🌐 テクノロジー分野は、クラウドや人工知能インフラの拡大に伴い、興味深い時期を迎えています。
Q & A
現在の株式市場の動向はどのようになっていますか?
-株式市場は上昇トレンドにあるものの、その勢いは若干弱まっており、特にテクノロジー企業の収益が注目されています。
S&P 500の動向はどうですか?
-S&P 500は約0.3%上昇しており、テクノロジー企業の前倒しの上昇幅は約0.7%です。
セミコンダクター業界の動向はどのようなものですか?
-セミコンダクター業界は好調で、フィラデルフィアセミコンダクター指数は約0.6%上昇しています。
テスラの株価が上昇した理由は何ですか?
-モルガンスタンレーがテスラを自動車部門のトップピックに指定し、フォードを置き換えたことが理由です。
マクドナルドの株価が上昇した背景には何がありますか?
-マクドナルドは予想よりも少なく_sales_decline_を発表し、足取り数が減少し、価格が上昇したことが影響しています。
仮想通貨業界が選挙季にどのように影響を与えているかを教えてください。
-元大統領トランプは仮想通貨に関連した議題を強調し、選挙戦で有利な立場を築いています。一方、カマラ・ハリスも暗号コミュニティへの姿勢を緩和しています。
トランプ前大統領の大統領選挙での仮想通貨に関する見解はどのように変化しましたか?
-トランプ前大統領は第1任期中にビットコインを詐欺と呼んでいましたが、現在は仮想通貨に非常に友好的な姿勢をとっています。
セネタール・ルミスが提案したビットコインの戦略储备とは何ですか?
-彼女の法案では、アメリカ合衆国が5年間に100万ビットコインを保有し、20年間債務を減らすために使用することができると提案しています。
仮想通貨業界が政治的影響力を増している中、民主党はどのように対応していますか?
-民主党のいくつかの政治家は、仮想通貨業界に対抗するために、より友好的な政策を推進しています。
デジタル資産市場の動向について説明してください。
-デジタル資産市場は活発で、企業がビットコインを資産として保有し、取引に使用する傾向があります。
テクノロジー企業の収益発表の週間はどのように重要ですか?
-収益発表の週間は、特にテクノロジー企業にとって非常に重要で、市場の動向に大きな影響を与える可能性があります。
テクノロジー企業のcapex(資本支出)に関する投資家の期待は何ですか?
-投資家は成長を望み、テクノロジー企業が技術インフラに積極的に投資していることを歓迎しています。
インテルの業績予想についてどう思いますか?
-インテルは数年間かけてビジネスを積極的に投資し、企業向け市場にさらされている部分の軟化に伴い、需要の回復を期待しています。
セミコンダクター業界の動向はどのようになっていますか?
-セミコンダクター業界はサイクル的なものであり、企業が製品ロードマップを実行することで、この期間を乗り切ることができると期待されています。
政治的状況がセミコンダクター企業にどのような影響を与えるかを教えてください。
-政治的状況はセミコンダクター企業に影響を与えていますが、企業はイノベーションと投資を通じて、これらの状況に適応する必要があります。
Outlines
📈 株価上昇とテック企業の業績発表
Sonali Basakがホストを務めるBloomberg Marketsでは、株価上昇とテック企業の業績発表が焦点です。S&P 500は0.3%上昇し、テック企業はその2倍近い上昇幅を記録しています。フィラデルフィア半導体指数も好調で、その中でも一つのハイフライヤーが目立ちます。一方、Russell 2000はその勢いを失い、0.8%下落しています。Teslaの株価は、Morgan Stanleyが自動車部門でトップピックに選んだことを受け、上昇しています。McDonald'sの株価も、予想よりも小さめの売上減少を発表したことが影響しています。
🗣️ 仮想通貨と選挙戦の関連性
元大統領トランプは、ナッシュビルで開催されたビットコインカンファレンスでの講演で、現SEC主席のGary Genslerを解任し、新たなFCC主席を任命する意向を示しました。さらに、ビットコインや仮想通貨に関するアドバイザリーボードを設置し、アメリカを未来を阻害するのではなく、未来を築く国にすることを誓いました。トランプ前大統領は、仮想通貨に関連した議論を巡って、選挙戦で重要な役割を果たしていることが明らかになりました。一方、Kamala Harrisも仮想通貨業界との関係をリセットし、より友好的な姿勢を見せていると報道されています。
💡 仮想通貨保有の戦略的な意義
仮想通貨を戦略的に保有することの重要性が議論されています。Bitcoinは耐久性の高い資産として認識され、アメリカ合衆国が5年間で100万ビットコインを保有することを目指す法案が提案されています。これは、国家債務を削減するのに利用される可能性があります。しかし、立法府での仮想通貨に関する法案の進展は、選挙の結果に左右される可能性があり、現在の貧弱な動向から復帰するまで時間がかかる可能性があります。
🌐 デジタル資産の未来と企業の対応
デジタル資産の未来について、企業が積極的に対応している状況が説明されています。Marathon DigitalやCoinbaseなどの企業は、Bitcoinを保有し、それにのっとってビジネスを展開しています。これは、彼らがインターネットの通貨としてBitcoinを重視していることを示唆しています。企業は、Bitcoinを資産として保有することで、デジタルインフラの拡大に応えています。
🛠️ セミコンダクター産業の動向
セミコンダクター企業の業績とその将来性についての議論がされています。Intel、Qualcomm、Nvidiaなどの企業は、技術インフラを強化するために積極的に投資しています。しかし、株価の動向から見ると、市場はこれらの企業の将来に対する期待と懸念が混在しています。セミコンダクター企業は、製品ロードマップの実行と市場への価値提供に重点を置く必要があります。
🏢 企業買収と市場の反応
City Streetを率いる投資家グループが、51億ドルで不動産保険会社Star Groupを買収することが発表されています。これは今年の民間投資ファンド支援の保険業買収の2番目に大きな取引とされています。しかし、Starの株価はこのニュースを受け、4年以上で最大の落下を記録しています。
Mindmap
Keywords
💡S&P 500
💡Big Tech
💡Philadelphia Semiconductor Index
💡Tesla
💡Morgan Stanley
💡McDonald's
💡Cryptocurrency
💡SEC Chair Gary Gensler
💡NFT
💡Bitcoin
💡Cloud Computing
Highlights
股市涨势似乎正在减弱,但当天仍上涨。
本周将有重要的央行决策和大型科技公司的财报。
标普500指数上涨约0.3%,大型科技股在财报发布前上涨近0.7%。
费城半导体指数因半导体公司发布财报而上涨约0.6%。
罗素2000指数下跌约0.8%,市场轮动交易失去部分动力。
特斯拉股价上涨,摩根士丹利将其作为汽车行业的新首选。
麦当劳股价上涨,公司宣布的销售下降幅度小于分析师预期。
加密货币公司在当天表现不佳,尽管前总统特朗普在纳什维尔的比特币会议上宣布了亲加密货币议程。
特朗普在会议上对现任SEC主席加里·詹斯勒发表了强烈言论。
特朗普表示,他将任命一个新的FCC主席,支持美国建设未来而非阻碍未来。
特朗普计划立即任命一个比特币和加密货币总统咨询委员会。
加密货币在选举季节中的影响正在增加,特朗普和哈里斯都在调整他们的立场。
特朗普在第一任期内曾称比特币为骗局,但现在他的态度有所转变。
特朗普发行了自己的NFT,并从加密货币重量级人物那里获得了捐款。
参议员卢米斯提出了一项法案,建议美国建立一个比特币储备,以减少国家债务。
Coinshares的Steve McClurg认为,比特币应成为全球储备货币的一部分。
McClurg建议美国不仅购买被没收的比特币,还应购买更多比特币,并控制赤字和支出。
McClurg对中央银行数字货币持怀疑态度,更支持不受单一国家控制的货币。
Neuberger Berman的高级分析师Dan Flax对微软和亚马逊的财报持乐观态度。
Flax认为,尽管存在周期性逆风,但能够执行产品路线图的公司将变得更强大。
Flax指出,尽管地缘政治紧张,但创新和投资是公司应对挑战的关键。
Transcripts
Welcome to Bloomberg Markets I'm Sonali Basak.
The stock rally appears to be losing some of its steam, but still higher on
the day. We're looking at some key central bank
decisions across the week and big tech earnings floating through.
And before we get to that, let's take a check on the markets here.
And looking at the S&P 500 rising about 3/10 of 1% higher.
Big tech also on the rise before those earnings hit the tape, almost 7/10 of 1%
higher. Remember the Philadelphia Semiconductor
index also higher by about 6/10 of 1% on semiconductor out with earnings this
morning. A high flying in that index today
promising results there. And the Russell 2000, that rotation
trade losing some of its steam, 8/10 of 1% lower on the day.
Let's take a look here at some of the day movers on the equity side here.
We're looking at Tesla shares higher after Morgan Stanley named the company
as its new top pick within the auto sector, replacing Ford.
High profile analyst Adam Jonas maintains his overweight rating and
street high $310 target on Tesla. He writes that cost cuts and
restructuring have helped the company restrict downsides of its EV business.
Meanwhile, also taking a look at McDonald's shares rising.
This comes after the company announced a sales decline that was less dramatic
than what analysts had feared for. The sales drops comes amid a decrease in
foot traffic, which is partially due to the company's higher prices, as well as
customers. Increasingly tight budgets and shares in
crypto. And companies are running into a wall a
bit on the day they were rallying, remember, because the former President
Trump this weekend announced an expansion into a pro crypto agenda at a
major Bitcoin conference in Nashville. Speaking of that conference, Trump had
some strong words for current SEC Chair Gary Gensler.
On day one, I will fire Gary Gensler, who will appoint a new FCC chairman who
believes America should build the future, not block the future.
Upon taking office, I will immediately appoint a Bitcoin and crypto
Presidential Advisory Council. Let's discuss how crypto is playing into
this election season with Balance of Power co-host Kailey Leinz.
Because of course, as we saw former President Trump really campaigning a
little more there in Nashville. We also know from the Financial Times
and others that Kamala Harris is also starting to change her tone, apparently
to the crypto community as well, right? Yeah.
Generally, this really just underscores that being pro crypto might be something
that is attractive for both candidates in this presidential cycle.
Obviously, Donald Trump is trying to paint himself as the more crypto
friendly candidate with these ideas of not just firing Gary Gensler, but
creating a stockpile of Bitcoin and creating an advisory council.
And of course, to use his words, making the US the crypto capital of the planet
planet, which does represent a bit of an evolution for Donald Trump.
If you remember, during his first term in office, he suggested that Bitcoin was
a scam, that the value of these tokens were made out of thin air.
So this is definitely an about face. And in part you can attribute that to
say the fact that Donald Trump issued his own NFT is that he was selling.
We actually have a great look at that in our big tech story on the Bloomberg
terminal and online today. But in part, this is also because there
is a lot of money at stake here. We know that crypto packs like Fair
Shake have well over 00 million ready to deploy this cycle.
Donald Trump himself has already received donations from many crypto
heavyweights, including the Winklevoss twins and, of course, even a national.
This weekend he was charging over $800,000 a head to fundraise to take
part in his crypto roundtable. So part of this is about the money and
not just it being spent in his favor, but trying to make sure it's weaponized
against his opponent, Kamala Harris, too, of course, as you allude to
personally, has been there's been reporting that she is opening up more to
crypto, that she wants a so-called reset with the industry.
And I actually spoke with one of the more crypto friendly Democrats out
there, Congressman Wiley Nicole of North Carolina, about that last week.
He said he's been working behind the scenes to encourage her campaign to
adopt more friendly crypto policies. He talked about that reset on stage in
Nashville as well this weekend. And there's a number of other Democrats
who are pushing push pushing for the policy platform to be more crypto
friendly as they don't want to leave candidates vulnerable given the growing
influence this industry does seem to be having.
Just to go back to one final point here on this idea of a crypto reserve, a
strategic reserve of the United States here, it was only hinted at really in
broad strokes in that Trump speech, but also, again, brought up through Senator
Lummis introducing a bill. What would this look like?
Well, what Senator Lamar says is essentially that her bill would create a
stockpile, that the US would have to hold a Bitcoin, essentially saying it
would be a million Bitcoin over five years and that the government would have
to hold that for 20 years. And during those two decades it could be
used to reduce the national debt. She says that the goal here is to
recognize the fact that Bitcoin is a durable asset.
I would just notionally we have seen Senator Lummis, together with even
colleagues across the aisle, like I like Senator Kirsten Gillibrand putting
forward crypto legislation before. It hasn't always had success in the
Senate. And that's certainly going to be a key
here because, yes, Donald Trump or Kamala Harris, if they were president,
would have the power to make decisions over things like an FCC chair.
But actual legislating, divvying up, for example, the regulatory authority
between the SEC and the CFTC is going to have to be an act of Congress.
We have seen that moving forward in the House through the 21 bill and others.
And it is worth pointing out that Senator Debbie Stabenow of the AG
Committee has also been working on legislation that would give the CFTC
more power. She was actually supposed to push
forward that with that this week before the Senate leaves for the August recess,
but has now pulled it back. It does seem to be a bit of a stalemate,
which just supports the idea that especially considering the House is
already home until mid-September, that in the actual legislating when it comes
to crypto is going to have to wait until at least after the election balance of
power. Carlos Kailey Leinz, thank you so very
much for staying all over it. Now let's discuss this more with
Coinshares, U.S. head of digital asset Steve MCCLURG.
And I want to start with you on that point of a strategic reserve.
What would this really do and what does it mean for Bitcoin at the end of the
day? Can this be something that actually sees
the light of day in America? Yeah.
Look, I think it really we really should have a strategic reserve because
globally, many countries have several currencies that they hold in their
strategic reserve. Most of it is U.S.
dollars, but also currencies of other countries.
And Bitcoin has really emerged as a global currency for the Internet,
essentially. So it's a it's a currency without
borders. It's a digital currency.
And even though it's not the currency of one single country, I think it's very
important as you begin to remit payment all over the world using a common
currency that's not controlled by one country.
What finances such a reserve, though? I mean, Steve, if you think about the
current state of affairs in America, there's a lot of concern about the
deficit. Why would you then spend money on
Bitcoin? Well, it really has to do more with
inflation. So inflation has been very high for the
last five years in the United States. It's been high for decades, actually,
but the last five years, it's really crept up.
And one of the reasons why inflation is so high is because there's not any kind
of cap on the US dollar. We could just continue to print more and
more of it without any concern as to what's backing it up.
We broke the gold standard in the seventies and right now there really is
no standard. So there is the potential of inflation
running out of control. Well, here's another question.
Should that money being used for the reserve be really limited to the Bitcoin
that's been seized by the United States? Or should there be a bigger effort in
your mind? Yeah, I really do think that there
should be a program where you're buying not just not just Bitcoin, but also
continue to buy gold, continue to buy currencies of other countries.
But Bitcoin should be a big part of that.
So not only taking the seized bitcoin, which I believe the US government has
about 200,000 bitcoin at the moment, but also purchasing more.
But I think more importantly we do need to start paying down our deficit and
controlling spending before we can get to a strategic Bitcoin reserve.
We do really do have to address those two issues and those really should be
addressed in this current presidential campaign.
Let's take a look forward here as well, because there are aspects of the digital
asset landscape that were very much embraced by the former president during
his speech over the weekend. But there are certain aspects that had a
lot more criticism. For example, the idea of a central bank,
digital currency. This is a massive debate.
Where do you stand on it? Should there or should there not be one?
Yeah, I'm not actually a really big fan of a central digital currency for a
country. I am a bigger fan of currency that's not
controlled or inflated by any one country.
You know, other countries in the past, like, you know, the Weimar Republic or
Zimbabwe or Argentina have let inflation run out of control.
And not that the US is looks exactly like one of those countries, but we have
let inflation run out of control over the last five years and there needs to
be some kind of some kind of cap, whether it's a backing or whether it's
just a use of a neutral currency like Bitcoin.
So moving forward here, you saw, for example, the marathon digital
announcement about buying new Bitcoin. How do you think companies are going to
react to what we saw over the weekend, even if it takes a long time for the
United States to shift its strategy around Bitcoin, you're seeing companies
move ahead. Do you think they're jumping the gun?
No, I don't think they're jumping the gun at all.
We actually predicted about three years ago that several companies would begin
to hold Bitcoin on their balance sheet and actually launched an ETF with that
theme. Very shortly afterwards, we saw Tesla,
we saw MicroStrategy and some other companies begin to hold that.
The the value of holding Bitcoin on a company's balance sheet really is if
you're if you're a global company dealing in tech, it makes a lot of sense
because it is the currency of the Internet, so to speak.
But certain companies like Marathon or Coinbase or some other companies that
either have transactions or holdings in Bitcoin, it makes a lot of sense for
them to actually hold a piece of that on their balance sheet as an attestation to
that currency. And it just makes it makes sense even
from a from a practical standpoint that sometimes they do need to access that
Bitcoin on the balance sheet. So I don't think they're jumping the gun
at all. But but what I do think will happen is
that you'll start seeing other auto companies outside of Tesla begin to hold
Bitcoin and accept Bitcoin for their cars and other large purchases.
Steve, we have to leave it there. That is coinshares U.S.
head of digital assets, Steve mcclurg. Of course, on the heels of a very long
awaited speech by former president trump down in nashville over the weekend.
Now coming up, it's the biggest week of the year for earnings with 27 trillion
worth of companies reporting worldwide. We're going to talk about what to expect
next. This is Bloomberg
and.
Time now for the stock of the hour. We're watching for of the Madness of the
Magnificent Seven reporting earnings this week.
The company's worth some 0 trillion are under pressure as the market breadth
broadens out from the world's largest tech companies.
We're going to discuss this now with Dan Flax, Neuberger Berman, senior analyst.
And you think about just how much money these magnificent seven names have
brought in in the last couple of years, where the valuations stand today and how
sensitive they are to earnings expectations.
You saw how Alphabet reacted just last week.
How do you feel about where we stand right now and what has the most
potential for upside? I think we're in a very interesting
period in the technology space. You're seeing continued buildout of the
cloud and the artificial intelligence infrastructure as we look ahead to
earnings this week. I'm excited about what I think we'll see
out of Microsoft. I think their earnings will be healthy
and Amazon as well. I think the Amazon Web services cloud
business, you'll see good growth. And that coupled with what we saw last
week from from Google Cloud, demonstrates that really this this
buildout of the digital infrastructure remains healthy.
We'll, of course, get an update from Mehta on digital advertising, which I
think remains healthy as we saw from Google search business last week.
So a lot to look for. But I think the longer term trends
around cloud and mobile remain intact and healthy.
How do you think investors are recalibrating expectations around CapEx
spending here? You think about what it costs to make
that transition when it comes to AI and how much patience investors have to see
that money create a return quickly. Do you think investors are becoming less
patient? I think investors want to see growth.
And so if we look at Google last week, they've indicated and they are spending
aggressively on their technical infrastructure, I think that's the right
strategy for them as well as Microsoft, Amazon as well.
Given that their cloud businesses, in the case of Amazon, it's over 00
billion of revenue. And so they need to invest and where
there is excess capacity. Google, for example, they're investing
in their search business clearly cloud. They have other revenue drivers.
Amazon has the same as does Microsoft to absorb it.
Some of what we'll see, though, is the investor community wants to see the new
revenue streams. You're seeing early signs of that, but
that is going to take time. So the key is to invest on one hand and
to play offense and of course, navigate the near-term cyclical headwinds, be be
thoughtful on costs. But but ultimately with an eye towards
driving growth over the next 12 to 18 months.
Curious about what you think about other parts of the capital stack here or the
technology stack rather, because we also have Intel reporting this week.
What are your expectations from them given how much we've seen the stock fall
off this year already? Intel under Pat Gelsinger is undergoing
a multi-year transition as they invest aggressively in the business, which is,
I think, the right strategy. Parts of their business, which are
exposed to the enterprise, for example, have seen some softness along with other
companies exposed to the enterprise. But as you as you see progress on
inventories, ultimately you should see better demand in PCs, perhaps help by
air over the next several months that can help others.
Intel and others excuse me, like like Advanced Micro Devices as well.
And so the semiconductor companies, Qualcomm is another one, will see their
results midweek. They're a leader in Mobile.
The businesses are cyclical. But but those companies and I mentioned
Qualcomm, which has a significant opportunity in the edge or the mobile
infrastructure. Think about factories, farms.
Think about all the devices and of course, the Android smartphones where
they have a role to play. So I expect cyclical headwinds to remain
a focus. But the companies that can execute on
their product roadmaps, I think will emerge stronger from this period.
How do you play the chips in semiconductor industry at this point in
time? You've just seen a major run up in
valuations. You think about the Nvidia boom that
you've seen Nvidia up still 130% this year and you see part of that broadening
that market broadening story not really just mean big tech, too small cap,
right? You see it mean people trying to find
new ways into the AI story. How do you get into that narrative?
We look at it from a variety of perspectives.
You mentioned in video, we continue to like that name.
And it's not just the chips, it's really the the software, the millions of
developers on their platform and a vibrant ecosystem as well as, of course,
continued execution on their roadmap. But but a lot of companies we talked
about the cloud companies, they're big customers of NVIDIA, but they're
continuing to to innovate and invest in their own chip roadmaps as well.
We like companies, for example, ASML, that that make the the systems
lithography in this case that are really foundational to developing the newest
and next generation of chips. And so we look at it from an equipment
standpoint. We look at it from an R&D and a design
standpoint. And then also we look at companies we
talk to again about the cloud companies that can actually harness this and drive
incremental revenue streams over the next 1 to 2 years.
And we think the incremental revenue streams and the opportunities in the
second half of the decade will be significant as we look out.
You know, you look at the geopolitical rhetoric here as well as the tone you're
getting, not just from the Republican side of the presidential elections here,
President, former President Trump really coming out with the tough on China,
tough tariff policy being proposed, but also the Biden administration equally
coming out with tough policies around China.
What does this mean for any U.S. investor invested in the semiconductor
and chips industry? I think if I if I reflect on the last
two administrations, both have been aggressive in terms of our the US policy
towards China, I would expect that to continue for the foreseeable future for
the companies themselves. They really need to to innovate, invest
aggressively, manage costs as well, and deliver value to their customers.
And so it will matter most, in my view, their innovation, because you'll have
different individuals, I suspect, to occupy the White House over the next 5
to 10 years. And of course, globally you have a
variety of different administrations in Europe.
Clearly, China remains very important. And so I expect this continued
bifurcation of the supply chains. But the companies, particularly the
global ones, have to be able to navigate it.
They have to be able to innovate, and they're going to have to respond when
when when things come up. But if they can't innovate, then and
they can't grow, no matter who is in the White House, that'll be that'll be a
difficult for them. For those who can grow, I think they'll
be able to flourish even in what remains a very difficult geopolitical
environment. Dan, thank you for joining us today.
The start of a very, very, very busy week for tech investors.
That is Dan Flax, senior analyst at Neuberger Berman.
Now, coming up, we're watching shares of NCR group and what's said to be the
second largest private equity backed insurance deal of the year.
We're going to have details on that next.
This is Bloomberg.
An investor group led by City Street is agreeing to buy property insurer and
star group for $5.1 billion, and it's said to be the second largest private
equity backed insurance deal of the year.
And Star shares, though, are lower on the news and are on pace for their
biggest drop in more than four years. Joining us now for more on this is
Matthew Banks, Bloomberg News, M&A reporter.
And, you know, you look at what's going on here, Stephen MANOUKIAN Liberty's
strategic capital is part of this group. This does not look like a man that is
about to rejoin a potential Trump administration in the future.
I couldn't agree more. He's definitely staying busy.
So he did the New York community deal earlier in the year.
He's been sniffing around. Tick tock.
He's taking advantage of his connections and finding ways to put money to work.
So what is this group that has come together here?
You have six straight Stevenage and J.C. Flowers, but you have a stock that is
dropping on the deal, a 35 day go shop provision.
What are the uncertainties around? So first of all, they're paying $338 per
share in cash, which is about two or 3% less than where the stock was trading on
Friday. So it's something of a takeover.
I mean, to take under. So I think investors are responding to
that. Why are they taking 100?
Yeah. Now.
Why are they doing that? If you look at the press release,
there's a little bit of a hint there where the CEO says this provides a
liquidity event for our all of our shareholders.
And if you look at the stockholders standpoint, owns a big slug of it still.
You've got cppib. I think Stony Point has some
representation there. So it looks like it's an opportunity for
the private equity firms that control a big slug of the company to get out.
And Stony Point as it goes is staying in there going to provide some financing as
well. It's a strange one where it's like an
exit of an asset as well as a takeover at the same time.
That's exactly right. And Flowers knows this company.
He was invested in this company years ago.
So it looks like some really smart financier types see something that the
rest of us don't see? They're taking it under for a nice price
and they're going to do something different with it in the private
markets. Absolutely.
It's super interesting deal here with the flowers, Of course, they're like old
school. That's right.
That we're looking at here. Bloomberg's Matthew months, we thank you
so much for your time. Before we let you go here, also taking a
check on the markets because, of course, we are also on an up day here and a
merger Monday, as we've been talking about as well.
And a day before earnings season here, the calm before the storm.
We're looking at the S&P 500 higher by about one half of 1%.
And the big tech names playing even higher than that.
We're looking at the rest of the markets here pretty much unchanged.
We are looking at the Russell 2000. Not much movement there, but on the
lower side. So the rotation change hitting a wall.
I'm Sonali Basak that does it from Bloomberg Markets and this is Bloomberg
and.
Browse More Related Video
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)