Is a two-state solution for Israel and Palestine possible? | Start Here

Summary

The video script explores the concept of the two-state solution as a means to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It delves into the history of the region, the complex dynamics of land division, and the political and social challenges that have made this solution elusive. The script highlights the historical context, the role of international and local actors, and the impact of ongoing violence. It also examines the criticisms of the two-state solution and presents alternative viewpoints, including the one-state solution, emphasizing the importance of addressing the underlying issues of rights and governance.

Takeaways

• 🌍 The two-state solution, envisioning Israel and a new state of Palestine coexisting peacefully, is widely considered the most viable resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict but remains elusive due to historical, political, and territorial complexities.
• 🗺️ The land in question is marked by complex territorial divisions, including Israeli military occupations, Palestinian territories separated by Israeli settlements, and ongoing disputes over borders and control.
• 📜 The two-state solution concept has been around for decades, but some critics view it as an avoidance strategy that allows politicians to avoid addressing the core issues, such as individual rights and historical grievances.
• 🕌 Historical context is crucial: the region has been controlled by various empires and has a diverse population, with tensions rising during the British mandate due to growing Jewish immigration and Zionism.
• ⚔️ The conflict escalated after the creation of the state of Israel in 1948 and subsequent wars, leading to a complicated history of displacement, military occupation, and territorial disputes.
• 🤝 The Oslo Accords in the 1990s were a significant step toward peace, with Israel and Palestinians recognizing each other and outlining a framework for potential statehood, but they left many permanent status issues unresolved.
• 🚧 Key obstacles to peace include the ongoing expansion of Israeli settlements, political shifts in Israel towards more hardline positions, and divisions within Palestinian leadership.
• 🇺🇸 The United States has played a major role as a mediator but faces criticism for its strong alliance with Israel, which some argue limits its ability to pressure Israel for concessions.
• 💔 The peace process has been stalled for years, with recent conflicts like the 2023 Gaza war further complicating prospects for negotiation and leading to renewed calls for a two-state solution from international leaders.
• 🏴‍☠️ While the two-state solution remains the stated goal of some Palestinian groups, internal divisions and the rise of Hamas complicate representation, and there's debate about whether this solution is still viable given current realities.

Q & A

What is the two-state solution?

The two-state solution is a proposed framework for resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict by establishing two sovereign states: Israel and Palestine, living side by side in peace and security.

Why has the two-state solution been difficult to achieve?

The two-state solution has been difficult to achieve due to complex issues such as borders, the status of Jerusalem, the right of return for Palestinian refugees, Israeli settlements in the West Bank, and mutual distrust between the parties involved.

What historical events led to the current Israeli-Palestinian conflict?

The conflict has roots in historical events such as the British mandate in Palestine, the Balfour Declaration, the partition plans proposed by the British and the UN, the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, and subsequent wars and uprisings, including the Six-Day War in 1967 and the Intifadas.

What was the Oslo Accords?

The Oslo Accords were a series of agreements between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) in the 1990s, aimed at achieving a peace process and establishing a framework for Palestinian self-governance in parts of the West Bank and Gaza.

What are the main challenges to implementing a two-state solution today?

Challenges include the continued expansion of Israeli settlements, political divisions among Palestinians, shifts to the right in Israeli politics, lack of trust and credibility in leadership on both sides, and insufficient international mediation and support.

What role has the United States played in the Israeli-Palestinian peace process?

The United States has been a key mediator in the peace process, supporting Israel diplomatically and militarily, while also advocating for a two-state solution. However, it has faced criticism for not exerting enough pressure on Israel to halt settlement expansion and make necessary concessions.

What are the positions of different Palestinian factions on the two-state solution?

The PLO officially supports a two-state solution, while Hamas's position is less clear, with a 2017 document indicating acceptance of a Palestinian state along the 1967 borders but without explicit recognition of Israel.

Why is the issue of Israeli settlements a major obstacle to peace?

Israeli settlements are considered illegal under international law and their expansion in the West Bank complicates the creation of a contiguous Palestinian state, leading to further tensions and distrust between Israelis and Palestinians.

What impact did the 1948 Arab-Israeli War have on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict?

The 1948 war, following Israel's declaration of independence, led to the displacement of over 700,000 Palestinians, the establishment of Israel, and the loss of Palestinian land, creating long-lasting refugee issues and territorial disputes.

How has the Israeli-Palestinian conflict evolved since the Oslo Accords?

Since the Oslo Accords, the conflict has seen failed peace talks, continued violence, Israeli settlement growth, Palestinian political fragmentation, and shifting political dynamics, making a two-state solution increasingly elusive.

Outlines

00:00

🟦 The Elusive Two-State Solution

The two-state solution, envisioning Israel and a new state of Palestine coexisting peacefully, has long been proposed as a resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Despite being widely discussed, its implementation remains distant. The complexity of the issue includes historical claims, land division, and political maneuvers, with criticisms that the concept serves as a way for politicians to avoid responsibility.

05:01

🟩 Historical Context and the Birth of Israel

The idea of partitioning Palestine dates back to the early 20th century, influenced by British control and Zionist movements. Tensions between Jewish and Arab populations escalated, leading to the UN partition plan in 1947, which proposed separate Jewish and Arab states. The plan was accepted by Jewish leaders but rejected by Arab leaders, resulting in the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, which established Israel and displaced many Palestinians.

10:03

🟨 Oslo Accords and the Peace Process

The Oslo Accords, initiated in the 1990s, were a landmark in the peace process, establishing the Palestinian Authority and outlining a path towards a two-state solution. However, the agreements faced opposition from both Israelis and Palestinians, with criticisms of the accords' vague promises and the continuation of Israeli settlements in the West Bank. The peace process faced numerous challenges, including the assassination of Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin.

15:03

🟧 Challenges to the Two-State Solution

Despite international efforts, the peace process has struggled. Factors include Israeli settlement expansion, shifts in Israeli and Palestinian leadership, and internal divisions among Palestinians. The Oslo Accords did not address key issues like the status of Jerusalem and the right of return for Palestinian refugees, further complicating negotiations.

20:04

🟥 Current Perspectives and Alternatives

Recent years have seen dwindling support for the two-state solution, with some suggesting a one-state solution as a more realistic approach. The Israeli government has largely rejected the two-state model, and the Palestinian leadership is divided and weakened. Amid ongoing violence, some argue for focusing on ending discrimination and ensuring equal rights rather than pursuing separate states.

Keywords

💡Two-State Solution

The two-state solution refers to the proposal of creating two sovereign states, Israel and Palestine, to coexist peacefully. The idea is to establish a Palestinian state alongside Israel to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It is considered the only viable solution by many international leaders, though it remains elusive due to ongoing tensions and disagreements over land division and governance.

💡Gaza Strip

The Gaza Strip is a small Palestinian territory along the Mediterranean coast, bordered by Israel and Egypt. It has been under Israeli military occupation and blockade, leading to significant humanitarian issues. The recent war in Gaza has brought the region back into the headlines, highlighting the destruction and the ongoing conflict between Hamas and Israel.

💡West Bank

The West Bank is a landlocked Palestinian territory bordered by Israel and Jordan. It is characterized by a patchwork of Palestinian land interspersed with Israeli settlements, which are deemed illegal under international law. The settlements complicate the peace process and the establishment of a contiguous Palestinian state.

💡Israeli Settlements

Israeli settlements refer to communities established by Israel in territories occupied during the 1967 Six-Day War, including the West Bank and East Jerusalem. These settlements are considered illegal under international law and are a major obstacle to the two-state solution, as they expand Israeli control over land designated for a future Palestinian state.

💡Palestinian Refugees

Palestinian refugees are individuals who were displaced from their homes during the 1948 Arab-Israeli War and their descendants. The right of return for these refugees is a contentious issue in the peace process, with Palestinians demanding their return to their original homes and Israel opposing this due to demographic concerns.

💡Oslo Accords

The Oslo Accords are a series of agreements between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) aimed at achieving a peace treaty based on United Nations Security Council Resolutions 242 and 338 and at fulfilling the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination. Signed in the 1990s, these accords established the Palestinian Authority and outlined a framework for further negotiations, though many issues remain unresolved.

💡PLO (Palestine Liberation Organization)

The PLO is an organization established in 1964 to create an independent State of Palestine. It represents Palestinians in diplomatic efforts and was a party to the Oslo Accords. The PLO officially recognized Israel in 1988, which marked a significant step towards the peace process, although its power has diminished in recent years.

💡Hamas

Hamas is a Palestinian Islamic political and militant organization that controls the Gaza Strip. Classified as a terrorist organization by several countries, including the United States and the European Union, Hamas opposes the existence of Israel and has been involved in various conflicts with Israeli forces. Its stance complicates the peace process and the implementation of a two-state solution.

💡1967 Six-Day War

The 1967 Six-Day War was a conflict between Israel and neighboring Arab countries, including Egypt, Jordan, and Syria. Israel's victory resulted in the capture of the Gaza Strip, the West Bank, East Jerusalem, the Sinai Peninsula, and the Golan Heights. This war significantly altered the political landscape of the region and is central to the ongoing territorial disputes.

💡Right of Return

The right of return refers to the principle that Palestinian refugees and their descendants should be allowed to return to their homes in what is now Israel. This issue is a major sticking point in the Israeli-Palestinian peace process, with Palestinians demanding this right and Israel opposing it due to concerns over the demographic impact on the Jewish state.

Highlights

The two-state solution is seen as the only real solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, aiming for two states living side by side in peace and security.

The idea of a two-state solution has been around for decades but remains elusive, with ongoing conflicts complicating its realization.

The Palestinian territories, Gaza and the West Bank, are under Israeli military occupation, making the path to a Palestinian state complicated.

Israeli settlements, considered illegal under international law, have expanded, making the division of land and creation of a Palestinian state more difficult.

The history of the region includes control by various ancient kingdoms and empires, with modern conflicts rooted in these historical claims.

The British Mandate of Palestine and the Balfour Declaration promised a Jewish homeland, leading to increased Jewish immigration and subsequent tension with the Arab population.

In 1947, the UN proposed a partition plan for separate Jewish and Arab states, but Arab leaders rejected it as unfair.

The 1948 Arab-Israeli War resulted in Israel declaring itself a state, leading to significant Palestinian displacement and the establishment of current borders.

The 1967 Six-Day War resulted in Israel's control over the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and Gaza, intensifying the conflict.

The Oslo Accords in the 1990s marked the beginning of the peace process, with mutual recognition and a plan for gradual Israeli withdrawal and increased Palestinian autonomy.

Despite initial optimism, the Oslo Accords faced opposition from both sides and failed to resolve key issues, such as the status of Jerusalem and the right of return for Palestinian refugees.

Israeli settlement expansion continued during the peace process, undermining trust and complicating the creation of a Palestinian state.

Political shifts in Israel have moved towards the right, with fewer politicians supporting the two-state solution and some advocating for full annexation of Palestinian territories.

Palestinian leadership is divided between the PLO and Hamas, complicating negotiations and representation.

Recent conflicts, including the 2023 war in Gaza, have renewed discussions on the two-state solution but have also highlighted the significant obstacles and skepticism surrounding its feasibility.

Transcripts

let's talk about the two-state solution

Israel living alongside the new state of

Palestine it's long been seen as the

answer but remains

elusive with the war in Gaza it's back

in the headlines the only real solution

is a two-state solution over time a

lasting end to the Israeli Palestinian

conflict can only comes through a

two-state solution a future in which two

states live side by side in peace and

security so what do people actually mean

when they talk about a two-state

solution how long has the idea been

around and why do some people think that

it's become more of an avoidance

strategy that lets politicians off the

hook they use this as a tool to absolve

themselves of responsibility it's a form

of

escapism

the two-state solution is all about

deciding how this land is divided who

lives there and who controls it now you

might think it's about getting Israelis

and Palestinians to agree on a simple

split but there's nothing simple about

it just look at the map for a start this

is Israel and then you have the

Palestinian territories which are under

Israeli military occupation and cut off

from each other gaza's here Israel's war

has left the strip in Ruins and the West

Bank is more like a patchwork of

Palestinian land because of all the

settlements Israel has built over the

years these are illegal under

international law there are now 700,000

Israeli settlers living on Palestinian

land and it makes the path to a

Palestinian State much more complicated

if this was meant to be a question of

two states and if it was question of

drawing a border believe me a border

would have been drawn a long time ago

the problem is is that this has never

been about a line it's about the rights

of individuals it's about history the

region of Palestine has been fought over

for thousands of years and controlled by

different ancient kingdoms and empires

in more modern times it was part of the

Ottoman Empire but the British took

control there during the first world war

and it later became known as British

mandate Palestine the population was 78%

Muslim 11% Jewish and 10% Christian

according to a census in

1922 now even before they took control

the British supported the idea of

establishing a Jewish homeland in

Palestine it was stated in a letter

known as the Balor declaration and the

Jews were promised a national home in

Palestine that was the aim of a movement

called Zionism it encouraged Jews to

move to British mandate Palestine and in

the 1920s and 30s more and more did many

were fleeing persecution in Europe but

the growing Jewish population led to

tension with the local Arab population

the Palestinians Jewish and Arab armed

groups cropped up and there was

violence in response a British

commission suggested partitioning the

land but there was no support for the

idea the scheme to divide the country

between Arabs and Jews has pleased

nobody in Palestine an agitation has

fended discontent to the point of

terrorism in the 1940s the question of

what should happen in Palestine grew

more urgent so did pressure to establish

a Jewish homeland especially after World

War II and the

Holocaust in 194 7 the British asked the

United Nations to make recommendations

on the future government of

Palestine and this is what they came up

with another partition plan which

allocated 56% of the land to a Jewish

State and left 43% for an Arab State the

remaining land including Jerusalem with

all of its holy sites would be under

International control the UN General

Assembly voted to adopt the plan Jewish

leaders accepted it but Arab leaders

rejected it they saw it as deeply unfair

especially because the Arab population

was the

majority the following year Israel went

ahead and declared itself a state and

five Arab Nations went to war with

Israel Israel calls it their war of

independence Palestinians call it the

neba which means catastrophe because in

that fighting more than 700,000

Palestinians fled or were forced from

their homes many ended up in Jordan

Lebanon and Syria by the way that's

important to know about because when

people talk about a few future

Palestinian State one of the big

questions is whether all those

Palestinians and their descendants will

get to go back What's called the right

of

return now after the 1948 War Israel

ended up with 78% of the land so more

than the UN partition plan that left 22%

for Palestinians to live in split

between the West Bank and East Jerusalem

which Jordan controlled and Gaza which

Egypt controlled those borders became

known as the Green line they're still

the internationally recognized borders

of Israel and it's more or less the

division that many people have in mind

when talking about a two-state solution

but then in 1967 there was another War

Israel pushed out Jordan and Egypt

seized control of the West Bank East

Jerusalem and Gaza and imposed a

military occupation many many many

countries then started to put pressure

on Palestinians to say You must

recognize Israel's existence you have to

recognize that Israel took over 78% of

your historic Homeland and instead let's

try to get back that remaining 22% in

the Palestinian side the idea of

territorial partition was very very

difficult uh but by the 1970s there are

some who were pushing saying you know

look we're never going to get all of

historic Palestine we can build a state

on a portion of liberated Palestine and

in 1988 there was an official shift by

that point the pl o the Palestinian

Liberation Organization had become the

main group representing Palestinians and

their cause its chairman yaser arat

declared the independence of

[Music]

[Applause]

Palestine and although the Declaration

was mostly symbolic it was important

because Arafat also made it clear that

he accepted the principle of partition

and the existence of Israel that helped

pave the way for the Oslo Accords a pair

of agreements which are seen as the

beginning of the peace process it

started out with secret talks in

Norway's capital that's where the name

comes from and it led to this

moment the Israeli and Palestinian

leaders shaking hands on the White House

lawn after Decades of fighting they

declared their commitment to Peaceful

coexistence so what were the details of

Oslo well in The First Agreement 1993

the two sides formally recognized each

other which was a big deal they set out

a timetable for Israel to start

withdrawing from parts of the occupied

territories and for Palestinians to get

more autonomy that led to the creation

of the Palestinian Authority or PA

although its power was and still is

limited it's more like a local Council

than a government and the PA only

operates in parts of the Palestinian

territories because in the second dolo

agreement the West Bank was carved up

into three administrative areas what the

peace process was all about was not

about Israel accepting the 78% and

letting Palestinians live freely in the

remaining

22% instead what it was about was Israel

takes the 78% puts it in its pocket and

then negotiates over the remaining 22%

now the Alo Accords were interim

Arrangements they were only supposed to

last 5 years and in that time the two

sides Were Meant to to negotiate the

really tough stuff what are called the

permanent status issues so things like

how to share Jerusalem the city has huge

religious importance for both sides and

they both see it as their Capital the

issue of Palestinian refugees and

whether they get the right of return we

mentioned earlier what to do about all

the Israeli settlements security

arrangements and where you draw those

final borders so Oslo looked like it was

heading in the direction of a two-state

solution but it wasn't actually out the

Osa Accords are sometimes remembered as

having um sort of promised a two-state

solution that is absolutely and

completely false it's very very work

carefully drafted in order to avoid

mentioning anything about Palestinian

State still the two sides were talking

to each other there was a lot of

diplomacy going on and many people felt

optimistic about it there were a lot of

Peace conferences on all kind of levels

Grassroots politicians journalists

artists there was a hope in the air but

there was opposition to the peace

process too on both

sides in Israel there were big protests

against Oslo close to half of the

society that said we're not on board

with this process talking to terrorists

this is going to uh mean Israeli

withdrawal from territory that is an

essential part of the land of Israel in

1995 a Jewish nationalist who rejected

the peace process assassinated prime

minister Yak rabim so very early on one

of the main architects of the oso

Accords was

[Music]

gone there was also opposition on the

Palestinian side for lots of reasons

there are many Palestinians ill and they

were also in the late

90s who didn't agree with the p of

Arafat namely that the Palestinian

should recognize the state of Israel

there are many Palestinians who believe

that all Palestine belongs to the

Palestinian People Israel took it from

them in 48 and they feel that there's no

room for

compromise that was the position of some

armed groups like Hamas and Palestinian

Islamic Jihad who carried out attacks on

Israel there were also Palestinians who

opposed Oslo because of their

frustration about how little it was

delivering Israel never fully withdrew

from the territory it promised and it

kept building settlements we'll come

back to that in a minute at least part

of the Palestinians feel that they are

cheated that this was a c for Effective

Israeli annexation just a complete

disillusionment with diplomacy a

complete disillusionment with

negotiations with the with with the Oslo

process and and and so on by the end of

the 9s oslo's 5-year time frame was up

and the peace process was basically on

life support there was a push to save it

at Camp David the US president country

Retreat how is it going Mr President how

long is it going to take Mr

President we pledged to each other we

would answer no questions and offer no

comments but the summit ended without an

agreement and if anything there was more

distrust as both sides blamed each other

for the

failure soon after that frustration and

anger boiled over the trigger was this

visit by a senior Israeli politician to

the alaxa Moss compound in East

Jerusalem a super inflammatory move

check out our episode on aloa if you

want to understand why there were riots

and it led to an uprising known as the

second

inata Palestinians staged huge protests

some carried out attacks on Israel and

Israel used heavy military force against

Palestinians it was more than 4 years of

intense conflict and all the peace

efforts just were burning in the fire of

the intifa but they weren't complet

completely extinguished there were many

more attempts over the years to get the

peace process back on track and the

two-state solution became the stated

goal of all that diplomacy they begin to

say maybe one of the problems with Oslo

is it didn't spell out any end so let's

spell something out let's give something

to the

Palestinians um and this is when you

begin to have open declarations from the

United States that there should be an

entity called Palestine at the end but

while the International Community seemed

to be doubling down on the two-state

idea there were other developments

pulling momentum in the opposite

direction let's run through three major

ones starting with settlements which

Israel kept on expanding even during the

height of the peace process it was as

though the Oslo agreements gave Israel

the green light to build and expand

settlements with the thinking being and

they used to say this we have to take

every Hilltop and then we can negotiate

down and and that's why between the

years of 1993 to the year 2000 that's

why we saw virtually a doubling in the

number of settlers from 200,000 to

almost

400,000 once you are not ready to freeze

the

settlements you give the message that

you don't agree to a Palestinian State

cuz if you have an intention to continue

to build on Palestinian ground so for

sure you have no intention to evacuate

it then there's the way that Politics on

both sides have developed since the

early 2000s on the Israeli side there's

been a strong shift to the right and

fewer politicians who back the two-state

idea an ultra nationalist ideology that

was once thought of as Extreme has now

become part of the

mainstream settlers who openly call for

the full annexation of all Palestinian

territory are government ministers

and in his speech at the UN prime

minister Benjamin Netanyahu held up a

map of Israel that covered the whole

land on the Palestinian side the

challenge is more about who actually

speaks for the Palestinian people

because it's not that clear you've got

the PLO which still represents

Palestinians internationally Arafat was

the chairman but he died in a suspected

poisoning in 2004 and was replaced by

Mahmud abas Abbas is also the president

of the PA but the PA doesn't operate in

Gaza anymore because after elections in

2006 Hamas ended up in control there so

Palestinian leadership is already split

and then there are bigger questions

around legitimacy there haven't been

elections since that vote in 2006 these

days abas is pretty unpopular he's seen

as old and out of touch and the PA is

accused of being corrupt and working too

closely with israelian authority not

only does not have any um uh credibility

and doesn't no longer has any capacity

it's virtually disintegrating in the

West Bank on the other hand polls show

that Hamas and its leader isma Han are

more popular than Mahmud Abbas but

several countries classify Hamas as a

terrorist organization and refuse to

recognize it as a representative of

Palestinians so where has all of this

left the peace process well dead

basically the last time there were

direct negotiations about a two-state

solution was in 2014 during the Obama

Administration so a decade ago you need

uh credible leaders in Israel and

Palestine which we we don't have you

need serious mediation from outside

which we don't have and you need a

mobilized uh Regional and Global public

opinion to support the two negotiating

parties but it's nowhere on the horizon

right now this is where the US also

comes in for a lot of criticism because

while it's always had an important role

as a mediator the US is also Israel's

biggest Ally and

protector Americans

have such a leverage over Israel who

Israel is politically economically

diplomatically internationally and

obviously H militarily totally dependent

on the United States they never really

took measures to push Israel they just

you know condemned Israel

with talking you don't get

anything and then there's everything

that's happened since October 7th

2023 around 1,00 people were killed in

hamas's attacks on Israel that's

according to the Israeli

authorities in response Israel vowed to

wipe out Hamas its war on Gaza has

killed more than 31,000 Palestinians

most of them women and

children the un's highest court said

there is a plausible risk of

[Music]

genocide and against that horrifying

backdrop Talk of the two-state solution

is back it's once again being presented

as the only option for lasting Peace by

a range of world leaders and

organizations the United States

continues to believe that the best

viable path indeed the only path is

through a two-state

solution

what's the Palestinian position well the

two-state solution Remains the stated

goal of the PLO hamas's position is less

clear in 2017 they published a document

that did accept the formation of a

Palestinian State along the 1967 borders

some took it to mean that Hamas was open

to diplomacy but Hamas is never

explicitly recognized Israel and it

maintains its right to use violence

against the occupation as for Israel's

current position well officials from the

Prime Minister down have repeatedly

rejected the idea of a two-state

solution is there still a chance for a

two-state solution I think it's about

time for the world to realize the oso

Paradigm failed on the 7th of October

and we need to build a new one and in

order to build a new one do that new one

include the Palestinians living in a

state of their own is that what it

includes biggest question is what type

of Palestinians are in the other side

this what Israel realized o the answer

is absolutely no it's not that the

two-state solution is absolutely utterly

forever impossible it's just politically

very very unlikely and would require

such a coincidence of interests and

political determination that his

likelihood is extremely slim so there's

a lot of skepticism plus there's an

accusation that all the talk of a

two-state solution is actually part of

the problem those words have become the

Fig Leaf it's become a way of plating

Palestinians very very convenient to

believe that there is a

solution somewhere on the on the shelf

and one day we will take it and use it

but it's not there anymore some people

argue that there needs to be a more

drastic change in mindset to one that's

more realistic about the current

situation where you've got one state the

state of Israel that has almost total

control over Palestinian life and

enforces a system of discrimination that

human rights groups describe as

apartheid the argument goes why not

focus on fixing that with a one-state

solution so rather than dividing the

land you focus on how to govern it and

ensure everyone's rights are protected

regardless of their religion or

ethnicity we have a one state we don't

have to create it we have to create a

new regime only to turn it from an

aparte system to a to a democracy I

don't want to oversimplify it it's right

now it seems Unthinkable it's not like

we will do a magic and this will

work but at least I can see a road

somewhere often times people talk in

terms of escapism oh this will be undone

with one-state solution or be undone

with uh a two-state solution

but what we really need to focus on is

ending that violence will Palestinians

do they want to have their own separate

entity their own separate State

certainly some do but the vast majority

are not looking to have a state the vast

majority are looking to have that their

rights are enshrined and protected and

that's got to be the starting

point

we've done lots of other explainers

related to Israel and Palestine here's

one we filmed in East Jerusalem this one

is all about the US Israel

[Music]

relationship