The Four Quadrants: A Map of All Knowledge and Human Experience
Summary
TLDRThis video explores Ken Wilbur's integral philosophy and his four quadrants model, which maps the entirety of human experience and knowledge. It explains how this model can be used to understand contrasting perspectives like Jordan Peterson's and Michel Foucault's, and situates various schools of thought, from materialist atheism to traditional Buddhism, within a unified holistic framework.
Takeaways
- 🧠 The Four Quadrants model by Ken Wilber is a comprehensive framework for understanding different dimensions of human experience and knowledge domains.
- 🌐 It serves as a tool to contrast different thinkers, such as Jordan Peterson and Michel Foucault, and to situate various schools of thought on a unified map.
- 📊 The model is structured along two axes: the individual vs. collective (X-axis) and internal vs. external (Y-axis), creating four quadrants.
- 🤔 Quadrant 1 (Q1) represents the internal and individual, encompassing thoughts, feelings, and logic, and is associated with phenomenology and Freud's psychoanalysis.
- 🔬 Quadrant 2 (Q2) is the external and individual, focusing on the physical manifestations of internal experiences, such as brain activity and hormonal responses.
- 🌿 Quadrant 3 (Q3) is the internal and collective, representing the intangible cultural, linguistic, and value systems that shape personal experiences.
- 🏙️ Quadrant 4 (Q4) is the external and collective, concerning the empirical aspects of social structures, technologies, and physical infrastructures.
- 🌱 The model illustrates how personal experiences (Q1 and Q2) are grounded and contextualized by collective dimensions (Q3 and Q4).
- 🤝 It provides a balanced appraisal of intellectual conflicts by recognizing the validity of each quadrant's perspective without reductionism.
- 📚 Wilbur's 'A Theory of Everything' and 'Sex, Ecology, Spirituality' are recommended for a deeper dive into the Four Quadrants model.
- 🌟 The Four Quadrants model is a valuable tool for diffusing intellectual conflicts and understanding the underlying dynamics of different cultural and philosophical debates.
Q & A
What is the four quadrants model by Ken Wilber?
-The four quadrants model by Ken Wilber is a theoretical framework designed to map and integrate all human knowledge and experience. It divides the human experience and knowledge into four domains based on two axes: individual vs. collective (X-axis) and internal vs. external (Y-axis), resulting in four quadrants: internal individual (Q1), external individual (Q2), internal collective (Q3), and external collective (Q4).
How does the four quadrants model relate to the human experience?
-The model provides a comprehensive way to understand the different dimensions of human experience. Q1 represents internal individual experiences like thoughts and feelings. Q2 is the external individual, focusing on the physical manifestations of internal states. Q3 encompasses the internal collective, including language, culture, and value systems. Q4 represents the external collective, such as social structures and technologies.
What is an example of a Q1 thinker according to the script?
-An example of a Q1 thinker is Searle, who is focused on phenomenology, the study of human experience without reference to anything outside of the mind, emphasizing pure personal experience.
How does the script describe the relationship between Q1 and Q2?
-The script describes the relationship between Q1 (internal individual) and Q2 (external individual) as two sides of the same coin. Every thought and emotion in Q1 has a physical counterpart in Q2, such as brain activity and hormonal responses.
Can you explain the concept of Q3 using the script's analogy?
-Q3, the internal collective, is likened to an 'ocean' in which we swim. It represents the intangible aspects like language, culture, and value systems that shape our personal experiences. The analogy suggests that our individual thoughts and ideas are influenced by this 'ocean' of collective internal factors.
What does Q4 represent in the four quadrants model?
-Q4 represents the external collective aspects of human experience. It includes the empirical side of social interactions, such as production methods, technological infrastructure, and physical structures like buildings and transportation systems.
How does the script use the four quadrants model to differentiate between culture and society?
-The script differentiates between culture (Q3) and society (Q4) by using the example of visiting a foreign country. Q4 is the observable societal structures and technologies, while Q3 involves the internal cultural understanding, values, and worldviews that are not immediately apparent to an outsider.
What is the significance of the four quadrants model in understanding intellectual conflicts?
-The model helps in diffusing intellectual conflicts by allowing individuals to step back and objectively assess different perspectives. It provides a balanced appraisal of various viewpoints by considering the unique contributions and limitations of each quadrant.
How does the script relate the four quadrants model to the debate between Jordan Peterson and the social justice movement?
-The script presents the debate as a conflict between Peterson's Q1 emphasis on individual responsibility and change versus the social justice movement's Q3 and Q4 focus on collective change by addressing systemic issues like oppression and cultural bias.
What are some examples of thinkers associated with Q3 according to the script?
-Examples of thinkers associated with Q3, as mentioned in the script, include Nietzsche, who explored the revaluation of values and the distinction between master and slave morality, and Foucault, known for his work on power dynamics.
How does the script describe the reductionist tendencies within each quadrant?
-The script describes reductionist tendencies as each quadrant's way of emphasizing its domain as the most important, such as materialists focusing solely on the physical (Q2), or spiritualists claiming that the mind is all that exists (Q1), thereby reducing all phenomena to their respective quadrants.
Outlines
🧠 The Four Quadrants Model: Unifying Human Experience and Knowledge
This paragraph introduces Ken Wilber's integral philosophy and its central concept, the Four Quadrants Model. It's described as a comprehensive tool for understanding various dimensions of human experience and domains of knowledge. The model is used to contrast different thinkers like Jordan Peterson and Michel Foucault, and to situate diverse perspectives on topics such as materialism, social justice, and human behavior. The Four Quadrants are outlined as follows: the internal and individual (Q1), the external and individual (Q2), the internal and collective (Q3), and the external and collective (Q4). The paragraph emphasizes the model's utility in framing human existence and knowledge, suggesting it offers a holistic view of reality that integrates personal experience with collective cultural and societal structures.
🌐 Internal and External Realms: Exploring Individual and Collective Dimensions
This paragraph delves deeper into the specifics of each quadrant within the Four Quadrants Model. It discusses Q1 as the internal and individual realm, encompassing thoughts, feelings, and logic, with reference to Freud, Stoicism, and Buddhism. Q2, the external and individual, is the physical manifestation of internal experiences, such as brain activity and hormonal responses. The paragraph then transitions to the collective dimensions, Q3 being the internal and collective, described as the intangible yet pervasive influence of language, culture, and values that shape personal experiences. It uses Nietzsche's aphorism to illustrate the guiding force of Q3 on individual thought. Q4, the external and collective, includes the empirical aspects of society, such as technology, infrastructure, and social structures. The paragraph concludes by highlighting the interplay between the individual and collective realms, and how they give meaning and context to human experiences.
🌟 The Four Quadrants in Cultural and Intellectual Context
The final paragraph discusses how the Four Quadrants Model can be applied to understand ongoing cultural and intellectual debates. It contrasts thinkers and theories associated with each quadrant, such as Freud and spiritual thinkers in Q1, empirical scientists like John Locke and B.F. Skinner in Q2, cultural theorists and philosophers in Q3, and social scientists and economists in Q4. The paragraph also uses the model to analyze conflicts between different perspectives, such as the debate between Jordan Peterson and the social justice movement, and the reductionist tendencies of each quadrant. It concludes by emphasizing the model's value in providing a balanced appraisal of intellectual conflicts and a more objective understanding of the underlying dynamics of these debates.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Integral Philosophy
💡Four Quadrants Model
💡Internal Experience
💡External Individual
💡Internal Collective
💡External Collective
💡Reductionism
💡Empiricism
💡Cultural Context
💡Personal Responsibility
💡Objectivity
Highlights
Ken Wilbur's four quadrants model is the centerpiece of integral philosophy and a useful tool for understanding different dimensions of human experience and knowledge domains.
The model helps to contrast the voices of Jordan Peterson and Michel Foucault, as well as situate the social justice movement within a broader framework of thought.
The four quadrants integrate all human knowledge and experience to find a unified, holistic cosmos, avoiding the need to choose a single school of thought.
The model maps everything from internal experiences to the Gaia hypothesis, the Big Bang, language, and power dynamics.
The four quadrants are divided by two axes: the x-axis for individual vs. collective, and the y-axis for internal vs. external.
Quadrant 1 (Q1) represents the internal and individual aspects, such as thoughts, feelings, and logic.
Quadrant 2 (Q2) is the external and individual dimension, including physical manifestations of thoughts and emotions.
Quadrant 3 (Q3) is the internal and collective quadrant, encompassing language, culture, value systems, and worldviews.
Quadrant 4 (Q4) is the external and collective quadrant, including social aspects, production, and techno-economic modes.
The model provides a framework for understanding the different arguments in culture, such as the conflict between individual responsibility and collective change.
The four quadrants offer a balanced appraisal of intellectual conflicts and help in unpacking underlying issues.
The model allows for a more objective view of silos of thought by providing a step back from reductionist perspectives.
Wilbur's 'A Theory of Everything' and 'Sex, Ecology, Spirituality' are recommended for a deeper dive into the four quadrants model.
The model is a tool for diffusing intellectual conflicts and understanding the different domains of human existence and knowledge.
The four quadrants represent the simultaneous existence in personal thoughts, physical bodies, collective value systems, and the external world.
The model is useful for framing the domains of human existence and knowledge, offering insights from four different angles.
Transcripts
ken wilbur's model of the four quadrants
is the centerpiece of the integral
philosophy and it is one of the most
useful tools you'll ever come across for
conceptualizing the different dimensions
of the human experience and the
different domains of knowledge
with relevance to what we've been
talking about recently on the channel
it's a way of understanding the voice of
jordan peterson in contrast to that of
michel foucault and the social justice
movement it's also a good way of
situating a lot of the material we have
looked at in the past from the fault
line between materialist atheists and
traditional buddhists to the perspective
that humanity isn't a cancer but more
relatable to the behavior of bacteria we
see where marx and freud's work fits in
where nietzsche is operating from and
where schools like semiotics empiricism
and phenomenology fit on the map in
wilbur's work this four quadrants model
is a map of the entirety of reality
it's the central point of his attempt to
integrate all human knowledge and
experience together so that we can find
ourselves in a unified holistic cosmos
again rather than having to choose which
school of thought we align with it's a
really interesting theory that maps
everything from the internal experience
of bacteria to the gaia hypothesis the
big bang language and power dynamics
there's a lot of moving parts and some
parts of it i'm not a hundred percent
sold on but in this episode we're going
to focus in on the human element and
look at why this model is such a useful
way to frame the domains of human
existence and knowledge this tickles
your mind and you want to dive deeper
i'd highly recommend wilbur's book a
theory of everything and if you really
want to give it a deeper dive then i
would highly recommend his book sex
ecology spirituality with that out of
the way let's talk about the four
quadrant map so the first thing to note
is that these quadrants are mapped out
over two axes the x-axis separates the
individual quadrants on the top from the
collective quadrants on the bottom while
the y-axis separates the internal
quadrants on the left-hand side from the
external quadrant on the right-hand side
this leaves us with four different
quadrants the first quadrant q1 in the
upper left is the quadrant of the
internal and individual the second
quadrant q2 in the upper right is the
space of the external and individual the
bottom left quadrant q3 is the internal
and collective and finally the bottom
right q4 is the external and collective
another way of talking about them is the
i the it the we and the its now we have
them divided up let's explore what each
of these quadrants actually contain in
the first quadrant we have the internal
individual aspect of our lives here
you'll find our thoughts our feelings
our moods as well as our logic all the
wonderful things that happen in your
little noggin happen right up here in q1
so you can think of the work of freud
here who's focused on the individual's
internal life or of the stoics or
buddhists who are focused on our
relationship to our internal world but
the purest example i think of q1 is
searle's phenomenology which seeks to
understand human experience without any
reference to anything outside of the
mind it's about pure personal experience
and everything that happens in this
first quadrant has a correlate in q2 the
quadrant of the external individual
dimension of our being
whenever you have one of your
hair-brained thoughts it doesn't happen
in some disentangled mental sphere if we
shove you in an fmri machine having
juice you up with dye we'll be able to
see your brain light up when you have
this thought and when we call it a
stupid thought we see your amygdala
light up in defensive anger but then as
you tell yourself you're better than
that you remember to breathe we'll see
your prefrontal cortex light up as it
tries to get your little tantrum under
control and of course it's not just
about what's going on in the brain
there's the release of hormones the
depth or shallowness of your breathing
your heart rate all of all these things
mirror the psychological experience that
you're having
everything that happens internally
happens externally every thought has a
physical side and a mental side same
goes for your emotions so that's q1 and
q2 this is the nature of your individual
mind body system but the individual
element is only one half of the human
experience none of this makes sense
without understanding what grounds it
and contextualizes it and for that we
need to look at q3 and q4 the collective
sides of the human experience q3 is the
most intangible of the quadrants the
internal and individual is easy to grasp
because it's the thoughts and ideas
you're having in your own head but q3 is
a little trickier to point out at first
but it's everywhere as ever nietzsche
hits the nail on the head in the third
aphorism of beyond good and evil he
writes that most of the conscious
thinking of a philosopher is secretly
guided and forced into certain channels
by his instincts behind all logic and
its seeming sovereignty of movement too
there stand valuations or more clearly
physiological demands for the
preservation of a certain type of life
q3 is the internal ocean that we swim in
this is the quadrant of language culture
value systems and world views the
personal q1 experience is completely
shaped by the q3 ocean in the episode on
cesura semiotics we talked about the
difference between long and prol which
you can think of in terms of a game of
chess so you have the long chess which
is the hidden rules of the game and then
you have the parole which is the million
and one instantiations of those rules
it's the individual games of chess that
happen within the context of that set of
rules language has a similar hidden
structure that gives meaning to every
instance of speech and writing
linguists have unearthed the structure
of language nouns tenses articles word
order but the structure pre-existed the
archaeological work of the linguist the
same goes for culture and for value
systems they are intangibles that we
don't directly touch but would shape our
experience of the world there the
riverbanks that unbeknownst to the river
are guiding and steering its course
this is a good analogy because the
billion drops of water in the river
shaped the riverbank which in turn
redirects the river there's an active
relationship between the bank which
steers the river and the movement of the
water through this guided path changing
the path to give a concrete example you
can think of the experience of hunger
the q1 q2 experience of hunger is very
different for hunter-gatherer and
western middle class individual there's
a similar physiological experience but
the meaning that this experience is
given and the actions it inspires are
completely different and that is because
of the different q3 oceans that these
individuals are swimming in the
hunter-gatherer will reach for the bow
and arrow where the westerner grabs
their wallet or their phone the
individual experience is in some senses
very similar i am hungry i want not to
be hungry i'm going to go do something
about that but the reality couldn't be
more different one thinks about going
out to hunt the other things about going
to the shop or opening an app on their
phone this reaction to the personal
experience of hunger is shaped by the
cultural q3 backdrop as wickenstein once
wrote the limits of my language mean the
limits of my world q4 is the outside of
this collective experience it is the
empirical side of the collective
equation in q3 we have the internal
experience of collectivity there's
language and culture there's our values
and worldviews and just as the
individual thoughts feelings and ideas
have their empirical correlates in the
brain and body so these components of
the internal collectivity have their own
empirical correlates in sex ecology
spirituality wilbur summarizes the
contents of q4 as follows
this quadrant includes the exterior of
any of the social aspects of human
interaction including forms of
production and techno-economic modes bow
and arrow horticultural tools agrarian
implements industrial machinery
computers and so on architectural
structures transportation systems
physical infrastructure even written
material forms of books legal codes
linguistic structures verbal signifiers
and so forth one great way of explaining
the difference between the q3 culture
and the q4 society is wilbur's example
of going to a foreign country so let's
say you go to a country where you don't
speak the language and that it's
completely different to your culture
when you first arrive you are in the q4
society but you're not in the q3 culture
you can observe the architecture the
population density the relative wealth
and poverty the demographics you can see
what technologies they have and how
their society is structured this is all
q4 you are surrounded by this q4 society
but until you learn the language and
learn to talk to the people you don't
have access to the q3 culture you don't
know what the world view of the people
is you don't know what they value or why
they do what they do you don't know the
power structures you're seeing the
outside of their collectivity you're
seeing the q4 but you haven't looked
into the inside of the collectivity you
haven't seen into their collective value
system without language and interaction
this isn't possible so these are the
four quadrants then of the human
experience we exist in four domains all
at once it's not just our personal
thoughts but our physical bodies that
are the outside of these thoughts and
feelings there's the collective value
system that contextualizes and makes
parts of this individual experience more
salient than others finally there's the
outside of this collectivity everything
from the architecture of your local shop
to the supply chain of trucks to keep it
stocked and all the technologies that
make this supply chain work and the
construct this architecture our lives at
any moment can be viewed from these four
angles which give very different
insights so now that we have briefly
sketched out these four dimensions of
the human experience let's play around
with it a little bit as an intellectual
map
so as you've already seen in q1 we have
thinkers like freud the stokes and the
spiritual thinkers like buddha jesus
anthony demello jed mckenna all these
thinkers are focused on the internal
individual dimension of existence moving
over to q2 we'll find thinkers like john
locke and b.f skinner this is the realm
of the hard sciences like physics
chemistry and biology is the quadrant of
empiricism and of studying individual
things through observation and
measurement you isolate the individual
being to be studied and you experiment
to understand its qualities and its
nature coming down to q3 we find
nietzsche's work on the revaluation of
all values on the dionysian versus the
apollonian and on the distinction
between master and slave morality we
have kuhn's work on paradigms as being
the grounding culture that the science
exists in at any moment in time we have
the structuralists and their search for
the underlying structures of human life
we have foucault's work on power and
scissors work on semiotics we also have
adam smith's invisible hand of the
market and finally then we have q4 where
we have the study of the external
collective down here we have fields like
ecology and chaos theory we have marx's
economic theories and statistical
studies of human societies jordan
peterson has published a lot of papers
on the q4 findings of the ocean
personality model and how for example it
is more common for people with high
politeness to be right leaning while
those with higher compassion are more
likely to be left leaning this is also
where a lot of steven pinker's work with
the better angels of our nature is
focused this is the philosophy of
utilitarianism august counts theories of
social evolution and the science of
climate change all of these theories and
systems are directed at studying the
outsides of the collective experience
the four quadrants model is also a great
way of understanding the different
arguments that are going on in the
culture at any one point in time
a recent exploration of jordan peterson
and the social justice movement can be
understood as a conflict between
peterson's q1 vision of personal
responsibility and creating change in
the individual realm coming into
conflict with the social justice
movement's belief that change lies in
the collective sphere by tackling
oppression bigotry and bias in the
culture peterson says be the change you
wish to see in the world well the social
justice movement says let's make the
world fair for everyone they both want
to make the world a better place but get
frustrated with each other over how to
do that when you look at richard
dawkins's attacks on religion as a
delusion or as a virus you're seeing a
q2 conflict with q1 dawkins is a
rationalist materialist matter is the
fundamental thing the externals are the
fundamental thing this religious stuff
doesn't fit the mold of empirical
science and so it belongs in the trashy
we can see how each quadrant can reduce
the world to their little section of
reality it's not just the material is
saying that matter is all there is and
reducing all internal phenomena to
firearms in the brain there's plenty of
spiritual folk out there who say that
the mind is all that there is there's
the claim associated with darada that
everything is interpretation or the idea
associated with foucault that power is
all that there is all of these are
distinct forms of reductionism coming
from the different corners of the map
everyone has their way of seeing things
and they have to explain why that way is
the most important way the four
quadrants model allows us to take a step
back and to give a more balanced
appraisal of the situation gives us a
way of looking at each silo with a
little more distance and objectivity
like any model it's imperfect but it's
extremely useful as a way of diffusing
intellectual conflicts and unpacking
what is actually going on beneath the
surface that's everything for this
episode of the living philosophy if
you've enjoyed it please give the video
a thumbs up down below and as ever i'd
like to thank shane and all the other
patrons of the channel for their support
in keeping this thing going if you want
to support the channel you can head over
to patreon you can get your name in the
credits as well as early access to
scripts videos and and a few other
things as well if you have any thoughts
insights or feedback i would love to
hear from you down in the comments
otherwise i shall see you next time
thank you for watching
Browse More Related Video
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)