The Four Quadrants: A Map of All Knowledge and Human Experience

Summary

This video explores Ken Wilbur's integral philosophy and his four quadrants model, which maps the entirety of human experience and knowledge. It explains how this model can be used to understand contrasting perspectives like Jordan Peterson's and Michel Foucault's, and situates various schools of thought, from materialist atheism to traditional Buddhism, within a unified holistic framework.

Takeaways

• 🧠 The Four Quadrants model by Ken Wilber is a comprehensive framework for understanding different dimensions of human experience and knowledge domains.
• 🌐 It serves as a tool to contrast different thinkers, such as Jordan Peterson and Michel Foucault, and to situate various schools of thought on a unified map.
• 📊 The model is structured along two axes: the individual vs. collective (X-axis) and internal vs. external (Y-axis), creating four quadrants.
• 🤔 Quadrant 1 (Q1) represents the internal and individual, encompassing thoughts, feelings, and logic, and is associated with phenomenology and Freud's psychoanalysis.
• 🔬 Quadrant 2 (Q2) is the external and individual, focusing on the physical manifestations of internal experiences, such as brain activity and hormonal responses.
• 🌿 Quadrant 3 (Q3) is the internal and collective, representing the intangible cultural, linguistic, and value systems that shape personal experiences.
• 🏙️ Quadrant 4 (Q4) is the external and collective, concerning the empirical aspects of social structures, technologies, and physical infrastructures.
• 🌱 The model illustrates how personal experiences (Q1 and Q2) are grounded and contextualized by collective dimensions (Q3 and Q4).
• 🤝 It provides a balanced appraisal of intellectual conflicts by recognizing the validity of each quadrant's perspective without reductionism.
• 📚 Wilbur's 'A Theory of Everything' and 'Sex, Ecology, Spirituality' are recommended for a deeper dive into the Four Quadrants model.
• 🌟 The Four Quadrants model is a valuable tool for diffusing intellectual conflicts and understanding the underlying dynamics of different cultural and philosophical debates.

Q & A

What is the four quadrants model by Ken Wilber?

The four quadrants model by Ken Wilber is a theoretical framework designed to map and integrate all human knowledge and experience. It divides the human experience and knowledge into four domains based on two axes: individual vs. collective (X-axis) and internal vs. external (Y-axis), resulting in four quadrants: internal individual (Q1), external individual (Q2), internal collective (Q3), and external collective (Q4).

How does the four quadrants model relate to the human experience?

The model provides a comprehensive way to understand the different dimensions of human experience. Q1 represents internal individual experiences like thoughts and feelings. Q2 is the external individual, focusing on the physical manifestations of internal states. Q3 encompasses the internal collective, including language, culture, and value systems. Q4 represents the external collective, such as social structures and technologies.

What is an example of a Q1 thinker according to the script?

An example of a Q1 thinker is Searle, who is focused on phenomenology, the study of human experience without reference to anything outside of the mind, emphasizing pure personal experience.

How does the script describe the relationship between Q1 and Q2?

The script describes the relationship between Q1 (internal individual) and Q2 (external individual) as two sides of the same coin. Every thought and emotion in Q1 has a physical counterpart in Q2, such as brain activity and hormonal responses.

Can you explain the concept of Q3 using the script's analogy?

Q3, the internal collective, is likened to an 'ocean' in which we swim. It represents the intangible aspects like language, culture, and value systems that shape our personal experiences. The analogy suggests that our individual thoughts and ideas are influenced by this 'ocean' of collective internal factors.

What does Q4 represent in the four quadrants model?

Q4 represents the external collective aspects of human experience. It includes the empirical side of social interactions, such as production methods, technological infrastructure, and physical structures like buildings and transportation systems.

How does the script use the four quadrants model to differentiate between culture and society?

The script differentiates between culture (Q3) and society (Q4) by using the example of visiting a foreign country. Q4 is the observable societal structures and technologies, while Q3 involves the internal cultural understanding, values, and worldviews that are not immediately apparent to an outsider.

What is the significance of the four quadrants model in understanding intellectual conflicts?

The model helps in diffusing intellectual conflicts by allowing individuals to step back and objectively assess different perspectives. It provides a balanced appraisal of various viewpoints by considering the unique contributions and limitations of each quadrant.

How does the script relate the four quadrants model to the debate between Jordan Peterson and the social justice movement?

The script presents the debate as a conflict between Peterson's Q1 emphasis on individual responsibility and change versus the social justice movement's Q3 and Q4 focus on collective change by addressing systemic issues like oppression and cultural bias.

What are some examples of thinkers associated with Q3 according to the script?

Examples of thinkers associated with Q3, as mentioned in the script, include Nietzsche, who explored the revaluation of values and the distinction between master and slave morality, and Foucault, known for his work on power dynamics.

How does the script describe the reductionist tendencies within each quadrant?

The script describes reductionist tendencies as each quadrant's way of emphasizing its domain as the most important, such as materialists focusing solely on the physical (Q2), or spiritualists claiming that the mind is all that exists (Q1), thereby reducing all phenomena to their respective quadrants.

Outlines

00:00

🧠 The Four Quadrants Model: Unifying Human Experience and Knowledge

This paragraph introduces Ken Wilber's integral philosophy and its central concept, the Four Quadrants Model. It's described as a comprehensive tool for understanding various dimensions of human experience and domains of knowledge. The model is used to contrast different thinkers like Jordan Peterson and Michel Foucault, and to situate diverse perspectives on topics such as materialism, social justice, and human behavior. The Four Quadrants are outlined as follows: the internal and individual (Q1), the external and individual (Q2), the internal and collective (Q3), and the external and collective (Q4). The paragraph emphasizes the model's utility in framing human existence and knowledge, suggesting it offers a holistic view of reality that integrates personal experience with collective cultural and societal structures.

05:02

🌐 Internal and External Realms: Exploring Individual and Collective Dimensions

This paragraph delves deeper into the specifics of each quadrant within the Four Quadrants Model. It discusses Q1 as the internal and individual realm, encompassing thoughts, feelings, and logic, with reference to Freud, Stoicism, and Buddhism. Q2, the external and individual, is the physical manifestation of internal experiences, such as brain activity and hormonal responses. The paragraph then transitions to the collective dimensions, Q3 being the internal and collective, described as the intangible yet pervasive influence of language, culture, and values that shape personal experiences. It uses Nietzsche's aphorism to illustrate the guiding force of Q3 on individual thought. Q4, the external and collective, includes the empirical aspects of society, such as technology, infrastructure, and social structures. The paragraph concludes by highlighting the interplay between the individual and collective realms, and how they give meaning and context to human experiences.

10:03

🌟 The Four Quadrants in Cultural and Intellectual Context

The final paragraph discusses how the Four Quadrants Model can be applied to understand ongoing cultural and intellectual debates. It contrasts thinkers and theories associated with each quadrant, such as Freud and spiritual thinkers in Q1, empirical scientists like John Locke and B.F. Skinner in Q2, cultural theorists and philosophers in Q3, and social scientists and economists in Q4. The paragraph also uses the model to analyze conflicts between different perspectives, such as the debate between Jordan Peterson and the social justice movement, and the reductionist tendencies of each quadrant. It concludes by emphasizing the model's value in providing a balanced appraisal of intellectual conflicts and a more objective understanding of the underlying dynamics of these debates.

Keywords

💡Integral Philosophy

Integral Philosophy is a comprehensive approach to understanding human experience and knowledge that integrates multiple perspectives. In the video, it is highlighted as the central theme, with Ken Wilber's model of the four quadrants being a key tool within this philosophy. The model is used to map different dimensions of human experience and knowledge, offering a unified view of reality.

💡Four Quadrants Model

The Four Quadrants Model is a theoretical framework developed by Ken Wilber to map the entirety of reality. It divides the human experience into four quadrants based on two axes: individual vs. collective and internal vs. external. The video uses this model to analyze various thinkers and theories, positioning them within the quadrants to illustrate their focus areas.

💡Internal Experience

Internal Experience refers to the personal and subjective aspects of an individual's life, such as thoughts, feelings, and moods. In the script, it is associated with Quadrant 1 (Q1), where the focus is on the individual's internal life, as exemplified by the work of Freud and phenomenology, which seeks to understand human experience without external reference.

💡External Individual

External Individual pertains to the physical manifestations of an individual's internal states, such as brain activity and hormonal responses. The video script mentions Quadrant 2 (Q2) as the space where these external manifestations are observed, like the brain's reaction to thoughts and emotions.

💡Internal Collective

Internal Collective represents the shared cultural, linguistic, and value systems that influence an individual's internal life. The script discusses Quadrant 3 (Q3) as the quadrant of language, culture, and worldviews, which shape personal experiences and are referenced in Nietzsche's aphorism about the guiding force of instincts behind conscious thought.

💡External Collective

External Collective involves the observable social structures and systems that make up the collective human experience. In the video, Quadrant 4 (Q4) is described as encompassing the empirical aspects of human interaction, including production methods, technology, and infrastructure.

💡Reductionism

Reductionism is the approach of simplifying complex phenomena by reducing them to their fundamental components. The video script discusses how each quadrant can lead to a form of reductionism, with materialists focusing solely on the physical, and spiritualists or others emphasizing only one aspect of reality, such as power or interpretation.

💡Empiricism

Empiricism is a philosophical stance that asserts knowledge comes primarily from sensory experience and observation. The script places thinkers like John Locke and B.F. Skinner in Quadrant 2, emphasizing the empirical study of individual phenomena through observation and measurement.

💡Cultural Context

Cultural Context refers to the background of shared beliefs, practices, and values that influence an individual's understanding and behavior. The video uses the concept to explain how the same personal experience, like hunger, can have vastly different meanings and responses depending on the cultural context, as represented by Quadrant 3.

💡Personal Responsibility

Personal Responsibility is the belief that individuals should be accountable for their actions and the changes they wish to see in the world. The video contrasts this concept, associated with Jordan Peterson's Q1 vision, with the social justice movement's focus on collective change, illustrating a conflict between individual and collective perspectives.

💡Objectivity

Objectivity is the ability to assess a situation without personal bias or influence. The Four Quadrants Model is presented in the video as a tool for achieving a more balanced and objective appraisal of intellectual conflicts by providing a framework to view each perspective with distance.

Highlights

Ken Wilbur's four quadrants model is the centerpiece of integral philosophy and a useful tool for understanding different dimensions of human experience and knowledge domains.

The model helps to contrast the voices of Jordan Peterson and Michel Foucault, as well as situate the social justice movement within a broader framework of thought.

The four quadrants integrate all human knowledge and experience to find a unified, holistic cosmos, avoiding the need to choose a single school of thought.

The model maps everything from internal experiences to the Gaia hypothesis, the Big Bang, language, and power dynamics.

The four quadrants are divided by two axes: the x-axis for individual vs. collective, and the y-axis for internal vs. external.

Quadrant 1 (Q1) represents the internal and individual aspects, such as thoughts, feelings, and logic.

Quadrant 2 (Q2) is the external and individual dimension, including physical manifestations of thoughts and emotions.

Quadrant 3 (Q3) is the internal and collective quadrant, encompassing language, culture, value systems, and worldviews.

Quadrant 4 (Q4) is the external and collective quadrant, including social aspects, production, and techno-economic modes.

The model provides a framework for understanding the different arguments in culture, such as the conflict between individual responsibility and collective change.

The four quadrants offer a balanced appraisal of intellectual conflicts and help in unpacking underlying issues.

The model allows for a more objective view of silos of thought by providing a step back from reductionist perspectives.

Wilbur's 'A Theory of Everything' and 'Sex, Ecology, Spirituality' are recommended for a deeper dive into the four quadrants model.

The model is a tool for diffusing intellectual conflicts and understanding the different domains of human existence and knowledge.

The four quadrants represent the simultaneous existence in personal thoughts, physical bodies, collective value systems, and the external world.

The model is useful for framing the domains of human existence and knowledge, offering insights from four different angles.

Transcripts

ken wilbur's model of the four quadrants

is the centerpiece of the integral

philosophy and it is one of the most

useful tools you'll ever come across for

conceptualizing the different dimensions

of the human experience and the

different domains of knowledge

with relevance to what we've been

talking about recently on the channel

it's a way of understanding the voice of

jordan peterson in contrast to that of

michel foucault and the social justice

movement it's also a good way of

situating a lot of the material we have

looked at in the past from the fault

line between materialist atheists and

traditional buddhists to the perspective

that humanity isn't a cancer but more

relatable to the behavior of bacteria we

see where marx and freud's work fits in

where nietzsche is operating from and

where schools like semiotics empiricism

and phenomenology fit on the map in

wilbur's work this four quadrants model

is a map of the entirety of reality

it's the central point of his attempt to

integrate all human knowledge and

experience together so that we can find

ourselves in a unified holistic cosmos

again rather than having to choose which

school of thought we align with it's a

really interesting theory that maps

everything from the internal experience

of bacteria to the gaia hypothesis the

big bang language and power dynamics

there's a lot of moving parts and some

parts of it i'm not a hundred percent

sold on but in this episode we're going

to focus in on the human element and

look at why this model is such a useful

way to frame the domains of human

existence and knowledge this tickles

your mind and you want to dive deeper

i'd highly recommend wilbur's book a

theory of everything and if you really

want to give it a deeper dive then i

would highly recommend his book sex

ecology spirituality with that out of

the way let's talk about the four

quadrant map so the first thing to note

is that these quadrants are mapped out

over two axes the x-axis separates the

individual quadrants on the top from the

collective quadrants on the bottom while

the y-axis separates the internal

quadrants on the left-hand side from the

external quadrant on the right-hand side

this leaves us with four different

quadrants the first quadrant q1 in the

upper left is the quadrant of the

internal and individual the second

quadrant q2 in the upper right is the

space of the external and individual the

bottom left quadrant q3 is the internal

and collective and finally the bottom

right q4 is the external and collective

another way of talking about them is the

i the it the we and the its now we have

them divided up let's explore what each

of these quadrants actually contain in

the first quadrant we have the internal

individual aspect of our lives here

you'll find our thoughts our feelings

our moods as well as our logic all the

wonderful things that happen in your

little noggin happen right up here in q1

so you can think of the work of freud

here who's focused on the individual's

internal life or of the stoics or

buddhists who are focused on our

relationship to our internal world but

the purest example i think of q1 is

searle's phenomenology which seeks to

understand human experience without any

reference to anything outside of the

mind it's about pure personal experience

and everything that happens in this

first quadrant has a correlate in q2 the

quadrant of the external individual

dimension of our being

whenever you have one of your

hair-brained thoughts it doesn't happen

in some disentangled mental sphere if we

shove you in an fmri machine having

juice you up with dye we'll be able to

see your brain light up when you have

this thought and when we call it a

stupid thought we see your amygdala

light up in defensive anger but then as

you tell yourself you're better than

that you remember to breathe we'll see

your prefrontal cortex light up as it

tries to get your little tantrum under

control and of course it's not just

about what's going on in the brain

there's the release of hormones the

depth or shallowness of your breathing

your heart rate all of all these things

mirror the psychological experience that

you're having

everything that happens internally

happens externally every thought has a

physical side and a mental side same

goes for your emotions so that's q1 and

q2 this is the nature of your individual

mind body system but the individual

element is only one half of the human

experience none of this makes sense

without understanding what grounds it

and contextualizes it and for that we

need to look at q3 and q4 the collective

sides of the human experience q3 is the

most intangible of the quadrants the

internal and individual is easy to grasp

because it's the thoughts and ideas

you're having in your own head but q3 is

a little trickier to point out at first

but it's everywhere as ever nietzsche

hits the nail on the head in the third

aphorism of beyond good and evil he

writes that most of the conscious

thinking of a philosopher is secretly

guided and forced into certain channels

by his instincts behind all logic and

its seeming sovereignty of movement too

there stand valuations or more clearly

physiological demands for the

preservation of a certain type of life

q3 is the internal ocean that we swim in

this is the quadrant of language culture

value systems and world views the

personal q1 experience is completely

shaped by the q3 ocean in the episode on

cesura semiotics we talked about the

difference between long and prol which

you can think of in terms of a game of

chess so you have the long chess which

is the hidden rules of the game and then

you have the parole which is the million

and one instantiations of those rules

it's the individual games of chess that

happen within the context of that set of

rules language has a similar hidden

structure that gives meaning to every

instance of speech and writing

linguists have unearthed the structure

of language nouns tenses articles word

order but the structure pre-existed the

archaeological work of the linguist the

same goes for culture and for value

systems they are intangibles that we

don't directly touch but would shape our

experience of the world there the

riverbanks that unbeknownst to the river

are guiding and steering its course

this is a good analogy because the

billion drops of water in the river

shaped the riverbank which in turn

redirects the river there's an active

relationship between the bank which

steers the river and the movement of the

water through this guided path changing

the path to give a concrete example you

can think of the experience of hunger

the q1 q2 experience of hunger is very

different for hunter-gatherer and

western middle class individual there's

a similar physiological experience but

the meaning that this experience is

given and the actions it inspires are

completely different and that is because

of the different q3 oceans that these

individuals are swimming in the

hunter-gatherer will reach for the bow

and arrow where the westerner grabs

their wallet or their phone the

individual experience is in some senses

very similar i am hungry i want not to

be hungry i'm going to go do something

about that but the reality couldn't be

more different one thinks about going

out to hunt the other things about going

to the shop or opening an app on their

phone this reaction to the personal

experience of hunger is shaped by the

cultural q3 backdrop as wickenstein once

wrote the limits of my language mean the

limits of my world q4 is the outside of

this collective experience it is the

empirical side of the collective

equation in q3 we have the internal

experience of collectivity there's

language and culture there's our values

and worldviews and just as the

individual thoughts feelings and ideas

have their empirical correlates in the

brain and body so these components of

the internal collectivity have their own

empirical correlates in sex ecology

spirituality wilbur summarizes the

contents of q4 as follows

this quadrant includes the exterior of

any of the social aspects of human

interaction including forms of

production and techno-economic modes bow

and arrow horticultural tools agrarian

implements industrial machinery

computers and so on architectural

structures transportation systems

physical infrastructure even written

material forms of books legal codes

linguistic structures verbal signifiers

and so forth one great way of explaining

the difference between the q3 culture

and the q4 society is wilbur's example

of going to a foreign country so let's

say you go to a country where you don't

speak the language and that it's

completely different to your culture

when you first arrive you are in the q4

society but you're not in the q3 culture

you can observe the architecture the

population density the relative wealth

and poverty the demographics you can see

what technologies they have and how

their society is structured this is all

q4 you are surrounded by this q4 society

but until you learn the language and

learn to talk to the people you don't

have access to the q3 culture you don't

know what the world view of the people

is you don't know what they value or why

they do what they do you don't know the

power structures you're seeing the

outside of their collectivity you're

seeing the q4 but you haven't looked

into the inside of the collectivity you

haven't seen into their collective value

system without language and interaction

this isn't possible so these are the

four quadrants then of the human

experience we exist in four domains all

at once it's not just our personal

thoughts but our physical bodies that

are the outside of these thoughts and

feelings there's the collective value

system that contextualizes and makes

parts of this individual experience more

salient than others finally there's the

outside of this collectivity everything

from the architecture of your local shop

to the supply chain of trucks to keep it

stocked and all the technologies that

make this supply chain work and the

construct this architecture our lives at

any moment can be viewed from these four

angles which give very different

insights so now that we have briefly

sketched out these four dimensions of

the human experience let's play around

with it a little bit as an intellectual

map

so as you've already seen in q1 we have

thinkers like freud the stokes and the

spiritual thinkers like buddha jesus

anthony demello jed mckenna all these

thinkers are focused on the internal

individual dimension of existence moving

over to q2 we'll find thinkers like john

locke and b.f skinner this is the realm

of the hard sciences like physics

chemistry and biology is the quadrant of

empiricism and of studying individual

things through observation and

measurement you isolate the individual

being to be studied and you experiment

to understand its qualities and its

nature coming down to q3 we find

nietzsche's work on the revaluation of

all values on the dionysian versus the

apollonian and on the distinction

between master and slave morality we

have kuhn's work on paradigms as being

the grounding culture that the science

exists in at any moment in time we have

the structuralists and their search for

the underlying structures of human life

we have foucault's work on power and

scissors work on semiotics we also have

adam smith's invisible hand of the

market and finally then we have q4 where

we have the study of the external

collective down here we have fields like

ecology and chaos theory we have marx's

economic theories and statistical

studies of human societies jordan

peterson has published a lot of papers

on the q4 findings of the ocean

personality model and how for example it

is more common for people with high

politeness to be right leaning while

those with higher compassion are more

likely to be left leaning this is also

where a lot of steven pinker's work with

the better angels of our nature is

focused this is the philosophy of

utilitarianism august counts theories of

social evolution and the science of

climate change all of these theories and

systems are directed at studying the

outsides of the collective experience

the four quadrants model is also a great

way of understanding the different

arguments that are going on in the

culture at any one point in time

a recent exploration of jordan peterson

and the social justice movement can be

understood as a conflict between

peterson's q1 vision of personal

responsibility and creating change in

the individual realm coming into

conflict with the social justice

movement's belief that change lies in

the collective sphere by tackling

oppression bigotry and bias in the

culture peterson says be the change you

wish to see in the world well the social

justice movement says let's make the

world fair for everyone they both want

to make the world a better place but get

frustrated with each other over how to

do that when you look at richard

dawkins's attacks on religion as a

delusion or as a virus you're seeing a

q2 conflict with q1 dawkins is a

rationalist materialist matter is the

fundamental thing the externals are the

fundamental thing this religious stuff

doesn't fit the mold of empirical

science and so it belongs in the trashy

we can see how each quadrant can reduce

the world to their little section of

reality it's not just the material is

saying that matter is all there is and

reducing all internal phenomena to

firearms in the brain there's plenty of

spiritual folk out there who say that

the mind is all that there is there's

the claim associated with darada that

everything is interpretation or the idea

associated with foucault that power is

all that there is all of these are

distinct forms of reductionism coming

from the different corners of the map

everyone has their way of seeing things

and they have to explain why that way is

the most important way the four

quadrants model allows us to take a step

back and to give a more balanced

appraisal of the situation gives us a

way of looking at each silo with a

little more distance and objectivity

like any model it's imperfect but it's

extremely useful as a way of diffusing

intellectual conflicts and unpacking

what is actually going on beneath the

surface that's everything for this

episode of the living philosophy if

you've enjoyed it please give the video

a thumbs up down below and as ever i'd

like to thank shane and all the other

patrons of the channel for their support

in keeping this thing going if you want

to support the channel you can head over

to patreon you can get your name in the

credits as well as early access to

scripts videos and and a few other

things as well if you have any thoughts

insights or feedback i would love to

hear from you down in the comments

otherwise i shall see you next time

thank you for watching