Jordan Peterson: What Kind of Job Fits You?

Essential Truth
11 May 201709:21

Summary

TLDR视频脚本讨论了智力在职业选择和生活中的重要性。强调了智力水平与工作匹配的必要性,以及在职业层级中智力需求的增加。建议人们找到适合自己智力水平的职位,避免处于不利地位。同时指出,高智力职位通常要求高度的责任心、压力承受力和神经质水平。还提到了不同智力水平适合的不同职业,并强调了社会对低智力人群就业问题的忽视,呼吁对此问题进行关注和解决。

Takeaways

  • 🧠 了解自身智力水平对于个人生活至关重要,因为它影响你能否胜任工作并影响周围人。
  • 🔍 随着你攀登能力层级,对流体智力的需求增加,因此要避免超出自己的能力范围。
  • 🤔 你需要用智力、责任心、创造力、压力容忍度和宜人性来评估自己是否适合某个工作。
  • 🐟 找到适合自己智力水平的职业层级,成为“小池塘里的大鱼”,避免成为“房间里最笨的人”或“房间里最聪明的人”。
  • 🏋️‍♂️ 如果你不够尽责,可能不适合每周工作70小时的工作,反之亦然。
  • 🏢 高层职位通常需要高智力、高责任心和高压力容忍度。
  • 💡 智力在很大程度上是速度,聪明的人更可能在竞争中领先。
  • 📊 IQ在116到130之间(85%到95%百分位)的人可以从事律师、研究分析师、编辑、广告经理、化学家、工程师和执行经理等职业。
  • 🚀 如果你想成为领域内最好的,IQ超过145是必要的,可能需要达到160,这会让你成为万里挑一或十万里挑一的人。
  • 👨‍🏭 IQ在87到93之间是相对合格的技工的合适范围,而低于87则面临就业困难。
  • 🤖 随着技术的发展,对认知能力的需求在增加,这使得低IQ人群的就业机会越来越少。

Q & A

  • 为什么了解自己的智力水平对职业选择很重要?

    -了解自己的智力水平对职业选择很重要,因为不同工作对智力的要求不同。如果一个人的智力水平不足以应对工作要求,他可能会在工作中感到痛苦,并且给周围的人带来不便,因为他无法妥善处理职位所要求的任务。

  • 在职业晋升过程中,智力需求是如何变化的?

    -在职业晋升过程中,随着职位的提升,对流体智力的需求也会增加。因此,为了避免失败,一个人不应该将自己置于超出自己能力范围的职位。

  • 如何确定自己是否适合某个职位?

    -确定自己是否适合某个职位需要综合考虑智力、责任心、创造力、压力承受能力和宜人性等因素。一个人需要根据自己的个性特点和能力来选择一个合适的工作环境。

  • 为什么说在职业选择中,处于智力的上四分位数是理想的?

    -处于智力的上四分位数意味着在某个领域内具有较高的智力水平,这有助于个人在职业中取得成功和幸福感。在这种情况下,个人能够在一个相对容易掌握的环境中工作,同时还有提升的空间。

  • 为什么不想成为房间里最聪明的人?

    -如果成为房间里最聪明的人,可能意味着你应该处于一个更具挑战性的环境中。在这种情况下,你可能没有足够的成长空间,或者你的能力没有得到充分利用。

  • 如果一个人不够高度尽责,他应该避免哪种类型的工作?

    -如果一个人不够高度尽责,他应该避免那些需要长时间工作和高强度投入的工作,因为他可能不适合这样的工作节奏。

  • 在复杂等级制度的高层职位中,通常需要哪些特质?

    -在复杂等级制度的高层职位中,通常需要高智力、高尽责性、高压力承受能力以及良好的决策能力,因为这些职位往往伴随着快速的职业变动和复杂的决策需求。

  • IQ对于职业选择有哪些具体的影响?

    -IQ影响一个人能够学习和掌握新技能的速度。例如,IQ在116到130之间的人可能适合成为律师、研究分析师、编辑等职业;而IQ低于85的人可能会发现适合他们的工作机会非常有限。

  • 为什么说智力在一定程度上是速度?

    -智力在一定程度上是速度,因为智力高的人能够更快地理解和解决问题,这使得他们在竞争中更有优势,能够更快地达到目标。

  • 当前社会对于低IQ人群的就业问题有何挑战?

    -随着技术的发展和对认知能力需求的增加,低IQ人群的就业机会越来越少。社会需要找到解决方案,以确保这部分人群能够找到适合的工作。

  • 为什么美国军队不招募IQ低于83的人?

    -美国军队不招募IQ低于83的人,因为研究表明这个智力水平以下的人可能无法满足军队的基本要求。这也反映了在某些情况下,智力水平对于执行特定任务是必要的。

  • 随着自动化的发展,哪些职业可能会受到影响?

    -随着自动化的发展,不仅蓝领工作受到威胁,低层次的白领工作,如一些法律工作,也可能受到影响,因为智能系统能够处理一些以前需要专业技能的任务。

Outlines

00:00

🧠 智力与职业选择

第一段主要讨论了智力在个人生活和职业选择中的重要性。强调了智力水平对于胜任工作的重要性,指出如果智力不足以应对工作需求,将会导致个人和周围人的痛苦。提到随着职业层次的提升,对流体智力的需求也会增加。建议人们在选择职业时,应考虑自己的智力、尽责性、创造力、压力承受能力以及宜人性等个性特质,以避免将自己置于不利的位置。同时,建议人们找到适合自己智力水平的职业层次,避免成为最聪明或最不聪明的人,而是找到能让自己有所提升的环境。还提到了不同智力水平适合的不同职业,如IQ在116到130之间的人适合从事律师、研究分析师等职业,而IQ低于85的人则面临就业困难。

05:02

🔍 智力水平与工作类型

第二段继续讨论了智力水平与工作类型之间的关系。指出随着智力水平的降低,工作内容变得更简单、更重复。提到IQ在103到108之间的人适合从事一些技术性或复杂性较低的工作,如店员、会计员等。进一步指出,IQ低于87的人在就业市场上的选择非常有限,这对社会是一个挑战。讨论了技术进步如何影响低智力水平人群的就业机会,强调了社会需要解决这一问题。还提到了美国军队对智力水平的要求,以及不同政治观点对这一问题的看法,指出无论是保守派还是自由派,都没有正确面对这一问题。最后,提到了自动化对低智力水平人群就业的影响,以及社会需要为这些人找到合适的工作机会。

Mindmap

Keywords

💡智力

智力是指一个人理解和处理信息的能力,通常与解决问题、学习新技能和进行复杂决策的能力相关。在视频中,智力被强调为成功和幸福的关键因素之一,特别是在职业选择和个人发展方面。例如,视频提到智力水平决定了一个人是否能够胜任某个工作,以及在职业阶梯上能爬多高。

💡工作

工作是指个人为了生计或职业发展而从事的有偿劳动。视频中提到,选择适合自己智力水平的工作至关重要,否则可能会在工作中感到痛苦和挫败。例如,如果一个人的智力不足以胜任某个工作,那么他可能会在工作中遇到麻烦,影响自己和周围人的生活。

💡流体智力

流体智力是指在面对新问题和复杂任务时,能够灵活运用已有知识进行推理和解决问题的能力。视频中强调,随着职业层次的提升,对流体智力的需求也在增加,因此个人需要评估自己的流体智力水平,以避免在职业发展中遇到瓶颈。

💡个性

个性是指一个人的性格特征和行为习惯,如责任心、创造力、压力容忍度等。视频中提到,个性特征对于职业选择和工作表现同样重要。例如,一个具有高度责任心的人可能更适合需要长时间工作和高度专注的职业。

💡神经质

神经质是指一个人在面对压力和挑战时容易感到焦虑和不安的倾向。视频中提到,神经质水平较高的人可能更适合压力较低的工作,以避免在工作中感到过度紧张和压力。

💡宜人性

宜人性是指一个人在社交互动中表现出的友好、合作和关心他人的倾向。视频中提到,宜人性较高的人可能更适合在需要团队合作和良好人际关系的环境中工作。

💡职业层次

职业层次是指在职业体系中,不同职位和角色的等级和地位。视频中提到,随着职业层次的提升,对智力和个性特征的要求也在增加。例如,高层管理职位通常需要更高的智力水平和更强的个性特征。

💡IQ(智商)

IQ(智商)是衡量一个人智力水平的标准化测试结果,通常用于评估一个人的逻辑推理、抽象思维和问题解决能力。视频中提到,IQ水平可以影响一个人在不同职业中的成功机会,例如IQ在116到130之间的人可能适合从事律师、研究分析师等职业。

💡自动化

自动化是指通过机器和计算机系统代替人工进行生产和服务的过程。视频中提到,随着自动化技术的发展,许多传统职业正在消失,这对低智力水平的工作者构成了挑战。例如,律师和会计等职业正在被自动化技术所取代。

💡社会结构

社会结构是指社会中不同群体和个体之间的关系和互动模式。视频中提到,随着社会的发展和技术的进步,社会结构正在发生变化,这对不同智力水平的人产生了不同的影响。例如,高智力水平的人在社会中的地位和机会可能会增加,而低智力水平的人可能会面临更多的就业挑战。

💡职业选择

职业选择是指个人根据自己的兴趣、能力和社会需求选择从事某种职业的过程。视频中强调,个人需要根据自己的智力和个性特征做出明智的职业选择,以避免在职业生涯中遇到不必要的困难。例如,视频中提到,选择一个智力水平处于上四分位数的职业层次,可以使个人在工作中更有优势和成就感。

Highlights

智力差异对个人职业生涯至关重要,不同工作对智力的要求不同。

在职业层级中,智力越高,对流体智力的需求越大。

个人需要根据自己的智力、性格特点选择适合的职业。

在职业选择中,应避免自身弱点成为致命缺陷。

选择职业时,应找到能使自己智力处于上四分位数的领域。

在职业环境中,既不应是最不聪明也不应是最聪明的人。

高智商的人在职业层级中处于顶端,部分原因是他们到达得更快。

智商115至130的人适合从事律师、研究分析师等职业。

智商超过145是成为领域顶尖人士的必要条件。

智商103至108的人适合从事商店经理、会计等职业。

智商100是平均水平,适合从事接待员、收银员等职业。

智商87至93的人适合从事技工、食品服务伙伴等职业。

智商低于87的人面临就业难题,社会尚未解决这一问题。

技术发展导致对认知能力的需求增加,低智商人群就业更加困难。

美国军队不招募智商低于83的人,反映了对智力的绝对需求。

社会对智力的需求增加,导致律师等职业逐渐消失。

Transcripts

play00:00

first of all you need to know them for

play00:01

your own life because you ought to know

play00:04

that there are differences intelligence

play00:05

it's really important if you go into a

play00:07

job and you're not smart enough for that

play00:09

job you're gonna have one bloody

play00:11

miserable time and you're gonna make

play00:13

life wretched for the people around you

play00:15

because you won't be able to handle the

play00:16

position and as you climb hierarchies of

play00:19

competence the demand on fluid

play00:21

intelligence increases and so unless you

play00:24

want to fail you don't put yourself in

play00:25

over your head

play00:26

well what's over your head well that's a

play00:28

tricky thing to figure out I mean you

play00:30

have to figure that out with

play00:31

intelligence you have to figure it out

play00:32

with conscientiousness you have to

play00:34

figure it out with creativity you have

play00:35

to figure out with stress tolerance with

play00:38

agreeable Ness because you want to go

play00:39

into a cooperative environment and not a

play00:41

competitive one if you're agreeable and

play00:43

with neuroticism you what could probably

play00:45

want to keep the stress level of your

play00:47

job relatively low because those are all

play00:49

places that you can break down and most

play00:51

people have at least one significant

play00:54

weakness in their intelligence

play00:56

personality makeup and you've got to be

play00:57

careful not to place yourself in a

play00:59

position where that's going to be a

play01:00

fatal flaw but what you really want to

play01:02

do as far as I can tell if you want to

play01:04

maximize your chances for both success

play01:06

and and let's say well-being is you want

play01:09

to find a strata of occupation in which

play01:12

you would have an intelligence that

play01:14

would put you in the upper quartile

play01:15

that's perfect then you're a big fish in

play01:18

a small pond and you don't want to be

play01:20

this you don't want to be the stupidest

play01:22

guy in the room it's a bloody rough

play01:24

place to be so and you probably don't

play01:27

want to be the smartest guy in the room

play01:28

either because what that probably means

play01:30

is you should be in a different room

play01:31

right you should look at a place where

play01:33

if you're right at the top it's you've

play01:35

mastered it it's time to go somewhere

play01:37

where you're a little lower so that

play01:39

you've got something to climb up for so

play01:41

and I can if you're not hyper

play01:43

conscientious for example you're

play01:44

probably not gonna want a job that you

play01:46

have to work 70 hours a week at because

play01:48

you're just not wired up that way you'd

play01:49

rather have some leisure and like more

play01:51

power to you if that's how you're wired

play01:53

up there's nothing wrong with having

play01:54

some leisure but if you're someone who

play01:56

can't stand sitting around doing nothing

play01:58

ever then maybe you can go into a job

play02:01

that's going to require you to work 75

play02:03

hours a week and almost all jobs that

play02:05

are at the top of complex dominance

play02:07

hierarchies require very high

play02:09

intelligence and insane levels of

play02:10

conscientiousness as well generally

play02:12

speaking as pretty day

play02:13

high levels of stress tolerance you know

play02:16

because that can knock yo - because

play02:17

there's going to be sharp fluctuations

play02:20

in your career generally speaking at the

play02:23

higher levels of a structure and you

play02:26

have to make very complicated decisions

play02:28

often with very short time horizons so

play02:30

you have to decide if that's what you

play02:32

want so okay so how smart do you have to

play02:35

be to be different things in life well

play02:37

if you were have an IQ of a 116 to 130

play02:42

which is 85th percentile and above so

play02:45

it's one person an eighth up to one

play02:47

person in 130 I believe is 85 90 95 is

play02:51

it 95 I think it's 95 one person aid to

play02:54

one person in 20 then you can be a

play02:56

attorney a research analyst and editor

play02:59

at advertising manager a chemist and

play03:01

engineer and executive manager etc

play03:03

that's that's the now that's not the

play03:06

high end for IQ by the way you know that

play03:09

it can go up well I can go up

play03:11

indefinitely although there's fewer and

play03:13

fewer people as it goes up so if you

play03:15

want to be the best at what you're doing

play03:17

Bar None then having an IQ of above 145

play03:21

is a necessity and maybe you're pushing

play03:23

160 in some situations and maybe that's

play03:25

making you one person in 10,000 or even

play03:28

one person in a hundred thousand and

play03:29

then also to really be good at it you

play03:32

probably have to be reasonably stressed

play03:33

tolerant and also somewhat conscientious

play03:35

so you know people well you think well

play03:38

why is it that smart people are at the

play03:41

top of dominance hierarchies and the

play03:42

answer to that in part is because they

play03:44

get there first

play03:45

right I mean everything's a race roughly

play03:47

speaking and the faster you are the more

play03:50

likely you are to be at the forefront of

play03:51

the pack and intelligence in large part

play03:53

is speed that's not all of it is so if

play03:56

you're moving towards something

play03:58

difficult rapidly the faster people are

play04:00

going to get there first

play04:01

so IQ of 115 110 to 115 so that's 85th

play04:06

to 73rd to 85th percentile copywriter

play04:09

accountant manager sales manager sales

play04:12

analyst general manager person

play04:14

purchasing agent registered nurse Sales

play04:16

Account Executive if you look at

play04:19

universities the smartest people are

play04:21

they're above this who are the smartest

play04:23

people at university what do you think

play04:26

mathematicians

play04:27

assists and mathematicians right right I

play04:30

could tell you who's on the other end

play04:31

but I won't yeah I'd like to though

play04:37

anyway anyways okay

play04:40

going down the now 103 to 108 is

play04:43

slightly above average rate 60th to 70th

play04:45

percentile store manager bookkeeper

play04:47

credit clerk lab test your general sales

play04:49

telephone sales accounting clerk

play04:51

computer operator customer service rep

play04:53

technician clerk typist so you see at

play04:55

this level people are people have some

play04:57

technical skill and some ability to deal

play04:59

with complex things okay that's dead

play05:01

average 100 is average dispatcher in a

play05:06

general office police patrol officer

play05:08

receptionist cashier general clerical

play05:11

inside sales clerk meter reader printer

play05:13

teller data entry electrical helper 95

play05:18

to 98 machinist food to partner manager

play05:21

Quality Control checkers security guard

play05:23

unskilled labor maintenance arc welder

play05:25

die setter mechanic good-good IQ range

play05:27

for relatively qualified trades people

play05:30

87 to 93 messenger factory production

play05:34

worker assembler food service worker

play05:36

nurse's aide wear host Minh custodian

play05:38

janitor material handler Packer now what

play05:41

you're seeing what you're starting to

play05:42

see is that as he moves down the

play05:43

hierarchy the jobs get simpler they're

play05:46

more likely to be assigned by other

play05:47

people or they're repetitive because

play05:50

what IQ predicts to some degree is how

play05:53

rapidly you can learn something but once

play05:54

you've learned it it doesn't predict how

play05:56

necessarily how well you do at it and so

play05:59

the more repetitive jobs ten people with

play06:02

lower IQs are more suited to more

play06:04

repetitive jobs under 87 is there

play06:06

something well no right that's a big

play06:12

problem and it's something our society

play06:14

has not addressed at all jobs for people

play06:18

with IQs of less than 85 are very very

play06:20

rare so what the hell are those people

play06:22

supposed to do it's like 1 it's 15% of

play06:26

the population what are they supposed to

play06:28

do well we better figure it out because

play06:31

one of the things that's happening too

play06:33

is that as the as the high IQ tech geeks

play06:36

get a hold of the world the demand for

play06:39

cognitive power is increasing not

play06:40

decreasing

play06:41

you want to be a teller well you know

play06:43

those checkout machines they're not so

play06:45

simple you want to work at McDonald's

play06:48

you think that's a simple job you don't

play06:49

see robots working at McDonald's and the

play06:51

reason for that is that what McDonald's

play06:53

workers do is too complex for for robots

play06:56

to do so well so this is a discussion

play07:03

that no one wants to have but that's

play07:04

okay it's still a problem and it has to

play07:07

be dealt with so the US government I

play07:09

think I told you this at one point

play07:10

already it's illegal to induct anyone

play07:13

into the US Army if they have an IQ of

play07:14

less than 83 right it's about 10% of the

play07:18

population because the US Army that and

play07:21

they've been doing IQ testing since IQ

play07:23

testing began because they want

play07:24

everybody they can possibly get into the

play07:26

army because in peacetime they use it as

play07:29

a way of moving people up the

play07:31

socio-economic ladder and in wartime

play07:32

well obviously you need as many soldiers

play07:35

as you can get your hands on and so

play07:37

you're not going to be any pickier then

play07:39

you have to be so when the US Army says

play07:42

it's illegal to induct anybody into the

play07:44

Armed Forces if they have an IQ of less

play07:46

than 83 then you know that they've done

play07:48

it for absolute necessity right and when

play07:51

people have made a finding that

play07:52

contradicts what they want to hear and

play07:55

they're doing it out of absolute

play07:56

necessity you can be reasonably true

play07:58

that it's one of those facts that just

play07:59

won't bloody well go away and so you

play08:01

might think well if there's nothing for

play08:03

someone with an IQ of less than 83 to do

play08:05

in the army what makes you think that

play08:07

there's something that they can do in

play08:08

the general population and then the

play08:10

issue is you know because the

play08:12

Conservatives will say well they should

play08:14

just work harder it's like sorry that

play08:15

ain't going to fly and the Liberals will

play08:17

say well there's no difference between

play08:18

people anyhow and you can just train

play08:21

people to do everything and that's wrong

play08:22

so they're both wrong and they're

play08:24

seriously wrong and the fact that

play08:26

neither side of the political

play08:27

perspective will take a good cold hard

play08:30

look at this problem means that we're

play08:32

going to increasingly have a structural

play08:34

problem in our societies because we're

play08:36

complexify 'never ething so rapidly that

play08:39

you can't find employment unless

play08:40

increasingly unless you're intelligent

play08:42

you guys are really going to face this

play08:44

you know lawyers are disappearing like

play08:46

mad and the reason for that is you can

play08:49

look it up online increasingly you can

play08:51

do things yourself if you're smart and

play08:53

so like the working class people

play08:55

being wiped out pretty nicely over the

play08:57

last 30 years by by automation and

play08:59

various other things it's the low end of

play09:01

the white collar class that's coming up

play09:03

next so I'm not saying that lower

play09:05

lawyers are in the low end but low end

play09:07

lawyers are in the low end of the white

play09:09

collar class so there's still going to

play09:11

be plenty of positions for people who

play09:13

are creative and fast on their feet and

play09:15

super smart in fact those people are

play09:17

going to have all the money and that's

play09:18

already happening to a great degree

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Related Tags
智力职业选择工作IQ成功个性压力合作竞争自动化
Do you need a summary in English?