Lawyer Up on Contracts: Elura & Michele discuss Mutuality of Consideration
Summary
TLDRThe video script discusses the concept of mutuality in contract law, using relatable examples to clarify that for a contract to be valid, both parties must have a reciprocal reason for their actions. It emphasizes understanding the backstory to determine if consideration is truly mutual, rather than just coincidental.
Takeaways
- π The concept of 'mutuality of consideration' is crucial in contract law, meaning both parties must provide something of value for the contract to be valid.
- π The term 'consideration' can be confusing, but it essentially refers to the reason why each party is fulfilling their part of the contract.
- πΆ The 'so that test' is a simple way to determine if there is mutuality in a contract: each party must be doing something 'so that' the other party does their part.
- π An example of non-mutual consideration is a grandmother giving $5 to a child for lemonade, not because of the contract, but because she thinks the child is cute.
- π§ If the grandmother is thirsty and gives $5 for lemonade, it passes the 'so that test' because she gives the money so that she gets the lemonade.
- π° The amount of money is not the issue; it's whether the money is given as part of the mutual agreement, not just as a gift.
- π€ΉββοΈ A hypothetical scenario of a tightrope walker and a person in a chicken suit singing can be analyzed using the 'so that test' to determine if a contract exists.
- π The validity of a contract depends on understanding the backstory and intentions of both parties, not just their actions.
- π Mutuality of consideration requires a reciprocal relationship where each party's actions are directly tied to the other's, creating a back-and-forth dynamic.
- π Understanding the mutuality of consideration is essential for determining the validity of a contract, and it's not as complicated as it might initially seem.
Q & A
What is the concept of 'mutuality of consideration' in contract law?
-Mutuality of consideration means that in a valid and enforceable contract, there must be consideration (something of value) given by both parties. Each party is doing something because of the contract, and their actions are reciprocal.
What does the 'so that test' refer to in the context of contracts?
-The 'so that test' is a way to check if a contract has good consideration. It asks whether each party is performing their part of the contract because of the other party's performance. It ensures that there is mutuality in the consideration.
Can you provide an example of a situation where mutuality of consideration is lacking?
-An example is when a grandmother gives $5 to a child for selling lemonade, not because she wants the lemonade but because she thinks the child is cute. This fails the 'so that test' as the grandmother's action is not in response to the child's performance.
How does the concept of mutuality of consideration apply to a scenario where someone is walking a tightrope and someone else is singing in a chicken suit?
-For a contract to be valid in this scenario, the tightrope walker must be walking because the other person is singing in a chicken suit, and the singer must be singing because the other person is walking the tightrope. Their actions must be reciprocal and motivated by each other's performance.
What is the significance of knowing the backstory in determining mutuality of consideration?
-Knowing the backstory is crucial because it helps determine the true motivations behind each party's actions. This is necessary to ascertain whether their actions are reciprocal and whether the consideration is mutual.
Why is it incorrect to say that more money automatically makes consideration valid?
-The validity of consideration is not about the amount of money but whether the money is given as part of a reciprocal agreement. The focus is on the mutuality and the reason behind the exchange, not the amount.
What happens if the motivations behind the actions of the parties are not clear in a contract scenario?
-If the motivations are not clear, it may be difficult to establish mutuality of consideration. The contract might be deemed invalid if it cannot be proven that each party is performing their part because of the other party's performance.
Can you explain why the mutuality of consideration is important for a contract to be enforceable?
-Mutuality of consideration is important because it ensures that both parties have a stake in the contract and are committed to fulfilling their obligations. It provides a legal basis for enforcing the contract if one party fails to perform.
What advice does the speaker give to students regarding the concept of mutuality of consideration?
-The speaker advises students not to be scared by the concept and to focus on understanding the motivations behind the actions of each party. They should think of practical examples, like chicken suits and tightropes, to grasp the concept better.
How can the 'so that test' be applied in real-life contract scenarios to determine if the consideration is mutual?
-In real-life scenarios, you can apply the 'so that test' by asking whether each party is performing their part of the contract because of the other party's performance. This helps determine if the consideration is mutual and if the contract is valid.
Outlines
π Understanding Mutuality of Consideration
This paragraph explains the concept of mutuality of consideration in contracts. It clarifies that for a contract to be valid, there must be two pieces of consideration from both parties involved. The 'so that test' is introduced as a way to determine if the consideration is mutual. The example of a child selling lemonade and receiving money from a grandmother is used to illustrate the concept. The narrative emphasizes the importance of knowing the backstory to determine if the consideration is mutual, as the intent behind the actions of both parties is crucial in forming a valid contract.
Mindmap
Keywords
π‘Neutrality of Consideration
π‘Mutuality of Consideration
π‘Contract
π‘Consideration
π‘Valid Contract
π‘Enforceable Contract
π‘So That Test
π‘Backstory
π‘Lemonade Stand
π‘Tightrope Walker
π‘Chicken Suit
Highlights
The concept of neutrality of consideration is often misunderstood and can be confusing.
Mutuality of consideration means there must be two pieces of consideration for a valid contract.
The 'so that' test is used to determine if a contract has good consideration.
An example of a lemonade stand is used to explain the concept of consideration.
The backstory is crucial in determining whether consideration is mutual.
The $5 given by a grandmother is not valid consideration if it's just because she thinks you're cute.
Mutuality is achieved when both parties are doing something because of the contract.
The example of a tightrope walker and a chicken suit singer is used to illustrate mutual consideration.
The chicken suit singer must be performing for the sole reason of the tightrope walker's act.
The tightrope walker must be walking only because the chicken suit singer is performing.
The concept of mutuality is essential for a contract to be valid.
Understanding the backstory and intentions of both parties is crucial in contract law.
The example of a dying wish to see a circus trick is used to emphasize the importance of mutuality.
The 'so that' test must be passed in both directions for a contract to be valid.
The concept of mutuality should not be intimidating and can be understood through practical examples.
The transcript emphasizes the importance of knowing the reasons behind actions in contract law.
The transcript uses humor and relatable examples to make complex legal concepts more accessible.
Transcripts
all right so you're in contract class
and you're going to hear some crap about
neutrality of consideration and it's
going to scare you because nobody knows
what it means calm down it's not that
confusing mutuality of consideration
means that in order to have a valid and
enforceable contract whatever is working
as consideration has to be there on both
sides that means there are two count
them two pieces of consideration for any
valid contract means that this guy is
doing this because of the contract and
this guy's also doing this because of
the contract we at lawyer up call this
the so that test it's a tiget check to
see if your contract is valid because of
good consideration it has to pass the so
that test so you're 5 years old you're
selling lemonade for a nickel a glass
Grandma comes over and she goes oh
you're so cute here's $5 and then you
give her a glass lemonade is that $5
consideration maybe she giving you $5 so
that you give her a lemonade or she
giving you $5 just because she thinks
you're cute well the thing is you really
got to know the backstory if she's giv
it to you because she thinks you're cute
then it's not consideration because it
fails to so that test she's giving you
$5 so that nothing cuz you're cute
you're giving her the lemonade so that
she gives you the $5 but there's no
mutuality so it don't work it's got to
pass both sides so that on both sides if
Grandma's really freaking thirsty and
she's got no change and she gives you $5
because she wants that lemonade then it
works same $5 it works this time where
before it didn't so don't let your
professor say $5 more money doesn't work
as consideration that's not what I said
I said it works when it passes the so
that test here's the thing about
contract okay and the special thing
about consideration looking at the words
that people say and looking at the
circumstances and looking at what
everybody's doing does not on its own
answer the question about whether
consideration is mutual no you got to
know the backstory you have to know the
backstory so here this could be the
situation say you come upon a scene
there's a guy walking a tight rope
between two trees on one side and
another guy's dressed up in chicken
costume singing not Liza Minelli Tunes
is there a good consideration there is
this a contract I think so I don't know
what happens what happens if this guy
who's singing Li and Manelli Tunes is
doing it so that this guy walks on the
tight RPP and the guy's Walking On The
Tight ROP so that the guy is will sing
in a chicken suit you don't know what
their things are maybe it turns them on
to see a guy in a chicken suit singing
Li of Manelli Tunes maybe this guy's
dying wish is to get somebody to perform
a circus trick you never know can say
but in order for it to be a valid
contract you'd have to be ble to say
that the only reason the tight RPP guy
is walking is to get the guy to go in
the chicken suit and it must be true in
both ways the chicken suit guy must be
dressed as a chicken for no reason other
than wanting the tight RPP guy to go
across that rope that is the only way
it'll work it has to be that I'm doing
my part only because I want you to do
you your part and you wouldn't do it
unless I did my part it has to be back
and forth on both sides it has to pass
the so that test mutuality consideration
don't let it scare you think of chicken
suits and Ty ropes
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)