CA0S NOS EUA

Summary

In this video script, the speaker discusses a significant event that occurred on July 14th, which they had previously predicted. They reference a similar prediction made in 2018 about an event that did occur. The speaker uses the 'slingshot argument' method learned during their master's studies to provide a concise explanation, suggesting that two names, Gary O'Donoghue and Greg Smith, are key to understanding the situation. They analyze security failures during a public event involving a former president, hinting at a possible setup. The script raises questions about intentional actions, benefits, and the implications of the event, suggesting a larger orchestrated scenario.

Takeaways

• 🗓️ The video was a live broadcast on a special day, July 14th, discussing events that the speaker had previously predicted.
• 👥 The speaker engages with long-time followers, asking if they remember the events of 2018 that were similar to what has just occurred.
• 📢 The speaker emphasizes the importance of subscribing to the channel and activating the subscription to support the content.
• 🔎 The speaker mentions using a method learned during their master's degree in logic and metaphysics to simplify complex information and focus on the most important aspects.
• 🎯 The speaker introduces the 'slingshot argument' or 'stiling argument' as a way to solve a big problem with a quick and simple argument.
• 🤔 The speaker invites viewers to reflect on who benefits from the situation, referencing the Roman Empire's concept of 'cui bono' (who benefits).
• 📌 Two key names are highlighted as crucial to understanding the event: Gary O'Donoghue, a BBC correspondent, and Greg Smith, a resident interviewed by O'Donoghue.
• 🕵️‍♂️ The speaker suggests that the security's inaction was not a mistake but a deliberate 'stand down', allowing the event to unfold.
• 🏛️ The event is described as the 'biggest theater' in human history, implying a grand staging or setup.
• 🔍 The speaker raises questions about the security measures, such as why all rooftops were not secured, similar to historical events like the Kennedy assassination.
• 🧐 The speaker expresses skepticism about the official narrative, suggesting that it's more than just a security failure and that there's a need for deeper analysis.

Q & A

What significant event is the speaker referring to that happened on October 7th?

The speaker does not specify the exact event but implies it is a significant occurrence that they had previously discussed or warned about, which has now come to pass.

What is the significance of the name Rafael Ron in the context of the script?

Rafael Ron is mentioned as a historical figure whose study can provide insight into the events that transpired on October 7, 2023. The speaker suggests that understanding Rafael Ron's history is key to understanding the current situation.

What does the term 'argumento sing' refer to in the script?

The term 'argumento sing' or 'sing shot argument' refers to a method of resolving a complex issue with a quick and simple argument, which the speaker learned during their master's studies in Logic and Metaphysics.

Who are Gary Don and Greg Smith, and why are they significant in the script?

Gary Don and Greg Smith are mentioned as key figures whose names, if researched, would provide clarity on the events that occurred. Gary Don is a BBC correspondent who interviewed Greg Smith, a resident who witnessed the events in question.

What did Greg Smith observe during the incident involving the ex-president's speech?

Greg Smith observed an individual on a rooftop with what appeared to be a defense equipment, which had a long tube. This individual was in a position to potentially harm the ex-president, yet security did not act promptly.

What does the speaker suggest about the security response time during the incident?

The speaker suggests that the security response time was unacceptably slow, taking 3 to 5 minutes to react after being alerted to the threat on the rooftop, which the speaker implies was not a mistake but a deliberate action.

What is the 'cui bono' concept mentioned by the speaker?

The 'cui bono' or 'cui prodest' concept, originating from the Roman Empire, refers to the idea of determining who benefits from a particular situation. The speaker invites the audience to consider who benefited from the events of October 7th.

What historical precedent does the speaker draw a parallel to the current situation?

The speaker draws a parallel to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy on November 22, 1963, suggesting a similar security failure where all rooftops were not controlled, leading to a successful assassination attempt.

Why does the speaker believe the incident was not a mistake but a deliberate action?

The speaker believes it was not a mistake due to the unusual delay in the security response, the strategic location of the incident with few rooftops, and the fact that security typically controls all vantage points in such situations.

What is the speaker's conclusion about who benefited from the October 7th events?

The speaker concludes that the individual referred to as 'Donal Trump' or 'the owner of triumph' benefited from the events, as it increased his power and chances of returning to a significant position, possibly the White House.