How to Finish 6 Months of Study in 72 Hours
Summary
TLDRIn this video, Dr. Justin Sun, a learning coach and former medical doctor, shares effective cramming strategies for students with an imminent exam. He emphasizes the importance of understanding learning objectives and Bloom's taxonomy to prioritize study material. Sun advises focusing on high-logic-point concepts first, then filling in gaps with lower-logic-point details. His method aims to maximize study efficiency and logical reasoning abilities, even under time constraints, ultimately improving guessing accuracy on exams.
Takeaways
- π Start by understanding the importance of Bloom's Taxonomy and how it influences the creation of exam questions, which helps in prioritizing study material.
- π₯ Dr. Justin Sun's personal experience with cramming for an exam in 3 days, and the importance of learning from such experiences for effective studying.
- π― Focus on the learning objectives provided by institutions, as they are legally obligated to test students on these objectives, guiding your study direction.
- π€ Develop the ability to think like an examiner to increase the chances of studying the right content by understanding the framework behind exam creation.
- π Identify the levels of learning that are likely to be assessed, such as lower order thinking like memorization and higher order thinking like evaluation and synthesis.
- π§ Utilize logical reasoning to deduce answers for unfamiliar questions by focusing on major concepts and principles that offer the most 'logic points'.
- π Prioritize studying material that has high logic points, which are the key concepts that help explain other parts of the topic and enhance deductive reasoning.
- β° Strategically allocate time over 3 days, starting with high logic point topics, then mid-level, and finally filling in gaps and memorizing details.
- π On day one, spend time identifying learning objectives and the likely levels of assessment to filter the importance of study material.
- π« Be prepared to skip lectures that are lower order and memorization-heavy if they do not contribute significantly to logical reasoning or deduction.
- π Use the final day for identifying gaps and focusing on memorization techniques for details that are necessary but not central to logical reasoning.
Q & A
What is the main topic of the video?
-The main topic of the video is how to study effectively in a short period of time, specifically how to cram efficiently for an exam in 3 days without compromising the quality of learning.
Who is Dr. Justin Sun?
-Dr. Justin Sun is a learning coach and the head of learning at I Can Study. He is also a former medical doctor who has helped thousands of people learn more efficiently over the past decade.
Why did Dr. Sun initially struggle with his medical school exam?
-Dr. Sun struggled because he completely forgot about the existence of a paper he was supposed to study for, due to relying on previous student notes that did not cover that particular paper. He only studied for 60 hours in the 72 hours leading up to the exam.
What was the outcome of Dr. Sun's last-minute cramming for the medical school exam?
-Dr. Sun received a C+, which is equivalent to about 65%, which was the worst mark he ever received in medical school. However, he was able to pass because the exam was heavily based on rote memorization.
What is Bloom's revised taxonomy mentioned in the video?
-Bloom's revised taxonomy is a framework used to create exam questions that assess students on different levels of thinking, ranging from lower-order thinking (isolated knowledge) to higher-order thinking (integrated understanding).
What are learning objectives and why are they important for exam preparation?
-Learning objectives are the specific goals or competencies that an educational institution aims to teach and assess in a subject. They are important for exam preparation because they guide the creation of exam questions and help students focus their study efforts on what will actually be tested.
How can understanding the examiner's perspective help with exam preparation?
-Understanding the examiner's perspective allows students to think like the examiner, which can help them predict what might be tested and at what level of learning, thus increasing their chances of studying the right topics and concepts.
What is the concept of 'logic points' in the context of this video?
-'Logic points' refer to the value of a piece of information in helping a student explain other things in the topic or make logical inferences about unknown information. Information with higher logic points is more useful for deducing other knowledge gaps.
Why is it beneficial to focus on higher logic point items during the first phase of cramming?
-Focusing on higher logic point items first is beneficial because these items are more likely to help a student make connections between concepts and logically deduce answers to questions they might not know, thus increasing their chances of answering correctly on the exam.
How should a student prioritize their study material during a 3-day cramming period according to the video?
-A student should prioritize by first identifying the learning objectives and the levels of learning that will likely be tested, then focusing on the material with the highest logic points. On the second day, they should focus on items with slightly lower logic points, and on the third day, they should address any obvious gaps and try to memorize any remaining details.
What is the guided learning program mentioned by Dr. Sun and where can one find it?
-The guided learning program is a step-by-step training program created by Dr. Sun that distills a decade of his experience in teaching people to learn more efficiently. It can be found at ionstudy.com, with a link provided in the video description.
Outlines
π Effective Cramming for Exams
Dr. Justin Sun, a learning coach and former medical doctor, introduces a method for studying efficiently in a short amount of time, specifically three days before an exam. He emphasizes this is not a recommendation for regular study habits but a skill to master in case of necessity. He shares a personal anecdote from medical school where he had to cram for an exam, resulting in a C+ grade. The story illustrates the importance of understanding the structure of exams, often based on frameworks like Bloom's Taxonomy, which categorizes levels of thinking and learning. Dr. Sun suggests that knowing the examiner's perspective and focusing on higher-order thinking can significantly improve cramming effectiveness.
π€ Strategic Cramming Based on Learning Objectives
The summary explains the importance of aligning study efforts with learning objectives and the legal obligations of institutions to test based on these objectives. It outlines the concept of Bloom's revised taxonomy, highlighting the difference between lower and higher order thinking in exam questions. The speaker advises using the taxonomy to predict the types of questions that might be asked, thus focusing study time on the most relevant material. The summary also introduces the idea of 'logic points', suggesting that some information is more valuable for logical deduction and should be prioritized during a cram session.
π Prioritizing Information for Maximum Learning Impact
This paragraph discusses a strategy for 'hyper cramming', which involves identifying the most valuable information based on its potential for logical deduction. It suggests focusing on major concepts and principles that can help infer other knowledge gaps, rather than getting bogged down in detailed, low-value information. The speaker provides a step-by-step approach for the first day of a three-day cram session, recommending spending time understanding learning objectives and the levels of learning that will be assessed, followed by focusing on the most connected and logically powerful information.
π A Three-Day Cramming Schedule for Optimal Results
The final paragraph outlines a detailed schedule for a three-day cram session. On the first day, the focus should be on high-logic-point information, which is most connected and valuable for reasoning. The second day involves revisiting slightly lower logic point topics, still avoiding overly detailed information. The third day is reserved for identifying any obvious gaps and using techniques like flashcards or memory palaces to memorize necessary details. The speaker also promotes his guided learning program for further study techniques and emphasizes that this cramming method helps train the brain for discernment and deep processing of information.
Mindmap
Keywords
π‘Cramming
π‘Learning Objectives
π‘Bloom's Revised Taxonomy
π‘Logical Deduction
π‘Fact Recall
π‘Strategic Cramming
π‘Multiple Choice Questions
π‘Microbiology
π‘Antibiotic Resistance
π‘Memory Palace Technique
π‘Guided Learning Program
Highlights
Dr. Justin Sun introduces a method to study efficiently in a short time without encouraging cramming.
The importance of understanding Bloom's revised taxonomy for effective studying.
The significance of learning objectives in shaping exam questions.
How to prioritize studying based on the level of thinking assessed in exams.
The story of Dr. Sun's experience with forgetting an exam and the strategy he used to pass.
The concept of 'logic points' to determine the value of information for deducing other knowledge.
Strategic filtering of information based on its relevance and logical deduction power.
The method of 'hyper cramming' and its application for limited time study sessions.
Using logic to make educated guesses when information is not memorized.
The importance of understanding the examiner's perspective to study effectively.
Differentiating between lower and higher order thinking in exam preparation.
The strategy of focusing on major concepts and principles over detailed technical information.
A day-by-day breakdown of an effective 3-day cramming schedule.
The role of logical reasoning in filling knowledge gaps during exams.
How to maximize the chances of guessing correctly on multiple-choice questions.
Dr. Sun's guided learning program for more efficient learning methods.
The benefits of the proposed cramming method for discerning information and deep processing.
Adapting the cramming strategy for longer study periods to maintain the same phases of focus.
Transcripts
so you've got an exam coming up in 3
days and you haven't started studying at
all what can you do to get the best
grade possible in this video I'm going
to teach you how you can study a huge
amount in a very short period of time to
be clear I'm not encouraging you to cram
for an entire exam in just 3 days but
knowing how to cover a lot of volume in
a short period of time is a useful skill
if you're new to this Channel and you're
wondering who I am I'm Dr Justin Sun I'm
a learning coach in the head of learning
I can study I'm also a former medical
doctor and for the last decade I've
helped thousands of people learn more
efficiently which does sometimes include
doing some hyper cramming before we jump
in I'd appreciate if you give this video
a like it really helps with the
algorithm which my life is at the mercy
of so why 3 days well there's a funny
story actually back when I was in my
third year of medical school there was
this paper that I was studying for and I
actually completely forgot that this
paper even existed and I know what
you're thinking thinking how can you
forget that a paper even exists well at
the time I was actually using a previous
student notes as my primary source of
studying I wasn't going to lectures
anymore and this student just decided
not to write any notes with this
particular paper so I just didn't like I
just forgot I just forgot that the whole
paper existed until 3 days before the
exam yes I understand it was really dumb
I've been very dumb for a very long long
part of my life and so for that 3 days
before the exam I studied a lot like in
72 hours I probably studied 60 of those
hours and I ended up getting the worst
mark that I ever received in medical
school which was a C+ which I think is
like a 65% or something but the thing is
I was actually quite lucky because that
particular exam and that particular
paper was very very fact recoil heavy so
I could rely on a lot of just Plano root
memorization and still managed to pass
funnily enough that very paper the next
year changed the way that they were
examining so that you would no longer
have been able to do that the questions
got way more complicated way more Nuance
like if you didn't properly understand
it you wouldn't have done very well also
potentially not surprising I don't
remember anything about that paper
anymore in fact I remember so little
about that paper I don't even remember
what the paper was on like I have a
vague memory of remembering something to
do with the pancreas and that's it maybe
was the gallbladder anyway I've learned
a lot more about how to study
effectively since then and I'm going to
teach you the right method of cramming
if you've got limited time without
spending like 20 hours a day studying so
for the first thing about cramming the
right way is to understand that you're
in a compromised position anyway you got
to lose something and you have to be
strategic about what you're going to
lose if you haven't started studying for
something 3 days before your exam and
you're expecting to still do really well
you're either a genius or you're
delusional I'm just going to let you
decide which one you are and a big thing
that helped me understand how to crme
the right way was actually getting
trained on creating assessment questions
myself as an educator I've realized what
goes on behind the scenes when they're
creating an exam paper how they thinking
about what the test you want because if
you can think like the examiner you
increase your chance of studying the
right thing now most places most
institutions will create exam questions
based on some kind of framework and
common one would be like Bloom's revised
taxonomy or solo taxonomy or really any
variation but they follow the same
general principles there are usually
different orders and levels of thinking
and they're trying to assess you on
those as a very general summary lower
order methods of thinking and learning
these tend to be a lot more isolated
whereas the higher order levels tend to
be much more integrated and there's
something of a spectrum in between so
it's the first piece of helpful
information now the the second thing is
to know that most institutions in most
countries are legally obligated to test
you on the learning objectives now they
don't have to test you on every single
learning objective and what Falls within
the scope of a learning objective can be
quite a gray area sometimes but they're
still a useful guide to work off and
most examiners are going to think like
this there's a list of learning
objectives that they have for that
particular subject let's say that there
are three for one lecture and they're
going to be thinking how can they test
these learning objectives at these
different levels of learning so already
this helps to narrow down our focus a
little bit for example if we have a
topic around Greek history then we might
get asked a question at a lower order
that's like described the major events
and significance of the Greco Persian
Wars who were the key leaders and what
were the key battles and outcomes of
this conflict whereas for the same
subject a mid order question might be
something like like analyze the social
and political structure of Athens during
the time of Pericles how did pericles's
leadership impact the Athenian democracy
culture and Empire Building efforts you
can see that it sign they compare and
contrast multiple ideas against each
other compared to the really higher
order questions which might sound a
little bit more like evaluate the
influence of Greek philosophy on the
development of West and thought
discussed the contributions of Socrates
Plato and Aristotle and how their ideas
shaped not only ancient grease but also
subsequent intellectual philosophical
traditions so now it's not just about
examining different ideas against each
other but now you have to create a value
judgment about how important the
contribution of each of these ideas and
relationships are on each other it's
more than just knowing that there are
differences and similarities it's
understanding the significance of them
if we use another example like
microbiology then we could have a lower
order equ that sounds like explain the
differences between procaryotic and
eukariotic cells with examples of
microorganisms that belong to each
category and describe their basic
structural characteristics relatively
straightforward fact recall quite
isolated a mid-order question instead
might sound a little bit more like
discuss the role of microorganisms and
biogeochemical cycles focusing on the
nitrogen and carbon Cycles how do
bacteria and AA contribute to nutrient
cycling in ecosystems and what are the
ecological implications of these
processes again you can see now we're
looking at comparing different concepts
and ideas with each other but we don't
have the idea of significance that comes
through the higher order version which
might sound like critically evaluate the
use of antibiotics in medicine and
agriculture analyze the challenges of
antibiotic resistance its mechanisms and
the potential consequences for public
health and propose strategies to address
the issue of antibiotic resistance
effectively that's a super broad
question incredibly complicated but
again you see that they're asking you
about the consequence the significance
the importance of these interaction
actions so this is going to be the
pattern across the board any lecture
objective they can test you on a direct
immediate fact recall very isolated they
can ask you about comparisons with
related other Concepts or objectives or
they can ask you about the significance
of them again they don't necessarily
have to ask each of these depending on
your curriculum sometimes the lecture
objectives are actually written in a way
that indicates what level they're
interested in so for example the lecture
objective might actually say that what
they want from you is to be able to
describe the something something
something which suggest that it's a
lower water Mastery they're looking for
whereas if the lecture objective uses
words like discuss evaluate contrast
these are indications that they want
that higher order flare and so when you
scan through electure objectives you can
actually get a reasonably good map for
how they're likely to test you now
remember you're going to lose something
you're not going to be able to cover
every single question there are going to
be things that you miss but this is is a
more strategic way of using your time it
increases the probability of getting
more questions correct but this is still
not enough because even then especially
if you've got a Content dense curriculum
it's going to be very overwhelming and
this is where the idea of logic comes in
how can we help our brain figure out
what the right answer is even when it
doesn't actually know the right answer I
mean it's kind of a fancy way of just
saying how can we guess more accurately
and so if we look at how our brain is
able to make logical deductions it can
be even more strategic how we spend our
time cramming let me explain our brain
has a network of knowledge it's able to
use this network to make inferences
about new information and new problems
so let's say you didn't study everything
and the test question is now asking you
about some piece of information that is
missing from your network well if you've
got enough connections that are
surrounding in it you can logically
infer the answer this is something that
might be called deduction or logical
reasoning and so obviously if you've got
more knowledge and more things
surrounding the Gap then it's easier to
make the inference for example if the
only thing that you're missing is the
second step of a process but you know
the first step and the third step and
you know what goes in and you know what
comes out you might logically be able to
figure out what happens in the middle to
make it from input and output and here's
a really strategic part when it comes to
cramming is that not all information is
the same value from a logical reasoning
perspective we can always think about
each piece of information having like
logic points the more logic points
something has the more useful it is in
figuring out other things typically
these are going to be the major Concepts
principles rationals on the other hand
if you have something that is low level
of logic points then this is going to be
like a very very detailed technical
piece of information like for example a
particular constant for an equation or
the particular micrometers or the tubule
this is information which might come up
somewhere but there's limited ways that
you can use this information to
logically deduce other knowledge gaps
and so this gives us the basis for our
hyper cramming strategy we want to use
our time to figure out what are the
learning objectives what are the and
levels of learning that they're likely
to assess us on for each of these
objectives and then what are the pieces
of information that give us the most
logical deduction power I.E which pieces
of information have the highest logic
points now you might be wondering how do
you even know what the logic points of
something are and the answer is that
until you really spend more time to
study which you don't have time to do by
the way you're not really going to know
so you have to make your best guess the
good good news is that your best guess
is probably going to be reasonably
accurate all you have to do is as you're
reading the lecture slides or the
coursebook or whatever resources you're
studying from you ask yourself how
valuable is this piece of information at
helping me explain other things in the
topic how helpful is it at making sense
of multiple other things in the topic
and you will generally be able to say
okay well this seems like it might Maybe
be related to some other things or you
might read it and think this seems
really specific and it's probably not
going to be very relevant and so what
you do is you just ignore the things
that seem like they're not going to be
as relevant and you just start with the
things that feel like they are connected
to more pieces and it doesn't really
matter if you miss a few things because
first of all again you've got limited
time you got to pick your losses but the
other thing is that you might get three
pages down and realize something you
skipped earlier actually is really
related like it directly explains this
other thing that you're now reading
about well that's fine you can just
always go back and then learn it now but
the key is to be quite aggressive with
filtering what information is helping
you reason about the topic and which
information is something that you might
just end up having to wrot learn and
memorize which you've got limited time
for and that's the type of thing that
you should really have for the last
night of cramming rather than day one of
a 3-day cramming stretch so here is how
I would schedule it if you've only got 3
days day one spend about one or 2 hours
of that time which I know it seems like
a lot of time but it's well worth it
scoping through the topic to pick out
what are the learning objectives and
what are the orders of learning that
they're probably going to test me on
this is going to give you a bit of
filter for when you're reading the
information so you can make sense of how
important it is and how much time it's
worth investing into it in the first
place you might sometimes find entire
lectures where every single learning
objective is very very lower order and
memorization heavy this is the type of
lecture that you might want to just
completely skip on this first day and
come back to later it's kind of like a
nice to have on the other hand you might
realize that only two or three lectures
are really really dense and asking you
about the higher water things and you've
got like another 10 or 20 lectures that
are all much simpler much faster and the
learning objectives for it seem much
simpler in lower order in that case the
right strategy might be to put the
higher water of stuff off first and just
go through the simple lectures because
most places you will have to be tested
on every lecture at least once in fact I
remember when I was in unique one of my
friends skipped the hardest five
lectures of Bio chemistry like these
five lectures would have taken like the
same amount of time to study as all the
other lectures combined for that topic
and they managed to get an A minus
without studying the hardest lectures at
all they only focused on the simplest
lectures and because they knew that as a
percentage all of these lectures have to
be tested at least once they just moed
up a bunch of those easy points and they
let themselves just figure out the rest
with the hardest lectures to get like
you know 20 or 30% of those questions
right but the moral of the story here is
that when you're clear about the
learning objectives and you're clear
about the different orders that they're
likely to test you on it makes you have
a much better judgment about what is
relevant and what is not so it's time
very worthwhile to spend after you do
that go through the lectures and keep
that filter in your mind ask yourself
how connected as this information to
everything else does it give me more
logical reasoning and deduction ability
and make a guess on how many logic
points it has spend your time to learn
the things that have the highest logic
points only for as much of that paper as
you can you want to cover as many
lectures as possible focusing only on
the stuff that has the highest logic
points and to be honest if you can do
that there is a really good chance that
with that alone you could pass because
especially if it's a multiple choice
question youve increased the chance of
guessing the right answer from maybe
like a 25% random selection to a 45% but
we still have day two and so on day two
we're going to do the exact same thing
as day one but now on the slightly lower
level of logic points these are the
things that you skipped on the first day
still not those really really detailed
things but the parts that feel like they
are maybe a little bit more important
but definitely not as important as the
stuff that you covered on day one and
again go through as many lectures as
possible filling that out and again I
know it's scary to keep just skipping
all of this content but You' got to lose
something and again you have to pick
your losses and so for day three we're
going to spend this time looking at the
learning objectives looking at the
different orders that they're going to
test you on and asking yourself are
there any really obvious gaps that I
haven't been able to fill yet and if
you've got some more time try to cram in
using flash cards or Memory Palace
techniques all the tiny little details
that you might need to pick up and just
get through as many of those details as
possible if you can't get through them
more no big deal you're already putting
yourself in the best possible position
anyway and what you'll find is that when
you walk into the exam you're not really
going to be that confident for any
question but overall your chances of
getting the right Mark are going to be
relatively High because you can figure
out a lot of things you can logically
reason the right answers if you like
this approach you thought it was
interesting and you want to learn more
methods like this then this as well as
basically everything else I talk about
in all my videos are covered in my
guided learning program this is a
stepbystep guided training program that
distills a decade of my experience
teaching people to learn more
efficiently so that you can have the
smoothest and easiest and most
error-free path of becoming more
efficient learner if that sounds
appealing to you then you can check that
out at ion study.com there's a link in
the description now this method of
criming is actually really beneficial
for some other reasons as well first of
all it really helps to figure out that
logic Point scoring because it trains
your brain to be more Discerning with
the information this is a really
important part of deep processing which
is in other words how intelligent you
are and that's something that you can
train I talk about that a lot more in my
video around learner types and the other
thing is that if you have more days like
4 days or 5 days or 6 days or seven days
or maybe even like you know like a whole
semester to study for it you can
actually use the exact same approach but
you just spend longer on each of the
days but the phases and what you're
focusing on in each phase of study
Remains the Same in the first phase
whether that's one day or seven days
we're focusing on the higher logic Point
items and then on the second phase we're
focusing on the mid logic Point items
and in the third phase AKA maybe the few
weeks before the exam or few days we're
going to be going through lecture
objectives looking at the different
orders that we might be tested on
looking for gaps and then mopping up all
those little details that we'd have to
rot memorize that we're only going to
remember for a few days anyway and so
that is the most cognitively beneficial
way of cramming again I'm not saying you
should cram but if you're going to do it
you may as well do it the right way
Browse More Related Video
What I Learned After 5000 Hours of Revision
What are the BEST apps for Learning? - Q/A (Youtube comments edition)
How I UPGRADE the Most Popular Study Techniques
Learning Expert Reacts to Top Medical Student Advice
How I Would Study in Med School (If I Could Start Over)
How to UPGRADE iPad note taking (with Science)
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)