Is your Brain a Computer?

Instant HPS
19 Sept 201406:34

Summary

TLDRThis historical exploration delves into the evolving perceptions of the human brain, from 17th-century hydraulic models to the 19th-century telegraph analogy, and finally to the modern computer metaphor. It questions whether the brain operates like a computer, examining the differences in hardware and the possibility of shared software functions. The video introduces computational neuroscience, suggesting that while the brain may not compute exactly like a computer, understanding its algorithms and representations can provide insights into its workings and potential malfunctions.

Takeaways

  • 🧠 The historical perspective: In the 1600s, Rene Descartes proposed the brain and nervous system as a network of fluid-filled pipes, influenced by hydraulic animated statues.
  • 🕰️ 1700s fascination: The era saw a craze for automaton clockwork machines that mimicked human actions, leading to the publication of 'Man the Machine' by Julien Offray de La Mettrie, who compared the human body to a self-winding machine.
  • 📬 Telegraph analogy: In the 1800s, the nervous system was likened to a telegraph network, an analogy that persists today in discussions of nerve signals and the brain.
  • 💡 Modern analogy: Today, the brain is often compared to a computer, with information stored in memory and processed over time, raising questions about the validity of this metaphor.
  • 🤖 Hardware vs. software: The brain's hardware is fundamentally different from a computer's, with no central processing unit and distributed control structures.
  • 🛠️ Evolution vs. design: The brain has evolved over millions of years, unlike computer software designed by engineers, suggesting different operational principles.
  • 🤔 Metaphorical skepticism: There is skepticism about the computer analogy being taken too literally, considering the differences in evolution and design.
  • 🔍 Middle ground: A third possibility suggests the brain may not work exactly like a computer but could use computational elements like algorithms and logical functions.
  • 🧬 Computational neuroscience: This field of research explores the brain's operations as computations, even if they differ from those in computers, to understand neural functions.
  • 🦉 Owl example: Neuroscientists use computational theory to explain how an owl computes the position of prey based on sound arrival time differences, demonstrating the practical use of computational thinking.
  • 🧐 Theoretical formulation: The computational approach aids in formulating theories about the function of neural systems, crucial for understanding the complex network of brain cells and fibers.

Q & A

  • What was Rene Descartes' theory on the human brain and nervous system in the 1600s?

    -Rene Descartes proposed that the human brain and nervous system were an elaborate network of fluid-filled pipes which controlled the body, inspired by the hydraulic animated statues of the time.

  • What was the fascination with automata and clockwork machines in the 1700s, and how did it relate to the understanding of the human body?

    -In the 1700s, there was a craze for automata and clockwork machines that resembled humans in their actions. Physician and philosopher Julien Offray de La Mettrie wrote a book called 'Man the Machine,' suggesting that the human body, including the brain, is a self-winding machine made of springs.

  • Why did La Mettrie publish 'Man the Machine' anonymously?

    -La Mettrie published anonymously due to the troubling implications of his theory, which suggested that if a clockwork brain could explain all human thoughts and behavior, then humans might not possess a soul.

  • How did the telegraph network influence the understanding of the nervous system in the 1800s?

    -In the 1800s, the spread of telegraph cables led to the nervous system being compared to a telegraph network, with signals being transmitted from the nerves to the brain, an analogy that persists today.

  • What is the current analogy used to describe the brain, and why might it be more than just a metaphor?

    -The current analogy for the brain is a computer. This might be more than a mere metaphor because it appeals to us as the computer is an advanced technological device, and it could potentially help us better understand how the brain works by comparing it with a computer.

  • What was the original meaning of the word 'computer', and how has it evolved?

    -The word 'computer' originally referred to people, typically women, whose job was to perform mathematical operations by hand. The term evolved with the advent of digital computers that took over these tasks.

  • How did Alan Turing's conception of the Turing machine relate to the human brain?

    -Alan Turing's conception of the Turing machine was about breaking down and automating the steps a human computer makes when performing routine tasks, which can be related to how the human brain processes information.

  • What are the differences between the hardware of the brain and a computer?

    -The hardware of the brain is completely different from that of a computer. For example, computers have central processing units where algorithms are executed, whereas the brain's control appears to be distributed among various structures with no central CPU.

  • Why might the brain's software be different from computer software even if they perform similar operations?

    -The brain's software might be different because it has evolved over millions of years, whereas computer software is designed by human engineers to solve problems and write code in a manner that is often roundabout and not necessarily optimal from a software engineering perspective.

  • What is the middle ground between the literal and skeptical attitudes towards the computer analogy for the brain?

    -The middle ground suggests that while the brain may not work exactly like a computer, it could use elements central to computational theory, such as algorithms, symbolic representations, and logical functions, indicating that the brain performs computations, albeit different from those in a computer.

  • What is computational neuroscience, and how does it relate to understanding the brain?

    -Computational neuroscience is a field of research that explores the idea of the brain performing computations, even if they are different from those in a computer. It helps neuroscientists formulate theories about the function of neural systems and provides a step towards understanding and potentially fixing the brain when it malfunctions.

Outlines

00:00

🧠 Historical Brain Analogies and Computational Theory

This paragraph delves into the historical perspectives on the human brain's function, comparing it to various mechanical devices over the centuries. Rene Descartes in the 1600s envisioned the nervous system as a network of fluid-filled pipes. In the 1700s, the fascination with automaton clockwork machines inspired the idea that the human body could be a self-winding machine, as suggested by physician and philosopher Julien Offray de La Mettrie in his anonymously published book 'Man the Machine'. The 1800s saw the nervous system likened to a telegraph network, an analogy that persists today in discussions of nerve signals. The modern analogy of the brain to a computer is explored, questioning whether this is a mere metaphor or if there is a deeper connection. The origins of the term 'computer' and the evolution of digital computers are also discussed, along with the potential for understanding the brain better through computational theory.

05:01

🦉 Computational Neuroscience and Owl's Auditory Perception

The second paragraph focuses on the application of computational theory in neuroscience, specifically how it aids in understanding the brain's functionality. It uses the example of an owl's ability to pinpoint the location of its prey by processing the slight differences in sound arrival time at its ears. This example illustrates how computational approaches can help neuroscientists formulate theories about the workings of neural systems. The paragraph discusses the complexity of the brain's cellular structure and the importance of computational theories in making sense of this complexity, emphasizing their role in advancing our understanding of brain function and in developing treatments for neurological disorders.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Rene Descartes

Rene Descartes was a 17th-century French philosopher known for his dualistic theory of mind-body separation. In the script, Descartes is mentioned for proposing that the human brain and nervous system functioned like a complex network of fluid-filled pipes, which was a significant shift from the understanding of the time. His ideas laid the groundwork for later theories about the brain's mechanisms.

💡Hydraulic animation

Hydraulic animation refers to the use of water pressure to create movement in mechanical devices, often seen in statues or figures. The script mentions that Descartes was inspired by hydraulic animated statues, which suggests a mechanical view of the human body, influencing his theories on the brain and nervous system.

💡Automata

Automata are self-operating machines, often designed to mimic lifelike movements or actions. In the 18th century, as mentioned in the script, there was a fascination with clockwork machines that could perform human-like tasks. This historical context is important as it reflects the evolving understanding of mechanisms that could be compared to human functions, including the brain.

💡Julien Offray de La Mettrie

Julien Offray de La Mettrie was an 18th-century physician and philosopher who wrote 'L'Homme Machine' (Man a Machine), suggesting that the human body, including the brain, operates like a self-winding machine. The script highlights his work as an example of early attempts to mechanize human functions, which is central to the theme of understanding the brain through mechanical analogies.

💡Telegraph

A telegraph is a device for transmitting messages over long distances through electrical signals. In the 19th century, as the script explains, the nervous system was compared to a telegraph network, illustrating how the understanding of communication technologies influenced the way scientists thought about the brain's signaling processes.

💡Computational theory

Computational theory in the context of the brain refers to the idea that cognitive processes can be understood as computations performed by the brain. The script discusses this theory as a middle ground between the literal and metaphorical use of computers to understand the brain, suggesting that while the brain may not work exactly like a computer, it could still use computational elements.

💡Hardware and software

In the script, 'hardware' refers to the physical components of a computer, like the central processing unit, while 'software' refers to the programs and algorithms that run on the hardware. The distinction is made to highlight the differences between the brain's biological structure and the artificial constructs of computers, yet it also suggests a potential parallel in how both process information.

💡Evolution

Evolution is the process by which species change over time through genetic variation and natural selection. The script uses the concept of evolution to contrast the organic development of the brain with the designed software of computers, suggesting that the brain's processes may be fundamentally different due to its evolutionary history.

💡Neural systems

Neural systems are networks of neurons that work together to perform specific functions in the brain. The script mentions the importance of understanding the function of neural systems, which is a central theme in the video as it relates to the computational approach to studying the brain.

💡Computational Neuroscience

Computational Neuroscience is a field that applies principles from computational theory to understand the brain's functions. The script introduces this field as a starting point for exploring how the brain might perform computations, even if they differ from those in a computer, indicating a blend of literal and metaphorical understanding of the brain as a computational device.

💡Owl's auditory localization

Owl's auditory localization refers to the ability of owls to determine the position of prey by the slight difference in sound arrival time at their two ears. The script uses this as an example of how neuroscientists can apply computational theories to understand specific brain functions, illustrating the practical application of computational approaches in neuroscience.

Highlights

In the 1600s, René Descartes proposed that the human brain and nervous system were an elaborate network of fluid-filled pipes controlling the body, inspired by hydraulic animated statues.

In the 1700s, there was a craze for automata and clockwork machines that looked and acted like people, leading to Julian Offray de La Mettrie's book 'Man the Machine'.

La Mettrie claimed the human body, including the brain, is a self-winding machine, a collection of springs, but had to publish anonymously due to the troubling implications for the soul.

In the 1800s, the nervous system was compared to a telegraph network, an analogy that persists today when discussing signals transmitted from nerves to the brain.

Today's common analogy for the brain is a computer, with information stored in memory and new information processed over time.

The word 'computer' originally referred to people, typically women, who performed mathematical operations by hand before digital computers took over.

Alan Turing laid the conceptual foundations of modern computing with the Turing machine, inspired by breaking down and automating the steps a human computer makes.

Digital computers now perform complex tasks like playing chess, flying planes, and managing the stock market, raising the question of whether they work like us or replicate our brain's functions.

The possibility that the brain works literally like a computer is considered, including the separation of hardware and software differences.

The brain's evolved hardware is fundamentally different from a computer's central processing units, with control distributed across various structures.

The brain's software may not be the same as a computer's, as it has evolved over millions of years, unlike human-engineered computer software.

A skeptical view suggests the brain may not work like a computer at all, and the analogy is merely metaphorical.

Even as a metaphor, computational approaches may still be useful for understanding the brain.

A middle ground is proposed, where the brain may not work exactly like a computer but uses elements central to computational theory like algorithms and symbolic representations.

Computational neuroscience explores the idea of the brain performing computations, even if different from those in a computer.

Neuroscientists use computational theory to explain how an owl's brain computes the precise position of prey based on sound arrival time differences.

The computational approach helps neuroscientists formulate theories about the function of neural systems to understand behavior and fix issues when the brain goes wrong.

Transcripts

play00:06

in the 1600s Rene deart proposed that

play00:09

the human brain and nervous system were

play00:11

an elaborate network of fluid filled

play00:13

pipes which controlled the body he was

play00:15

inspired by the hydraulic animated

play00:17

statues that delighted the nobility of

play00:20

Europe in the 1700s there was a craze

play00:23

for autonoma Clockwork machines which

play00:25

looked and acted like people writing

play00:28

drawing and even playing the FL

play00:31

physician and philosopher Julian lri

play00:34

wrote a book called man the machine

play00:36

which claimed that the human body

play00:38

including the brain is just a

play00:40

self-winding machine a collection of

play00:43

Springs he had to publish anonymously

play00:45

because of the troubling implication

play00:47

that if A Clockwork brain explains all

play00:49

human thoughts and behavior then we have

play00:52

no

play00:53

soul coinciding with the spread of

play00:55

telegraph cables in the 1800s 19th

play00:59

century things ERS compared the nervous

play01:01

system to a telegraph Network the

play01:03

analogy lives on today when we talk of

play01:05

signals being transmitted from the

play01:07

nerves to the brain as strange as these

play01:10

historical cases might seem they weren't

play01:13

just speculation for the sake of it

play01:15

comparing something you don't understand

play01:17

like the brain with a machine you do

play01:19

understand is an important part of

play01:21

scientific

play01:23

methodology today's goto analogy for the

play01:26

brain is a computer we store information

play01:29

in our memory and take time to process

play01:32

new

play01:33

information but is this any more than

play01:35

mere metaphor one which appeals to us

play01:38

because the computer is the most

play01:39

advanced technological device around or

play01:42

is it that the brain really is a

play01:45

computer the word computer first meant

play01:48

the people typically women whose job it

play01:51

was to perform mathematical operations

play01:53

by hand before digital computers took

play01:56

over the

play01:57

work when Alan Turing laid the

play01:59

conception ual foundations of modern

play02:01

Computing with the touring machine he

play02:03

was thinking about how to break down and

play02:06

automate the steps that a human computer

play02:08

makes when performing a routine task now

play02:12

our digital computers do much more than

play02:14

add and subtract they play chess fly

play02:17

planes beat us in game shows wheel and

play02:20

deal on the stock market do they manage

play02:23

all this because they work like us

play02:25

because they replicate the way our brain

play02:27

works and is it possible that we can

play02:30

better understand how the brain works by

play02:32

comparing it with a

play02:34

computer it's worth breaking down the

play02:37

different ways this could turn out first

play02:40

it's possible that the brain does

play02:42

literally work like a

play02:43

computer here we need to separate

play02:46

hardware and software it's always been

play02:48

clear that the hardware of the brain is

play02:50

completely different from that of a

play02:53

computer for example computers have

play02:55

central processing units control centers

play02:58

where their algorith get executed

play03:01

there's no CPU in the brain control

play03:04

appears to be distributed around

play03:06

numerous different

play03:09

structures even if the hardware is

play03:11

completely different it might still be

play03:14

that the brain performs the same basic

play03:16

operations that a computer does in other

play03:19

words that the software is the

play03:21

same one reason to think this is

play03:24

unlikely is that the brain has evolved

play03:27

over millions of years whereas computer

play03:29

soft sof Ware is designed by human

play03:31

Engineers who solve problems and write

play03:33

code the often roundabout solutions that

play03:36

natural selection hits upon are unlikely

play03:39

to be the same ones that would seem

play03:40

optimal to a software

play03:42

engineer a second possibility is that

play03:45

there is no concrete sense in which your

play03:48

brain works like a computer at all it's

play03:50

merely a

play03:51

metaphor given the concerns just raised

play03:54

about taking the computer analogy too

play03:56

literally there may be something to the

play03:58

skepticism

play04:00

but even if computational approaches are

play04:02

merely metaphorical in this sense they

play04:04

may still be useful

play04:07

metaphors it is thus worth exploring a

play04:10

third possibility that seeks a middle

play04:12

ground between these literal and

play04:14

skeptical attitudes towards the computer

play04:16

analogy namely it's possible that the

play04:19

brain does not work exactly like a

play04:22

computer but that it does nonetheless

play04:24

use some of the elements that are

play04:26

Central to computational Theory like

play04:28

algorithms symbolic representations and

play04:31

logical

play04:32

functions in other words it may be

play04:35

fruitful to think about the brain as

play04:37

performing computations even if those

play04:40

computations are very different from

play04:42

those we'd find in a

play04:44

computer this idea is the starting point

play04:47

of a field of research called

play04:48

computational Neuroscience for example

play04:51

neuroscientists have developed an

play04:53

explanation of how an ow so precisely

play04:56

works out where prey is positioned by

play04:58

looking at the computations performed in

play05:00

its brain neurons in a specific circuit

play05:04

respond to the tiny differences in the

play05:06

arrival time of a sound at the owl's two

play05:09

ears this gives a reliable output of the

play05:12

praise

play05:13

position but how far can neuroscientist

play05:15

go by thinking of the brain in

play05:17

computational terms one of the

play05:19

advantages of the computational approach

play05:22

is that it helps neuroscientists

play05:24

formulate theories about the function of

play05:26

neural systems when you open the scholar

play05:29

look inside what's there is a collection

play05:31

of billions of cells linked together by

play05:34

a tangle of nerve fibers we need

play05:37

theories of function in order to unravel

play05:39

that tangle and to understand which

play05:41

features of those cells and fibers are

play05:43

relevant to behavior and so the

play05:45

computational approach provides an

play05:47

important step towards understanding how

play05:50

the brain works and fixing it when it

play05:52

goes

play05:53

[Music]

play05:58

wrong

play06:07

[Music]

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Related Tags
Brain TheoryNeuroscienceHydraulic AnalogyClockwork MachinesJulian Offray de La MettrieTelegraph NetworkComputational MetaphorDigital ComputersHuman ComputerComputational NeuroscienceNeural Systems