Anker Prime 250W 27650 mAh versus UGREEN 25k 145W Power Banks

Summary

This video script reviews two high-capacity power banks, the Ugreen 145W and the Anker 250W Mega, assessing their charging capabilities and efficiency. The Ugreen, while advanced with multiple charging modes, struggles to maintain its high power output and has an inaccurate power meter. The Anker, boasting a 250W output, delivers impressive charging speeds but also has display inaccuracies. Both power banks offer good energy storage, but the Ugreen's UPS functionality and the Anker's efficiency make them notable, albeit with some flaws and high price tags.

Takeaways

• 🔋 The Ugreen power bank claims to provide 145 watts of power capability but struggles to sustain this output for long periods, likely due to overheating issues.
• 🔌 The Ugreen model 90597 A power bank features Power Delivery and Quick Charge capabilities on three ports, but lacks PPS modes, which may limit charging for certain devices.
• 🔍 The Ugreen power bank's user manual includes an infographic detailing port capabilities and power delivery, which is appreciated for clarity but lacks information on usable capacity.
• ⏱️ The Ugreen power bank's charging cycle is relatively slow, topping out at 60 watts, and it takes 1 hour and 42 minutes to fully charge, which is moderate compared to competitors.
• 📊 A chart is provided comparing the Ugreen and Anker power banks' ability to charge various devices multiple times, indicating the Ugreen can charge most devices but not as quickly as the Anker.
• 🔥 The Ugreen power bank has thermal issues, overheating and shutting down at 70% capacity during high-power output tests, suggesting potential design limitations.
• 📈 The Anker 1340 Prime power bank offers 250 watts output and includes PPS support for fast charging of Samsung devices, positioning it as a high-performance option.
• 🔌 The Anker power bank can deliver a wide range of voltages and has a more accurate display for charging progress, but still shows inaccuracies in the final charging stages.
• 🔄 Both power banks have low power modes for charging small devices over extended periods and are within the 100Wh limit for air travel, making them portable options.
• 🌡️ Thermal performance varies between the two power banks, with the Anker staying cooler during tests, suggesting it may be better suited for warmer climates.
• 💰 Both power banks are positioned at the higher end of the market in terms of price, with the Anker offering more power and modes of operation but at a premium cost.

Q & A

What is the main purpose of the video script?

The main purpose of the video script is to review and compare the charging capabilities of two power banks, the Ugreen 145W and the Anker 250W Mega Ultra Power Bank, to help viewers make an informed buying decision.

What claims does the Ugreen power bank make about its power capabilities?

The Ugreen power bank claims to have a 145 watts power capability, with three total ports that can deliver various voltages and support both power delivery and Quick Charge capabilities.

What is the issue with the Ugreen power bank's power output as described in the script?

The Ugreen power bank has an issue with sustaining its high power output. It can only deliver 145 watts for a short period before one of the ports shuts down, likely due to overheating of the electronics rather than the battery.

What is the Anker power bank's main advantage according to the script?

The Anker power bank's main advantage is its efficiency and high power output capability, being able to charge at 140 watts for most of its charge cycle and having a low power loss from the wall to the output.

What is the issue with the power meter display on both power banks?

The power meter display on both power banks is inaccurate, showing 100% charge before the charging cycle is actually complete, which can mislead users about the actual charging status.

What is the UPS capability of the Ugreen power bank?

The Ugreen power bank has UPS (uninterruptible power supply) functionality, allowing it to keep the USB-C port operating during power outages on the other USB port, although it can still deplete itself as it allows more power to flow out than in.

What is the power density of the power banks discussed in the script?

The power density of the power banks indicates how fast the energy can be accessed. The more expensive power banks, like the Anker, stand out with higher power densities, meaning they can charge and discharge faster.

What are the physical dimensions and form factors of the Ugreen and Anker power banks?

The Ugreen power bank is described as a more typical long flat pack, while the Anker power bank is likened to a burrito due to its larger and heavier form factor, but also because it contains a larger battery capacity.

What is the script's final verdict on the Ugreen power bank's value for money?

The script suggests that the Ugreen power bank, while not necessarily bad, is overpriced considering its average efficiency and struggles to deliver on its power claims, making it less competitive compared to other high-end power banks.

What future content does the script mention for the channel?

The script mentions that the channel plans to review more power adapters, including some lower wattage ones from Europe, and that there is a long list of upcoming power banks and adapters to be tested.

Outlines

00:00

🔋 Power Bank Showdown: Ugreen vs Anker Mega

This paragraph introduces a comparative review of two high-capacity power banks, the Ugreen 145W and the Anker 250W Mega. The Ugreen model claims to offer 145W of power output with advanced features like Power Delivery and Quick Charge across three ports, but lacks PPS mode which might limit charging for certain phones. The Anker, on the other hand, is expected to be a tough competitor, boasting a 250W output and various voltage delivery options. The script outlines the testing process to evaluate power sustainability, operational modes, and energy capacity, aiming to assist viewers in making an informed purchase decision. It also mentions the support for the channel through Patreon and other platforms.

05:01

📊 Detailed Analysis and Testing of Power Banks

The second paragraph delves into the detailed testing and analysis of the Ugreen and Anker power banks. It discusses the Ugreen's ability to deliver up to 145W, but notes issues with sustained high power output, suggesting potential electronic overheating. The Anker power bank is highlighted for its efficiency, PPS support for Samsung devices, and its quick charging capabilities. Both power banks are evaluated on their charging cycles, efficiency, and display inaccuracies. The paragraph also touches on the UPS capability, form factor, and thermal performance of the devices, concluding with a comparison of their weight and packaging waste.

10:02

💡 Power Bank Performance and Value Assessment

The final paragraph wraps up the review by assessing the value and performance of the Ugreen and Anker power banks. It points out that while both power banks have high power density and can charge and discharge quickly, they come at a premium price. The Ugreen is criticized for its inability to sustain its claimed power output and for its overheating issues, while the Anker is praised for its efficiency and power capabilities, despite its high cost. The paragraph also discusses the power banks' energy and power densities, form factors, UPS functionality, and their performance in low power mode. The script ends with the presenter's plan for future videos, including more power adapters and banks, and an invitation for viewer suggestions.

Keywords

💡Power Bank

A power bank, also known as a portable charger or battery pack, is a personal, portable device that stores energy and is used to charge electronic devices such as smartphones, tablets, and laptops. In the video, the main theme revolves around testing and comparing different power banks, focusing on their charging capabilities, power output, and efficiency.

💡Power Delivery

Power Delivery (PD) is a specification that enables faster, more efficient charging and supports a wider range of voltages, currents, and charging speeds. In the context of the video, the Ugreen power bank is noted to have Power Delivery capabilities, allowing it to deliver varying voltages and support Quick Charge on multiple ports.

💡Quick Charge

Quick Charge is a technology that enables devices to charge faster than standard charging methods. The script mentions that the Ugreen power bank has Quick Charge capabilities on its ports, which is an important feature for users who require rapid charging of their devices.

💡Wattage

Wattage refers to the rate of energy transfer, measured in watts. In the video, wattage is a critical metric used to evaluate the power output capabilities of the power banks, with the Ugreen claiming 145 watts of power capability and the Anker offering 250 watts.

💡USB-C

USB-C is a type of USB connector that is becoming more prevalent due to its ability to carry more power and data, and its reversible design. The script discusses the USB-C ports on the power banks, noting their ability to deliver and receive various voltages and support charging at different rates.

💡mAh (Milliampere-hour)

mAh is a unit of measure for the amount of electrical charge that a battery can store. The script mentions the capacities of the power banks in mAh, with the Ugreen having 25,000 mAh and the Anker 27,600 mAh, indicating their energy storage capabilities.

💡PPS (Programmable Power Supply)

PPS is a feature that allows for flexible voltage and current combinations, supporting newer fast-charging technologies. The Anker power bank in the video is noted to have PPS mode, which is important for devices that require this mode for optimal charging.

💡Efficiency

In the context of power banks, efficiency refers to how well the device converts power from the wall to the output power without significant loss. The script discusses the efficiency of both power banks, noting that the Anker has improved efficiency compared to previous models.

💡Thermals

Thermals in the context of electronics refer to the heat generated during operation. The video script mentions checking the thermals of the power banks, indicating the importance of temperature management to ensure safe and efficient operation.

💡UPS (Uninterruptible Power Supply)

A UPS is a device that provides emergency power to an electrical load when the input power source fails. The script discusses the UPS capability of the Ugreen power bank, noting its ability to continue providing power on one port even when the main power source is interrupted.

💡Energy Density

Energy density is a measure of the amount of energy stored in a given system or region of space per unit volume or mass. The script uses energy density to compare the power banks, indicating that higher energy density is desirable as it means more energy is stored in a smaller or lighter package.

Highlights

The Ugreen power bank is put to the test against the Anker 250W Mega Ultra Power Bank to see if it can live up to its claims.

Ugreen claims 145 watts of power capability, a significant figure in the power bank market.

The Ugreen power bank features advanced capabilities including Power Delivery and Quick Charge on three total ports.

The Ugreen lacks PPS modes, which could limit its compatibility with certain devices.

A specific port on the Ugreen can deliver 100 watts of output power, which is clearly labeled.

The Ugreen's charging rate is capped at 60 watts, which is surprisingly low considering its power output capabilities.

The Ugreen power bank's user manual includes an infographic detailing port capabilities and power delivery, enhancing user understanding.

The Ugreen power bank's performance was tested with various devices to determine its charging capabilities.

The Ugreen can only deliver 145 watts for a short time before one of its ports shuts down, suggesting potential overheating issues.

The Anker 1340 Prime power bank offers 250W output and includes PPS mode for Samsung 45W super fast charging.

The Anker power bank has an issue with its display showing 100% charge before the charging cycle is actually complete.

The Anker power bank is noted for its efficiency, with only a 19% power loss from the wall to the output.

Both power banks were tested for UPS (uninterruptible power supply) capability, with the Ugreen showing better performance.

The Ugreen and Anker power banks both have low power modes that allow for charging small devices over extended periods.

The power banks meet the 100Wh requirement for extra non-permitted air travel, although they are on the heavier side.

The Ugreen's 145W claim is questioned as it cannot sustain 100W without shutting down, indicating a discrepancy between claim and reality.

Thermal performance of the power banks was tested, with the Anker showing better temperature management.

The power density of the power banks is analyzed, showing that higher-priced power banks can charge and discharge faster.

The Anker power bank is praised for its efficiency and power capability, justifying its higher cost for those needing top performance.

The Ugreen power bank is noted for its friendly form factor but falls short in delivering the power it claims, with average efficiency.

Both power banks offer good watt-hour battery figures and independent output negotiation, preventing device resets upon plug/unplug.

Transcripts

hello today I have more power Banks two

big requests really one from ugreen that

is really going to be in a tough spot to

see if it can keep up with its claims

because it is going up against the big

anchor 250 W Mega ultra power bank it's

probably just nonsense because you know

what we do here we'll be testing it to

find out if these power Banks can

sustain their power levels what modes of

operation they have how much energy do

they have and a whole lot more in this

video the ur- green claims 145 watts of

power capab AB ility so it's no slouch

either in this series I try to answer

the question which power bank do I want

to get the videos get technical so hang

on and always ask questions if you don't

understand something the performance is

measured and is compared to near

competitors in this video two power

banks will be reviewed to find out the

charging capabilities and help you make

an informed buying decision as I slowly

build up the list of power Banks tested

hopefully we will find some better ones

so that is why this video is here to

find out if one of these is the better

power bank if you want to help support

the channel there's a link to patreon

the super button and and my website down

in the description special thanks to my

patrons and channel supporters first up

is the ug green 145 wat 25,000 Mah

powerbank with model

90597 A this has been requested for

quite a long time and is finally making

it onto the channel the power bank is a

little more advanced in that it has both

power delivery and Quick Charge

capabilities on three total ports it can

deliver 5 9 12 15 and 20 volts on the

USBC and 5 9 and 12 volts on the USB a

port as well as charge from those

voltages on the USBC this distinctly

lacks any PPS modes I could see so this

will only slow charge phones that

require PPS mode the device has a

specific Port that can deliver 100 watts

of output power and is labeled as such

which is a good idea the other Port can

do up to 45 Watts the other USBC Port

that is these two ports together will

get you 145 Watts total we will have to

check later for how long it can do this

145 wats 4 the charging is a little

slower topping out at 60 WTS for this

power bank this is surprising

considering how how much power out it

has the user manual is nice because it

includes the infographic that shows what

ports do what and how much power they

can deliver with various devices pluged

in I like this method of showing the

capabilities there could certainly be

more in here like the actual usable

capacity but nope not that anyone else

does that either no specific safety

listing which is fairly common for power

Banks let's change things up and look at

claim charge rates I made a chart of

devices these are from the previous

reviews and I just kept the data and

changed it around a bit to the number of

times the power bank can do each of

these things with those devices it looks

like the energy in this device can

pretty much charge anything it might not

be the fastest but at least it can do it

the power bank can do the 145 watts of

power output but don't expect it to do

it for very long it only just charge to

70% of the rated capacity before turning

off interestingly only the 100 watt Port

shut down and the 45 watt Port kept on

operating this makes me think the

electronics are overheating and not the

battery we will check The Thermals later

on but this was a problem I ran into

with this power bank it won't deliver

100 Watts just like the bassest ones I

looked at for a whole discharge cycle it

always stops before depleting the

battery the best I was able to get out

of this power bank continuously was 50

wats this really can't keep up in the

long run with the wattage claims on the

package and it looks like the

electronics are the blame here if you

want to try to go 115 Watts on one port

it will shut down safely though so with

that the power bank can't easily empty

the tank at 100 wats which is is a bit

of a Down point for this power bank

already this should be a 50 wat power

bank in reality since that's what it can

do full-time and then it needs a little

break since it overheats before

depleting the battery to 0% the power

bank used a reasonable amount of energy

during the charging cycle and charged

moderately quickly at 1 hours and 42

minutes to a full charge it isn't bad it

doesn't take most of the advantage of

100 wat power adapter but it still gets

there in a reasonable time the one issue

I have with this adapter is the

inaccuracy of the display it says 100%

at 1 hour and 13 minutes yet keeps on

charging for an additional 30 minutes

I'm not a fan of the power meter

displaying inaccurate information even

if it showed 99% while it wasn't fully

done and then it tripped over to 100%

when it was actually done that would be

nice this power bank also loses some

efficiency points at 211% power loss at

50 wats out this delivers an average

amount from the wall to the output that

is okay it's just in the middle it isn't

great it isn't bad and this is really

recent because the newer power banks

have gotten a lot more efficient the

ankor a 1340 Prime power bank 27,600 Mah

portable charger with 250 W output again

we have the anchor retail packaging

shelf Freddy it can deliver 5 9 12 15 20

and E 28 volts on the USBC and 59 and 12

volts on the usba a port as well as

charge from those voltages on the USB C

Port that first USBC Port is compatible

with 140 W mode only this also has a PPS

or program grammable power supply mode

of 21 volts and this can do 5 amps too

so support for Samsung 45 w super fast

charging is on the menu it only does it

on the faster Port though the other Port

has no PPS the user manual for this is

not bad it gives you some very

simplified specifications easy to know

how to use and what to expect they do

mention the double push to enable the

low power mode but I still can't get it

to turn off here is a chart of devices

with numbers and times it can charge

each it looks like with the energy in

this device it can pretty much do

anything and it should be able to charge

all of these devices at maximum speed

the power bank can charge very quickly

with its USBC Port the device will full

charge at 140 WTS for nearly its entire

charge so at 140 Watts it only takes 1

hour at 100 Watts it takes 1 hour and 24

minutes not bad and faster than most

other power banks in 140 W mode it

tapers for about 20 minutes but this one

also has the issue where the display

shows 100% long before charging it is

done the screen percent charge on this

device is extremely inaccurate and I

also saw this on the 200 W anchor power

bank it's like from the 737 to this

device they forgot how batteries

work this does have Bluetooth in it and

app support I'm just mentioning it but

based on Anchor's history with user data

and apps I'm not going to install it I

know everyone is just as bad but I'm not

going to test it the anchor does have

the multi-pin magnetic connector on the

botom for charging with the base I kind

of wonder if anyone will buy into this

system besides me and other reviewers

let me know the power bank was great in

terms of efficiency it matches the zmi

and overall efficiency and it does a

surprisingly good job at supplying power

to the output power bank only loses 19%

of the power from the wall to provide

you portable power this is very good

moving on to checking if this power bank

can deliver 250 watts and I only got it

to 235 Watts continuous because the low

power mode stays on for hours and you

just have to wait for it to time out but

either way it doesn't do it continuously

it shuts off I got through a decent

amount of the battery though down to

about 35% or so before it shut down it

didn't have a persistent overheat

warning either it just shut down and

reset okay time to weigh some power

Banks overall the power banks are

heavier maybe a bit heavier than they

should be the ug green is 506 G which

isn't awful and the anchor is 663 G

which seems like a lot but it is a

larger battery we'll check the density

later on I checked the packaging on

these and the anchor was 249 G of waste

to have a fancy box and it's just not

worth anything these both did come with

USBC cables the anchor has the 140 W

labeled but it's really a 240 W cable

and the U green came with a 100 bot

cable each around 20 G these power banks

have very different dimensions again the

anchor I would describe as a burrito

power bank and the ug green is a more

typical long flat pack the anchor is

bigger and heavier but it is also a

larger battery and in comparison with

the other power banks in this range this

one is nearly the same size as the 737

so they did make some optimization of

space for this one the voltages all

stayed within the tolerances of the USB

power delivery specification which is

nice to see these power Banks all had

General compatibility with any Chargers

I use them with another Advantage is

they both will charge very slowly but

still charge even with an old 5w USB a

brick so this is great to see next I

checked the UPS capability of these

power banks that is uninterruptible

power supply as it turns out the green

was able to keep the USBC Port operating

during multiple functions on the other

USB port so this can keep going even

when the power goes out on that other

Port the issue here is that the power

bank can deplete itself still since it

will allow more power to flow out than

in it only charged at 30 WTS so it isn't

really a UPS and it isn't supposed to be

but if you want to keep the power going

for a project this will probably work

Anor claims to not have this feature and

does not it turns off right away both of

these power banks have a low power mode

with a double click they turn on the

usba port for several hours to charge

low power devices I'm still having

trouble to get it to turn off on the

anchor these power banks are within the

100w hour requirement for extra

non-permitted air travel of power Banks

they're a little heavy but can still be

carry on power Banks the anchor is about

as close as you can get to the limit at

99.54% if you need it but it won't stay

on for a long period of time I got about

10 minutes of runtime on the anchor at

235 Watts before it shut down granted

that basically depleted the battery the

ug green however is much worse it's 145

watt claim Is Not Great it can only do

that for a few minutes before it shuts

down but still worse it couldn't even

sustain 100 Watts without shutting down

I don't like the claim being so much

larger than the reality The Thermals on

these power Banks were reasonable they

got warm for sure they had a few hot

spots especially around the USB port end

where the electronics are the anchor

basically didn't get much warmer than

ambient so this might be a better option

power bank for warmer climates the

charging and discharging showed low and

stable temperatures during all tests

even the full power test it didn't get

hot the ug green was fine on charging

which is limited to 60 WTS but when you

flip over to discharging it does develop

some hot spots and it will overheat and

anything over 50 continuous Watts it

still didn't get overly hot on the

outside of the case so it's safely shut

down which is good but it's supposed to

be 145 watts in terms of value these end

up on the lower end of the scale but did

show Improvement on the previous anchor

power banks these are expensive power

Banks the bigger anchor one is really

expensive I'm surprised I bought this

actually they have big claims for

performance and they charge a premium

for those extra features the thing I

don't like is those extra features are

basically temporary or really just

marketing tricks in some cases just like

the others it's a theme these don't

charge at the full rated speed they

don't discharge at the full rated speed

they do technically meet the claims but

charging for features that aren't

fulltime features is not so great one

advantage with both of these power Banks

is the non- renegotiation of the outputs

with the USBC ports so these will both

stay on as long as you use the power

onto the density chart another way to

look at the data is the power density

and this is where even if it's just a

marketing number these look great

although the older 737 still wins one of

these I am looking at the energy and

power densities of these power Banks the

energy density is shown two ways with

both the weight and the physical size

and liters the higher the energy density

the better the power density tells you

just how fast you can access that energy

these more expensive power Banks stand

out you can charge them fast and you can

discharge them fast and apparently that

costs money just a side note these

higher power density power Banks also

tend to be a lot more efficient than the

slower charging ones anchor improved

over predecessors in energy density but

still is behind the competition but

again that speed comes at a price of

limited time offer although the new

anchor does better here in that it can

charge and discharge at 140 Watts

without requiring rest periods overall

these power banks are different yet

somehow have the same flaws the anchor

has a ton of power capability on paper

but it's a short-term delivery it can do

140 Watts much better than the 737

though so they have shown some measured

Improvement the ug green reminds me of

the over overheating Shar geek it just

doesn't have the screen to tell me about

it I don't like that it's expensive too

the charge meters on these power banks

are both basically token gestures they

don't display the real battery

percentage during the charging cycle

without a separate power meter you have

no idea when charging is actually

complete 20 to 45 minutes after the

device is 100% is not acceptable it

isn't like they taper at that 100% Mark

either they continue at the full charge

level for a while okay so on the

positive then well one of of these the

anchor is really efficient if you want

to waste the least amount of energy and

really need portable power the anchor

has the most power the most modes of

operation and the maximum travel safe

energy out of anything I have tested so

the price is somewhat Justified for

being the best performer both of these

are plain safe you're basically doubling

the biggest laptop battery the U green

wasn't necessarily bad I've just looked

at some really high-end power Banks and

it's close but it doesn't win any c

ategory compared to them between the ug

green and the zmi the zmi is coming with

me first actually the zmi will probably

go over the anchor too well it already

has so which power bank do you want the

anchor is expensive very expensive it

can charge and discharge faster than the

others though full charge in 1 hour and

discharge faster ug green is a more

friendly form factor I think but it

struggles to deliver the power it is

average efficiency wise though and it

does pack a good amount of energy

storage both had good wat hour battery

figures

both have the low power mode the ug

green has UPS functionality the

negotiation is more independent on these

devices so plugs and unplugs don't cause

other devices to reset the ug green does

more of that than the anchor so overall

they're both competent power Banks okay

these are tested and not yet on any

database I'm still trying to dream it

into reality and it keeps not working at

least I remembered to put stickers on

them this time thanks for watching next

week the plan is to do more power

adapters I think I'm going to do some

lower wattage ones I picked up from a

trip to Europe never heard of the brands

so it should be fun to check them out I

also have lots more adapters and power

Banks I also have a very long list so

keep the suggestions coming I write them

all down so check the all things website

Linked In the description for upcoming

videos and as always I will see you in

the comment section thanks again and

goodbye