The Intel Arc A770 16GB – Worth It in Mid 2024?

Summary

The Intel Arc A770 graphics card has significantly improved since its launch, making it a competitive option in mid-2024 due to its declining price. This video reviews its performance across various games such as Apex Legends, Crisis Remastered, Cyberpunk 2077, and Doom Eternal, highlighting its strengths and weaknesses. While the A770 offers good performance and value, it falls short in some games compared to Nvidia and AMD cards. Ideal for compute workloads, it may not be the best choice for hardcore gamers but presents a viable option for budget-conscious users needing a powerful workstation.

Takeaways

• 🚀 The Intel Arc A770 has seen performance improvements since its launch and is becoming more affordable, making it an increasingly attractive option for gamers.
• 📈 The A770's performance in games like Apex Legends, Crisis Remastered, and Cyberpunk 2077 is playable at various resolutions, with some games benefiting from higher settings.
• 🔥 In games like Doom Eternal and Fortnite, the A770 delivers impressive frame rates, especially at 1080p and 1440p, suggesting good optimization for certain titles.
• 🛠️ The test system used for evaluating the A770 includes an i7-11700K, DDR4 memory, and fast SSDs, ensuring that the tests focus on the GPU's capabilities without other bottlenecks.
• 🎮 The A770's performance in Helldivers 2 and Modern Warfare 3 shows it can handle different types of games, though not always with the highest frame rates compared to other GPUs in its class.
• 🌟 The A770 shines in Red Dead Redemption 2, delivering smooth gameplay across resolutions, highlighting its potential in well-optimized titles.
• 💻 The card's power consumption is significant, drawing between 160 to 200 Watts on average during gaming, which is similar to other GPUs in its class.
• 🔄 The A770's idle power draw is higher than some competitors, which could affect overall system efficiency and power supply requirements.
• 💰 Intel's pricing strategy acknowledges the A770's performance relative to its competition, offering the card at a price point that reflects its capabilities and market positioning.
• 🏗️ The A770 is positioned as a strong option for compute-intensive workloads and may be more suited for professional use cases like AI and data visualization than hardcore gaming.
• 🔄 The script suggests that the A770's performance in gaming is 'all right' but recommends considering the A750 for most consumers due to its lower price and similar feature set.

Q & A

How has the Intel Arc A770's performance evolved since its launch?

The Intel Arc A770's performance has significantly improved since its launch, making it a better deal as its price continues to decrease.

What is the significance of the Intel Arc A770's price reduction in relation to its performance?

The price reduction makes the Intel Arc A770 more competitive and a potentially better value for consumers, especially as its performance has improved since launch.

What is the test system configuration for evaluating the Intel Arc A770's performance in the video?

The test system includes an i7-11700K based build with the Z690 Ora Elite AX, DDR4 memory, Samsung 970 Evo boot SSD, Time Tech 1 TB Gen 4 SSD for games, and 64 GB of 3600 MT/s D4 memory to prevent any bottlenecks.

How did the Intel Arc A770 perform in Apex Legends in terms of FPS at different resolutions?

At 1080p, the A770 achieved an average of 207 FPS and a 1% low of 145 FPS. At 1440p, the performance was 158 FPS on average with a 1% low of 120 FPS. At 4K, it dropped to 91 FPS on average and a 1% low of 72 FPS.

In which game did the Intel Arc A770 struggle to maintain high FPS at 4K resolution?

The A770 struggled with Cyberpunk 2077 at 4K resolution, achieving only an average of 39 FPS and a 1% low of 35 FPS.

How did the Intel Arc A770 handle the game Doom Eternal at different graphic settings and resolutions?

The A770 performed exceptionally well in Doom Eternal at the nightmare preset, providing a smooth 145 FPS average and 93 FPS 1% low at 1080p, 121 FPS average and 80 FPS 1% low at 1440p, and 71 FPS average and 54 FPS 1% low at 4K.

What is the reviewer's opinion on the Intel Arc A770's performance in Fortnite at 4K resolution?

The reviewer finds the A770's performance in Fortnite at 4K to be playable but not competitively viable due to random stutters and frame dips, with an average of 76 FPS and a 1% low of 66 FPS.

How does the Intel Arc A770 compare to other GPUs in terms of power consumption during gaming?

The A770 has a power consumption range of 160 to 200 Watts on average during gaming, which is similar to the RTX 3060 Ti, and it can draw up to 300 Watts comfortably from the power connectors.

What is the reviewer's recommendation for consumers considering the Intel Arc A770 for gaming?

The reviewer suggests that the A770 might not be the best choice for hardcore gaming due to its price and performance compared to other options, but it could be worth considering for specific needs and workflows.

What alternative use case does the reviewer suggest for the Intel Arc A770 based on its performance and price point?

The reviewer suggests that the A770 is well-suited for heavy compute workloads, such as AI or data visualization for CAD and modeling programs, making it a good choice for a powerful workstation setup.

Outlines

00:00

🚀 Intel Arc A770 Performance Review and Benchmarks

The video script discusses the Intel Arc A770 graphics card, noting its improved performance since launch and decreasing price, making it an increasingly attractive option for gaming. The script suggests that while it may not be the best in its class, it's worth considering for gaming in Mid 2024. The narrator invites viewers to like, subscribe, and comment, emphasizing the importance of community engagement. The test system is described in detail, including an i7-14700 K processor, Z690 Ora Elite AX motherboard, DDR4 memory, and fast SSD storage, ensuring no bottlenecks for the A770. The script proceeds to benchmark the A770 in various games like Apex Legends, Crisis Remastered, Cyberpunk 2077, and Doom Eternal, highlighting its performance across different resolutions and settings.

05:01

🎮 In-Depth Intel Arc A770 Gaming Performance Analysis

This paragraph delves deeper into the gaming performance of the Intel Arc A770, showcasing its capabilities in titles like Fortnite, Helldivers 2, Modern Warfare 3, and Red Dead Redemption 2. The A770 demonstrates impressive performance in Fortnite and Doom Eternal, with smooth frame rates at various resolutions. However, in Helldivers 2 and Modern Warfare 3, the card shows some inconsistency, particularly at 4K resolution. The script also touches on the power consumption of the A770, comparing it to other GPUs and noting its higher idle power draw. The narrator acknowledges the A770's strengths in certain games but also its limitations in others, suggesting that it may not be the top choice for all gamers.

10:03

🔍 Intel Arc A770 Market Positioning and Value Proposition

The script reflects on the Intel Arc A770's market positioning, recognizing Intel's awareness of its product's strengths and weaknesses. It discusses the card's competitive pricing strategy, especially when compared to other GPUs like the RTX 3060 or RX 6600. The narrator points out that while the A770 has theoretical power, it sometimes falls short in actual game performance. The script also addresses the challenges of first-generation product adoption, including the need for software optimization and developer support. The A770 is presented as a potentially good value for compute-intensive tasks rather than just gaming, with its pricing becoming more attractive as the market matures.

15:04

🛠️ Intel Arc A770 as a Workstation GPU and Conclusion

The final paragraph focuses on the Intel Arc A770's suitability as a workstation GPU for heavy compute workloads, such as AI or data visualization in CAD and modeling programs. The script suggests that the A770 and A750 offer excellent performance for their price, making them powerful workstation options. It also discusses the card's power efficiency, comparing it to other GPUs and noting its higher power draw during idle. The narrator concludes by stating that while the A770 may not be the best choice for hardcore gaming, it is an interesting product that could be worth considering for specific use cases. The video ends with a call to action for viewers to like, subscribe, and comment on their thoughts about the A770.

Keywords

💡Intel Arc a770

The Intel Arc a770 is a graphics processing unit (GPU) designed by Intel for gaming and graphic-intensive applications. It is significant in the video as the main subject of discussion, with its performance being evaluated in various games. The script mentions how its performance has improved since its launch and its price has been decreasing, making it a potentially better deal for consumers.

💡Performance

Performance in the context of this video refers to the speed and responsiveness of the Intel Arc a770 when running games. It is a core theme of the video, as the author evaluates how well the GPU handles different games at various settings and resolutions. For example, the script discusses the a770's performance in 'Apex Legends' and 'Cyberpunk 2077', noting the frames per second (FPS) it achieves.

💡Benchmark

A benchmark in this video is a standard or point of reference against which the GPU's performance is measured. The script uses several games as benchmarks to test the a770's capabilities. For instance, 'Apex Legends' and 'Crisis Remastered' are mentioned as part of the Benchmark Suite to evaluate the GPU's performance at different resolutions and settings.

💡Frames Per Second (FPS)

Frames Per Second (FPS) is a measure of how many individual frames are displayed in a second, which is crucial for smooth gameplay. The video discusses the a770's FPS in various games, indicating how smooth the experience would be for users. For example, 'Apex Legends' is said to have an average FPS of 207 at 1080p resolution.

💡Price-to-Performance Ratio

The price-to-performance ratio is a metric that compares the cost of a product to its performance capabilities. The video script mentions that the Intel Arc a770 is becoming a better deal as its price decreases, suggesting that its current price offers good value for its performance level in gaming.

💡Resolution

Resolution in the context of this video refers to the number of pixels displayed on the screen, with higher resolutions providing more detail but requiring more processing power. The script discusses the a770's performance at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K resolutions, indicating how the GPU handles games at these different levels of detail.

💡Game Engine

A game engine is the core software that powers a game, handling rendering, physics, and other game functions. The video script mentions several game engines, such as the Source engine used in 'Apex Legends' and the Cry Engine used in 'Crisis Remastered', to discuss how the a770 performs with different engines.

💡DirectX 12

DirectX 12 is a collection of application programming interfaces (APIs) for handling multimedia tasks, especially game programming, on Windows. The video discusses games built on DirectX 12, such as 'Fortnite', to illustrate the a770's performance with this specific technology.

💡Vulkan API

Vulkan is a low-overhead, cross-platform 3D graphics and computing API that provides high-performance access to graphics and compute devices. The script mentions games like 'Doom Eternal' that use the Vulkan API, highlighting the a770's performance in these games.

💡Bottleneck

In the context of computing, a bottleneck is a part of a system that cannot keep up with the demands of the other parts, slowing down the entire process. The video script discusses ensuring that the test system's memory and storage do not bottleneck the a770's performance during testing.

💡RTX 3070

The RTX 3070 is a graphics card from Nvidia, often used as a benchmark for comparing performance with other GPUs. The script mentions the RTX 3070 as a potential alternative to the Intel Arc a770 for users looking for a similar power envelope in gaming performance.

Highlights

The Intel Arc A770 has significantly improved in performance since launch and has become more affordable.

The A770 offers competitive gaming performance at 1080p and 1440p resolutions in various popular games.

At 1080p, the A770 performs well in Apex Legends, averaging 207 FPS with a 1% low of 145 FPS.

In Crysis Remastered, the A770 handles the demanding CryEngine well, achieving 232 FPS on average at 1080p.

Cyberpunk 2077 runs smoothly on the A770 at 1080p and 1440p, though 4K performance is less optimal.

Doom Eternal performs excellently on the A770, especially at 1080p with a smooth 145 FPS average.

Fortnite runs competitively on the A770 at medium settings with ultra textures, achieving 155 FPS at 1080p.

Helldivers 2 performs best at 1080p on the A770, with some performance drops at higher resolutions.

Modern Warfare 3 and Warzone 2 are playable on the A770, but other similarly priced GPUs offer better performance.

Red Dead Redemption 2 performs smoothly at 1440p on the A770, with a notable improvement over 4K.

Ex Defiant shows strong performance on the A770, especially at 1080p and 1440p with DirectX 12.

The A770 offers more compute throughput than competing GPUs from NVIDIA and AMD, but struggles to utilize this fully in games.

Intel has priced the A770 competitively, often lower than an RTX 3060 or RX 6600.

The A770 draws more power than some competing GPUs, averaging 160 to 200 watts during gaming.

While the A770 is good for heavy compute workloads, it may not be the best choice for a gaming-focused PC.

Transcripts

the Intel Arc a770 is an interesting

card because its performance has

improved significantly from launch and

along with the fact that this thing

keeps coming down in price it's becoming

a better deal by the day is it worth

grabbing one of these cards to game on

in Mid 2024 even though it's not really

the best in its class

[Music]

before we get into this video I'd like

to say not to forget to hit the like

button and subscribe so you'll be

notified about all our future uploads

additionally don't forget to leave a

comment especially if there's something

I missed I can't cover every aspect of

the a770 over the course of a single

video but I figured just discussing some

updated benchmarks then diving into some

general discussions about the card were

appropriate for covering the information

I wanted to present without any further

Ado let's dive into the test system and

see what we'll be

running to test the a770 let's throw it

in my personal system an i71 14700 K

based build with the z690 Ora Elite ax

ddr4 as the backbone of this computer

we've got decent memory and storage

compatibility along with the latest in

terms of pcie transfer rates with the

Samsung 970 Evo as the boot SSD and a

Time Tech 1 TB Gen 4 SSD as the game

Drive we've got plenty of quick storage

to prevent bottlenecking from this

particular subsystem along with 64 GB of

3600 megat transfer pers second D4 we

shouldn't run into any bottlenecks on

the memory side of things and should

allow us to focus on the performance of

the graphics processing circuitry all

the system specs are in the description

if you want to replicate the tests we're

performing in this video with the specs

out of the way let's dive into some

games and see how the a770 is holding up

now that we're a bit further into

2024 first up on the Benchmark Suite

Apex Legends a now 5-year-old

firstperson Battle Royale game built on

a fork of the OG Source engine the

performance recorded in late June 2024

is still Beyond playable at all

resolutions though it may look like

things have regressed because we're

testing at higher settings for turning

an average in 1% low of 207 and 145 FPS

at 1080p this isn't really something to

complain about and if you want more

frames then you can always go down to

competitive settings 1440p saw

performance dipped down to 158 FPS on

average with a 120 FPS 1% low that's

still very playable and in all honesty

is very competitive despite the high

settings 4K saw performance dropped to

91 FPS on average and a 1% low of 72 FPS

which also remains playable but much

less competitive if you're on a higher

refresh rate monitor Apex performs well

on the a770 and I don't really have

anything to say about it other than it

looks and performs about like got

expected

to crisis remastered is another direct

X11 based title but this time on the

much more demanding cry engine despite

the traditional curb stomp that this

game usually hands out the a770 was able

to hold its own at all resolutions 1080p

performed the best with an average in 1%

low of 232 and 128 FPS and jumping to

1440p the 1% load doesn't change that

much coming in at

122 the average is more impact Ed by the

jumping resolution coming in at

186 which I mean is still very playable

4K performs similarly to Apex coming in

with an average in 1% low of 93 and 63

FPS respectively crisis is usually a

game that's a bit more on the

challenging side to run and that's

definitely the case here at 4K but the

a770 is able to eat this game for

breakfast at 108 and

1440p cyberpunk 2077 is where the a770

goes for more of a console esque

experience at 4K but 1080 and 1440p are

Beyond playable with an average and 1%

low of 96 and 73 FPS at 1080p things

don't look super impressive but based on

my firsthand experience playing this

game it feels significantly smoother at

times than on the older drivers 1440p

returned another playable average and 1%

low coming in at 73 and 59 FPS

respectively though zss might be worth

considering if you want to play it this

resol resolution or above even 4K was

playable but it definitely wasn't

optimal with a 39 FPS average and 35 FPS

1% low would I play cyberbug at these

settings at 4K probably not but 1440p I

honestly wouldn't mind and you could

probably get away with turning on rate

tracing with some upscaling and still

hit the 60fps mark Doom Eternal an

ittech engine game written on the Vulcan

API was one of the best performing games

tested when taking the graphic settings

and presentation into consideration

tested at the nightmare preset the a770

crushed this game at all resolutions

with 1080p in particular providing a

very smooth and not noticeably

inconsistent 145 FPS average and 93 FPS

1% low 1440p was even impressive with

the results returning an average of 121

and a 1% low of 80 4K achieved an

average and 1% low of 71° 54 though

which is lower than 1440p by quite a

decent margin but keep in mind how many

more highquality pixels the GPU needs to

render considering we're testing if this

game's equivalent to high settings I

think the a770 performs very well

whether it has been specifically

optimized by Intel or it's just a Vulcan

performance Trend but other titles built

on this API perform incredibly well on

all of The Alchemist cards but

especially the one we've got here if

you're wanting to get into some Doom

maternal then the a770 would provide you

an awesome experience though you might

be able to find something like an RTX

3070 if you're wanting a similar power

envelope the game up next on our list is

built on directx12 but still performs

pretty well fortnite in this case at the

medium settings with ultra textures

performed very competitively at 1080 and

1440p and remains somewhat so at

4K achieving an average in 1% low of 155

and 115 FPS respectively at 1080p the

a770 and 14700 K combo can push a

competitive experience that could get

even better by lowering the settings but

with what we're testing at I think this

is ultimately fine in what most users

will gravitate towards 1440p saw the

average dip down to 135 and the 1% low

coming in at 103 FPS the performance

loss equates to just under 13% on

average which is very impressive

considering we're rendering almost

double the amount of pixels at the

higher resolution jumping up to 4 time

1080P or 4K and performance remained

playable but probably not competitively

viable due to random stutters and frame

deps with the average at 1% low coming

in at 76 and 66 FPS respectively the

game plays like a console version which

is to me pretty impressive considering

you can buy this card for the price of a

console and it's pushing four times the

amount of pixels held divers 2 is one of

those games that is getting better as

time goes on but it's still definitely a

bit rougher on the edges on Intel gpus

we're testing at the medium preset and

Native resolution here so things look

much better than potato mode but not

enough to justify running like this

returning an average and 1% low of 90

and 80 FPS at 1080p the a770 performs

smoothly for the most part but has some

hiccups here and there 1440p saw the

overall performance profile dropped to

66 and 58 FPS which remains playable but

is kind of on the cusp of what I think

feels good and then 4K comes in and

finishes off with a 41 FPS average and

36 FPS 1% low the FPS can fluctuate kind

of wildly at times at this resolution so

if you're wanting to explore the bug

infested worlds of Hell divers then

1080p is probably the way to go

upscaling could also be useful here but

I ultimately didn't use it because it

makes everything look blurry

the next title is based on directx12

Modern Warfare 3 and by extension war

zone 2 overall the a770 performs well

but doesn't Stand Out amongst the crowd

of similarly priced

gpus a 3060 could beat this performance

quite soundly but for what this card

offers I don't think it's a weakness

returning 117 FPS on average at 1080p

the card is able to push a somewhat

locked High refresh rate experience but

the 1% low of 69 kind of sits as a thorn

in its side even 1440p has a similar

spread between the 1% low average and

maximum coming in at 89 FPS on average

and 58 FPS on the 1% low 4K was also

playable but it definitely wasn't

competitive if you think lagging and

getting clipped at 120 FPS is annoying

try running it just below 60 almost the

entire time it's right on the cusp of

being butter smooth but it doesn't get

there in 75% of situations the average

in 1% low came in a 54 and 39 FPS which

some of you out there are going to say

is playable but if you played it for

yourself trust me it just felt

inconsistent 1440p didn't have any of

those issues so you could probably get

away with turning on zss at 4K to fix

the inconsistencies overall I wouldn't

buy an a770 just to play COD but if you

are buying one then you can play it and

sometimes they can play it pretty damn

well the next game is another Vulcan

based title and it really lets the

hardware stretch its legs Red Dead

Redemption 2 tested at the Xbox One X

settings looked very good and it's

incredible that this game originally

came out 6 years ago now maybe it's the

age of the software but at all

resolutions I didn't have any problems

with how it felt and after playing I was

actually kind of surprised where the 4K

results came in at starting at set

resolution it came in with a 57 FPS

average and a 47 FPS 1% low which is

definitely playable but it felt like it

was hitting a 60 hzz refresh rate pretty

consistently with a drop here or there

when an explosion is triggered lowering

the resolution down to 1440p and the

performance jumps up quite significantly

this time achieving an average in 1% low

of 103 and 77 FPS respectively the game

felt very smooth to play and I could

imagine this being an awesome experience

on a 1440p variable refresh rate monitor

1080p came in with a 134 FPS average and

a 95 FPS 1% low once again remaining

very smooth and for all intents and

purposes completely playable on the

a770 would I buy this card over a

similarly priced used Nvidia card

potentially because it's honestly pretty

good performance but also potentially

not because it's drawing a decent amount

of power we're talking around 225 watts

to render this locking the FPS could

help mediate the power issue but out of

the box there aren't any issues a new

game to our test Suite I figured I would

add it because I've been playing it

somewhat casually and that's ex defyant

this game has both a DirectX 11 and

direct x 12 backend and for testing

purposes we'll be running everything on

DirectX 12 at the high preset the a770

performs pretty well returning an

average in 1% low of 140 and 90 FPS

1440p came in a bit lower hanging out

around 111 FPS for the average and 74

for the 1% low it's definitely still

playable and competitively viable

but if you want the most frames 1080 or

1440p with upscaling seems to be where

you'd want to be with the Intel cards 4K

remained playable with an average and 1%

low of 69 and 55 FPS so things are

certainly nice to play but I'd probably

lower the settings or turn on resolution

scaling if I were hellbent on playing at

this resolution even with the strong

performance on display I'm cautious to

give my opinions on the a770 performance

and comparison to similarly priced gpus

simply because I just haven't tested it

in depth on any other card that I own

for all I know a 470 could get quadruple

the frame rate is that likely no but I

think you get where I'm going with this

if you want to get an a770 for X defiant

then there are the performance figures

if they look good for what you want to

use the card for then it might be worth

at least checking

out overall if I had to give thoughts on

the a770 it's that I'm glad Intel more

or less knows their niche in the market

and they price the hardware accordingly

from a technical perspective these cards

offer significantly more compute

throughput than competing cards from inv

video with similar data path counts but

when it comes to actually utilizing that

Hardware in games and software the card

struggles to fully Flex its muscles when

it needs to do so don't get me wrong the

card can definitely weight lift and I

think that Red Dead Redemption 2

fortnite and doom maternal are great

examples of it but in other games that

people are probably more likely to be

playing in current ear besides fortnite

like hell divers or war zone or even

cyberpunk the game just struggles to

keep up with the raw FPS numbers put out

by similarly spec cards from the red and

green teams though Intel has obviously

taken this into consideration when

pricing their cards because you can find

them for a similar price if not less

than that of an RTX 3060 or RX

6600 this is what I mean by Intel

knowing their Niche I'm not trying to

mean it in a condescending manner more

so that they're aware of the comings of

their product and are pricing them

accordingly they know that they can't

price this Hardware too high or else no

one will buy it and to be honest why

would the average consumer buy it at

this point in time over a competing

Nvidia or AMD card for the same money

sure the card has all this theoretical

power but the large team High budget

software utilizing is pretty light on

the ground in 2024 this will 100% change

with time but even when it does finally

catch up the Nvidia implementation for

both the r tracing and tensor as6 are a

generation ahead in terms of the feature

set leaving the ultimate question of why

buy this card when you launch a product

and it's the first generation you're

going to have adoption issues as your

immediate barrier to success you don't

have an existing software and Hardware

base from which to draw developers and

the same goes for Consumer level

software it's the chicken and egg

problem when the cards first launch the

mass Market isn't going to adopt it

immediately and even if it does there's

still going to be some lag time between

getting the cards in the hands of

developers and riding working software

pricing is high initially because Intel

wants to recoup their development costs

but once more software is running on the

hardware then consumers will be more

enticed to just consider Intel as an

option because it works with their use

case combine this with a lower price

whether it be because manufacturing

prices have been optimized or they just

want to move units and now you have a

much more attractive offer for consumers

but launch deck closer to $400 or I'd

say consistently over the $380 Mark can

now be head for consistently under $300

closer to around

290 the a750 can be found for even less

with those cards coming in at under $200

for a new unopen card here in the US if

you're a GPU programmer and want to get

into sickle programming then this card

and also the a750 provide tons of power

that you can squeeze computations from

if you know how to properly write your

GPU code instead of this card being a

scaled up integrated Graphics solution

like what we'd see on an i5 or i7 line

desktop processor it's its own Fork of

the architecture giving it the ability

to optimize for certain workloads as a

result this high performance Graphics

architecture draws more power but

achieves more performance this card

isn't going to be as efficient as what

is shipped with an igpu on something

like an i31 12100 but it's also not a

firmy situation where you can cook eggs

on the thing if we're being honest

honest the card has the ability to draw

up to 300 WTS comfortably from the power

connectors and 375 watts if you really

want to get technical by including the

motherboard power but during operation

we're looking at around 160 to 200 Watts

on average during a gaming workload a

good comparison in the power department

is actually the RTX 360 TI another area

in power where the Intel card behaves

very similarly to an older AMD

architecture like gcon 4 or5 is an idle

power draw my 4070 which is a much more

powerful card draws 15 watts when idling

compare that to the over 30 Watts that

the a770 idles at I'm sure this can be

fixed in the drivers because AMD

resolved this issue as well it was quite

famously on the rx4 and 580 and then

also on the 5700 family of cards if I

recall correctly it doesn't make the

card unusable but it means that you

shouldn't cheap out on your power supply

and it's putting out more heat overall

is the a770 worth checking out or

potentially purchasing to power your

next gaming PC well probably not a

gaming PC I mean it would work and could

push decent frame rates as we've seen

but these cards seem like they're

designed for work meaning heavy compute

workloads like AI or data visualization

for Cad and modeling programs these

cards are unsung heroes for this price

point get an i52400 and an RK 750 or

a770 and you've got yourself an

incredibly powerful workstation for

under

$700 but for what what this channel

traditionally focuses on gaming and

consumer 3D workloads the a770 is all

right I definitely recommend at least

checking them out online to see if they'

work for your specific needs and

workflow but for the hardcore gaming

crowd it's probably not worth picking up

one of these cards simply because

they're just too expensive picking up an

a750 would give you the majority of the

performance and all of the features all

for like a $100 discount either way the

a770 is an interesting Critter and I

can't wait to keep taking a look at it

in the

future so thank you for watching and if

you enjoyed don't forget to leave a like

And subscribe and click the Bell icon so

you'll be notified about all our future

uploads let me know what you guys think

about the a770 does the card meet your

performance expectations or does it lag

behind and would you even consider

trying to get your hands on one that's

all I really have to say on the matter

so thanks again for watching and I'll

catch you in the next video