The Tuskegee Experiment: Crash Course Black American History #29

Summary

The script for 'Crash Course Black American History' discusses the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, a deeply unethical experiment conducted by the U.S. Public Health Service from 1932 to 1972. It involved 600 African-American men, 399 with syphilis, who were deceived into participating without informed consent, being denied treatment even after penicillin was discovered. The study's exposure in 1972 led to national outrage, a lawsuit, and a $9 million settlement. It prompted the National Research Act of 1974, emphasizing informed consent and ethical research. The study's legacy continues to impact trust in medical institutions among Black Americans and highlights ongoing disparities in healthcare.

Takeaways

• 📚 The script discusses the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, a notorious unethical medical experiment conducted by the U.S. Public Health Service on African-American men from 1932 to 1972.
• 🧬 The study was based on racist and false beliefs about biological differences between Black and White people, particularly concerning the effects of syphilis on the brain and cardiovascular system.
• 🔍 600 African-American men were recruited for the study, with 399 having syphilis and 201 serving as the control group without the disease, to observe the untreated progression of syphilis in Black individuals.
• 💉 Penicillin, discovered as a cure for syphilis, was intentionally withheld from the participants, even after it became the standard of care, leading to severe health consequences and deaths.
• 🙅‍♂️ The participants were not given informed consent, as they were misled about the nature of the study and the treatment they were receiving for 'bad blood', a local term for various ailments.
• 🤔 The study was conducted without any white participants to test the alternative theory of worse neurological symptoms in white individuals, showing a clear bias in the research approach.
• 🏥 The Tuskegee Syphilis Study has had a lasting impact on the trust of Black Americans in the medical community and has highlighted the need for diverse representation in medical research.
• 📉 The study's exposure in 1972 by a whistleblower led to its termination and subsequent legal actions, resulting in a settlement and the establishment of the Tuskegee Health Benefit program.
• 🛡️ The National Research Act of 1974 was enacted in response to the study, creating guidelines for the protection of human subjects in research and emphasizing the importance of informed consent.
• 🤝 In 1996, the Tuskegee Syphilis Study Legacy Committee was formed to address the emotional damages of the study and to hold the federal government accountable for ethical research practices.
• 🇺🇸 President Bill Clinton's public apology in 1997 acknowledged the profound moral wrongs committed by the U.S. government and emphasized the need for a better future in medical ethics.

Q & A

What was the premise of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study?

The Tuskegee Syphilis Study was an unethical clinical study conducted by the U.S. Public Health Service on 600 African-American men, where 399 had syphilis and 201 did not. The study aimed to observe the natural progression of untreated syphilis in Black Americans, withholding treatment from those infected.

Why was the study considered unethical?

The study was unethical because participants were not given informed consent, were misled about the nature of the study, and were denied treatment for syphilis even after penicillin was discovered as a cure.

What was the impact of the study on the participants and their families?

The study led to many participants suffering from severe health issues, including blindness, mental health issues, and death due to untreated syphilis. Additionally, their wives and children contracted syphilis as a result.

How did the Tuskegee Syphilis Study affect the medical community's approach to research ethics?

The study led to the National Research Act of 1974, which established guidelines for the protection of human subjects in research, emphasizing the importance of informed consent and ethical research practices.

What was the role of Eunice Rivers in the study?

Eunice Rivers, a Black nurse, was instrumental in recruiting the 600 men for the study. Her role is controversial, as some argue she was complicit in the deception, while others believe she was also misled.

Why was the study named the 'Tuskegee Syphilis Study' despite some disagreement with the name?

The study is named after Tuskegee because that is where it was conducted. However, some believe the name unfairly places blame on the Tuskegee community rather than on the government and researchers responsible for the study.

What were the incentives offered to participants in the study?

Participants were offered medical care, burial insurance, rides to and from the study site, meals, and free treatment for minor illnesses and ailments, which were compelling incentives during the Great Depression.

How did the broader Black community in rural Alabama perceive the study?

The broader Black community was misled about the study's true purpose. Many believed it was a beneficial government program due to the involvement of Black doctors, pastors, teachers, and community leaders in recruitment.

What was the aftermath of the study's exposure in 1972?

After the study was exposed in 1972 by Peter Buxtun, it led to national outrage, prompting its shutdown. A class-action lawsuit was filed, resulting in a settlement of over $9 million for the participants and their families.

What is the significance of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study in understanding racial disparities in healthcare?

The study is a stark example of racial discrimination and medical ethics violations, contributing to ongoing distrust of the medical system among Black Americans and highlighting the need for diverse and inclusive research.

How has the Tuskegee Syphilis Study influenced current discussions about race and medical research?

The study serves as a reminder of historical traumas in medical research and underscores the importance of addressing current systems and structures that perpetuate racial disparities in healthcare, beyond just the historical event itself.

Outlines

00:00

🧪 The Tuskegee Syphilis Study Introduction

This paragraph introduces the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, a horrific chapter in American medical history where African-American men were deceived into participating in a study without their informed consent. The study, conducted by the US Public Health Service, involved 600 men, 399 of whom had syphilis. The aim was to observe the natural progression of untreated syphilis in African-Americans, despite the availability of penicillin as a cure post-1940s. The paragraph also touches on the historical context of racial discrimination in medical practices, including the belief in biological differences between races, which led to unethical experimentation and exploitation of Black Americans.

05:02

🏥 The Recruitment and Misrepresentation of the Study

The second paragraph delves into the recruitment process of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, highlighting the exploitation of poor, uneducated sharecroppers in rural Alabama. Participants were offered incentives such as medical care and burial insurance, which were compelling during the Great Depression. The study was presented as a traditional research project with control and experimental groups, but participants were never informed that they were part of an experiment. The term 'bad blood' was used to describe the condition, obscuring the true nature of syphilis. Furthermore, the broader Black community was misled about the study's intentions, with many believing it to be a beneficial government program.

10:02

📜 The Aftermath and Impact of the Tuskegee Study

This paragraph discusses the aftermath of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, which only ended after a whistleblower leaked information to the press in 1972, leading to national outrage. The study's victims and their families were eventually compensated with a settlement of over $9 million, and the US government provided free medical services through the Tuskegee Health Benefit program. The National Research Act of 1974 was enacted to protect the rights of study participants and improve research ethics. The paragraph also addresses the lasting impact of the study on the trust between the Black community and the medical establishment, and the importance of diversity in research to prevent future medical errors.

Keywords

💡Tuskegee Syphilis Study

The Tuskegee Syphilis Study refers to a notorious unethical medical experiment conducted by the U.S. Public Health Service on African-American men from 1932 to 1972. The study involved withholding treatment from men with syphilis to observe the disease's progression. It is central to the video's theme of medical ethics and racial discrimination in healthcare. The study is mentioned repeatedly throughout the script, illustrating a dark chapter in American medical history.

💡Informed Consent

Informed consent is a fundamental ethical principle in medical research where participants are fully informed about the study's procedures, risks, and benefits before agreeing to participate. The video emphasizes the lack of informed consent in the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, highlighting a gross violation of research ethics and the participants' autonomy. The script explains that the men were not told they were part of an experiment, a critical omission in the context of informed consent.

💡Racism

Racism is a belief that one race is superior to others, often resulting in discrimination and prejudice. The video script discusses the historical context of racism in American medicine, including the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, where racist beliefs influenced medical practices and research. The script mentions that physicians and scientists held false beliefs about biological differences between races, leading to the exploitation of Black Americans in medical experiments.

💡Medical Experimentation

Medical experimentation refers to the testing of new treatments, drugs, or procedures on human subjects for scientific research. The video's main narrative revolves around the unethical medical experimentation in the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, where participants were deceived into being part of a study without receiving appropriate treatment for syphilis. The script describes how the study was used to test racially biased theories about disease progression.

💡Syphilis

Syphilis is a contagious sexually transmitted disease that can cause severe health complications if left untreated. In the video, syphilis is the disease at the center of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, where its untreated form was studied in African-American men. The script explains that the study's goal was to observe the effects of untreated syphilis in this population, leading to significant suffering and death.

💡Ethical Research

Ethical research involves conducting studies with integrity, respect for participants, and adherence to established ethical guidelines. The video discusses the unethical nature of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study as a stark contrast to ethical research practices. The script points out the study's failure to obtain informed consent and its continuation despite evidence that treatment was necessary, violating basic ethical principles.

💡Public Health Service

The Public Health Service is a government agency responsible for protecting the health of citizens. In the context of the video, the U.S. Public Health Service conducted the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, which the script describes as an abhorrent misuse of public trust and authority. The study's connection to the Public Health Service underscores the betrayal of the community's trust and the systemic nature of the unethical actions.

💡Medical Discrimination

Medical discrimination refers to unfair treatment in healthcare based on factors such as race, ethnicity, or social status. The video script highlights the historical and ongoing issue of medical discrimination, particularly against Black Americans, as exemplified by the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. The study is presented as a case where medical discrimination led to severe harm and a lasting legacy of mistrust.

💡Healthcare Access

Healthcare access refers to the availability and affordability of health services for individuals. The video script describes the Tuskegee Syphilis Study participants as individuals who might not have had access to healthcare otherwise, making the government's offer of free treatment seem like a great opportunity. However, this access was deceptively tied to their participation in an unethical study, revealing a tragic exploitation of their vulnerability.

💡National Research Act

The National Research Act is a U.S. law enacted in response to the Tuskegee Syphilis Study to protect the rights of research participants. The video script mentions this act as a significant outcome of the study, which led to the establishment of guidelines and oversight to ensure ethical research practices. The act's creation is a direct response to the egregious violations of research ethics highlighted in the video's narrative.

💡Medical Mistrust

Medical mistrust refers to a lack of confidence in healthcare providers or institutions, often stemming from past experiences of discrimination or deception. The video script discusses how the Tuskegee Syphilis Study contributed to medical mistrust among Black Americans, as the study's legacy continues to influence perceptions of medical research and treatment. The script notes that this mistrust is a barrier to participation in research and can affect healthcare outcomes.

Highlights

Introduction of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, emphasizing its real-life impact and the deception involved in medical treatment.

Discussion on the problematic terminology and the importance of not blaming the Tuskegee community for the study.

Historical context of racism in medicine, highlighting the inhumane treatment of enslaved Black Americans.

The false biological distinction and inferiority theories about Black people held by physicians and scientists.

The flawed rationale behind the Tuskegee Syphilis Study based on racist and medically dubious theories.

Recruitment of 600 African-American men for the study, with 399 having syphilis, to observe untreated syphilis effects.

Ethical issues of the study, including the withholding of treatment and the lack of informed consent.

The study's racial bias, focusing only on Black participants and ignoring potential neurological symptoms in white subjects.

The exploitation of poor and uneducated sharecroppers, who were misled about the nature of the study.

Incentives offered to participants, such as medical care and burial insurance, amidst the Great Depression.

The lack of informed consent and the misleading description of the study as treatment for 'bad blood'.

The role of Black community leaders in recruiting participants, reflecting a broader deception.

Eunice Rivers' controversial involvement as a Black nurse in recruiting participants for the study.

The withholding of penicillin as a cure, even after its discovery, leading to unnecessary suffering and death.

The exposure of the study by investigator Peter Buxtun, leading to public outrage and the study's termination.

Legal actions and compensation for the victims, including a class-action lawsuit and a settlement.

The establishment of the National Research Act in response to the study, emphasizing the importance of informed consent.

President Bill Clinton's public apology in 1997, acknowledging the profound moral wrongs committed by the government.

The lasting impact of the study on the mistrust of the medical system among Black Americans.

The ongoing issue of underrepresentation of Black Americans in research studies and its implications for healthcare.

The Tuskegee experiment as a microcosm of larger historical traumas contributing to healthcare inequality.

The need to address current systems and structures that perpetuate racism and discrimination in medicine.

Transcripts

Hi I’m Clint Smith and this is  Crash Course Black American History.  

I want you to imagine that you’re  in the shoes of this person:  

You’re being offered free medical treatment by a  team of doctors that work for the US government.  

And for context, there aren’t really  a lot of doctors that live near you.  

And these doctors from the government seem like people you can trust, plus it’s free. So it seems  

like a really great opportunity to get healthcare  when you might not otherwise have access to it.  

But what if when you went to see this  team of doctors, people who you trusted,  

you were actually, without your knowledge,  made to be part of an experiment? And what if,  

as part of that experiment, you had medication  purposefully withheld from you – medication  

that could have saved your life, but because  it was kept from you, it led to years-long,  

debilitating illness, and even the possibility  of death for you, your friends, and your family.  

I mean, it sounds like a horror movie  – but it wasn’t. This was very real,  

and it happened to very real people.

Today we’re talking about the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. Let's start the show. INTRO  

First, a note on terminology. While the study is  famously called the Tuskegee Syphilis Study or  

Experiment, some scholars disagree with that  name. The people of Tuskegee, they believe,  

are not to blame for what happened, and some argue  that the framing of it being named the “Tuskegee  

Experiment” implicitly places the blame and burden  on that community, rather than the government.  

Racism, discrimination, and prejudice have long  been part of the way we practice medicine in  

the United States. This isn’t new. In fact,  it started in the earliest days of slavery.  

Enslaved Black Americans were rarely treated  humanely by physicians in the Antebellum South.  

Oftentimes, they were only examined when  their ability to bear children or to work was  

in question. And many physicians experimented  with new medical treatments on enslaved Black  

Americans, without their consent. Entire fields of  study, like the field of gynecology, were built on  

the backs of Black Americans being exploited  and experimented on by the medical system.  

Many physicians and scientists of this era falsely  believed, sometimes consciously and sometimes  

unconsciously, that Black people are biologically  distinct, or even inferior, to white people.  

For example, physicians and  scientists in the United States  

incorrectly believed that syphilis, a contagious  sexually transmitted disease that can also make  

the sexual partners of the infected individual and  their children sick, affected those of European  

descent and African descent differently. What’s more, many physicians and scientists  

thought that White Americans had more developed  brains than Black Americans. And so even though  

it was apparent that White Americans  could develop syphilis, it was believed  

that they would suffer more neurological  symptoms as the disease progressed.  

These same physicians and scientists  believed that Black Americans  

had less developed brains, and were ruled  by their more basic organ functions. So,  

they posited that Black people would suffer  more cardiovascular complications, rather  

than neurological. The Tuskegee Syphilis Study  gave researchers and physicians the opportunity  

to test these deeply troubling, medically  dubious, and just plain old racist theories.  

So in 1932, 600 African-American  men from Macon County, Alabama  

were recruited to participate in this experiment  conducted by the Public Health Service.  

399 of the men were already diagnosed with  syphilis and 201 were not. So the goal of  

the study essentially was to see what happens  to Black people when you don’t treat syphilis.  

At the time the study started, penicillin  wouldn’t be a confirmed treatment for syphilis  

for over a decade; but there were still  recommended treatments for the disease  

that were withheld and penicillin  would eventually be withheld too.  

The word “unethical” doesn’t even  begin to cover how abhorrent this was.  

The researchers did not test the alternative  theory that white people had worse neurological  

symptoms than Black Americans or even have  any white participants in the study at all.  

In addition to their theories, they  based their justification for the study  

on another study done on all white subjects  called the “Oslo Study of Untreated Syphilis.”  

But when this study was published, it strongly  advocated for treating the subject for syphilis  

and warned against doing otherwise. Regardless,  the researchers proceeded with the study and  

chose the Tuskegee Institute as the place  where they would base their project.  

Many of the subjects were poor and uneducated  sharecroppers who lived throughout rural Alabama.  

Many of them had never seen a doctor before, nor  had they received any traditional medical care.  

But in this context, it might have felt to  them like they were getting an extraordinary  

amount of treatment. The participants  had to have a lot of blood tests,  

x-rays, and spinal taps, and a lot of tests to  see how the disease impacted the population.  

For participating in the study,  the men were offered medical care  

and burial insurance. And since Black Americans  were hit really hard by the Great Depression,  

these types of incentives  were extremely compelling.  

The Black unemployment rate in the South at  the time was around 50%, and many of these men  

needed benefits for themselves and their families.  They were also given rides to and from the study,  

meals on the days that they were present, and  free treatment for minor illnesses and ailments.  

Even though the study was set up like  a traditional research study – with  

control groups and experimental groups  – the subjects were never actually told  

that they were part of a study at all! While the men did agree to be examined  

and treated by the doctors, they weren't  told that they were being experimented on.  

Essentially, the researchers never received a  really important thing called Informed Consent.  

Informed consent is when a  researcher tells a research subject  

about the study they are participating  in, the risks involved, and gives them the  

option of whether to participate or not. Informed consent is important because it  

acknowledges that the participant has the agency  to make their own decision for their own body.  

What the men were told was that they were  receiving treatment for something called  

“bad blood,” a local term used  to describe a number of different  

illnesses that resembled anemia and fatigue. What’s even worse is that even the broader  

Black community in rural Alabama had been misled  about what the Public Health Service was doing.  

Many of these men were recruited by Black  doctors, local pastors, teachers, and  

community leaders – demonstrating that many people  thought that the men could benefit from joining.  

This is an important point because the  study members of the Tuskegee community  

were led to believe this was a special  government program that would be worthwhile  

for themselves and the whole community. A Black nurse named Eunice Rivers, who is a  

very controversial figure in this incident, helps  demonstrate how complicated this all was. She was  

one of the first Black American women to work for  the United States Public Health Service and she  

helped recruit the 600 men into this study.  Today, many scholars wrestle with whether or  

not she was complicit in what took place or if  she was a victim who had been misled herself.  

Even after penicillin was discovered  as a cure for the disease, and became  

a standard of care in the 1940s, most of the  men were not offered treatment by the study.  

The United States Public Health Service  researchers withheld medication and  

critical information about it from their  subjects. As a result, many of the men died,  

went blind, or experienced severe mental health  issues due to the untreated syphilis ravaging  

their bodies. And many of their wives  and children caught syphilis as well.  

Eventually, a United States Public Health  Service Venereal Disease investigator named  

Peter Buxtun started to ask questions about  why this study was happening and whether it  

was ethical. He leaked the information to  the press in 1972 and the resulting story  

prompted so much national outrage that the  decades-long study was finally shut down.  

In the summer of 1973, an attorney  named Fred Gray and the NAACP  

filed a class action lawsuit on the behalf of  the individuals who participated in the study,  

and their families. They ended up settling for  more than $9 million for the study participants.  

The US government also promised to give  the surviving victims free medical service  

and burial services as a form of compensation  through the Tuskegee Health Benefit program, which  

provided medical care for the study's survivors.  And in 1975, the wives, widows and children of the  

participants were added to the program as well. An important outgrowth of this infamous study  

is the National Research Act, which was signed  into law in 1974. This act was a critical force  

in protecting the rights of study participants and  shaping research ethics in the United States.  

It created the National Commission for the  Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical  

and Behavioral Research, which identified  basic principles of research and ways to  

ensure those principles were followed.  The Commission's recommendations required  

researchers to always get informed consent  from all of their study participants.  

In 1996, the Tuskegee Syphilis Study Legacy  Committee was organized to develop a strategy  

to address the emotional damages of the study,  to hold the federal government accountable for  

more ethical research practices, and to persuade  the federal government to publicly acknowledge  

their role in harming this  community of Black Americans.  

And in 1997, President Bill Clinton  apologized publicly, stating:  

“It is not only in remembering that shameful past  that we can make amends and repair our nation,  

but it is in remembering that past that we can  build a better present and a better future...The  

United States government did something that  was wrong—deeply, profoundly, morally wrong.”  

We also want to emphasize that this is recent  history. This didn’t happen in like the 1700s  

or 1800s. This study ended in 1972. And  this experiment is also one of the reasons  

why some Black Americans are skeptical of  doctors and researchers. Many still carry  

the memory of this deception deep in their bones. Today, many research studies in the United States  

still have few, if any, Black Americans in their  experiments. This is important to note because  

non-diverse studies are not as effective and  can lead to medical mistakes in the future.  

Part of this is tied to the fear that Black  people have about how they might be treated  

in these studies, but another part of it is that  sometimes researchers don’t adequately reach out  

to these communities. And one more thing,  

while the Tuskegee experiment does have  repercussions that continue to be felt today,  

it is not necessarily the all-encompassing  cause for all inequality in the medical system;  

what it is, is a microcosm of a larger  historical trauma, and it is one of many factors,  

both historical and contemporary, that  contribute to inequality in healthcare.  

This is worth saying explicitly, because by  putting an outsized portion of the blame on  

a single historical event, people can put less  blame on the current systems and structures  

that contribute to racism and discrimination  in the medical community today.  

As USC sociologist Karen Lincoln told  NPR in 2021, “If you say Tuskegee,  

then you don't have to acknowledge things  like pharmacy deserts, things like poverty and  

unemployment. . .You can just say, 'That happened  then...and there's nothing we can do about it."  

Sometimes, racism in the medical and scientific  community is not always as clear and blatant  

as it was in Tuskegee. Sometimes it’s  more subtle, and less easy to identify.  

But that doesn’t mean it isn’t there. And  it’s only by naming these things directly,  

that we will be able to build a scientific  and medical system that serves everyone in  

our country with justice and compassion. Thanks for watching. I’ll see you next time.  

Crash Course is made with the  help of all these nice people  

and our animation team is Thought Cafe. Crash Course is possible with the help  

of all the people who bought the 2021 Crash  Course Learner Coin, and by all our Patrons  

on Patreon. Thank you to all of our patrons and  supporters for making Crash Course possible.