Schiff's Senate Bid DESTROYED On Live Television - HE IS DONE

Summary

The transcript is of a fictitious news commentary mocking Democrat Adam Schiff's debate performance in his 2024 California Senate race. It contrasts Schiff's long-winded rhetoric with Republican Steve Garvey's quick retort calling Schiff a liar. The commentary criticizes Schiff as an ambitious politician who will say anything for power and questions his California residency. It argues Schiff lacks integrity, illustrated by his promotion of Trump-Russia collusion claims later disproven. Overall, the commentary attacks Schiff's character and portrays his Senate bid as doomed.

Takeaways

• 😡 Adam Schiff criticized for claims of evidence of Trump campaign collusion with Russia
• 👎 Schiff's critics say he lied about evidence and let partisanship influence investigations
• 🤥 Critics claim Schiff lacks evidence to back his past claims about Trump-Russia collusion
• 🗣 Schiff defends himself saying there's evidence of collusion between Trump campaign and Russia
• 📝 Schiff cites Trump campaign links to Russian intelligence as evidence of collusion
• 😠 Schiff accuses Republicans of enabling Trump's corruption and danger to democracy
• 😠 Garvey shuts down Schiff's response saying Schiff lied to the public
• 🤥 Critics paint Schiff as a sleazy career politician who'll say anything
• 🏠 Schiff accused of not really living in his California district
• 🤐 Schiff's Senate run seen as potentially torpedoed by this debate exchange

Q & A

What evidence does Schiff provide for his claim of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia?

Schiff cites Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort secretly meeting with a Russian intelligence agent and giving them internal polling data. He also mentions Russian intelligence helping the Trump campaign through hacking and social media manipulation.

What was the Trump campaign's response when offered dirt on Hillary Clinton by Russians?

The response was 'if it is what you say it is we would love it' and the Russians subsequently started releasing stolen emails when requested by the Trump campaign.

Why does the author accuse Schiff of being a sleazy career politician?

Because Schiff listed a small condo he bought in Burbank as his primary residence so he could be a representative for California, even though he doesn't actually live there full-time.

What point does Garvey make in his rebuttal to Schiff?

Garvey accuses Schiff of lying to 300 million people about evidence of Russian collusion, a lie that cannot be taken back.

How does the author characterize the exchange between Schiff and Garvey?

As a personification of memes created by the left (Schiff's long lecturing rants) and the right (Garvey's short 12-word shutdown).

Why does the author say Schiff doesn't care about people in his district?

Because his campaign website has no information or stances on any issues, indicating Schiff is morally bankrupt and only interested in money and power.

What indication is there that Schiff fabricated evidence related to Trump and Russia?

The author mentions Schiff creating fake documents, likely referring to Schiff's paraphrasing of the Trump-Zelensky phone transcript during impeachment hearings.

Has Schiff torpedoed his chances of winning the California Senate seat?

The tone of the article suggests the author believes Schiff's dishonesty and posturing has severely damaged his credibility and electability.

Why does the author say Schiff looks like an angry mom?

When lecturing about Trump's corruption, the author thinks Schiff resembles an angry mom catching her kids tracking mud in the house.

What does the author want readers to take away from the article?

That Adam Schiff is an unethical and self-serving politician who lies and fabricates stories for personal gain, making him unfit for elected office.