I'm Suing

Summary

A YouTuber discovers that someone has stolen their bass solos and used AI to create full songs without permission, leading to digital plagiarism. The user uncovers how AI music platforms allow for such theft with minimal security or copyright checks, and the frustration of seeing their work used without credit. This highlights a growing issue with AI in music, where real artists' work is exploited for profit. The creator questions the future of AI in the music industry, with concerns over authenticity and the impact on real artists.

Takeaways

• 😀 AI music websites can allow users to upload and remix real artists' work without any verification or accountability.
• 🎸 The user discovered that their original bass solos were stolen and turned into full songs without permission or credit.
• 😱 The AI-generated songs used the exact basslines from the user's work, with one of the songs even titled 'Day 4 Slap,' referencing the user's original content.
• 🕵️‍♂️ The user found more songs on the platform that used their original recordings, all without proper attribution or consent.
• 💥 The lack of regulation on AI music platforms means anyone can upload stolen content and pass it off as their own, potentially causing widespread exploitation of real artists' work.
• 💰 The platform's 'Pro' plan allows users to upload their own audio and remix songs, enabling easy theft with minimal oversight.
• ⚖️ There is little to no security system on the platform to check if uploaded audio already exists online or belongs to another artist.
• 👎 The user expresses frustration with the lack of a proper copyright verification system, which essentially relies on a 'trust me' approach.
• 🚨 The user is considering legal action, but recognizes that the stolen songs only have minimal views, which may not justify the effort or cost of pursuing it.
• 🤖 AI technology in music creation could lead to the widespread use of stolen content, potentially undermining real artists and their work. The user warns that music labels may soon adopt these AI tools to replace traditional artists.

Q & A

What is the main issue discussed in the script?

The main issue discussed is how an individual’s bass solos were stolen and used in AI-generated songs without permission or credit. The script highlights the lack of safeguards on AI music platforms, which allow users to upload and remix others' work without proper verification.

How does the speaker feel about the situation?

The speaker expresses feelings of violation, frustration, and disbelief. They describe being 'flabbergasted' and shocked at the lack of consequences for those who misuse others' work. There's also a sense of hopelessness as they mention the inevitability of AI being used in the music industry, especially by labels.

What is the speaker’s opinion on AI-generated music?

The speaker views AI-generated music as a form of plagiarism rather than true innovation. They believe AI is simply remixing existing works and passing them off as new creations, which undermines the efforts of real artists.

What was the speaker's reaction when they found their stolen music online?

The speaker was horrified when they discovered their original bass lines were used to create AI-generated songs. They were upset that the songs were published without their consent and with no credit given to them as the original creator.

How did the speaker discover that their music was stolen?

The speaker found their stolen music by searching for their own name on the AI music platform. Upon doing so, they found songs that used their original bass lines without any acknowledgment of their authorship.

What is the issue with the AI platform’s security system?

The AI platform has a very weak security system. The only verification for uploading audio is a simple disclaimer that asks users to confirm that the audio is original. There's no real scan or detection of existing copyrighted work, making it easy for people to upload and remix others' content.

How does the speaker feel about the AI music platform's business model?

The speaker is critical of the AI platform's business model, particularly the fact that paying for a pro plan essentially removes any meaningful safeguards against copyright infringement. This leads to a situation where users can easily steal music from real artists.

What impact does the speaker believe AI-generated music will have on the music industry?

The speaker predicts that AI-generated music will soon be widely adopted by music labels, as it allows for the rapid creation of music in a fraction of the time it takes human artists. This could lead to the devaluation of real artistic work and the rise of AI as the primary tool for producing music.

What broader concerns does the speaker raise about AI?

Beyond music, the speaker expresses concerns that AI technology is becoming increasingly invasive and difficult to distinguish from real content. They warn that AI could soon blur the line between what is real and what is generated, leading to confusion and distrust in digital media.

How does the speaker describe their experience with YouTube’s AI use?

The speaker mentions that YouTube is applying AI filters to creators' short videos to enhance quality without informing the creators. This led to an unexpected result where the speaker’s video made them appear much older than in the original footage, highlighting the unintended consequences of AI manipulation in media.