Sony 24-70mm F2.8 GM VS GM ii Comparison - Is NEWER worth the Money?

Summary

This video provides an in-depth comparison between the Sony 24-70mm F2.8 G Master Mark I and Mark II lenses. Covering build, features, ergonomics, and optical performance, the review highlights key differences such as weight, autofocus speed, buttons, and aperture control. Both lenses deliver excellent image quality, sharpness, and beautiful bokeh, but the Mark II stands out with faster XD linear motors, improved corner sharpness, upgraded coatings, and enhanced close-up versatility. While the Mark I remains a strong performer, the Mark II offers a more modern, lightweight, and feature-rich package, making it the preferred choice for both photographers and videographers.

Takeaways

• 😀 The Sony 24-70mm f/2.8 G Master Mark I is heavier and bulkier compared to the Mark II, making the latter a better choice for those seeking portability.
• 😀 The Mark II is lighter by almost 200 grams and offers a more compact design, enhancing overall comfort for daily use.
• 😀 Both lenses are weather-sealed and built with similar coatings for ghosting and flare reduction.
• 😀 The Mark II offers an additional customizable Focus hold button, an iris lock for precise aperture control, and an aperture ring for video shooters.
• 😀 Both lenses share similar controls, with a zoom ring and focus ring, but the Mark II has a linear focus ring for more accurate control.
• 😀 The original Mark I uses Sony's older direct drive SSM autofocus motors, while the Mark II features newer linear XD motors for faster and more accurate autofocus performance.
• 😀 The Mark II has an improved minimum focus distance, allowing photographers to get as close as 8.2 inches at the wide end for greater versatility.
• 😀 The Mark II produces noticeably sharper images, especially at the corners of the frame, with a significant performance improvement over the Mark I.
• 😀 At wide apertures (f/2.8), both lenses perform excellently in terms of autofocus speed and tracking, with both lenses being suitable for both photos and video.
• 😀 Overall, the Mark II is the better lens for sharpness, autofocus, and versatility, but the Mark I is still a solid choice if purchased at a discounted price.

Q & A

What is the main difference between the Sony 24-70mm f/2.8 G Master Mark I and Mark II?

The main difference between the Mark I and Mark II is the overall size and weight. The Mark II is lighter by almost 200 grams and features an improved design with added functionality, including two customizable focus hold buttons and an aperture ring with an iris lock for video users. The Mark II also has improved autofocus performance due to four XD linear motors.

Does the Mark II offer better autofocus performance compared to the Mark I?

Yes, the Mark II offers significantly better autofocus performance. It uses four XD linear motors, which allow for faster and more accurate focusing, even at high frame rates (up to 30 fps). The Mark I, while still fast, uses older direct drive SSM autofocus motors.

What improvements does the Mark II offer in terms of lens control features?

The Mark II offers an additional customizable focus hold button (two compared to one on the Mark I) and includes an aperture ring with an iris lock. This is particularly beneficial for video users who require precise aperture control. The Mark I lacks the aperture ring and lock.

How does the image quality compare between the two lenses?

Both lenses provide excellent image quality, with sharpness being particularly noticeable at 70mm. However, the Mark II slightly outperforms the Mark I in terms of sharpness, especially in the corners when wide open at f/2.8. Both lenses have very good performance in the center of the image.

Are there any significant differences in bokeh quality between the two lenses?

Both lenses produce smooth, creamy bokeh due to their nine aperture blades and fast f/2.8 aperture. There is no major difference in bokeh quality between the two, but the Mark II has an edge in corner sharpness and slightly better overall optical performance.

What about the weight and size of the lenses—how do they compare?

The Mark II is considerably lighter and smaller, making it easier to carry around for extended periods. The Mark I is heavier and larger, which may be less convenient for some users, particularly those who do a lot of handheld shooting or traveling.

Does the Mark II have any specific advantages for video shooting?

Yes, the Mark II is more video-friendly due to its aperture ring with the iris lock, which allows for precise control over the aperture, a feature the Mark I lacks. Additionally, the Mark II's autofocus performance and smooth focusing make it well-suited for video work.

How does the minimum focus distance compare between the two lenses?

The Mark II has an improved minimum focus distance of 8.2 inches at 24mm, allowing for more versatility when shooting close-up subjects. The Mark I's minimum focus distance is slightly longer, but still quite respectable for most uses.

How do the two lenses compare in terms of weather sealing?

Both the Mark I and Mark II are weather sealed and designed to handle challenging conditions. Both lenses feature a rubber gasket on the mount for added confidence in weather sealing, and both lenses are coated to reduce ghosting and flare.

Which lens is the better value for money?

If budget is a concern, the Mark I might be a better option, especially if you can find it on sale or used. It offers excellent performance at a reduced price now that the Mark II has been released. However, if you can afford the Mark II, it offers superior build quality, autofocus, and features, making it a better long-term investment.