How Interactive Should My Game Story Be?

Summary

Richard Rouse, a veteran game designer, explores the question of how interactive a game story should be. Drawing on examples from his own work and iconic games like Hades, Fable, and The Sims, he explains how designers should balance player expectations, narrative depth, and replayability. Rouse breaks down interactivity into layers—from moment-to-moment reactions to full simulation—emphasizing meaningful choices, teaching players the system, and rigorous playtesting. He highlights that interactivity doesn’t need to be maximal; it should be just enough to engage players, support the story, and create a compelling, personalized gaming experience.

Takeaways

• 🎮 Interactivity in games should enhance the player experience, providing engagement without overwhelming the narrative.
• 🕹️ Players gain different things from interactivity, including replayability, reactivity, self-expression, and shareability.
• 📌 Player expectations must be aligned with game genre and narrative promises to avoid confusion or disappointment.
• 🧩 There are multiple layers of interactivity: moment-to-moment, quest-level, multiple paths, character-level, and fully emergent simulations.
• 💬 Depth of interactivity can be achieved through dialogue barks, branching conversations, and meaningful consequences.
• 🔍 Hidden choices are valuable, but they should be balanced with obvious choices to ensure players recognize interactivity exists.
• 📖 Teaching players about interactivity is crucial; clear communication of choices enhances engagement and satisfaction.
• 🧪 Playtesting narratives is as important as gameplay testing, using vertical slices, prototypes, and full playthroughs to ensure systems are understood and enjoyable.
• -
• ⚖️ Moral and karma systems should be nuanced, allowing players to explore choices in multiple ways without oversimplifying good vs. bad decisions.
• -
• ✅ Ultimately, a game’s story should be interactive just enough to make it interesting, balancing narrative depth, player agency, and development constraints.
• -
• 🎨 Customization and character-level variations can create unique player experiences even within a fixed narrative structure.
• -
• 🔄 Replayable game structures should have narratives that support multiple runs, rewarding exploration and different player choices.

Q & A

Who is Richard Rouse and what is his experience in game development?

Richard Rouse is the studio creative director at Far Bridge. He has extensive experience in games with interactive narrative components, having worked on titles such as Odyssey, The Suffering, State of Decay, and The Church in the Darkness.

What is the main topic of Richard Rouse's talk?

The main topic of his talk is determining how interactive a game story should be and exploring the different levels and layers of narrative interactivity in games.

What is the significance of the movie 'eXistenZ' in the context of interactive storytelling?

'eXistenZ' illustrates the limitations of interactive narratives, showing a highly realistic game environment where the story is still on rails. Rouse uses it to emphasize that interactivity should enhance, not just simulate reality.

What are the key experiences players can get from interactivity according to Rouse?

Players can gain replayability (e.g., Hades), reactivity (e.g., Fable), shareability (e.g., Baldur’s Gate 3), self-expression (e.g., Sims), and maximal interactivity where the story is player-driven (e.g., Dwarf Fortress).

Why is understanding player expectations important when designing interactivity?

Player expectations, influenced by genre conventions and marketing, guide how much interactivity they anticipate. Misaligned expectations can lead to frustration, so designers need to ensure the game delivers a consistent and clear interactive experience.

What are the different layers of narrative interactivity described by Rouse?

The layers include: moment-to-moment interactions, quest-level choices, multiple paths, character-level dynamics, and full simulations where the player drives the story entirely.

How should game designers handle the depth of interactivity?

Designers should tailor interactivity depth to each layer. For example, moment-to-moment feedback can be simple reactions or 'barks,' while branching quests or conversations can vary in complexity. Depth should enhance the player experience without overwhelming development resources.

Why is it important to teach players about the game's interactivity?

Players need to understand that their choices have impact. Teaching them through clear cues, tutorials, or visualizations of choice consequences ensures meaningful engagement and prevents confusion or disappointment.

What are effective methods for playtesting narrative interactivity?

Playtesting can include vertical slices to test systems, paper prototypes to evaluate understanding and engagement, and full game tests for final adjustments. Iterative testing ensures the narrative and interactivity resonate with players.

What is Richard Rouse's ultimate advice on how interactive a game story should be?

The story should be interactive just enough to make it interesting. Designers should balance player freedom, narrative clarity, and practical development constraints to create a satisfying interactive experience.

How does Rouse suggest handling hidden choices in a game?

Hidden choices are encouraged but should be combined with more obvious choices, so players are aware that interactivity exists and some outcomes may be discovered only through exploration or creative play.

What lesson did Rouse learn from observing player behavior regarding moral choices?

Rouse found that most players choose positive actions first and experiment with negative paths only on subsequent playthroughs. This suggests that clear labels for good or bad choices are less effective than nuanced, gray morality systems.