What is Ethics?
Summary
TLDRThis whiteboard session delves into the fundamentals of ethics, tracing its origins from the Greek 'ethos' to the modern philosophical study of right and wrong human actions. It distinguishes ethics from morality, highlighting ethics as the theoretical exploration of moral principles, while morality is the practice. The session outlines the branches of ethics, including normative ethics, which sets moral standards, meta-ethics, which examines the meaning and origin of ethical terms, and applied ethics, which applies these theories to real-world dilemmas. The discussion aims to simplify the complex nature of ethics and its dynamic evolution through socio-cultural contexts.
Takeaways
- 📚 Ethics is a branch of philosophy that studies the rightness or wrongness of human actions and the concept of the 'good life'.
- 🌐 The term 'ethics' comes from the Greek word 'ethos', which originally meant custom or character.
- 🔍 There is no single absolute definition of ethics due to its evolving nature influenced by socio-cultural and political contexts.
- 🏛 In Greek tradition, ethics was about the good life and happiness, exemplified by Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics.
- 🕍 The Judeo-Christian tradition introduced a different focus on ethics, emphasizing righteousness and love of God and neighbor.
- 🤔 The relationship between doing what is right and being happy is complex and varies across different ethical views.
- 📉 Ethics and morality are not the same; ethics is the study of the theory of right action, while morality is the practice of ethics.
- 📝 Normative ethics is prescriptive, setting standards for right and wrong conduct, whereas meta-ethics is descriptive, exploring the meaning and function of ethical terms.
- 🛠 Applied ethics involves the practical application of moral theories to resolve specific moral problems, such as in business, biomedical, and social ethics.
- 👮♂️ A scenario involving a police officer shooting a terrorist illustrates the difference between normative ethics, which might say the act is wrong, and consequentialist ethics, which might argue it is morally correct in the situation.
- 🔄 The script highlights the dynamic nature of ethics, showing how it adapts to different contexts and the challenges in defining it absolutely.
Q & A
What is the origin of the term 'ethics'?
-The term 'ethics' is derived from the Greek word 'ethos,' which originally means custom or character.
What is the primary focus of ethics as a branch of philosophy?
-Ethics is primarily concerned with the rightness or wrongness of human actions and questions of how human persons ought to act.
Why is there no single absolute definition of ethics?
-There is no single absolute definition of ethics because the discipline is constantly evolving due to changes in socio-cultural and political contexts.
How does the Greek tradition view ethics in relation to the concept of the good life?
-In the Greek tradition, ethics was conceived as relating to the concept of the good life, with ethical inquiry directed toward discovering the nature of happiness.
What ethical orientation was introduced by the Judeo-Christian tradition?
-The Judeo-Christian tradition introduced an ethical orientation focused on the ideals of righteousness before God, and the love of God and neighbor, rather than the happy or pleasant life.
What is the difference between ethics and morality?
-Ethics is the systematic study of the underlying principles of morality, focusing on the theory of right action and the greater good, while morality is the practice of ethics, indicating the rightness or wrongness of human actions.
What are the two main types of ethical inquiry according to Sumner?
-According to Sumner, the two main types of ethical inquiry are normative ethics, which is prescriptive in nature, and meta-ethics, which is descriptive in nature.
What is the purpose of normative ethics?
-Normative ethics seeks to set norms or standards that regulate right and wrong or good and bad conduct, developing guidelines or theories that tell us how we ought to behave.
What does meta-ethics aim to understand?
-Meta-ethics aims to understand the nature and dynamics of ethical principles, asking questions about the nature and origin of moral facts and how we learn and acquire moral beliefs.
What is applied ethics and how does it differ from the other types of ethics?
-Applied ethics is the actual application of ethical or moral theories to decide which actions are appropriate in given situations. It differs from normative and meta-ethics by focusing on individual moral problems and practical decision-making.
How does the script illustrate the difference between the three major types of ethics?
-The script uses the example of a police officer shooting a terrorist to illustrate the differences: normative ethics might say the act is wrong because killing is intrinsically wrong, meta-ethics might question the underlying principles of such actions, and applied ethics would consider the specific situation and the consequences of the action.
Outlines
📚 Introduction to Ethics and Its Evolution
This paragraph introduces the concept of ethics, tracing its origins from the Greek word 'ethos' and explaining it as a branch of philosophy concerned with the rightness or wrongness of human actions. It discusses the evolution of ethics, from the Greek tradition focused on the good life and happiness, exemplified by Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics, to the Judeo-Christian tradition emphasizing righteousness and love. The paragraph highlights the difficulty in defining ethics absolutely due to its dynamic nature influenced by socio-cultural and political contexts. It also distinguishes between ethics and morality, with ethics being the study of the principles of right action and morality being the practice of these principles, aiming for peaceful coexistence and the general benefit.
🔍 The Branches of Ethical Inquiry: Normative and Meta Ethics
The second paragraph delves into the methodology of ethics, identifying two main branches: normative ethics and meta ethics. Normative ethics is prescriptive, setting standards for right and wrong conduct and developing guidelines for behavior, as illustrated by Immanuel Kant's duty-based ethics. Meta ethics, in contrast, is descriptive, focusing on understanding the nature and origin of moral facts and beliefs. It asks foundational questions about what constitutes good and justice. The paragraph also introduces applied ethics, which applies ethical theories to specific situations, such as resolving moral dilemmas in fields like business, biomedical, environmental, and social ethics.
🚔 Applied Ethics in Action: Case Studies and Practical Guidance
The final paragraph discusses the practical application of ethics through a hypothetical scenario involving a police officer faced with a moral dilemma. It contrasts the perspectives of methodists, who might argue the act of killing is intrinsically wrong, with utilitarians, who might justify the action based on the greater good of saving lives. The paragraph also touches on the role of casuistry in providing advisory guidance on individual moral problems. The summary concludes with an invitation to follow for more educational content on ethics, highlighting the aim of making philosophy accessible and easy to understand.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Ethics
💡Right Conduct
💡Good Life
💡Morality
💡Normative Ethics
💡Meta Ethics
💡Applied Ethics
💡Casuistry
💡Moral Uprightness
💡Socio-Cultural Context
💡Ethical Inquiry
Highlights
Ethics is derived from the Greek word 'ethos', originally meaning custom or character.
Ethics is a branch of philosophy studying the rightness or wrongness of human actions.
Ethics seeks to define right conduct and the good life through reason.
There is no single absolute definition of ethics due to its evolving nature with socio-cultural and political contexts.
Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics presents a theory of happiness and ways to attain it.
Judeo-Christian tradition emphasizes righteousness and love over the concept of a happy life in ethics.
Ethics and morality are distinct, with ethics being the study of the principles of morality and morality being its practice.
Normative ethics is prescriptive, setting standards for right and wrong conduct.
Meta ethics is descriptive, focusing on the meanings and functions of ethical terms.
Applied ethics applies moral theories to specific situations, such as resolving moral dilemmas.
Casuistry, part of applied ethics, deals with individual moral problems and provides guidance.
Business ethics, biomedical ethics, and social ethics are fields within applied ethics, each with specific focuses.
A moral dilemma example: A police officer's decision to shoot a terrorist to prevent a larger loss of life.
Different ethical perspectives may offer varying judgments on the same moral action.
The importance of understanding the nature and dynamics of ethics based on specific times and contexts.
The goal of ethicists is to seek the good through the aid of reason.
Morality is characterized as an end governed rational enterprise aiming for peaceful coexistence.
The difficulty in reconciling the views of doing what is right and being happy within ethics.
Transcripts
hello my fila notes friends with our
simple whiteboard discussions we hope to
help you in understanding the key topics
in philosophy in an incredibly easy way
in today's whiteboard edition we will
address the question what is ethics the
term ethics is derived from the Greek
word ethos which originally means custom
or character broadly construed ethics is
a branch of philosophy that studies the
rightness or wrongness of a human action
in particular this branch of philosophy
is concerned with questions of how human
persons ought to act in the search for a
definition of right conduct and the good
life it is for this reason that the
attempt to seek the good through the aid
of reason is the traditional goal of
ethicists it must be noted however that
there is no single absolute definition
of ethics this is because ethics as a
discipline is constantly evolving as a
result of a change in socio-cultural and
political context for example in the
Greek tradition ethics was conceived as
relating to the concept of the good life
thus the ethical inquiry during this
time was directed toward discovering the
nature of happiness in fact Aristotle's
Nicomachean ethics does not only present
a theory of happiness but also provides
ways in which happiness is attained now
centuries later a quite different
orientation was introduced by the
judeo-christian tradition in this
ethical tradition the ideals of
righteousness before God and the love of
God and neighbor not the happy or
pleasant life constitute the substance
of ethics
indeed if we make an effort to reconcile
these views we are faced with a
difficult task of defining the
relationship between doing what is right
and being happy again it is for this
reason that we cannot have an absolute
definition of ethics the least that we
can do in my opinion is to describe the
nature and dynamics of ethics based on a
specific time and context it is also
important to note that ethics is not the
same with morality although many
philosophers believe that the two terms
can be used interchangeably this is
because the former denotes the theory of
right action and the greater good while
the latter indicates practice that is
the rightness or wrongness of a human
action in other words ethics undertakes
the systematic study of the underlying
principles of morality
hence it is interested primarily in the
illustration of a more general problem
and the examination of underlying
assumptions in the critical evaluation
of moral principles morality of the
other hand is more prescriptive in
nature it tells us what we ought to do
and exhorts us to follow the right way
according to Terence McConnell morality
is characterized as an end governed
rational enterprise whose object is to
equip people with a body of norms that
make for peaceful and collectively
satisfying coexistence by facilitating
their living together and interacting in
a way that is productive for the
realization of the general benefit
for example a religious leader may ask
her followers to be good at all times in
this way a moralist may want to keep
alive the values she considers to be
worthwhile and to improve the moral
quality of the community where she
belongs
hence morality at the very least aims to
guide one's action by reason and gives
equal weight to the interests of each
individual affected by one's decision
indeed
this gives us a picture of what it
really means to be a morally upright
person and so we may conclude that
ethics is the science of morals while
morality is the practice of ethics
during the mid 20th century according to
Sumner a certain theory in the
methodology of ethics has gradually
become more and more widely accepted at
least by British and American moral
philosophers according to this position
there are two ways of doing ethical
inquiry namely normative ethics and meta
ethics on the one hand normative ethics
is prescriptive in nature as it seeks to
set norms or standards that regulate
right and wrong or good and bad conduct
this may involve articulating the good
habits that we should acquire the duties
so we should follow are the consequences
of our behavior on others hence
normative ethics normally attempts to
develop guidelines or theories that tell
us how we ought to behave
for an example immanuel kant's claimed
that an act is morally right if it is
done for the sake of duty is an example
of a normative ethics meta ethics on the
other hand is descriptive in nature
according to Sumner meta ethics is
allegedly constituted at least in part
by questions of the meanings of the
various ethical terms and functions of
ethical etre insists hence if a
normative ethical inquiry is evaluative
and prescriptive meta ethics is an
elliptical and descriptive put simply
meta ethics is a type of ethical inquiry
that aims to understand the nature and
dynamics of ethical principles it asks
questions about the nature and origin of
moral facts as well as the way in which
we learn and acquire moral beliefs thus
for example if normative ethics urges us
to do good at all times
meta ethics asks the question what is
good for sure if a moral philosopher
attempts to address the questions what
is good what is justice why should I be
moral then that moral philosopher is
doing meta ethics hence when play to
propose an answer to the question why
should I be moral plato was doing meta
ethics indeed Plato raised a meta
ethical question
in the course of the development of
ethics applied ethics became its third
major type as its name suggests applied
ethics is the actual application of
ethical or moral theories for the
purpose of deciding which ethical or
moral actions are appropriate in a given
situation
for this reason casuistry adherence of
applied ethics are concerned with
individual moral problems such as
abortion or euthanasia and attempt to
resolve the conflicting issues that
surround these particular moral problems
casuistry also act on some occasions in
an advisory capacity such as guiding
individuals in their choice of actions
for example they may attempt to resolve
the conflicting duties of a mother
suffering from ectopic pregnancy who has
no other option than to abort the fetus
applied ethics is usually divided into
different fields for example we may talk
about business ethics which deals with
ethical behavior in the corporate world
biomedical and environmental ethics
which deal with issues relating to
health welfare and the responsibility we
have toward people in our environment
and social ethics which deals with the
principles and guidelines that regulate
corporate welfare within societies
finally the difference between the three
major types of ethics can be illustrated
in the following situation a police
officer shoots a terrorist who is about
to blow up a crowded shopping mall the
act of the police officer is morally
wrong according to methods because it is
always wrong to kill as is well known
killing in itself is intrinsically wrong
however if the police officer does not
shoot the terrorists men
innocent people will die or get insured
though the police officers act may be
wrong the adherence of ignore motive
ethics may say that it is the right
thing to do in this particular situation
because not doing so will result in the
death of so many people
hence the action might be morally
correct
finally the kazoo assay that the police
officer is just doing his best to
fulfill his duty that is to protect as
many innocent lives as possible alright
that's it for today keep looking forward
to our series of daily whiteboard
additions as we try to make the learning
and understanding of philosophy
incredibly easy thanks for joining us
today in this edition of our daily
whiteboard here at filo notes full
transcript of this video is available at
feel or notes com to keep you updated of
our daily whiteboard additions here at
filo notes just click here and subscribe
until then thanks take care
you
[Music]
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)