VP Duterte, ipinababasura sa impeachment court ang kaso dahil labag umano sa Konstitusyon | 24 Oras
Summary
TLDRVice President Sara Duterte's legal team filed a response to the Senate Impeachment Court’s summons, asserting that the fourth impeachment complaint against her is unconstitutional. The complaint, according to Duterte, should be dismissed as it violates the one-year, one-complaint rule in the Constitution. Her reply, delivered just before the deadline, was presented with caution, expressing reserved objections to the court's jurisdiction. The Senate Secretary acknowledged the filing, while the House prosecution panel has until May 30 to respond to Duterte's answer.
Takeaways
- 😀 Vice President Sara Duterte has filed a response to the Senate Impeachment Court's summons regarding the fourth impeachment complaint against her.
- 😀 Duterte's response argues that the impeachment complaint should be dismissed as unconstitutional and void from the outset.
- 😀 The Vice President claims that the complaint violates the one-year, one-impeachment rule set by the Constitution.
- 😀 The Latin term 'Ad Cautelam,' meaning excessive caution, is included in Duterte's response.
- 😀 The Vice President's response was submitted at 6 p.m. on the deadline day to the Senate Impeachment Court.
- 😀 Senate Secretary Ray Bantog acknowledged receipt of the response, acting as the court's clerk.
- 😀 Duterte's legal team submitted a 35-page response, including a verification page.
- 😀 In her response, Duterte stated that they are reserving arguments but complying with the court's order.
- 😀 According to Camara spokesperson Attorney Princess Abante, they also received the response in the afternoon.
- 😀 The House prosecution panel has until May 30 to reply to VP Sara Duterte's answer to the impeachment complaint.
Q & A
What is Vice President Sara Duterte's response to the Senate Impeachment Court's summons?
-Vice President Sara Duterte's response to the Senate Impeachment Court's summons is that the fourth impeachment complaint against her should be dismissed because it is allegedly unconstitutional.
Why does Vice President Sara Duterte believe the impeachment complaint should be dismissed?
-Vice President Sara Duterte believes the impeachment complaint should be dismissed because it allegedly violates the constitution's one-year bar rule, which prohibits the initiation of more than one impeachment complaint against an official within a year.
What is the 'one-year bar rule' referenced in Vice President Duterte's response?
-The 'one-year bar rule' in the constitution prohibits the initiation of more than one impeachment complaint against an official within a year.
What does the Latin phrase 'Ad Cautelam' mean, and why is it included in the response?
-'Ad Cautelam' is a Latin term meaning 'with excessive caution' or 'more abundant caution.' It is included in Vice President Duterte's response to indicate that the answer was submitted with caution, without waiving any objections to the court's jurisdiction or other issues in the case.
What does the Senate Impeachment Court's clerk report about the submission of Vice President Duterte's response?
-Senate Secretary, Attorney Ray Bantog, who is acting as the clerk of court, reported that Vice President Duterte's response was received at 6 p.m. on the deadline day and was accepted without issue.
How many pages were included in Vice President Sara Duterte's submission?
-Vice President Sara Duterte submitted a total of 35 pages, including the verification page.
What did the spokesperson for the Camara report regarding the response from Vice President Duterte's camp?
-Camara spokesperson Attorney Princess Abante reported that they received the response from Vice President Duterte's camp that afternoon.
What was the deadline for the House prosecution panel to reply to Vice President Duterte's answer?
-The deadline for the House prosecution panel to reply to Vice President Duterte's answer was May 30.
What was the Senate Secretary's stance on Vice President Duterte's response?
-Senate Secretary Ray Bantog explained that while Vice President Duterte’s camp was submitting their response in compliance with the court's order, they were doing so with caution and reserving arguments for later.
Was the response from Vice President Duterte a motion to dismiss the impeachment complaint?
-No, Vice President Duterte's response was not a motion to dismiss the impeachment complaint. Instead, it was an answer submitted with caution, indicating objections to the court's jurisdiction and other issues.
Outlines

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowMindmap

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowKeywords

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowHighlights

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowTranscripts

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowBrowse More Related Video

Philippines Vice President Duterte Faces Impeachment as Activists File Second Complaint | WION

Dela Rosa on VP Duterte’s impeach raps: ‘I’m expecting the worst’ | INQToday

VP Sara Duterte, in-impeach ng Kamara sa botong 215; binanggit sa reklamo: banta kay... | 24 Oras

Maraming kongresista, malamig na umano sa pagsulong ng impeachment vs. VP Sara

VPSD - Pagtiwalaan ang mga senador; Kung may ipapa-inhibit dapat lahat: pabor at... | 24 Oras

Panelo believes PBBM is involved in VP Sara impeachment | News and Views
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)