وزير التعليم نعيم العبودي: لا يمكن فكي عن العـ ـصـ ـائب وأتحدى من يقول إنني درت الوزارة بطريقة حزبية

Summary

The speaker discusses their involvement with Asaib Ahl al-Haqq, highlighting the distinction between their personal partisan role and their work within the Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research. They emphasize their commitment to serving all Iraqis and challenge anyone to prove that their ministry operates in a partisan manner. The speaker stresses that even key positions, such as office managers, are chosen based on merit and not party affiliation. They defend their leadership, asserting that the ministry is driven by national interest rather than political loyalty.

Takeaways

• 😀 The speaker belongs to the Asaib Ahl al-Haqq political organization, which includes a resistant and armed faction.
• 😀 Despite being part of Asaib Ahl al-Haqq, the speaker does not submit to the group in a partisan way.
• 😀 The speaker highlights the importance of separating personal partisanship from the actions of Asaib Ahl al-Haqq.
• 😀 The speaker previously served as a spokesperson for Asaib Ahl al-Haqq and is now the head of the political office of the Sadiqun.
• 😀 The speaker emphasizes the difference between political partisanship and managing the country for the benefit of all Iraqis.
• 😀 The speaker challenges anyone to claim that the Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research was managed in a partisan way under Asaib Ahl al-Haqq.
• 😀 The speaker asserts that no one in the ministry was chosen based on partisan backgrounds, including the office director and undersecretaries.
• 😀 The speaker proudly claims that individuals in the ministry were chosen based on their professional competence, not political affiliation.
• 😀 The speaker challenges anyone to prove that an office manager or any other ministry employee was associated with Asaib Ahl al-Haqq.
• 😀 The speaker reinforces the commitment to running the ministry with a focus on the state and the well-being of all Iraqis, not political interests.

Q & A

What political organization does the speaker belong to?

The speaker belongs to Asaib Ahl al-Haq, which is a political organization with a part of it being resistant and armed.

How does the speaker view their relationship with Asaib Ahl al-Haq?

The speaker separates their personal partisanship from the organization itself, indicating they do not submit to Asaib Ahl al-Haq in a way that aligns with full submission.

What role did the speaker hold within Asaib Ahl al-Haq?

The speaker was previously a spokesman for Asaib Ahl al-Haq and is now the head of the political office of the Sadiqun.

What distinction does the speaker make about their work and political affiliation?

The speaker distinguishes between being a partisan and running a ministry with a broader vision for the country, emphasizing that their work in the ministry is for the benefit of all Iraqis, not for the party.

What challenge does the speaker make regarding the ministry’s operations?

The speaker challenges anyone to prove that the Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research has been managed in a partisan way by Asaib Ahl al-Haq, asserting that no one from the office director to the smallest employee was chosen based on partisan affiliation.

What does the speaker say about the selection of employees in the ministry?

The speaker claims that employees in the ministry, including the office manager, were chosen based on their qualifications and not because of any party affiliation, emphasizing that the chosen individuals were not from Asaib Ahl al-Haq.

How does the speaker justify the choice of the office manager in the ministry?

The speaker justifies the selection by stating that the office manager was chosen because of their academic background and had no connection to any political party, including Asaib Ahl al-Haq.

What does the speaker imply about political interference in the ministry?

The speaker implies that there was no political interference in the ministry’s operation and administration, emphasizing that it was managed based on competence rather than party loyalty.

What is the speaker’s stance on the administration of the ministry?

The speaker’s stance is that the ministry has been run with a focus on serving the nation as a whole, not with a partisan approach, even though they acknowledge their political affiliation.

How does the speaker address accusations of partisanship in the ministry?

The speaker directly challenges anyone to provide evidence that the ministry has operated along partisan lines, stressing that no one in the ministry has been appointed based on party affiliation, whether they are directors or employees.