Absurdism Explained | The Myth Of Sisyphus (Full Analysis)

Summary

This video script explores Albert Camus' essay 'The Myth of Sisyphus,' delving into the concept of the Absurd and its implications for human existence. Camus argues that life's inherent meaninglessness confronts us with an Absurd that cannot be rationalized. He introduces the idea of embracing the Absurd through revolt, freedom, and passion, using archetypes like Don Juan and the Conqueror to illustrate living authentically in an absurd world. The script also discusses Camus' philosophical stance on happiness, suggesting that true contentment comes from accepting life's struggle without illusions, much like the myth of Sisyphus who finds joy in his eternal defiance.

Takeaways

• 📚 Albert Camus explores the fundamental question of whether life is worth living in his essay 'The Myth of Sisyphus', considering the absence of inherent meaning in life.
• 🤔 Camus introduces the concept of the 'Absurd', which arises from the confrontation between the human desire for meaning and the world's indifferent silence.
• 🚫 He rejects the idea that traditional philosophical inquiries, such as ethics, epistemology, and metaphysics, can provide a satisfactory answer to the question of life's worth.
• 💡 Camus suggests that acknowledging the Absurd is the first step towards dealing with it, rather than seeking false comfort in philosophical suicide or irrational beliefs.
• 🏆 The essay outlines three transformative outcomes of embracing the Absurd: revolt, freedom, and passion, which allow one to live authentically in a meaningless universe.
• 🎭 Camus discusses the role of art as a means of expressing the Absurd but clarifies that it cannot inherently add value to life, only shape one's existence.
• 🎭 The character Kirilov from Dostoevsky's 'The Possessed' is presented as an example of someone who rebels against a Godless universe by asserting ultimate freedom.
• 🏹 The Absurd man is characterized by internal innocence and integrity, living without the constraints of imposed morality or fear of divine judgment.
• 🧗‍♂️ The myth of Sisyphus is used as an allegory for humanity's perpetual struggle against life's inherent absurdity, with Sisyphus representing the Absurd hero.
• 🏔️ Camus concludes that happiness can be found in the acceptance of our experiences and fate without illusions, as illustrated by Sisyphus finding joy in his eternal task.
• 📖 The video encourages viewers to read 'The Myth of Sisyphus' in its original form to experience Camus's ideas firsthand, beyond interpretations and summaries.

Q & A

What is the fundamental question of philosophy that Albert Camus explores in 'The Myth of Sisyphus'?

The fundamental question of philosophy that Albert Camus explores in 'The Myth of Sisyphus' is whether life is worth living, given the inherent lack of meaning in life.

What does Camus mean by the 'Absurd' in his essay?

By the 'Absurd,' Camus refers to the conflict between the human need for meaning and the universe's indifference and silence, which cannot provide the clarity or understanding that humans seek.

How does Camus describe the confrontation between the human quest for meaning and the universe's silence?

Camus describes this confrontation as a silent dialogue between humanity's longing for purpose and the enigmatic silence of the universe, which is a paradoxical dance that leaves us grappling with the profound mystery of our existence.

What are the three transformative outcomes of embracing the Absurd according to Camus?

The three transformative outcomes of embracing the Absurd, as posited by Camus, are revolt, freedom, and passion.

What are the three archetypes that Camus presents to illustrate how one should live when confronted with the Absurd?

The three archetypes presented by Camus are Don Juan, the actor, and the conqueror, each representing different ways of embracing the Absurd and living authentically.

How does Camus view the role of art in expressing the absurdity of life?

Camus views art as a means to express the absurdity of life, but he also points out that art cannot add inherent value to our life; it can only be a means to an end and a way to shape our existence.

What is the significance of the myth of Sisyphus in Camus' philosophy?

The myth of Sisyphus is significant in Camus' philosophy as it serves as an allegory for humanity's perpetual struggle against life's inherent absurdity, with Sisyphus representing the Absurd hero who finds meaning in his defiance and acceptance of his eternal task.

How does Camus differentiate the Absurd man from the rest of humanity?

Camus differentiates the Absurd man from the rest of humanity not by his actions but by his internal perspective towards them. The Absurd man operates outside the bounds of morality, free from notions of guilt or wrongdoing, and is led solely by his own sense of integrity.

What does Camus suggest about the relationship between happiness and the awareness of the Absurd?

Camus suggests that true happiness arises when we accept our life and fate as entirely our own. He implies that happiness and absurd awareness are closely linked, and genuine happiness can be found in accepting our experiences without relying on illusions.

How does the character Kirilov in Dostoevsky's work 'The Possessed' relate to the concept of the Absurd?

Kirilov in 'The Possessed' embodies the struggle with the idea of a Godless universe and ultimately ends his own life as a bold rebellion against this notion, attempting to assert ultimate freedom by becoming his own God, which Camus interprets as an understanding of the Absurd.

Outlines

00:00

📖 The Absurd and the Quest for Meaning

Albert Camus' essay 'The Myth of Sisyphus' is explored, focusing on the fundamental question of whether life is worth living. Camus introduces the concept of the Absurd, arising from the confrontation between human desire for meaning and the world's indifference. He argues that traditional philosophical inquiries are distractions from this central issue. The essay is known for laying the groundwork for absurdism, the belief that life is inherently meaningless. Camus suggests that acknowledging the Absurd is the first step in coping with it, and he uses the myth of Sisyphus to illustrate the human struggle against life's absurdity, advocating for rebellion and finding fulfillment in the act of living itself.

05:02

🤔 Philosophical Suicide and Embracing the Absurd

The second paragraph delves into how other philosophers have attempted to address the Absurd, leading to what Camus calls 'philosophical suicide'—an irrational embrace of objective meaning despite life's inherent absurdity. Camus rejects these approaches as inadequate. Instead, he proposes embracing the Absurd, which involves a courageous confrontation with life's chaos and meaninglessness, leading to revolt, freedom, and passion. The Absurd man is introduced as one who lives authentically in a world devoid of inherent meaning, starting with indifference to societal norms and moral systems, and gaining freedom by shedding the constraints of imposed meaning.

10:03

🎭 Archetypes of the Absurd Man and Artistic Expression

Camus presents three archetypes of how one might live in the face of the Absurd: the Don Juan, the actor, and the conqueror. These figures represent different ways of engaging with life's meaninglessness, from seeking pleasure and passion to embracing the pursuit of goals for their own sake. The paragraph also discusses the role of art as a means of expressing the Absurd, noting that while art can help shape our existence, it cannot add inherent value to life. Camus uses the work of Dostoevsky to illustrate how literature can grapple with metaphysical concerns and the impact of these on individual lives.

15:04

🏋️‍♂️ Sisyphus as the Absurd Hero and the Struggle for Meaning

The fourth paragraph continues the discussion on the Absurd, drawing a parallel between the repetitive nature of daily life and the myth of Sisyphus, who was condemned to eternally roll a boulder up a hill only for it to roll back down. Camus sees Sisyphus as a symbol of the Absurd hero, embracing life in its entirety and defying death despite the task's futility. The paragraph emphasizes the importance of living with full awareness of one's absurd situation, suggesting that happiness can be found in the acceptance of our experiences without illusions, and that the struggle itself is enough to fill one's heart.

20:04

🏔️ Acceptance of the Absurd and the Pursuit of Happiness

In the final paragraph, Camus concludes that happiness and an awareness of the Absurd are closely linked. He argues that true happiness arises when we accept our life and fate as our own, without relying on hope or illusions. The myth of Sisyphus serves to illustrate that happiness can be found in accepting the struggle of life, even when it is devoid of hope. Camus suggests that by embracing our absurd existence, we can transcend our fate and find genuine happiness in the struggle itself.

Keywords

💡Absurd

The term 'Absurd' in the context of the video refers to the inherent conflict between the human search for meaning and the universe's indifference. It is the central theme of Albert Camus' philosophy, which he explores in 'The Myth of Sisyphus.' The Absurd arises from the confrontation between the human need for understanding and the unreasonable silence of the world. The video uses the concept to discuss how individuals can live authentically in a world devoid of inherent meaning, as illustrated by the allegory of Sisyphus.

💡Albert Camus

Albert Camus is a French writer and philosopher central to the video's narrative. He is known for his works that explore the concept of the Absurd and existentialism. The video discusses his essay 'The Myth of Sisyphus,' where he introduces the idea of living in awareness of life's absurdity and finding meaning in the struggle itself, rather than seeking external validation or meaning.

💡Sisyphus

Sisyphus is a figure from Greek mythology who is eternally punished to roll a boulder up a hill, only for it to roll back down when he reaches the top. In the video, Sisyphus represents the Absurd hero who, despite the futility of his task, finds solace and happiness in his defiance and the act of struggling. This myth is used by Camus to illustrate the human condition and the possibility of finding meaning in life's repetitive and seemingly pointless struggles.

💡Absurdism

Absurdism is a philosophy that emerges from the recognition of the Absurd. It posits that humans seek inherent meaning and value in life, but the universe provides none. The video explains that absurdism, as introduced by Camus, is about acknowledging the Absurd and living life with full awareness of its inherent meaninglessness, embracing the struggle and finding personal meaning in the act of living itself.

💡Freedom

Freedom, in the context of the video, is the realization and exercise of one's autonomy in a world that lacks inherent meaning. It is one of the transformative outcomes of embracing the Absurd, as discussed by Camus. The video suggests that by shedding the constraints of imposed meaning and morality, individuals can experience true freedom, allowing them to live life on their own terms without the burden of preconceived notions.

💡Don Juan

Don Juan is an archetype presented in the video as an example of how one might live in the face of the Absurd. He is a seducer who lives passionately and without concern for a greater meaning in life or afterlife. The video uses Don Juan to illustrate the Absurd man's indifference to traditional moral systems and the pursuit of daily enjoyments as a way of embracing life's experiences.

💡Indifference

Indifference, as discussed in the video, is the attitude of the Absurd man towards the meaninglessness of life and the various moral and ethical systems imposed by society. It involves detaching from these abstractions and experiencing life without the need for external validation or meaning. The video suggests that this indifference can lead to a form of stoicism and freedom from suffering.

💡Absurd Man

The 'Absurd Man' is a concept introduced by Camus in the video to describe an individual who lives authentically in a world devoid of inherent meaning. The Absurd Man does not rely on external systems of meaning or morality but instead finds fulfillment in the act of living and the pursuit of personal desires and interests, free from the constraints of imposed meaning.

💡Tragedy

Tragedy, in the video, is associated with the recognition of one's fate and the limitations of existence. It is a human triumph over the Absurd, where characters like Sisyphus and Oedipus find happiness by accepting their fate without hope for a better condition. The video suggests that true heroism lies in this acceptance, which allows for a genuine happiness that arises from living life on one's own terms.

💡Happiness

Happiness, in the context of the video, is closely linked to the awareness of the Absurd. It is the state of contentment that arises when individuals accept their life and fate as their own, without illusions or hope for a preferable existence. The video suggests that true happiness can be found in the acceptance of our experiences and the inherent struggle of life, as exemplified by the myth of Sisyphus.

Highlights

Albert Camus explores the fundamental question of whether life is worth living in his essay 'The Myth of Sisyphus'.

Camus introduces the concept of the Absurd as the confrontation between the human quest for meaning and the universe's indifference.

The Absurd arises from the inability to explain life or the world with rationality or science, leading to meaningless abstractions.

Camus argues that recognizing the Absurd is the first step towards dealing with it, rather than seeking answers from religion or philosophy.

Embracing the Absurd leads to transformative outcomes such as revolt, freedom, and passion.

Camus rejects the idea of 'philosophical suicide', where one embraces an irrational belief in objective meaning despite the Absurd.

The Absurd man is indifferent to moral systems and the opinions of others, seeking authenticity in a world devoid of inherent meaning.

Camus presents three archetypes of how one can live in the face of the Absurd: the Don Juan, the actor, and the conqueror.

The Absurd man is characterized by innocence, as he operates outside the bounds of morality and is free from notions of guilt or wrongdoing.

Art can help express the absurdity of life but cannot add inherent value to it; it is a means to an end.

Camus uses the myth of Sisyphus to illustrate the human struggle against life's inherent absurdity and the pursuit of meaning in a futile task.

Sisyphus, despite his eternal struggle, finds happiness in his defiance and acceptance of his fate.

Camus suggests that happiness and absurd awareness are closely linked, with true happiness arising from accepting life and fate as our own.

The essay concludes that by embracing our absurd situation and living without illusions, we can find genuine happiness and meaning.

Camus's work encourages readers to confront the Absurd and live life authentically, despite its inherent meaninglessness.

Transcripts

to judge if this life is worth living is

giving answer to the most fundamental

question of philosophy this is the

question Alber kamu asks in the opening

sentence of his essay the mid of Copus

written in 1942 the French writer artist

and by some proclaimed philosopher asamu

himself did not consider himself one

wrote this now Infamous classic kamu is

trying to find an answer to the question

if life is worth living when in

inherently we know there is no true

meaning in life kamu coins this the most

important and quintessential

philosophical question the only question

that truly matters actually he even goes

a step further claiming that all other

questions in the history of philosophy

are Irrelevant in comparison to this one

ethics epistemology metaphysics they are

but mere distractions if they do not

seek an answer to this question the

essay is mostly known as an introdu

ction to what kamu coin the Absurd and

give rise to the philosophy of

absurdism but what does kamu mean with

the Absurd well in short every attempt

to look at the meaning of life in an

objective way always ends in absurdity

it is impossible to explain our life or

the world around us with rationality or

science as they only create meaningless

abstractions and as kamu writes himself

a man that has become conscious of the

Absurd is forever forever bound to it

the Absurd arises from the confrontation

between the human who asks and the world

that remains silent in an unreasonable

manner we long for clarity about our

existence but that Clarity is not given

to us questions that are unanswerable

such as what is the meaning of life is

there a divine plan or is there an

afterlife are in essence unknowable with

our limited comprehension and although

kamu did not coin himself an atheist

religion or God failed to provide him

with a satisfactory answer which brought

him to the following how should and can

we live life if we cannot rely on

anything if we cannot know the true

meaning of life and it appears that

there is none how can we relate to the

absurdity of our own existence that is

the question Albert kamu presents to us

in the mid of Copus influenced by the

philosophical ideas of thinkers like

Surin Kart Arthur shopau and fried n

kamu contends that life inherent meaning

despite Humanity's persistent efforts to

impose order and seek answers to

unanswerable questions drawing

inspiration from the ancient Greek myth

of Copus who is eternally tasked by the

gods to roll a boulder up a hill only

for it to roll back down kamu employs

this allegory to illustrate Humanity's

Perpetual struggle against life's

inherent absurdity according to kamu the

initial step towards dealing with this

absurdity is to acknowledge its

existence if again to Copus death is not

a viable option the only recourse is to

rebel by finding fulfillment in the very

Act of pushing the boulder upwards for

eternity in this video we will explain

and outline the main ideas of the essay

note that we will offer our own

subjective interpretation of this essay

and of course there are other

interpretations that are also possible

so be sure to let us know what you think

in the comment section below the my of

Copus consists of the following four

parts the first part part which is

titled an absurd reasoning a second part

titled the Absurd man a third part

titled absurd creation and last but not

least the fourth and final part which is

titled the myth of

Copus part one an absurd

reasoning in the opening of the essay

kamu delves into the fundamental

question of human existence which he

calls the Absurd as explained earlier

the Absurd is born out of our

confrontation with the meaninglessness

of life as humans we are creatures

driven by an innate longing for

happiness and irrational understanding

of the world around us yet when we

confront the vastness of the cosmos we

are met with an unsettling silence an

irrational void that defies our attempts

to find meaning imagine a traveler

wandering through a dense forest Guided

by the flickering light of his

flashlight and the hope of Discovery but

as the traveler Journeys deeper he finds

himself ins snared in a Labyrinth of

chaos and uncertainty where the very

fabric of reality seems to mock his

quest for understanding the clash

between our innate desire for meaning

and the indifferent chaotic nature of

the universe gives rise to the Absurd

it's not merely a matter of human

irrationality or Cosmic Randomness but

rather the inherent contradiction

between our quest for meaning and the

Stark reality of existence the ABS

emerges as the silent dialogue between

Humanity's longing for purpose and the

enigmatic Silence of the universe it's a

paradoxical dance that leaves us

teetering on the Edge of Reason

grappling with the profound mystery of

our own

existence so what should we do or put

differently what can we do to cope with

the

Absurd kamu observes that other

philosophers tried to Grapple with the

Absurd only to find their paths leading

to what he terms philosophic iCal

suicide this curious phenomenon entails

embracing an irrational belief in

objective meaning despite the inherent

absurdity of existence one example kamu

mentions is kar's proposition when faced

with the Absurd he advocates for a leap

of Fate referring to God urging us to

abandon reason and morality in favor of

a predetermined moral framework

essentially asking us to ignore the

absurds hence coming coining it a form

of philosophical suicide kamu dismisses

such Notions as inadequate responses to

the Absurd so what remains well K posits

another option embracing the Absurd this

entails a courageous confrontation with

the inherent chaos and meaninglessness

of existence leading to three

transformative outcomes Revolt freedom

and passion embracing the Absurd grants

us the realization of true Freedom unted

by the constraints of imposed meaning an

invitation to seize the richness of

life's experiences without the burden of

preconceived notions or unnecessary

moral Frameworks as in the example of

Gart but how does one go about this

daunting task this question serves as

the gateway to the second part of the

essay the Absurd man where kamu delves

deeper into the Practical implications

of embracing the Absurd and living

authentically in a world devoid of

inherent meaning here kamu notes that

for the Absurd man it's not about

explaining or solving anything but about

experiencing everything starts with

indifference this indifference

encompasses everything from an

indifference against or moral systems

such as religion or a type of Ethics to

the opinion of others when we detach

from these abstractions we break free

from the chains of suffering comeu here

verges on a form of stoicism in a sense

where remove moving significance brings

relief from most forms of Anguish by

shedding significance we not only

lighten our load of suffering from the

absurd but also gain greater freedom in

our choices this opens up the

possibility to a form of unrestrained

agency kamu gives us three archetypes

that describe how man should live once

being confronted with the reality of the

Absurd the three archetypes are the

Donan the actor and the Conqueror the

first archetype the Don Kuan or as I

like to call him myself the Playboy is a

Seducer he does not care about a greater

meaning in Life or in afterlife he is

simply a chaser of the daily enjoyments

he finds in life virtually living his

life without a worry on his Horizon

would you recognize in this individual a

constant state of misery or unhappiness

Donan chooses a life of passion and

excitement with a Perpetual smile

gracing his lips Don Juan acknowledges

there exists no Noble love except that

which acknowledges its own brevity and

uniqueness next we have the second

archetype the actor which is an

interesting archetype because the actor

for kamu symbolizes someone that lives

through the character he is portraying

on stage he is playing a role and loses

his own sense of self well knowing that

the character he is portraying is

temporary and will metaphorically

speaking die once the role is finished

the ACT gives it his all during his

performance which can be linked to the

transformative outcome of passion the

third and last archetype is the

Conqueror for the Conqueror overcoming

the Absurd is not merely about achieving

wealth status or even recognition

instead it is about embracing the

Relentless pursuit of goals the trill of

overcoming obstacles and the

satisfaction of continuous growth much

like cus endlessly pushing the boulder

of the Hill the Conqueror finds

fulfillment in the journey itself rather

than in any ultimate destination an

important side note here is that for

kamu these archetypes are just

hypothetical examples they are not

necessarily meant to be applied in life

literally he does not want them to be

granted the status of an ideal but wants

to use them to clarify his point another

important note is that the Absurd man in

whatever form he comes is aoral either

morality comes from something

Transcendent like God or it is invented

as a system by humans in order to

justify certain kinds of behavior the

Absurd man does not believe in God and

he has no need for moral justification

he is Led solely by his own sense of

Integrity which stands independent of

any moral framework since the Absurd man

operates outside the bounds of morality

free from Notions of guilt or wrongdoing

kamu characterizes him as innocent the

distinction between the Absurd man and

the rest of humanity lies not in his

actions but in his internal perspective

towards them for instance the difference

between Don Juan and an average Seducer

is not primarily in their behavior but

in their attitude towards that behavior

an ordinary Seducer might be accused of

the same false that kamu defends Don

Juan against the difference being that

for Don Juan there is nothing beyond the

act of Seduction itself he does not

seduce to find love or to alleviate

Melancholy he seduces purely for the

pleasure of Seduction Dan Juan embodies

the Absurd Man by recognizing that his

life lacks inherent meaning and that his

actions hold no significance beyond

their immediate consequences kamu labels

the Absurd man innocent to contrast it

against the Christian idea of sin in

Catholic belief everyone is born a

sinner marked by the original sin of

Adam and Eve a Christian lives with a

continual consciousness of sin and guilt

striving to earn forgiveness and gain

entry into heaven or the afterlife the

Christian Life is centered between our

innate evil and our potential for good

in contrast the innocence of the absurd

man eliminates any sense of sin or guilt

his actions and decisions are not

overshadowed by a fear of divine

judgment or the idea of a struggle

between good and evil he experiences no

internal restraints preventing him from

pursuing his Desires in this way the

Absurd man's innocence also reflects a

certain Integrity he lives a life

aligned with his interests and desires

without needing any moral code Beyond

part three absurd creation

in the third part of the essay kamu

points out that expressive forms such as

art help us to express the absurdity of

life however he also points out that

these Expressions cannot add inherent

value to our life they can only be a

means to an end so art in a sense helps

us shape our existence the notion that

art imitates life has been prevalent

since Aristotle's time the Greeks called

this concept mimesis a term from which

the English word MIME is derived kamu

likely references this Greek idea when

he describes the Absurd man as

performing a mime of Life viewing the

Act of Creation as the ultimate form of

dis imitation this embodies the essence

and the ideal of the Absurd man as we

should not hope to find a logical

explanation for life that is something

neither philosophy religion or science

can ever provide us let alone art

however art symbolizes the Revolt the

creative aspect of one's own perspective

on the world

asamu writes himself the only way to

deal with an unfree world is to become

so absolutely free that your own

existence is an act of

rebellion as a case study kamu explores

the work of Doki and more specifically

his novel de possessed in this novel

dooi wrestles with the notion that life

is either filled with meaning because of

God's existence or utterly pointless

without him unlike philosophers who deal

with abstractions of this question dooi

as a novelist delves into how these

metaphysical concerns impact our

individual

lives in this novel The Character kilof

embodies this struggle he wants to

revolt against the idea that God doesn't

exist kof embodies this struggle he

argues that for life to have purpose God

must exist but he cannot reconcile this

belief with the conviction that God does

not exist kof ends his own life not as

an act of Despair but as a bold

Rebellion against the idea of a Godless

Universe an attempt to assert ultimate

Freedom by becoming his own God he wants

himself in a certain sense to become God

it's precisely this absurd reasoning

that makes doeski an author that

understands the Absurd kamu interprets

this to mean that in a world without God

individuals assume the role of

determining their own fate without

Divine oversight human actions are

guided purely by personal will however

ever many people cling to Hope and fail

to embrace this absolute freedom kof

serves as a radical demonstration of the

complete Freedom available to

humans despite presenting an absurd

perspective through kirilov and other

characters dooi ultimately rejects the

full implications of absurdism and turns

to fate in his final novel The Brothers

karamazov doeski concludes with alosha

affirming belief in an afterlife

revealing his ultimate faith in God kamu

notes that while doeski engages deeply

with teams of absurdity he ultimately

aligns more with existentialism choosing

Faith over the acceptance of a

meaningless Universe we saw the same

reasoning in chapter one with

philosophers like Kart this chapter

extends that idea showing that doeski as

a writer mirrors this pattern

recognizing the Absurd doesn't

necessarily lead to creating literature

that reflects it

entirely part four the myth of Copus

the biggest part of the Absurd is our

everyday existence the Absurd person is

someone who has seen through the

ridiculous repetitions of daily life

Rising street car 4 hours in the office

or factory meal street car 4 hours of

work meal sleep and Monday Tuesday

Wednesday Thursday Friday and Saturday

according to the same Rhythm this spth

is easily followed most of the time but

one day the why arises and everything

begins in that weariness tinged with

amazement kamu Associates this

repetition of daily life to the Greek

MTH of Copus Copus was the king of epura

today known as Corinth he was also a

horrible Tyrant that killed others for

his own pleasure he was condemned by the

gods to the worst punishment imaginable

to men a punishment that other

philosophers such as Hyer would coin

worse than death itself to roll a

boulder up a hill only for it to roll

back down once he reached the top of the

hill over and over again for

eternity bound to a life of Perpetual

struggle his task rendered futile his

existence devoid of significance yet he

finds solace in his Defiance for kamu

Copus emerges as the emblem of the

Absurd hero one who embrac his life in

its entirety defying death despite being

forever chained to a task devoid of

meaning we are all Copus engaged in the

repetitive grind of our existence we all

laboriously push our individual burdens

only to witness their inevitable descent

back into insignificance the true

absurdity of our existence lies in our

conscious recognition of this copian

condemnation nevertheless kamu does not

advise us to succumb to despair he

envisions Copus confronting his Destiny

with Defiance as he descends the hill to

recommends his arduous task in these

fleeting moments of Liberation when he

transcends his fate and asserts

dominance over his burden Copus becomes

not only a prisoner of Eternity but a

rebel despite the seeming futility of

our daily struggles we grant them with

significance and meaning thus granting

our life's meaning amidst the absurdity

through the mid of Copus kamu undertakes

the Monumental task of analyzing the

essence and meaning of life yet rather

than delving into metaphysical or overly

abstract explanations he observes the

occasional onset of absurdity urging us

to heed his analysis of a shared State

of Mind his Focus remains fixed on the

question of how to live and attain

happiness kamu concludes I leave Copus

at the foot of the mountain one always

finds one's burden again but Copus

teaches the higher Fidelity that negates

the gods and raises rocks he too con

udes that all is well this universe

henceforth without a master seems to him

neither sterile nor futile each atom of

that stone each mineral flake of that

night fi mountain in itself forms a

world the struggle itself toward the

height is enough to fill a man's heart

one must imagine cus

happy kamu contends that the Absurd hero

perceives Life as a Relentless struggle

devoid of Hope denying or avoiding the

strugg strle and its inherent

hopelessness is a way to escape from the

Absurd contradiction of existence for

kamu the essential requirement for the

Absurd man is to live with a full

awareness of his absurd situation as

Copus pushes his Rock uphill he

experiences only toil and struggle but

during his descent he is aware of his

endless and futile struggle this

awareness mirrors the mindset of the

Absurd man who knows his efforts are

ultimately pointless as long as s

remains conscious of this his fate is no

worse than our own we only react with

Dread to Copus fate due to its evident

futility and despair Kimu argues that

life itself mirrors this point to

struggle without any promise of hope yet

he also implies that his fate is

Dreadful only as long as we continue to

hope for something more worthwhile our

predicament appears terrible when

contrasted with an imagined better

alternative if we abandon the notion of

a preferable existence we can accept Our

Fate without fear in doing so Kimu

suggests we can truly Embrace Life

without any Illusions Copus transcends

his fate precisely because he has embrac

it his ordeal becomes Dreadful only if

he continues to hope for or dream of a

better condition without hope the gods

have no means to torment him while kamu

differs from n in many ways his

inspiration to nin philosophy is very

evident here exploring tragedy Kimu

notes that cif's awareness of his fate

renders it tragic he references idus who

becomes a tragic figure upon realizing

his actions both characters ultimately

find happiness by concluding that all is

well kamu implies that tragedy is not

pessimistic but represents a human

Triumph recognition and acceptance of

her fate and limitations lead to True

heroism tragic fate seems terrible only

when contrasted with hope for something

more by abandoning hope Copus does not

perceive his fate as Dreadful but but

finds genuine happiness Kimu concludes

that happiness and absurd awareness are

closely linked true happiness arises

when we accept our life and fate as

entirely our own if happiness required

escaping reality through hope or fate it

would be a false happiness born out of

denial the myth of Copus aims to show

that happiness can be found in accepting

our experiences without relying on

Illusions therefore if genuine happiness

is possible Copus must be happy

while we've covered the key aspects of

the myth of Copus watching a video about

kamu cannot replace the experience of

reading his work firsthand as the

Italian saying goes tradutor trador to

translate or interpret is to betray our

interpretations can introduce

imprecisions due to personal biases and

perspectives I strongly recommend

reading the mid of Copus yourself you

can find a link to the book in the

description below along with links to

some of K's other words

did you enjoy this video if so please

give it a thumbs up and don't forget to

subscribe for more content also let us

know in the comments which philosopher

thinker or author you'd like us to

explore next your feedback helps us

bring you the content you want to see we

are here to serve you philosophy thank

you for watching and we will see you in

the next video take care