Social Media Corrupts Human Interactions | Jack Symonds | Part 1 of 6
Summary
TLDRIn this debate speech, Jack Simons argues that social media corrupts human interactions. He acknowledges social media's benefits, such as keeping people connected and aiding those in developing countries. However, he emphasizes its negative impact on real human connections, citing increased dependency on virtual validation, higher depression rates, and the promotion of unrealistic body images. Simons also highlights issues like fake news and the influence of social media on political processes. He concludes by urging a balance between online and face-to-face interactions to preserve genuine human connections.
Takeaways
- π± Social media is a double-edged sword, with both positive and negative impacts on human interactions.
- π Social media platforms like Facebook's internet.org have provided internet access to millions, particularly in developing countries.
- π£οΈ Social media gives people a voice and a platform to advocate for their beliefs and create movements.
- π₯ There's a growing dependency on social media for validation and instant gratification, which can replace real human connections.
- π Research indicates a correlation between frequent social media use and increased likelihood of depression, especially among young people.
- π½οΈ Social media can contribute to eating disorders by promoting unrealistic body images and enabling harmful online communities.
- π Social media can distort perceptions of reality by presenting idealized and often false views of others' lives.
- π³οΈ Social media has been implicated in influencing political behavior and elections, raising concerns about freedom of thought.
- π° The rise of 'fake news' on social media platforms has implications for the integrity and reliability of information.
- π€ The speaker encourages skepticism and critical thinking about the authenticity of social media interactions and content.
- π¬ The conclusion calls for awareness of social media's corrupting influence on interactions and a return to more genuine, face-to-face communication.
Q & A
What is the main argument of the speaker regarding social media?
-The speaker argues that while social media has benefits, such as connecting people and providing a voice to the underprivileged, it also corrupts human interactions by promoting unrealistic standards and causing mental health issues like depression and eating disorders.
How does the speaker acknowledge the positive aspects of social media?
-The speaker acknowledges that social media allows them to stay in touch with friends and family worldwide and highlights Facebook's internet.org initiative, which has provided internet access to millions in developing countries.
What is the speaker's stance on the role of social media in developing countries?
-The speaker sees social media as a positive force in developing countries, enabling access to the internet and the opportunities it brings, as exemplified by Facebook's internet.org.
What evidence does the speaker provide about the impact of social media on mental health?
-The speaker cites a study from the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, which found a correlation between frequent social media use and increased likelihood of depression among young people.
How does the speaker connect social media use to eating disorders?
-The speaker suggests that social media platforms contribute to eating disorders by promoting unrealistic body images and facilitating the spread of pro-anorexia and pro-bulimia communities.
What is the speaker's view on the role of social media in shaping societal interactions?
-The speaker believes that social media is changing societal interactions by replacing organic connections with virtual relationships and promoting envy and feelings of inadequacy due to idealized peer presentations.
What is the speaker's opinion on the authenticity of the world presented on social media?
-The speaker argues that the world presented on social media is dishonest and unrealistic, filtered and altered for the benefit of others, which contributes to the corruption of human interactions.
How does the speaker address the impact of social media on political engagement?
-The speaker mentions the 'I voted' feature on Facebook and the fake news scandal, suggesting that social media can influence political behavior and manipulate the information people receive, impacting freedom of thought.
What is the speaker's suggestion for dealing with the negative impacts of social media?
-The speaker suggests that instead of condemning social media, people should be aware of its corrupting influence on interactions and strive for more genuine, face-to-face conversations.
Who are the opposition speakers mentioned by the speaker, and what are their backgrounds?
-The opposition speakers are L vadlamani, the treasurer elect of the Oxford Union and an incoming summer intern at JP Morgan's Asset Management Division, and Liam Hackett, the founder and CEO of 'Ditch the Label,' an organization supporting victims of cyberbullying. Dr. Jessica Carbiner, a Tinder sociologist, is also mentioned.
What is the main motion being debated in the script?
-The main motion being debated is whether social media corrupts human interactions, focusing on the impact of social media on personal relationships and individual behavior.
Outlines
π± The Impact of Social Media on Human Interactions
The speaker, Jack Simons, opens the debate by acknowledging the benefits of social media, such as staying connected with loved ones and its positive role in developing countries, as exemplified by Facebook's internet.org initiative. However, he argues that the motion at hand is not about the merits of social media but its corrupting influence on personal relationships and individual behavior. He points out society's growing dependence on social media for validation and instant gratification, which is replacing genuine human connections with virtual ones. The speaker introduces the opposition speakers, setting the stage for a detailed exploration of social media's effects on individuals and society.
π€― Social Media's Link to Depression and Eating Disorders
This paragraph delves into the negative psychological effects of social media, citing a study from the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine that found a correlation between frequent social media use and depression, particularly among young people. The speaker argues that social media platforms contribute to eating disorders by promoting unrealistic body images and enabling harmful online communities. The platforms' ability to report self-harm and suicidal content is both a commendable feature and a stark indication of the severity of the problem. The speaker suggests that social media's presentation of idealized and often false portrayals of others' lives fosters feelings of envy and inadequacy, which are at the core of its corrupting influence on individual behavior and societal norms.
π Social Media's Influence on Society and Political Interactions
The final paragraph of the script addresses the broader societal implications of social media, including its impact on political engagement and the dissemination of information. The speaker discusses the potential manipulation of social media by popular figures rather than professionals, the spread of fake news, and the influence of Facebook's 'I voted' feature on voter turnout. He emphasizes the erosion of journalistic integrity and the prioritization of speed and access over truth. The speaker concludes by urging the audience to be aware of social media's corrupting effects on interactions and to prioritize face-to-face communication over online stalking, advocating for a more authentic and less mediated approach to human connection.
Mindmap
Keywords
π‘Social Media
π‘Depression
π‘Eating Disorders
π‘Instant Gratification
π‘Digital Universe
π‘Cyberbullying
π‘Tinder Sociologist
π‘Fake News
π‘Internet.org
π‘Pro-Ana and Pro-Mia Communities
π‘Journalistic Integrity
Highlights
Social media can have both positive and negative impacts on human interactions, but the focus of the debate is on the negative effects.
Social media provides benefits such as staying connected with friends and family worldwide and giving a voice to people in developing countries.
Facebook's internet.org has provided internet access to over 25 million people, enabling them to benefit from online resources.
The debate is about how social media affects our personal relationships and interactions, not just its overall benefits or drawbacks.
People are becoming more dependent on social media for validation and instant gratification, leading to a replacement of real human connections with virtual ones.
Research from the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine found a link between frequent social media use and increased likelihood of depression.
Social media platforms may contribute to eating disorders by promoting unrealistic body images and enabling harmful online communities.
Facebook and Instagram have implemented reporting mechanisms for self-harm and suicidal content, indicating the severity of mental health issues related to social media use.
Social media can elicit feelings of envy and inadequacy by presenting highly idealized and often false views of others' lives.
The impact of social media on society includes altering the way we interact with political leaders and the potential manipulation of information.
Facebook's 'I voted' feature may have influenced voter turnout in elections, raising concerns about the impact of social media on political behavior.
The debate highlights the need for skepticism and critical thinking when consuming information from social media platforms.
Social media is changing the way we communicate, with a shift towards speed and access over truth and journalistic integrity.
The speaker calls for awareness of the corrupting influence of social media on our interactions and a return to more authentic communication.
The debate concludes with a call to action to prioritize face-to-face conversations over social media stalking for more meaningful connections.
Transcripts
[Music]
the motion is this house believes social
media corrupts human interactions and I
now look to Jack Simons standing
committee lady Margaret Hall to open the
case for a
proposition thank you Mr President and
thank thank you for having me as one of
your guest speakers this evening I would
like to start by saying that I am most
certainly not against social media any
one of my friends or followers will tell
you that I'm certainly not averse to the
semi-regular Instagram post Facebook
upload or even Snapchat
story perhaps even more importantly as
an Australian student social media
allows me to effortlessly stay in
contact with my friends and family
around World more importantly still
social media acts as a positive
implication for many people living in
developing countries and some of the
world's largest social media companies
are at the heart of these positive
changes Facebook's internet.org for
example has given internet access to
over 25 million people around the world
who have been able to reap the many
benefits that the internet provides
these people live in countries ranging
from Kenya to colia and the program is
only in its first two years social media
gives a voice to the people it allows us
to fight for what we believe in it keeps
people safe and it allows us to create a
movement in the name of what we think is
right but the fact of the matter is that
the motion put before the house tonight
is not about the benefits of social
media it is not about whether or not the
internet is good or bad
the motion put before us tonight is
about the impact that social media can
have on our interactions on our
relationships and on each and every one
of our lives on a deeply personal
level as a society we are constantly
feeling the need to be seen by massive
amounts of people we are growing more
and more dependent on instant
gratification and in order to feel
included we are forced to post gram snap
tweet upload pin checkin swipe like
share react or
message our real human connections are
being replaced by virtual relationships
the simple truth is that for the most
part we are spending huge proportions of
Our Lives living in the Digital Universe
and it is corrupting the way that we act
with each other but before I go into
more detail about the ways in which
social media is affecting our lives it
falls on me to introduce tonight's
opposition speaking first for the
opposition tonight is my friend L
vadlamani now in the spirit of tonight's
debate Facebook memes often tell us to
find you someone who can do both but as
the treasurer elect of the Oxford Union
as president of the Oxford mulus Asian
society as an incoming summer intern in
JP Morgan's Asset Management Division
and as a regular attendee at all of the
finest nightclubs that Oxford has to
offer L vadani can not only do both she
can do it
all next up we have Liam Hackett founder
and CEO of ditch the label Liam and I
were chuckling earlier because I when I
was researching him in the leadup to
tonight's debate I came across the first
comment on his Wikipedia page which
simply read Liam Hackett should not have
a Wikipedia
page Liam you'll be pleased to hear that
I actually disagree I have tremendous
respect for you and the work that you're
doing for victims of cyber bullying and
I look very much forward to hearing what
you have to say tonight finally closing
the case for the opposition we have Dr
Jessica carbiner Tinder sociologist now
in an attempt to sabotage my opposition
and learn about their arguments for
tonight's debate I set my Tinder radius
to the maximum 160
km however it was obviously far enough
not far enough because Jessica we are
yet to match and I still have no idea
what you're going to say against me
tonight Mr President these are your
speakers and they are most
welcome I'd now like to continue my
argument by first discussing the impact
that social media is having on us at an
individual level because if we can agree
that social media is affecting us as
individuals and changing the way that we
behave it follows that social media is
affecting the way we interact with each
other research from the University of
Pittsburgh School of Medicine studied
over 1,700 people between the ages of 19
and 32 it was found that on average
participants were spending 61 minutes
per day on social media and visiting
social media ites over 30 times per week
this research was conducted in 2014 and
the numbers have been growing steadily
since that
time over one quarter of the young
people surveyed displayed indicators of
high levels of depression and the people
who most frequently checked social media
were found to be 2.7 times more likely
to develop depression than the average
now the opposition would have you
believe that this data is inaccurate
perhaps is people who are already
depressed that are turning to social
media as an
outlet while this may be true to some
degree the extent of the data simply
does not lie social media is causing
depression for a lot of people and of
course that depression is affecting the
way that we interact with each other in
the physical
World perhaps even more troubling than
the relationship between social media
and depression is the relationship
between social media and eating
disorders in young people and I'm not
just talking about young girls eating
disorders today are affecting people of
all genders of all Races and from all
socioeconomic backgrounds and in some
cases of all ages as
well the rise of pro-anorexia and proia
communities coupled with advancements in
social media algorithms now means that
these troubling communities have ways of
reaching people who aren't even
necessarily searching for them in the
first
instance as someone whose immediate
family has been directly affected by the
ravages of an eating disorder I can tell
you that social media does have a part
to play platforms like Facebook
Instagram and Tumblr are giving young
people distorted images of how their
bodies should look and often times the
the result is a serious mental illness
that has far-reaching implications on
loving families and loving friendship
ship the mere fact that Facebook and
Instagram have simple methods for
reporting self Haring and suicidal
content is respectable but it is also a
chilling indictment of the extent of
this
problem so if we take a step back and
examine the questions that we have
looked at so far why is social media
causing depression why is social media
causing Eating Disorders the answer is
one that I think we all inherently know
by being constantly presented with
highly idealized views of our peers
social media elicits feelings of envy
and feelings of inadequacy by instilling
us with the often false belief that
other people are leaving are living more
successful or more fulfilling
lives social media is not evil but it
can very well be
dishonest it presents us with a standard
that is unrealistic a reality that is
unreliable and a world which has been
filtered and altered for the benefit of
another person or group and that is the
very essence of
corruption not only is social media
corrupting the way that we behave as
individuals in our own lives it is also
changing the way that we act as a
society and the ways that we interact
with our political
leaders in the recent us election
Facebook's I voted function generated
340,000
extra votes while it hasn't yet been
determined whether these were in favor
of Republicans or in favor of Democrats
the implications on our freedom of
thought are worryingly
clear to give you a perhaps more serious
example in Facebook's recent fake news
Scandal Facebook employees were accused
by Gizmodo and other journalists of
falsely of of choosing the articles that
appear as trending on our news feeds
based on their own political beliefs
this alter ation of information this
filtering of our realities is once again
at the very heart of what corruption
really is but the issue goes deeper than
any one
Scandal social media is giving massive
followings to people who are popular
rather than people who are
professional truth is quickly being
replaced with speed and access and
journalistic integrity is something that
is quickly becoming harder and harder to
find
we are not having organic interactions
with each other with our friends with
our Idols with our families or with our
political leaders and if you think we
are I would urge you to be more
skeptical in summary my message is
simple we need not condemn social media
but to be aware of the fact that it is
corrupting our
interactions so tonight I say to you
all it's time to stop stalking and and
start
talking and sometimes you can learn you
can learn more by looking someone in the
eye than you can from looking at their
social media profile proud to propose
thank
[Applause]
[Music]
you
Browse More Related Video
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)