Social Media Corrupts Human Interactions | Jack Symonds | Part 1 of 6

OxfordUnion
21 Feb 201711:00

Summary

TLDRIn this debate speech, Jack Simons argues that social media corrupts human interactions. He acknowledges social media's benefits, such as keeping people connected and aiding those in developing countries. However, he emphasizes its negative impact on real human connections, citing increased dependency on virtual validation, higher depression rates, and the promotion of unrealistic body images. Simons also highlights issues like fake news and the influence of social media on political processes. He concludes by urging a balance between online and face-to-face interactions to preserve genuine human connections.

Takeaways

  • πŸ“± Social media is a double-edged sword, with both positive and negative impacts on human interactions.
  • 🌐 Social media platforms like Facebook's internet.org have provided internet access to millions, particularly in developing countries.
  • πŸ—£οΈ Social media gives people a voice and a platform to advocate for their beliefs and create movements.
  • πŸ‘₯ There's a growing dependency on social media for validation and instant gratification, which can replace real human connections.
  • πŸ“‰ Research indicates a correlation between frequent social media use and increased likelihood of depression, especially among young people.
  • 🍽️ Social media can contribute to eating disorders by promoting unrealistic body images and enabling harmful online communities.
  • 🌍 Social media can distort perceptions of reality by presenting idealized and often false views of others' lives.
  • πŸ—³οΈ Social media has been implicated in influencing political behavior and elections, raising concerns about freedom of thought.
  • πŸ“° The rise of 'fake news' on social media platforms has implications for the integrity and reliability of information.
  • πŸ€” The speaker encourages skepticism and critical thinking about the authenticity of social media interactions and content.
  • πŸ’¬ The conclusion calls for awareness of social media's corrupting influence on interactions and a return to more genuine, face-to-face communication.

Q & A

  • What is the main argument of the speaker regarding social media?

    -The speaker argues that while social media has benefits, such as connecting people and providing a voice to the underprivileged, it also corrupts human interactions by promoting unrealistic standards and causing mental health issues like depression and eating disorders.

  • How does the speaker acknowledge the positive aspects of social media?

    -The speaker acknowledges that social media allows them to stay in touch with friends and family worldwide and highlights Facebook's internet.org initiative, which has provided internet access to millions in developing countries.

  • What is the speaker's stance on the role of social media in developing countries?

    -The speaker sees social media as a positive force in developing countries, enabling access to the internet and the opportunities it brings, as exemplified by Facebook's internet.org.

  • What evidence does the speaker provide about the impact of social media on mental health?

    -The speaker cites a study from the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, which found a correlation between frequent social media use and increased likelihood of depression among young people.

  • How does the speaker connect social media use to eating disorders?

    -The speaker suggests that social media platforms contribute to eating disorders by promoting unrealistic body images and facilitating the spread of pro-anorexia and pro-bulimia communities.

  • What is the speaker's view on the role of social media in shaping societal interactions?

    -The speaker believes that social media is changing societal interactions by replacing organic connections with virtual relationships and promoting envy and feelings of inadequacy due to idealized peer presentations.

  • What is the speaker's opinion on the authenticity of the world presented on social media?

    -The speaker argues that the world presented on social media is dishonest and unrealistic, filtered and altered for the benefit of others, which contributes to the corruption of human interactions.

  • How does the speaker address the impact of social media on political engagement?

    -The speaker mentions the 'I voted' feature on Facebook and the fake news scandal, suggesting that social media can influence political behavior and manipulate the information people receive, impacting freedom of thought.

  • What is the speaker's suggestion for dealing with the negative impacts of social media?

    -The speaker suggests that instead of condemning social media, people should be aware of its corrupting influence on interactions and strive for more genuine, face-to-face conversations.

  • Who are the opposition speakers mentioned by the speaker, and what are their backgrounds?

    -The opposition speakers are L vadlamani, the treasurer elect of the Oxford Union and an incoming summer intern at JP Morgan's Asset Management Division, and Liam Hackett, the founder and CEO of 'Ditch the Label,' an organization supporting victims of cyberbullying. Dr. Jessica Carbiner, a Tinder sociologist, is also mentioned.

  • What is the main motion being debated in the script?

    -The main motion being debated is whether social media corrupts human interactions, focusing on the impact of social media on personal relationships and individual behavior.

Outlines

00:00

πŸ“± The Impact of Social Media on Human Interactions

The speaker, Jack Simons, opens the debate by acknowledging the benefits of social media, such as staying connected with loved ones and its positive role in developing countries, as exemplified by Facebook's internet.org initiative. However, he argues that the motion at hand is not about the merits of social media but its corrupting influence on personal relationships and individual behavior. He points out society's growing dependence on social media for validation and instant gratification, which is replacing genuine human connections with virtual ones. The speaker introduces the opposition speakers, setting the stage for a detailed exploration of social media's effects on individuals and society.

05:00

🀯 Social Media's Link to Depression and Eating Disorders

This paragraph delves into the negative psychological effects of social media, citing a study from the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine that found a correlation between frequent social media use and depression, particularly among young people. The speaker argues that social media platforms contribute to eating disorders by promoting unrealistic body images and enabling harmful online communities. The platforms' ability to report self-harm and suicidal content is both a commendable feature and a stark indication of the severity of the problem. The speaker suggests that social media's presentation of idealized and often false portrayals of others' lives fosters feelings of envy and inadequacy, which are at the core of its corrupting influence on individual behavior and societal norms.

10:02

🌐 Social Media's Influence on Society and Political Interactions

The final paragraph of the script addresses the broader societal implications of social media, including its impact on political engagement and the dissemination of information. The speaker discusses the potential manipulation of social media by popular figures rather than professionals, the spread of fake news, and the influence of Facebook's 'I voted' feature on voter turnout. He emphasizes the erosion of journalistic integrity and the prioritization of speed and access over truth. The speaker concludes by urging the audience to be aware of social media's corrupting effects on interactions and to prioritize face-to-face communication over online stalking, advocating for a more authentic and less mediated approach to human connection.

Mindmap

Keywords

πŸ’‘Social Media

Social media refers to digital platforms that enable users to create and share content or participate in social networking. In the video, it's the central topic of debate, with the speaker discussing its potential to corrupt human interactions. The script mentions both the positive and negative impacts, such as providing a voice to people and access to the internet, but also causing issues like depression and eating disorders.

πŸ’‘Depression

Depression is a mental health disorder characterized by persistent feelings of sadness and a lack of interest or pleasure in activities. The speaker cites research from the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, which found a correlation between frequent social media use and increased likelihood of depression among young people, suggesting that social media can exacerbate feelings of inadequacy and envy.

πŸ’‘Eating Disorders

Eating disorders are mental health conditions that involve an unhealthy relationship with food and body image. The script discusses how social media platforms can contribute to the development of eating disorders by promoting unrealistic body standards and providing access to pro-anorexia and pro-bulimia communities, which can influence vulnerable individuals.

πŸ’‘Instant Gratification

Instant gratification is the desire to experience fulfillment or satisfaction immediately without delay. The speaker argues that social media fosters a culture of instant gratification, where people seek quick fixes for their emotional needs, which can undermine the quality of human interactions and lead to a reliance on virtual relationships over real ones.

πŸ’‘Digital Universe

The term 'Digital Universe' metaphorically represents the virtual world created by digital technologies and platforms, including social media. The speaker uses this term to describe the vast amount of time people spend in the digital realm, suggesting that this immersion is altering the way we behave and interact with each other in the physical world.

πŸ’‘Cyberbullying

Cyberbullying is the use of electronic communication to bully others, typically by sending messages of an intimidating or threatening nature. The script mentions Liam Hackett, the founder of 'Ditch the Label,' an organization that supports victims of cyberbullying, indicating the negative social implications that social media can have.

πŸ’‘Tinder Sociologist

A 'Tinder Sociologist' is a term used in the script to describe Dr. Jessica Carbiner, who studies social dynamics on the dating app Tinder. This term is used to highlight the intersection of technology, social behavior, and academic research, showing how social media platforms influence modern relationships and dating practices.

πŸ’‘Fake News

Fake news refers to false information or propaganda published under the guise of being authentic news. The speaker discusses the 'fake news' scandal involving Facebook, where employees were accused of bias in selecting news stories for users' feeds, illustrating how social media can distort reality and manipulate public opinion.

πŸ’‘Internet.org

Internet.org is an initiative by Facebook aimed at providing internet access to the unconnected parts of the world. The script mentions this program as an example of social media's positive impact, having given internet access to over 25 million people, thus enabling them to benefit from the opportunities the internet offers.

πŸ’‘Pro-Ana and Pro-Mia Communities

Pro-Ana (pro-anorexia) and Pro-Mia (pro-bulimia) are online communities that promote and glorify eating disorders. The speaker warns of the dangers these communities pose, as they can exploit social media algorithms to reach and influence vulnerable individuals, contributing to the rise of eating disorders.

πŸ’‘Journalistic Integrity

Journalistic integrity refers to the ethical principles and practices that guide journalism, including accuracy, fairness, and accountability. The speaker argues that social media is eroding journalistic integrity by prioritizing popularity and speed over truth and professionalism, leading to a decline in the quality of information available to the public.

Highlights

Social media can have both positive and negative impacts on human interactions, but the focus of the debate is on the negative effects.

Social media provides benefits such as staying connected with friends and family worldwide and giving a voice to people in developing countries.

Facebook's internet.org has provided internet access to over 25 million people, enabling them to benefit from online resources.

The debate is about how social media affects our personal relationships and interactions, not just its overall benefits or drawbacks.

People are becoming more dependent on social media for validation and instant gratification, leading to a replacement of real human connections with virtual ones.

Research from the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine found a link between frequent social media use and increased likelihood of depression.

Social media platforms may contribute to eating disorders by promoting unrealistic body images and enabling harmful online communities.

Facebook and Instagram have implemented reporting mechanisms for self-harm and suicidal content, indicating the severity of mental health issues related to social media use.

Social media can elicit feelings of envy and inadequacy by presenting highly idealized and often false views of others' lives.

The impact of social media on society includes altering the way we interact with political leaders and the potential manipulation of information.

Facebook's 'I voted' feature may have influenced voter turnout in elections, raising concerns about the impact of social media on political behavior.

The debate highlights the need for skepticism and critical thinking when consuming information from social media platforms.

Social media is changing the way we communicate, with a shift towards speed and access over truth and journalistic integrity.

The speaker calls for awareness of the corrupting influence of social media on our interactions and a return to more authentic communication.

The debate concludes with a call to action to prioritize face-to-face conversations over social media stalking for more meaningful connections.

Transcripts

play00:01

[Music]

play00:09

the motion is this house believes social

play00:11

media corrupts human interactions and I

play00:13

now look to Jack Simons standing

play00:15

committee lady Margaret Hall to open the

play00:17

case for a

play00:27

proposition thank you Mr President and

play00:29

thank thank you for having me as one of

play00:30

your guest speakers this evening I would

play00:33

like to start by saying that I am most

play00:35

certainly not against social media any

play00:39

one of my friends or followers will tell

play00:41

you that I'm certainly not averse to the

play00:44

semi-regular Instagram post Facebook

play00:47

upload or even Snapchat

play00:49

story perhaps even more importantly as

play00:52

an Australian student social media

play00:55

allows me to effortlessly stay in

play00:57

contact with my friends and family

play00:59

around World more importantly still

play01:03

social media acts as a positive

play01:06

implication for many people living in

play01:08

developing countries and some of the

play01:10

world's largest social media companies

play01:13

are at the heart of these positive

play01:15

changes Facebook's internet.org for

play01:18

example has given internet access to

play01:21

over 25 million people around the world

play01:23

who have been able to reap the many

play01:25

benefits that the internet provides

play01:27

these people live in countries ranging

play01:29

from Kenya to colia and the program is

play01:32

only in its first two years social media

play01:35

gives a voice to the people it allows us

play01:37

to fight for what we believe in it keeps

play01:40

people safe and it allows us to create a

play01:43

movement in the name of what we think is

play01:46

right but the fact of the matter is that

play01:49

the motion put before the house tonight

play01:51

is not about the benefits of social

play01:54

media it is not about whether or not the

play01:57

internet is good or bad

play02:01

the motion put before us tonight is

play02:03

about the impact that social media can

play02:05

have on our interactions on our

play02:08

relationships and on each and every one

play02:11

of our lives on a deeply personal

play02:13

level as a society we are constantly

play02:17

feeling the need to be seen by massive

play02:19

amounts of people we are growing more

play02:21

and more dependent on instant

play02:24

gratification and in order to feel

play02:26

included we are forced to post gram snap

play02:30

tweet upload pin checkin swipe like

play02:34

share react or

play02:36

message our real human connections are

play02:39

being replaced by virtual relationships

play02:42

the simple truth is that for the most

play02:44

part we are spending huge proportions of

play02:46

Our Lives living in the Digital Universe

play02:50

and it is corrupting the way that we act

play02:52

with each other but before I go into

play02:55

more detail about the ways in which

play02:57

social media is affecting our lives it

play02:59

falls on me to introduce tonight's

play03:04

opposition speaking first for the

play03:06

opposition tonight is my friend L

play03:09

vadlamani now in the spirit of tonight's

play03:11

debate Facebook memes often tell us to

play03:13

find you someone who can do both but as

play03:17

the treasurer elect of the Oxford Union

play03:19

as president of the Oxford mulus Asian

play03:22

society as an incoming summer intern in

play03:25

JP Morgan's Asset Management Division

play03:27

and as a regular attendee at all of the

play03:30

finest nightclubs that Oxford has to

play03:32

offer L vadani can not only do both she

play03:36

can do it

play03:37

all next up we have Liam Hackett founder

play03:40

and CEO of ditch the label Liam and I

play03:43

were chuckling earlier because I when I

play03:45

was researching him in the leadup to

play03:46

tonight's debate I came across the first

play03:48

comment on his Wikipedia page which

play03:50

simply read Liam Hackett should not have

play03:52

a Wikipedia

play03:55

page Liam you'll be pleased to hear that

play03:57

I actually disagree I have tremendous

play03:59

respect for you and the work that you're

play04:01

doing for victims of cyber bullying and

play04:03

I look very much forward to hearing what

play04:04

you have to say tonight finally closing

play04:07

the case for the opposition we have Dr

play04:09

Jessica carbiner Tinder sociologist now

play04:13

in an attempt to sabotage my opposition

play04:15

and learn about their arguments for

play04:16

tonight's debate I set my Tinder radius

play04:19

to the maximum 160

play04:21

km however it was obviously far enough

play04:24

not far enough because Jessica we are

play04:26

yet to match and I still have no idea

play04:29

what you're going to say against me

play04:40

tonight Mr President these are your

play04:42

speakers and they are most

play04:51

welcome I'd now like to continue my

play04:54

argument by first discussing the impact

play04:57

that social media is having on us at an

play05:00

individual level because if we can agree

play05:03

that social media is affecting us as

play05:05

individuals and changing the way that we

play05:07

behave it follows that social media is

play05:10

affecting the way we interact with each

play05:12

other research from the University of

play05:15

Pittsburgh School of Medicine studied

play05:17

over 1,700 people between the ages of 19

play05:20

and 32 it was found that on average

play05:24

participants were spending 61 minutes

play05:26

per day on social media and visiting

play05:28

social media ites over 30 times per week

play05:32

this research was conducted in 2014 and

play05:35

the numbers have been growing steadily

play05:37

since that

play05:38

time over one quarter of the young

play05:41

people surveyed displayed indicators of

play05:43

high levels of depression and the people

play05:46

who most frequently checked social media

play05:48

were found to be 2.7 times more likely

play05:52

to develop depression than the average

play05:55

now the opposition would have you

play05:56

believe that this data is inaccurate

play05:59

perhaps is people who are already

play06:01

depressed that are turning to social

play06:03

media as an

play06:04

outlet while this may be true to some

play06:06

degree the extent of the data simply

play06:09

does not lie social media is causing

play06:12

depression for a lot of people and of

play06:15

course that depression is affecting the

play06:18

way that we interact with each other in

play06:19

the physical

play06:22

World perhaps even more troubling than

play06:24

the relationship between social media

play06:26

and depression is the relationship

play06:28

between social media and eating

play06:30

disorders in young people and I'm not

play06:32

just talking about young girls eating

play06:34

disorders today are affecting people of

play06:37

all genders of all Races and from all

play06:39

socioeconomic backgrounds and in some

play06:41

cases of all ages as

play06:43

well the rise of pro-anorexia and proia

play06:47

communities coupled with advancements in

play06:50

social media algorithms now means that

play06:52

these troubling communities have ways of

play06:55

reaching people who aren't even

play06:57

necessarily searching for them in the

play06:59

first

play07:00

instance as someone whose immediate

play07:02

family has been directly affected by the

play07:05

ravages of an eating disorder I can tell

play07:08

you that social media does have a part

play07:10

to play platforms like Facebook

play07:14

Instagram and Tumblr are giving young

play07:16

people distorted images of how their

play07:18

bodies should look and often times the

play07:21

the result is a serious mental illness

play07:25

that has far-reaching implications on

play07:27

loving families and loving friendship

play07:30

ship the mere fact that Facebook and

play07:33

Instagram have simple methods for

play07:36

reporting self Haring and suicidal

play07:38

content is respectable but it is also a

play07:41

chilling indictment of the extent of

play07:43

this

play07:44

problem so if we take a step back and

play07:48

examine the questions that we have

play07:49

looked at so far why is social media

play07:52

causing depression why is social media

play07:54

causing Eating Disorders the answer is

play07:56

one that I think we all inherently know

play08:00

by being constantly presented with

play08:02

highly idealized views of our peers

play08:04

social media elicits feelings of envy

play08:07

and feelings of inadequacy by instilling

play08:09

us with the often false belief that

play08:12

other people are leaving are living more

play08:14

successful or more fulfilling

play08:17

lives social media is not evil but it

play08:20

can very well be

play08:22

dishonest it presents us with a standard

play08:25

that is unrealistic a reality that is

play08:28

unreliable and a world which has been

play08:30

filtered and altered for the benefit of

play08:33

another person or group and that is the

play08:36

very essence of

play08:39

corruption not only is social media

play08:41

corrupting the way that we behave as

play08:43

individuals in our own lives it is also

play08:46

changing the way that we act as a

play08:48

society and the ways that we interact

play08:50

with our political

play08:52

leaders in the recent us election

play08:55

Facebook's I voted function generated

play08:57

340,000

play08:59

extra votes while it hasn't yet been

play09:02

determined whether these were in favor

play09:03

of Republicans or in favor of Democrats

play09:06

the implications on our freedom of

play09:08

thought are worryingly

play09:10

clear to give you a perhaps more serious

play09:13

example in Facebook's recent fake news

play09:16

Scandal Facebook employees were accused

play09:18

by Gizmodo and other journalists of

play09:21

falsely of of choosing the articles that

play09:23

appear as trending on our news feeds

play09:26

based on their own political beliefs

play09:28

this alter ation of information this

play09:31

filtering of our realities is once again

play09:33

at the very heart of what corruption

play09:36

really is but the issue goes deeper than

play09:39

any one

play09:41

Scandal social media is giving massive

play09:44

followings to people who are popular

play09:46

rather than people who are

play09:48

professional truth is quickly being

play09:51

replaced with speed and access and

play09:54

journalistic integrity is something that

play09:56

is quickly becoming harder and harder to

play09:58

find

play10:00

we are not having organic interactions

play10:02

with each other with our friends with

play10:04

our Idols with our families or with our

play10:07

political leaders and if you think we

play10:08

are I would urge you to be more

play10:12

skeptical in summary my message is

play10:14

simple we need not condemn social media

play10:18

but to be aware of the fact that it is

play10:20

corrupting our

play10:22

interactions so tonight I say to you

play10:25

all it's time to stop stalking and and

play10:29

start

play10:30

talking and sometimes you can learn you

play10:33

can learn more by looking someone in the

play10:35

eye than you can from looking at their

play10:38

social media profile proud to propose

play10:40

thank

play10:48

[Applause]

play10:55

[Music]

play10:58

you

Rate This
β˜…
β˜…
β˜…
β˜…
β˜…

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Related Tags
Social MediaHuman InteractionsMental HealthDepressionEating DisordersCyberbullyingOnline BehaviorDigital InfluenceMedia ImpactSocial Awareness