Interpreting Output for Multiple Regression in SPSS

Dr. Todd Grande
27 Nov 201608:40

Summary

TLDRIn this informative video, Dr. Grande teaches viewers how to interpret multiple regression output using SPSS. With a fictitious dataset involving career limitations and work experience as predictors, and days until employment as the outcome, the video guides through the process of conducting a regression analysis. It explains the significance of R-square, ANOVA, and p-values, and how to understand the impact of each predictor on the outcome. The video concludes with a clear explanation of the confidence intervals for the coefficients, offering a helpful guide for those new to regression analysis.

Takeaways

  • 👨‍⚕️ Dr. Grande introduces a video tutorial on interpreting multiple regression output in SPSS.
  • 📊 The video uses fictitious data with four variables: an ID variable, two predictor variables, and one outcome variable.
  • 🔑 The predictor variables are 'career limitations', an index reflecting potential barriers to employment, and 'experience', measured in years of work.
  • 📈 The outcome variable is 'days until employed', tracking the time it takes for participants to find work post-training.
  • ❓ Hypotheses suggest that higher career limitations may increase unemployment duration, while more experience may decrease it.
  • 📚 The video emphasizes checking assumptions before running multiple regression to ensure data suitability for the analysis.
  • 📝 The SPSS process involves selecting 'Analyze', 'Regression', and 'Linear', with 'days until employed' as the dependent variable.
  • 📋 The model includes career limitations and experience as independent variables, with options for statistics like R-squared change and confidence intervals.
  • 📊 The model summary reveals an adjusted R-square of 0.237, indicating that 23.7% of variance in employment time is explained by the predictors.
  • 🔍 The ANOVA table shows a statistically significant result (p < .05), validating the model's predictive power.
  • 📈 The coefficients table provides unstandardized and standardized coefficients, with p-values indicating the statistical significance of each predictor.
  • 📉 Career limitations have a positive impact on unemployment duration, with each unit increase associated with 2.658 more days until employed.
  • 📈 Experience has a negative impact, with each additional year reducing the days until employed by approximately 4 days.
  • 📊 Standardized coefficients indicate the effect size in terms of standard deviations, with career limitations increasing days until employed by 0.233 and experience decreasing it by 0.436.
  • 📐 Confidence intervals provide a range within which the true effect of each predictor is likely to fall, offering a measure of precision for the estimates.
  • 🤔 The video concludes by encouraging viewers to reach out with questions, emphasizing support for further understanding.

Q & A

  • What is the purpose of the video by Dr. Grande?

    -The purpose of the video is to explain how to interpret the output from a multiple regression analysis using SPSS.

  • What are the four variables mentioned in the SPSS data editor in the video?

    -The four variables mentioned are an ID variable, two predictor variables (career limitations and experience), and one outcome variable (days until employed).

  • What does the career limitations variable represent in the study?

    -The career limitations variable represents an index of potential barriers to employment, such as criminal history, low educational level, active substance use disorder, etc., with higher values indicating more severe limitations.

  • How is the experience variable measured in the study?

    -The experience variable is measured in years, representing the number of years a participant had either a full-time or part-time job.

  • What is the maximum number of days considered for the 'days until employed' variable?

    -The maximum number of days considered for the 'days until employed' variable is 365 days.

  • What are the hypotheses regarding the relationship between the predictor variables and the outcome variable?

    -The hypotheses are that a higher number on the career limitations variable would be associated with a longer time to become employed, and more experience would be associated with fewer days until employment.

  • What does the adjusted R-square value of 0.237 indicate about the model in the video?

    -An adjusted R-square of 0.237 indicates that 23.7% of the variance in the outcome variable (days until employed) is explained by the independent variables (career limitations and experience).

  • What does a statistically significant p-value in the ANOVA table suggest?

    -A statistically significant p-value (less than 0.05) in the ANOVA table suggests that the overall model is significant and that at least one predictor variable has a statistically significant effect on the outcome variable.

  • What is the interpretation of the unstandardized coefficient for career limitations being 2.658?

    -The unstandardized coefficient of 2.658 for career limitations means that for every one-unit increase in the career limitations index, there is an expected increase of 2.658 days until employed.

  • How does the experience variable affect the outcome variable according to the unstandardized coefficients?

    -The unstandardized coefficient for experience is -4.044, indicating that for every additional year of experience, the number of days until employed decreases by approximately 4 days.

  • What do the standardized coefficients tell us about the effect of each variable in terms of standard deviations?

    -The standardized coefficients indicate that for every one standard deviation increase in career limitations, the dependent variable increases by 0.233 standard deviations, and for every one standard deviation increase in experience, the dependent variable decreases by 0.436 standard deviations.

  • What is the purpose of the confidence intervals provided for the unstandardized coefficients?

    -The confidence intervals provide a range within which we can be 95% confident that the actual value of the unstandardized coefficient lies, indicating the precision of the estimates.

Outlines

00:00

📊 Introduction to Multiple Regression Analysis in SPSS

Dr. Grande introduces a tutorial on interpreting multiple regression output using SPSS. The video focuses on a hypothetical study with four variables: an ID variable, two predictor variables (career limitations and experience), and one outcome variable (days until employed). The career limitations variable represents potential barriers to workforce re-entry, while experience is measured in years of previous employment. The study aims to understand the relationship between these variables and the time to find employment post-training. The video will guide viewers through the SPSS interface for setting up a linear regression analysis, including selecting variables and choosing statistical options such as R-squared change, model fit, and confidence intervals.

05:01

📈 Analyzing Regression Results and Hypothesis Testing

This paragraph delves into the results of the multiple regression analysis. The p-values for both predictor variables, career limitations and experience, are statistically significant, indicating their impact on the outcome variable. The unstandardized coefficients reveal that an increase in career limitations is associated with a longer time to employment, while more experience is linked to a shorter period of unemployment. The standardized coefficients provide insight into the effect size in terms of standard deviations, showing that both variables have a substantial influence on the dependent variable. Confidence intervals for the unstandardized coefficients are also discussed, providing a range within which the true effect is likely to fall with 95% certainty. The summary concludes with an invitation for questions and further assistance, emphasizing the educational value of the video.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Multiple Regression

Multiple regression is a statistical method used to analyze the relationship between one dependent variable and multiple independent variables. In the video, Dr. Grande uses multiple regression to understand how career limitations and experience impact the time it takes for participants to find employment after a career training program. The script mentions conducting a multiple regression in SPSS, which is a statistical software package, to analyze the data.

💡SPSS

SPSS, or Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, is a widely used software for statistical analysis in various fields. The video script discusses using SPSS to perform a multiple regression analysis, indicating its role as a tool for interpreting the output from such statistical tests. Dr. Grande guides the viewers through the process of inputting data and running the regression analysis within the SPSS interface.

💡Dependent Variable

A dependent variable is the outcome or the variable that is being measured or tested in an experiment or study. In the context of the video, 'days until employed' is the dependent variable, representing the number of days it takes for participants to find employment after their career training program. The script explains how this variable is used in the regression analysis to determine its relationship with other variables.

💡Independent Variables

Independent variables are the factors that are manipulated or changed in an experiment to determine their effect on the dependent variable. In the video, 'career limitations' and 'experience' are the independent variables that are hypothesized to influence the time to employment. The script describes how these variables are entered into the regression model in SPSS to assess their impact.

💡Predictor Variables

Predictor variables are synonymous with independent variables and are used to predict the outcome of the dependent variable. In the script, 'career limitations' and 'experience' are referred to as predictor variables, which are hypothesized to predict the dependent variable 'days until employed'. The video explains how these variables are analyzed to determine their predictive power.

💡R-squared

R-squared is a statistical measure that represents the proportion of the variance for a dependent variable that's explained by an independent variable or variables in a regression model. The script mentions an adjusted R-square of 0.237, indicating that 23.7% of the variance in 'days until employed' can be explained by the predictor variables 'career limitations' and 'experience'.

💡ANOVA

ANOVA, or Analysis of Variance, is a statistical method used to compare means of two or more samples to determine if there is a statistically significant difference between them. In the video, the script refers to a statistically significant ANOVA finding, which suggests that the regression model with the predictor variables is significantly different from zero, indicating a meaningful relationship.

💡Coefficients

In the context of regression analysis, coefficients are numerical values that represent the relationship between the independent and dependent variables. The script discusses unstandardized and standardized coefficients for 'career limitations' and 'experience', explaining how they indicate the magnitude and direction of the effect these variables have on the dependent variable.

💡Standardized Coefficients

Standardized coefficients are coefficients that have been converted to a common scale, typically in terms of standard deviations, to allow for comparison of the relative strength of the effect of each independent variable on the dependent variable. The script explains that for every one standard deviation change in 'career limitations', there is a 0.233 standard deviation change in 'days until employed', and similarly for 'experience'.

💡Confidence Intervals

Confidence intervals provide a range of values within which the true population parameter is likely to fall, with a certain level of confidence. In the script, 95% confidence intervals are given for the unstandardized coefficients of 'career limitations' and 'experience', indicating the range in which the true effect of these variables on 'days until employed' is likely to be.

💡Statistical Significance

Statistical significance refers to the probability that the observed results are not due to chance. In the video, the script mentions p-values for 'career limitations' and 'experience', indicating that both variables have a statistically significant impact on 'days until employed', as their p-values are less than 0.05, suggesting that the effects observed are unlikely to be due to random chance.

Highlights

Dr. Grande introduces a video on interpreting multiple regression output from SPSS.

The video uses fictitious data with four variables: an ID variable, two predictor variables, and one outcome variable.

The first predictor variable, 'career limitations', represents potential barriers to workforce re-entry.

The 'experience' variable measures years of full-time or part-time job experience.

The outcome variable, 'days until employed', measures the time to find employment after a Career Training Program.

Hypotheses suggest that higher career limitations may increase the time to employment, while more experience may decrease it.

The video explains the process of conducting a multiple regression in SPSS, including setting up the model and selecting statistics.

The output includes descriptive statistics, correlations, model summary, and ANOVA results.

Adjusted R-square is used to interpret the proportion of variance explained by the model, which is 23.7% in this case.

ANOVA results show the model is statistically significant with a p-value less than 0.05.

Coefficients table reveals the unstandardized and standardized coefficients for 'career limitations' and 'experience'.

P-values indicate that both 'career limitations' and 'experience' have statistically significant impacts on employment time.

The unstandardized coefficient for 'career limitations' is 2.658, suggesting an increase in limitations leads to longer unemployment.

The negative unstandardized coefficient for 'experience' (-4.044) implies more experience results in shorter unemployment duration.

Standardized coefficients show the effect size in terms of standard deviations for each predictor variable.

Confidence intervals provide a range where the true coefficient values are likely to fall with 95% certainty.

The video concludes with an invitation for questions or concerns, offering further assistance.

Transcripts

play00:06

hello this is dr. Grande welcome to my

play00:09

video on interpreting the output from a

play00:11

multiple regression using SPSS as always

play00:15

if you find this video useful please

play00:17

like it and subscribe to my channel

play00:19

I certainly appreciate it I have in the

play00:23

SPSS data editor four variables these

play00:26

are fictitious data I have an ID

play00:28

variable I have a hundred participants

play00:30

in this design and I have two predictor

play00:35

variables and one outcome variable so

play00:39

for the first predictor variable this

play00:40

one is named career limitations so let's

play00:44

assume that we have participants that

play00:46

are in a career training program and we

play00:48

develop this series of questions to

play00:54

determine how many limitations they're

play00:57

facing in terms of getting back into the

play01:00

workforce and these questions go through

play01:04

a scoring process and end up in this

play01:07

variable and this is an index so certain

play01:11

characteristics or occurrences may be

play01:13

weighted more heavily than others

play01:16

potential limitations could include a

play01:18

criminal history low educational level

play01:22

an active substance use disorder and

play01:25

other factors so a higher value in this

play01:30

variable would represent more

play01:34

limitations or more severe limitations

play01:37

then we have experienced an experience

play01:40

we've measured in years this be the

play01:42

number of years a participant had either

play01:44

a full-time or part-time job then we

play01:48

have days until employed so after the

play01:52

completion of the Career Training

play01:55

Program the number of days until the

play01:58

participant finds employment is measured

play02:01

and for this example the maximum would

play02:04

be 365 days so we could have a couple

play02:07

hypotheses here

play02:10

before we conduct a multiple regression

play02:13

career limitations we believe the higher

play02:16

the number on the career limitations

play02:19

variable the longer it would take to

play02:22

become employed and for the experience

play02:25

variable the more experience associated

play02:27

with fewer days with a smaller number of

play02:32

days until the participant becomes

play02:34

employed now there are assumptions from

play02:37

multiple regression but here I'm gonna

play02:39

be focused on the output so I'm not

play02:43

going to check those assumptions but

play02:46

just know there are assumptions before

play02:48

running a multiple regression that would

play02:51

need to be checked to make sure these

play02:52

data would be appropriate for that

play02:55

statistic so here under analyze

play02:59

regression and linear I have the dialog

play03:03

for linear regression and you can see

play03:07

there's one space for a dependent

play03:11

variable or an outcome variable and

play03:12

that's going to be days until employed

play03:15

and you can have multiple independent

play03:17

variables or predictor variables in this

play03:19

case I have two career limitations and

play03:23

experience under statistics by default

play03:28

we have estimates and model fit I'm just

play03:30

going to add r-squared change and

play03:33

descriptives here as well as the

play03:35

confidence intervals at the 95% level

play03:39

continue and I'm not going to make any

play03:41

other changes here under the buttons on

play03:44

the right so ready to conduct the

play03:47

multiple regression click OK

play03:49

and let's take a look at the tables we

play03:52

have the descriptive statistics here up

play03:55

top then correlations variables entered

play04:00

and removed both of the variables I put

play04:02

into the model used here model summary

play04:06

we have R square and adjusted r-square

play04:11

we're going to be interpreting adjusted

play04:13

r-square so with this model we have the

play04:16

two predictor variables the one

play04:18

dependent variable and we have an

play04:20

adjusted r-square of 0.23 seven

play04:23

this tells us that 23.7% of the variance

play04:27

in the dependent variable is explained

play04:29

by the independent variables moving down

play04:33

to ANOVA we have a statistically

play04:34

significant finding here less than point

play04:37

zero five for the p-value then we have

play04:40

the coefficients table so we have your

play04:43

career limitations experience and the

play04:46

unstandardized coefficients for career

play04:49

limitations it's two point six five

play04:51

eight and for experience it's negative

play04:54

four point zero four four we also have

play04:58

the standardized coefficients and

play05:00

p-values so let's start with the

play05:03

p-values here for career limitations we

play05:07

have point zero zero nine that's

play05:09

statistically significant so this

play05:11

variable has a statistically significant

play05:15

impact on the outcome variable on the

play05:20

days until employed taking a look here

play05:23

at the p-value associated with

play05:25

experience you can see this is also less

play05:29

than point zero five so we have

play05:31

statistically significant contribution

play05:33

from the experience predictor variable

play05:36

looking at the unstandardized

play05:38

coefficients for career limitations we

play05:41

have a value here of two point six five

play05:43

eight and what this tells us is as the

play05:49

career limitations index increases by a

play05:52

value of one for every one unit of

play05:55

change for career limitations we're

play05:59

going to see a two points six five eight

play06:02

change in the days until employed

play06:06

variable so one point on the Kermit

play06:11

Asians

play06:12

one additional point is associated with

play06:15

two point six five eight days increase

play06:20

on the dependent variable so the more

play06:22

career limitations we have as measured

play06:26

by that scale by that index

play06:29

the longer it takes the participant to

play06:32

find employment experience however works

play06:36

differently with the experienced

play06:38

independent variable we have a negative

play06:40

value for the unstandardized coefficient

play06:42

negative four point zero four four so if

play06:46

this tells us is as experience increases

play06:48

by one year because experience is

play06:50

measured in years that's the unit of

play06:52

analysis for that variable the number of

play06:55

days into employed decreases by about

play06:58

four so more experience associated with

play07:02

a smaller number of days of unemployment

play07:08

now when thinking about this in terms of

play07:11

standard deviations we would look at the

play07:12

standardized coefficients so for every

play07:16

full standard deviation of movement we

play07:20

see in career limitations very one

play07:22

standard deviation of movement we see

play07:25

what this variable the dependent

play07:27

variable days until employed increases

play07:32

by 0.23 three standard deviations for

play07:37

every one standard deviation of movement

play07:39

we see an experience as an experience

play07:41

increases by one standard deviation we

play07:44

have a decrease on the dependent

play07:47

variable base until employed of negative

play07:50

0.4 three six standard deviations and

play07:52

then moving over to the confidence

play07:55

interval and this is for the

play07:56

unstandardized coefficient we interpret

play07:59

before we can see there's a 95% chance

play08:02

that the actual value of the

play08:06

unstandardized coefficient is between

play08:10

0.67 one and 4.6 or four

play08:15

and the actual value for experience we

play08:20

can be 95% confident that is between

play08:23

negative five point six six three and

play08:26

negative two point four two six I hope

play08:30

you found this video on interpreting the

play08:32

output from multiple regression in SPSS

play08:34

to be helpful as always if you have any

play08:36

questions or concerns feel free to

play08:37

contact me I'll be happy to assist you

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Related Tags
SPSS TutorialRegression AnalysisCareer TrainingPredictive ModelingStatistical SignificanceEmployment DataVariable InterpretationData AnalysisResearch MethodsStatistical Software