Is AI A Bubble?

Summary

This video explores the hype and reality of artificial intelligence (AI), discussing its evolution, current capabilities, and potential future impacts. It highlights the difference between AI as it exists today and the speculative concept of artificial general intelligence (AGI). The script critiques the overuse of the term 'AI' by corporations for marketing purposes, and the skepticism around AI's true potential, suggesting that while AI has value, its revolutionary potential may be overstated. The video also mentions Ground News, a platform for unbiased news comparison.

Takeaways

• 😄 The script humorously begins by defining AI as a sloth, but clarifies that Artificial Intelligence is about computer systems imitating human behavior.
• 🕒 AI is not a new concept; its roots trace back to the early days of computing, but the current hype is centered around large language models and neural networks.
• 📈 Companies like Nvidia and Microsoft are capitalizing on the AI trend, with Nvidia becoming the third-largest company globally, largely due to its association with AI.
• 🤔 There's a debate on the transformative potential of AI, with opinions ranging from life-altering technology to a fleeting tech fad.
• 📊 Ground News is highlighted as a platform that aggregates articles from various sources, providing insights into political bias, ownership, and headlines.
• 🔍 The script discusses the limitations of AI, emphasizing that it cannot create original ideas without training data and lacks true understanding.
• 📝 AI's role in everyday life is still debated, with some seeing it as a professional tool rather than a daily utility for the average person.
• 🧩 AI is often oversold as a revolutionary technology, but many capabilities attributed to AI are things traditional software has been doing for a while.
• 🤖 The pursuit of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) is compared to the Singularity, with the script suggesting that achieving true machine consciousness might be further away than some believe.
• 💡 The script criticizes the misuse of the term 'AI' by corporations to boost stock values, even when their products don't truly incorporate AI.
• 🕊 The potential and risks of AI are weighed, with concerns about misinformation and job displacement, but also recognition of AI's established value in areas like search engines and recommendations.

Q & A

What is the humorous definition of AI provided by Miriam Webster and Al Perkins in the video?

Miriam Webster defines AI as a three-toed sloth, and Al Perkins describes a sloth as a slow-moving arboreal mammal. The name AI was humorously given to this creature because of its high-pitched screech.

What is the actual definition of Artificial Intelligence (AI) mentioned in the video?

Artificial Intelligence is the ability for computer systems and algorithms to imitate intelligent human behavior.

Why do some companies use the term 'AI' to boost their stock values?

Companies use the term 'AI' to attract investors, as it suggests that they are working on cutting-edge technology, which can lead to an increase in their share values.

How has Nvidia's value increased due to its association with AI?

Nvidia, known for producing GPUs for gaming PCs and other computing products, has become the third-largest company on the planet due to its association with AI, seeing an increase in value that is considered obscene.

What is the role of Microsoft in the AI hype train according to the video?

Microsoft is pushing AI into every corner of their operating system and has a close relationship with Open AI, making it the most valuable corporation on the planet.

What is the purpose of the Ground News website and app as described in the video?

Ground News is a website and app that gathers related articles from over 50,000 sources worldwide, allowing users to compare how different outlets cover the same story, including political bias, ownership, and headlines.

What is the controversy mentioned in the video regarding Open AI's Safety and Security committee?

The controversy is about Open AI setting up a Safety and Security committee as it starts training for the next Frontier Model, which has caused concerns due to the recent departure of previous safety team leaders.

How does the video describe the capabilities and limitations of large language models?

Large language models take in a lot of information, require a user prompt, and through complex algorithms, create probabilities of what the output should be. However, they are not actually alive and cannot create wholly original or novel ideas without training data.

What is the difference between weak AI and strong AI (AGI) as discussed in the video?

Weak AI is capable of doing very specific tasks it was programmed to do, while strong AI (AGI) would be capable of learning skills and tasks it was never trained to learn, potentially leading to machine sentience and consciousness.

What is the main concern regarding AI safety mentioned in the video?

The main concern is not about robots taking over the world, but rather the potential for AI services to replace traditional search engines, where those in charge could manipulate information to benefit their own motives and agendas.

What is the video's perspective on the current hype around AI and its potential future impact?

The video suggests that the current hype around AI might be a bubble and that it is more about style over substance. It questions whether the technology is truly revolutionary or just an evolutionary step in AI development.

Outlines

00:00

🤖 AI Hype and Its Impact on the Market

The video script starts by humorously defining AI as a sloth and then explains the true meaning of Artificial Intelligence (AI) as the simulation of human intelligence by computer systems. The script discusses the historical development of AI and its current hype, which is largely driven by large language models and neural networks. It critiques the use of the term 'AI' by corporations to boost stock values without a clear understanding of the technology. The video introduces Ground News, a platform that aggregates articles to show different perspectives on the same story, using the example of how OpenAI's safety committee is covered by various media outlets with different biases.

05:02

🧐 The Reality of AI Capabilities and Misconceptions

This paragraph delves into the limitations of AI, explaining that despite its impressive capabilities, AI does not understand or think in the human sense. It highlights examples where AI fails to provide accurate responses due to a lack of training data or incorrect algorithms. The script also points out that many AI claims are exaggerated, with traditional software often being mistaken for AI. It discusses the potential of AI in areas like natural language programming and data compilation but cautions against overstating its current capabilities.

10:04

🔮 Speculations on AGI and the Future of AI

The script explores the concept of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), which refers to a strong AI capable of learning and applying skills to tasks it wasn't trained for. It questions the feasibility of achieving AGI with current technology and the hype surrounding it. The paragraph also discusses the potential societal impacts of AGI, such as the ability to control information and manipulate public opinion, and emphasizes that safety concerns should focus on realistic uses of AI rather than science fiction scenarios.

15:06

💡 AI as an Evolutionary Technology, Not a Revolutionary One

Here, the script argues that AI, particularly large language models, may not be as revolutionary as they are portrayed but rather an evolution of existing technology. It compares the AI bubble to the dot-com bubble of the late 90s, suggesting that a burst could lead to a more realistic assessment of AI's value. The video references a survey indicating that most people are confused about AI and have concerns about its impact on jobs and privacy, hinting at a potential backlash against AI integration.

20:06

🚫 Skepticism Towards AI Hype and Its Market Implications

The final paragraph expresses skepticism about the current AI hype, likening it to the metaverse craze and criticizing companies for using AI as a buzzword without substantial technological advancements. It discusses the potential negative consequences of AI, such as job displacement and privacy concerns, and suggests that the industry is focused more on style than substance. The script concludes with the acknowledgment that AI has value but questions the extent of its impact on everyday life and the validity of the extravagant claims made by some analysts and companies.

Keywords

💡Artificial Intelligence (AI)

Artificial Intelligence refers to the simulation of human intelligence in machines that are programmed to think like humans and mimic their actions. In the video, AI is the central theme, with discussions on its current state, potential, and the hype surrounding it. The script mentions how AI is being used by corporations to increase their share values and how it's being integrated into various technologies.

💡Large Language Models (LLMs)

Large Language Models are AI systems that process and generate human-like text based on the input they receive. The video discusses the capabilities and limitations of LLMs, such as their ability to create output based on probabilities derived from training data, and their inability to understand or think in the way humans do.

💡Neural Networks

Neural Networks are a set of algorithms designed to recognize patterns. They are a crucial component of AI that enables machines to learn from data. The script touches on neural networks in the context of AI's potential and the current limitations of the technology.

💡AGI (Artificial General Intelligence)

Artificial General Intelligence refers to a type of AI that possesses the ability to understand, learn, and apply knowledge across a wide range of tasks at a level equal to or beyond that of a human. The video speculates on the potential of achieving AGI and the implications it could have on society.

💡Hype Train

The term 'hype train' in the video is used metaphorically to describe the excessive promotion and enthusiasm for AI without a clear understanding of its capabilities or limitations. It suggests that the excitement around AI may be disproportionate to its current state of development.

💡Stock Values

Stock Values in the context of the video relate to the market value of a company's shares. The script mentions how companies are leveraging the term AI to attract investors and increase their stock values, even if their products or services do not genuinely incorporate AI technology.

💡Bias

Bias in the video refers to the inclination or prejudice of a news source or AI system towards a particular point of view. It discusses how AI systems can inadvertently propagate bias if not properly trained and monitored, and how news outlets may present stories with varying degrees of bias.

💡Ground News

Ground News is mentioned as a sponsor of the video and is described as a platform that aggregates articles from various sources, providing a breakdown of political bias, ownership, and headlines. The video promotes the use of Ground News to understand different perspectives on stories, including those related to AI.

💡Blind Spot

In the context of the video, 'Blind Spot' is a feature of the Ground News platform that highlights stories not covered by left-leaning or right-leaning news media. This feature is used as an example to show how media bias can affect the visibility and framing of news stories.

💡Quantum Computing

Quantum Computing is a technology that uses quantum bits, or qubits, to perform complex calculations at speeds far greater than traditional computers. The video briefly mentions quantum computing as a potential game-changer for AI, although it is not yet clear how it might impact the field.

💡Bubble

The term 'bubble' in the video refers to the economic phenomenon where an asset or a sector becomes overvalued due to excessive enthusiasm and speculation. The script suggests that the current AI boom may be a bubble, with inflated expectations that may not be sustainable in the long term.

Highlights

Ground News sponsors the video, providing a platform for comparing news coverage from various sources.

Miriam Webster's humorous definition of AI as a sloth contrasts with the technological AI, emphasizing the gap between perception and reality.

AI's history dates back to early computers, but modern AI hype is not the same as video game enemies or chatbots from the past.

Corporations use the term 'AI' to boost share values, regardless of the actual application of AI in their products or services.

Nvidia's transformation into the third-largest company globally is attributed to its association with AI technology.

Microsoft's AI integration and partnership with Open AI has propelled it to become the most valuable corporation.

The debate on AI's societal impact is ongoing, with no consensus on its potential as a tech fad or a transformative force.

Large language models, like chat GPT, process information based on complex algorithms but lack original thinking capabilities.

AI's limitations are exposed when it fails to answer questions not present in its training data, as demonstrated by the '21st letter' example.

Many AI capabilities are not new but are rebranded traditional software functionalities, creating confusion in the market.

Amazon's brick-and-mortar store was falsely assumed to use AI for automatic checkouts, but it might just be monitored by employees.

Google's AI struggles with providing accurate information, as seen in its failed attempt to answer basic questions using Reddit posts.

AI's potential is real, with applications in natural language programming and data compilation, but its accuracy and reliability are still in question.

The pursuit of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) is compared to the Singularity, with unknowns and debates on its feasibility.

Tests for AGI involve complex real-world problem-solving, far beyond current AI capabilities, highlighting the gap between ambition and reality.

The hype around AI may be a bubble, with inflated expectations and potential for a market correction, similar to the dot-com era.

AI's future is uncertain, with skepticism around its revolutionary potential and concerns about its current state as more style than substance.

Public opinion on AI is largely uninformed and negative, with concerns about job displacement and manipulation by tech companies.

The video concludes with a call to view AI as an evolutionary technology with potential but also with significant challenges and unknowns.

Transcripts

this video is sponsored by ground news

more from them in a bit Miriam Webster

defines AI as a three-toed sloth

according to Al Perkins a sloth is a

slow moving arboreal mammal and the name

AI was given to this creature because of

its high pitched Screech fascinating

Artificial Intelligence on the other

hand is the ability for computer systems

and algorithms to imitate intelligent

human behavior this is not anything new

the technology dates back to nearly the

beginning of computers but obviously the

AI that is gaining all the hype today

isn't quite the same as the enemies in

your video games or the countless chat

Bots that have been around for decades

clearly chat GPT is not the same as

clippy probably this whole AI thing it's

complicated we don't know the ultimate

potential of large language models and

neural net works and blah blue blah but

at the same time it doesn't take a

genius to figure out that the letters a

and I are being used as much as possible

by corporations looking to increase

their share values if a company so much

as utters AI investors cannot help but

invest even if they have no idea what it

means or what it does or what it might

do they just assume it's going to make

money Nvidia which was well known for

being the producer of gpus for gaming

PCs and other Computing products has

gone from a successful company to well

the third largest on the planet it has

seen an increase in value that is

nothing short of obscene all thanks to

this

AI Microsoft is now the most valuable

corporation on the planet as the company

is all aboard the AI hype train pushing

it into every corner of their operating

system and having an extremely close

relationship with open AI all the while

nobody can seem to agree on whether this

technology will change the very fabric

of our society or prove to be another

flash in the pan Tech fad everyone

everyone has an opinion I'm exhausted of

seeing this back and forth argument that

never seems to reach any conclusion and

speaking of ground news is a website and

app that Gathers related articles from

more than 50,000 sources around the

world in one place so you can compare

how different Outlets cover the same

story each story comes with a clear

breakdown of the political bias

ownership and headlines of the sources

reporting all backed by ratings from

three Independent News monitoring

organizations take a look at the story

about how open AI is setting up a Safety

and Security committee as it starts

training for the next Frontier Model

something that has caused a lot of

controversies as previous safety team

leaders have recently left the company

so this story has been covered by more

than 73 sources with 37% of them leaning

left while 14% leans right you can also

see the ownership information and for

this story 40% of the reporting Outlets

are owned by media conglomerates you can

even compare headlines to see how this

bias can affect framing we can compare

headlines quickly and see how some

organizations WIll Stoke The public's

existing fears about AI to get clicks

While others might capitalize on the

distrust that Sam Alman has garnered

over the past few months God news has

this feature called Blind Spot which

instantly shows you stories that the

left leaning or right leaning news media

conveniently won't report on so go to

ground. news/ husk or use the link in

the video description to subscribe today

if you sign up through my link you will

get 40% off the Vantage plan which is

what I use to get unlimited access to

all of their features I think gr news is

an exceptionally important website and

one you absolutely need to check out now

back to the video yes AI has been around

for a while dating back to the earliest

computers but the hype right now

surrounds progress on large language

models these are programs that take a

lot of information in require a user

prompt and through complex algorithms

basically create probabilities of what

the output should be as lifelike as they

might seem these things are not actually

alive there's no think thinking involved

they cannot create wholly original or

novel ideas they require training data

to do anything I've seen it suggested

that one of the best ways to prove this

is to ask a question with an answer that

the AI model has not been provided with

in its training data for example go to

chat GPT and ask what's the 21st letter

in this sentence you might get a

different response but I got the AI

saying confidently it's e and if you say

I don't think that's right it will try

and count again and give you a different

letter this time I it will sometimes

interpret two and one as letters maybe

the apostrophe and the reason questions

like this break the AI is because it

doesn't actually understand what a

letter is it doesn't understand anything

but it searches the internet and its

training data for the most likely answer

even with these limit ations the

technology is clearly capable of some

impressive things from assisting you in

writing computer programs to proof

reading your short stories to helping

you cheat on your homework but even

still a lot of what gets promoted as AI

isn't really AI a lot of the

Revolutionary abilities that AI has been

reported to have is actually stuff that

traditional software has been capable of

doing for a long time this creates a

problem where the idea of this

technology it's often more valuable than

what it can actually do because again

just saying AI makes stock number go up

so a while back Amazon launched a real

life store a brick and mortar shop where

customers could walk in grab items off

the shelf put them in their carts and

leave without ever checking out these

items were automatically charged to

people's accounts without any need to

speak to a cashier or even even use a

selfs serve system it was all done

automatically many assume this was

handled using an array of computers and

sensors and scanners but in reality the

company just probably hired a lot of

Indian employees to watch people while

they shopped on cameras and then they

would charge the users's Amazon accounts

uh Google was caught off guard by the

immediate success of chat GPT and has

been trying its hardest to launch its

own AI competitor they paid millions of

dollars to Reddit for access to the

website's posts to train their AI with

and it went about as well as you'd

expect when users asked questions like

how to make your cheese stick on Pizza

Google decided the best answer was to

use non-toxic glue this information by

the way was provided by an 11-year-old

Reddit post by user foxsmith which

Google's model decided was the most

reliable sort course for information

when asked about how many rocks you

should eat a day it did not give the

correct answer of zero and look things

just kept getting worse from here as you

can imagine any technology that uses the

internet to train itself is probably

going to make a few mistakes and those

mistakes have made AI a very easy and

fun punching bag right now but yeah not

all AIS are created equally you can't

say that at L LM or machine learning or

neural networks are completely useless

because well a lot of people are using

it there's potential here natural

language programming could allow people

to write their own programs with no code

required just describing what kind of

application they want to make and the AI

would handle the rest you could use this

to learn to research information but

again AI can be wrong so I view it in

the same way that I you Wikipedia it's

useful it's a nice jumping off point but

you need to check your sources it's not

100% accurate or compiling lots of data

really quickly to get back at your

homeowners association this does have

real value automatic translations

transcriptions stuff that may have been

possible with previous software is just

more accessible than ever but people are

taking this too far the end goal of open

AI is to achieve achieve artificial

general intelligence AGI is supposed to

refer to a strong AI that can learn

skills in tasks that it was never

trained to learn this could lead to

machine sentience Consciousness The

Singularity and right now everyone seems

to believe that if you just keep

throwing more computing power more

energy more information into these

algorithms you can simply manifest a AI

from the kinds of artificial

intelligence we have today everybody has

a different way of defining AGI because

well nobody really knows what it's

supposed to look like we often divide AI

into two categories weak Ai and strong

AI weak AI is capable of doing very

specific tasks stuff it was programmed

to do and everything we've ever made so

far has been a weak AI AGI would be a

strong AI and it could it could do a lot

of jobs it could do a lot of stuff would

put you out of a job but what might this

look like exactly there are a few

different tests for AGI but I've always

found that the best would be something

done with an actual robot in automaton

take a robot and ask it to repair the

plumbing electrical systems and

appliances of an early 20th century home

especially if none of that information

is you know available through

documentation on the internet every home

is going to be slightly different so the

robot will need to make assumptions to

learn to understand why your custom

1950s toaster is not working and then

try and figure out possibly through

trial and error how to get it back into

toast making condition while today there

are demos of robots completing simple

tasks in the home these are in

controlled environments and are only

possible because of training data

created from previous experiences this

AGI robot would need to be capable of

learning from unique situations to ask

questions based on its own volition and

solve them by itself but there is no

proof that this will happen in fact

studies do seem to suggest that there

are diminishing returns when it comes to

this kind of stuff we don't know if any

of this is even possible with

traditional silicon chips and

programming binary code any of that it

could take entirely new forms of

computing to achieve this we don't fully

understand how the human brain works so

attempting to replicate it with far more

simplistic technology far more rigid

technology it just seems more than a bit

optimistic people are acting like we're

5 years away from robots taking every

job becoming alive enslaving Humanity

changing life forever and honestly chat

GPT could be a stepping stone to all of

this a stepping stone to AGI in the same

way that the Discover of gunpowder was a

stepping stone to the nuke or the hot

air balloon was a stepping stone to

Intergalactic space flight that is to

say not much of a step at all for all we

know llms and AGI might not even be

related we might not even be on the

right track we just don't know so if we

don't even know if this can manifest

into some more powerful AI if we have no

substantial evidence to support that

we're on the road to AGI then why all

the hype obviously it is incorporations

best interest for people to believe that

this technology is on the cusp of being

something truly revolutionary so good

it's frightening it makes it seem way

more advanced than it actually is it

implies more potential for growth which

will make the stock number go up and

they have ways to Market this technology

so many companies are just throwing

around the words AI even if it doesn't

even apply to their products in any way

gigabyte which usually makes gaming

Centric motherboards and memory thingies

and whatnot well they decided they

wanted to go all in on the AI thing and

have rebranded their products with a big

old AI plastered on the side of them

yeah rebranded because it's really just

kind of the same stuff you could find

anywhere else but now it's it's got AI

written on it whatever that means this

exact same thing happened a few years

back with the whole metaverse craze

where every company started proclaiming

that their existing video games and

online services were already in fact

metaverses because investors wanted to

hear that and it diluted the term to

such a point that the word metaverse

started to mean nothing more than than

just a synonym for software when an AI

makes a mistake the companies call it a

hallucination which is a very Mis

leading term this is applying a human

quality to the machine when in reality

it's not hallucinating it's just taking

a set of probabilities and it hasn't

received enough training data on the

topic or the right algorithms to give

you an accurate answer it is not

hallucinating it simply made a mistake

the technology simply wasn't good enough

will it improve yes but we don't know

how good it will get or how accurate it

will will become for AI sentients it

could be 5 years away or 10 or 100 or a

thousand or it might not be possible for

us to build this at all we don't know

and everything else until it happens is

just a guess a lot of the AI safety you

hear about actually does refer to more

realistic concerns about how this

technology might be used if in the

future AI Services become a replacement

for traditional search engines like

Google if people rely on chat GPT to get

all their news then those in charge of

the service can lie manipulate or alter

information to benefit those who are in

charge of the AI to push their own

motives their own agendas this is where

the concerns of safety often lie not in

the fantasy of robots taking over the

world or at least that's where the the

fears should lie and look if fancy

Quantum Computing or something entirely

unprecedented allows for robot

Revolution allows for AGI if today's

technology and llms are on the right

path to all of this and all we need is

just a few trillion dollars in the

combined power consumption of a small

nation I I'll be the first to admit I

was wrong Oopsy Daisy egg on my face but

right now I'm just a little bit

skeptical so for the purposes of this

video Let's assume that the future of AI

is not revolutionary but evolutionary

and if that's the case is it a bubble

yes yes it is but that doesn't mean it's

worthless I kind of see AI right now

like the do boom of the late 9s this was

a time where investors believed that

every single website was going to make

millions of dollars and once they

figured out that only certain websites

would ever become popular would ever

become profitable many of them took

their money and ran the resulting

Fallout led to the do Comm Bubble Burst

but this wasn't the end of the worldwide

web now I'm not saying that AI will be

as important as the internet but clearly

this is more than just a simple fad

that's going to fade away I do think the

bubble will burst and then the industry

will have to realistically look at its

value rather than rely on unfounded

promises and rampant speculation but

yeah a AI is here to stay cuz it's been

here for a long time AI already has

changed our world algorithms Drive

search engines YouTube channel

recommendations most of the internet is

driven off of this automation we know

that the technology has value because

it's been around for a while the

question is whether this new form of AI

llms will have a significant impact on

how we live and work or how significant

of an impact that might be and a lot of

people

seem to have some doubts about all of

this Rutter's Institute for the study of

Journalism pulled 12,000 people from six

different countries online about their

opinions on AI granted 12,000 people is

not that many doing plls online does not

mean perfect results but this is about

as good as we're going to get if we're

trying to figure out what the average

person thinks about this technology and

most people have no idea what it is or

what it does or what it could do a lot

of people have heard of AI and these new

services but they don't know what

distinguishes a large language model

from traditional computer software we

can tell that most people are not using

AI that often even if chat GPT has a

huge install base younger people are

more likely to try it out than older

people obviously but most people view AI

as a technology that will primarily be

used in professional settings by

scientists and social media companies

but less so by the average person in

their daily lives again if these people

don't actually know what AI is

considering some of these poll results

I'm I don't think they do none of this

is super helpful but there is some stuff

we can take away from this it seems like

people aren't just confused by the

technology they seem to fundamentally

dislike it there are a lot of concerns

about the damage it can do people are

scared it will take their jobs away or

just functions as tools to manipulate

the public and most don't seem

interested in the positive aspects of

this technology at all most can't even

identify what that might be sometimes a

technology does need to be more than

good enough it needs to be perfect when

driving a school bus or doing taxes for

a multi trillion dollar Corporation you

probably don't want to put this

responsibility on a robot that can or

probably will make a mistake yes humans

are not perfect the AI might even be

better than the human in many cases but

humans give people somebody to blame

when things go wrong they provide

accountability something that the AI

just doesn't have for AI Google spent

all of Google iio 2024 talking about its

AI initiatives and people didn't really

seem to care all that much A lot of

people just roll their eyes cuz it's

more AI slop Microsoft hyped up its new

line of AI PCS which most saw as a

concerning invasion of privacy rather

than anything remotely worthwhile the

corporation is betting the future of its

operating system of the Windows

operating system on AI and it's a bet

that doesn't seem to be panning out in

fact I've seen a lot more people talk

about moving to Linux now that Windows

is infected with this AI garbage I have

no doubt going forward that llms and

machine learning and AI will manifest

into to something valuable it's possible

this might even result in massive

changes to everyday life but right now

this entire thing has been polluted by

Bad actors false promises and in my

opinion pretty misleading marketing

tactics and it's baffling to me that

people have just forgotten the whole

metaverse craze from a few years back

where the word itself began to mean

nothing by the end these analysts who

don't even understand the basic

technology are hyping up others about

how much money we're all apparently

about to make claiming that nvidia's

going to be worth $1

trillion in just a few years and as far

as I can tell there there's just no

reasonable basis for these claims we've

reached a point where big Tech is so

desperate to achieve growth that it just

keeps taking these fairly predictable

and standard advancements in software

and then applying new buzzwords to the

technology and by the time the bubble

should burst they're already onto

marketing their next buzzword I don't

want to dismiss the entire potential of

AI by calling it the next metaverse but

look there there's a lot of problems

here and as of right now for many people

this technology just kind of comes off

as a slightly more invasive less

accurate version of all these digital

personal assistant that have already

become common place over the years this

whole industry

right now just seems so flimsy to me

there's a good chance that everything I

say here will age like milk I get that

maybe we will see a world where most

jobs become significantly easier with

the assistance of the machines where

this is a necessity or maybe the tech is

too good and we all lose our jobs I

think right now we're seeing a

technology that is more style over

substance there is substance there but

there's just there's a lot of fluff here

or maybe I'm completely wrong and in 5

years we'll all have Rosie the robot in

our homes I need to get my robot out of

my swimming pool I don't think she can

breathe again huge thanks to ground news

for sponsoring today's video go to

ground. news/ husk or use the link in

the video description to subscribe today

if you sign up through my link you will

get 40% off the Vantage plan

[Music]

[Music]