Sidang Perkara Nomor 19/PUU-XXIII/2025. Senin, 21 April 2025.

Summary

In this session of the Indonesian Constitutional Court, the petitioners introduce themselves and address the court about their case regarding the authority of the National Police Chief (Kapolri). They emphasize that their petition is free from political influence and solely focused on legal reforms. The petitioners make several amendments to their original request, including clarifications on their personal information and legal standing. The court reviews and approves the evidence submitted, before closing the preliminary hearing and announcing that the next steps will involve deliberation by the Constitutional Court panel.

Takeaways

• 😀 The session is officially opened for case number 19 PWU 23, Roman 2025, in the Constitutional Court.
• 😀 The presiding judge begins by greeting the attendees and acknowledging the occasion of the first session in the month of Shawwal after Eid al-Fitr.
• 😀 The petitioners introduce themselves: Sigurdes Celi, Gule, Kristian Adrianusite, and Devita Analisanda.
• 😀 The Court emphasizes that the current session's agenda is a preliminary hearing, specifically for reviewing amendments to the petition.
• 😀 The petitioners clarify that their case is not politically motivated and is focused on improving the Indonesian National Police, particularly regarding the legal oversight of the position of the National Police Chief (Kapolri).
• 😀 The petitioners highlight that their identity and legal standing have been adjusted according to the necessary documentation, clarifying their position as citizens rather than having a specific professional connection to the matter at hand.
• 😀 The petitioners provide updates on the legal standing section, with changes made following advice from the Court's counselors.
• 😀 The revised petition includes specific amendments in the legal text, particularly addressing provisions related to the National Police Chief's appointment and dismissal procedures.
• 😀 A significant change in the petition involves removing a request for the President to dismiss the National Police Chief, aligning with the Court's guidance.
• 😀 The petitioners' final request includes a call for priority in the Court's examination of their case, seeking a ruling on whether certain articles in the Indonesian Police Law contradict the 1945 Constitution.

Q & A

What was the main purpose of the session described in the transcript?

The main purpose of the session was to conduct a preliminary hearing for case number 19 PWU 23, which included the submission of corrected petitions by the applicants and the verification of evidence.

Who were the individuals presenting on behalf of the applicants in the case?

The individuals presenting on behalf of the applicants were Sigurdes Celi, Gule, Kristian Adrianusite, and Devita Analisanda.

What was the significance of the timing of the session mentioned in the transcript?

The session was held during the month of Syawal, following the celebration of Idul Fitri, which is acknowledged at the beginning of the hearing.

What was the issue the applicants wanted to address in their petition?

The applicants aimed to propose reforms related to the legal oversight of the position of the National Police Chief (Kapolri) in Indonesia, emphasizing the need for a legal control mechanism over the position.

What concern did the applicants raise regarding the perception of their petition?

The applicants expressed concern that there might be public speculation about their petition being politically motivated, which they denied, emphasizing that their petition was driven purely by legal and institutional concerns.

What did the applicants adjust in their petition based on the advice provided?

The applicants made several adjustments to their petition, including clarifying their job descriptions based on their identification cards and revising the legal standing sections in line with the advice given by the court.

What changes were made to the petitum (petition) of the applicants?

The applicants modified their petitum by removing a request for the President to dismiss the National Police Chief, as per the court's advice, and refocusing their petition on legal and procedural reforms.

What was the court's stance on the applicants’ submission of evidence?

The court accepted and validated the evidence submitted by the applicants, confirming that it matched the list of evidence provided and was deemed legally valid.

What were the key elements in the applicants' request for legal reform?

The key elements in the applicants' request included the revision of Article 11, paragraph 2 of the Indonesian National Police Law, to require the President to submit a justified proposal for the appointment or dismissal of the National Police Chief to the People's Representative Council (DPR).

What was the outcome of the hearing as mentioned in the transcript?

The hearing was concluded with the acknowledgment of the applicants' revisions to their petition and evidence. The court indicated that the matter would be discussed further by a panel of constitutional judges, who would determine whether the case would be heard in full or resolved without a plenary session.