Polemik Penerapan Kembali UN, Ini Sejarahnya dalam Kurikulum Pendidikan Indonesia

Summary

The debate over the reintroduction of the National Exam (UN) in Indonesia's education system is reigniting. While some educational experts and organizations argue against it, citing issues like unequal access to quality education and the impact on students, others see the exam as a necessary measure to address declining student knowledge. The history of the UN, spanning various formats from 1950 to 2020, reveals the challenges and controversies surrounding its use as a high-stakes testing tool. As discussions continue, the government evaluates whether to bring back the UN, considering both its potential benefits and drawbacks.

Takeaways

• 😀 The Indonesian government is considering the reintroduction of the Ujian Nasional (UN) after evaluating its impact on education.
• 😀 The UN has been a central topic in Indonesia's education system for decades, with various versions such as Ujian Penghabisan, Ujian Negara, Ujian Sekolah, and Ujian Nasional (UN) in the past.
• 😀 Critics argue that reintroducing the UN, especially as a high-stakes test, could disadvantage students due to factors like unequal access to education and resources.
• 😀 Dita Puti Sarasfaati, Executive Director of Bajik, emphasizes that factors other than student effort, such as the quality of education and teacher competence, affect UN results.
• 😀 Yanti Sri Yulianti from Kerlip advocates for ensuring children's educational rights are met before reintroducing the UN, stressing improvements in teacher quality, school infrastructure, and equal access to educational resources.
• 😀 The UN was abolished in 2020 as part of a transition to Asesmen Nasional (AN), which evaluates students on literacy, numeracy, character, and the school learning environment.
• 😀 The Asesmen Nasional (AN) was implemented in 2021 to replace the UN, with a focus on broader aspects of student learning beyond just academic performance.
• 😀 Concerns have been raised about the decline in student knowledge and basic skills like reading and writing, which have fueled discussions about the need for a national exam.
• 😀 The public has been encouraged to share their opinions on whether or not they support the return of the UN, with calls for a more balanced approach to student assessments.
• 😀 The history of the UN in Indonesia reflects the evolving nature of the national examination system, with various names and formats being used from 1950 until its suspension in 2020.

Q & A

What is the main topic discussed in the video script?

The main topic of the video script revolves around the potential reintroduction of the National Examination (UN) in Indonesia's education system and the various opinions and perspectives surrounding this issue.

Who is the Indonesian Minister of Education mentioned in the script?

The Indonesian Minister of Education mentioned in the script is Abdul, who spoke about the ongoing evaluation regarding the reimplementation of the National Examination (UN).

What are some concerns raised about the reintroduction of the National Examination (UN)?

Some concerns include the risk of the National Examination becoming a high-stakes test that could negatively impact students, especially those without access to quality education. Critics argue that factors such as school quality, teacher qualifications, and access to learning resources can influence the outcome of the exam.

What are the key factors that affect students' performance in the National Examination (UN)?

Key factors that affect students' performance in the UN include the quality of education at the school, the qualifications of teachers, availability of learning materials, and overall access to educational resources.

What is the stance of Dita Puti Sarasfaati, the Executive Director of Bajik, on the reintroduction of the UN?

Dita Puti Sarasfaati is against the reintroduction of the UN, particularly if it is used as a high-stakes test to determine the fate of students. She believes that such an approach would disadvantage students who lack access to quality education.

What legal precedent is cited regarding the National Examination (UN)?

The legal precedent mentioned is a 2007 ruling from the Jakarta Central District Court, which granted a lawsuit against the government over the UN policy. The decision was upheld by the Supreme Court in 2009, leading to the eventual cessation of the UN in 2020.

What changes occurred in Indonesia's education system regarding the UN after 2020?

After 2020, the National Examination (UN) was no longer held. Instead, the government shifted to the implementation of the National Assessment (AN), which focuses on assessing students' literacy, numeracy, character, and the learning environment at schools.

What was the purpose of the National Assessment (AN) implemented since 2021?

The National Assessment (AN) was implemented to evaluate students' learning outcomes in literacy and numeracy, as well as assess their character and the overall learning environment at schools. The results are reported in the form of a school education report.

What is the historical timeline of the National Examination (UN) in Indonesia?

The National Examination in Indonesia has been conducted in various forms since 1950, including 'ujian penghabisan' (1950-1964), 'ujian negara' (1965-1971), 'ujian sekolah' (1972-1979), 'eptanas' and 'epta' (1980-2002), 'ujian akhir nasional' (2003-2004), and finally 'Ujian Nasional' (2005-2020).

What do the critics believe needs to happen before the reintroduction of the National Examination (UN)?

Critics, including Yanti Sri Yulianti from the Keluarga Peduli Pendidikan group, argue that before the UN is reintroduced, the government must first improve the quality of teachers, provide adequate school facilities, and ensure comprehensive access to information and educational resources across Indonesia.