ANIME JELEK JANGAN DIKASIH SKOR SATU & ANIME BAGUS JANGAN KELEWAT DIPUJA

Summary

In this video, the creator critiques how anime is often judged based on subjective opinions rather than objective analysis. They highlight how personal preferences, like dislike for slow pacing or specific character types, often lead to unfair ratings. The creator emphasizes that anime, like any form of art, is inherently subjective, but there are still objective qualities like story structure, animation, and character development to consider when reviewing it. They also express frustration with fans who blindly defend their favorite series, refusing to acknowledge flaws, and call for more thoughtful, reasoned critiques of anime.

Takeaways

• 😀 Anime reviews should not be based solely on personal preference or subjective taste, but rather on objective analysis of the content's quality.
• 😀 It's important to avoid giving an anime a rating of one just because it doesn't align with personal tastes; it should be critiqued based on its intrinsic qualities.
• 😀 Just like food, music, or movies, anime is subjective, and everyone has their preferences, which should be respected.
• 😀 Criticism should be grounded in logical reasoning, not just personal distaste, especially when it comes to storytelling, animation, and character development.
• 😀 Fans should be open to acknowledging flaws in their favorite series, as being a true fan means being willing to critique what needs improvement.
• 😀 Anime that contains unrealistic elements, like superpowers in sports anime, shouldn't automatically be dismissed as bad; the focus should be on how well the story and characters are executed.
• 😀 There is a tendency among Indonesian audiences to mix personal bias with objective reviews, which leads to skewed opinions about anime.
• 😀 The internet and social media are full of subjective opinions, which can create 'pollution' in online reviews, making it harder to find objective critiques.
• 😀 Constructive criticism requires using both the heart and the mind to evaluate a series, not just relying on emotional responses.
• 😀 It's important to differentiate between liking a series and being able to critique it constructively; loving a series doesn't mean it is flawless.
• 😀 Criticism from fans should be welcomed and treated with respect, provided it is thoughtful and backed by reasoning, rather than just blind support or bias.

Q & A

What is the main point of the speaker in this video?

The speaker emphasizes the importance of not letting personal preferences or biases influence how an anime is rated. They stress the need for a more objective evaluation based on the intrinsic quality of the anime, rather than subjective tastes.

What does the speaker mean by 'subjectivity' in anime criticism?

Subjectivity in anime criticism refers to how personal tastes and individual preferences can influence a person's judgment of an anime. The speaker highlights that everyone has unique likes and dislikes, which should not be mistaken for objective quality.

Why does the speaker mention One Piece in the video?

The speaker mentions One Piece to illustrate how even a beloved anime can have aspects that may frustrate some viewers, such as slow pacing. This serves as an example of how personal preferences influence people's enjoyment of a series.

What example does the speaker provide about differing tastes in comedy?

The speaker uses Gintama as an example of a comedy anime that some people find hilarious, while others may not appreciate its style, calling it 'cheap' or 'vulgar.' This demonstrates how subjective comedy preferences can vary widely.

How does the speaker feel about people who rate anime based on personal dislike?

The speaker criticizes people who rate anime based solely on personal dislike or subjective preferences, particularly when the anime hasn't been objectively analyzed. They urge viewers to consider intrinsic qualities before making judgments.

What does the speaker suggest about anime reviews in Indonesia?

The speaker points out that many Indonesian viewers tend to mix personal preferences with objective analysis when reviewing anime. They express frustration with how some viewers' criticisms are not grounded in thoughtful, detailed analysis but are rather based on personal biases.

How does the speaker differentiate between personal taste and quality evaluation?

The speaker distinguishes personal taste from quality evaluation by explaining that personal taste is based on individual likes or dislikes, while quality evaluation should focus on the intrinsic elements of the anime, such as storytelling, animation quality, and character development.

What is the speaker’s stance on giving a rating of one to an anime?

The speaker argues that giving an anime a rating of one without fully analyzing its intrinsic quality is unjust. They suggest that ratings should only reflect deep analysis and not be influenced solely by personal dislike or subjective opinion.

Why does the speaker bring up sports anime with supernatural elements?

The speaker uses sports anime with supernatural elements as an example to show how some viewers might criticize these series for not being 'realistic.' They argue that such criticisms are often based on personal preferences rather than objective evaluation of the anime's story or execution.

What does the speaker say about being a true fan of a series?

The speaker suggests that being a true fan means being able to criticize the flaws or weaknesses of a series, rather than blindly defending it. They use the example of Gintama, showing that even though they are a fan, they can acknowledge and critique the show's shortcomings.