Panelo believes PBBM is involved in VP Sara impeachment | News and Views

Summary

In this interview, former Presidential Legal Counsel Attorney Salvador Panelo discusses the impeachment case against Vice President Sara Duterte, emphasizing the lack of substantial evidence and the political motives behind the proceedings. He defends Duterte's handling of confidential funds, arguing that the nature of such funds prevents disclosure of specific details. Panelo also critiques political figures like Harry Roque, pointing out his inconsistent actions and media presence. Throughout the conversation, Panelo asserts that political decisions, including those of senators, are often driven by public sentiment and political interests rather than legal principles.

Takeaways

• 😀 Attorney Salvador Panelo discusses the impeachment case against Vice President Sara Duterte, emphasizing the lack of evidence and constitutional issues surrounding the case.
• 😀 Panelo points out that the impeachment complaint violates constitutional requirements, particularly the rule that only one impeachment complaint can be filed within a year.
• 😀 He mentions that there is no continuing jurisdiction in the House of Representatives, which further complicates the impeachment process.
• 😀 Panelo asserts that the impeachment is politically motivated, aiming to disqualify Vice President Sara Duterte from the 2028 presidential race by using confidential funds as a basis.
• 😀 He highlights how public sentiment, shown through the election results, is against the impeachment, and politicians are likely to align with the people's views to safeguard their political futures.
• 😀 Panelo believes that many senators will vote according to the public’s pulse, rather than based on evidence, which is lacking in the impeachment case.
• 😀 He criticizes the use of confidential funds in the impeachment, stating that they are reserved for state security purposes and cannot be used as evidence.
• 😀 Panelo argues that the impeachment is based on fabricated evidence, including a list of names allegedly connected to the confidential funds, which are not legally disclosable.
• 😀 Regarding the asylum debate with Attorney Harry Roque, Panelo suggests that Roque has created his own problems with contradictions in his statements and documents, questioning his credibility.
• 😀 Panelo asserts that individuals seeking asylum, like Roque, must face the evidence against them and that hiding abroad creates suspicion of guilt. He advises Roque to return to the Philippines and face the charges head-on.

Q & A

What is the main topic of the discussion with Attorney Salvador Panelo?

The main topic of the discussion revolves around the impeachment case against Vice President Sara Duterte, particularly the legal issues surrounding the complaint and its implications.

What is the constitutional issue with the impeachment complaint against Vice President Sara Duterte?

The constitutional issue mentioned is the violation of the requirement that only one impeachment complaint can be filed within a year, and concerns regarding the jurisdiction of the House of Representatives since the complaint is not continuing.

Why does Attorney Panelo believe the impeachment case lacks evidence?

Attorney Panelo believes the impeachment case lacks evidence because the grounds for the complaint, such as the use of confidential funds, are not supported by concrete or finalized documentation, and the issue has not been conclusively proven.

What does Attorney Panelo suggest is the real goal behind the impeachment case?

Attorney Panelo suggests that the real goal of the impeachment case is to disqualify Vice President Sara Duterte from running in the 2028 presidential election by potentially convicting her and imposing a perpetual disqualification.

How does Attorney Panelo view the role of the Filipino people in the impeachment case?

Attorney Panelo believes the Filipino people have already expressed their disapproval of the impeachment through their votes in the recent elections, and this sentiment is likely to influence lawmakers’ decisions regarding the case.

What is Attorney Panelo’s stance on the impeachment process in the House of Representatives?

Attorney Panelo argues that the impeachment process in the House is not valid, as the constitutional requirement for filing a complaint within a year has been violated, and the issue lacks evidence to justify proceeding with the case.

What does Attorney Panelo say about the senators’ decision-making process in the impeachment case?

Attorney Panelo believes that senators will primarily consider the political pulse of the nation and their own political futures rather than the evidence in deciding whether to support or oppose the impeachment.

What is the significance of the confidential funds in the impeachment case?

The confidential funds are significant because they are being scrutinized as part of the impeachment case. Attorney Panelo argues that the funds are used for national security purposes, and revealing the details of the expenditures would jeopardize operations against enemies of the state.

What is Attorney Panelo’s response to claims that Vice President Sara Duterte should have explained the use of confidential funds earlier?

Attorney Panelo argues that Vice President Sara Duterte has already provided extensive explanations about the confidential funds, but critics continue to attack her, showing that the aim is not clarification but to discredit her.

How does Attorney Panelo view the impeachment case in relation to the political interests of lawmakers?

Attorney Panelo believes that lawmakers will consider their political future and the opinions of their constituents before making decisions on the impeachment case, which, in his view, lacks sufficient evidence to justify action.