GEF Madrid 2024: Conversation: K12 Education for the Age of AI
Summary
TLDRCharles Fadel, founder and COO of the Center for Curriculum Redesign, discusses the impact of AI in education, emphasizing the need to avoid anthropomorphizing AI and to focus on its current capabilities rather than speculative future developments. He highlights the evolution of AI from symbolic AI in the 1980s to today's large language models, emphasizing the importance of integrating AI responsibly in education. Fadel calls for a modernized curriculum that balances traditional and modern disciplines, fosters critical thinking, and prepares students for a versatile future. He also advocates for leveraging AI to enhance personalized learning and teacher support.
Takeaways
- ๐ง The speaker emphasizes the importance of not being overly anthropomorphic with AI, cautioning against trusting it too much simply because of its human-like appearance or interface.
- ๐ Charles Fadel, the founder and COO of the Center for Curriculum Redesign, highlights the evolution of AI from the 1980s to present, noting the significant increase in computational power and data availability.
- ๐ฎ Fadel discusses the current phase of AI as an engineering phase rather than a scientific one, indicating that we are now focused on applying AI rather than discovering new theories.
- ๐ก He warns of the dangers of anthropomorphization, suggesting that we are prone to trust technologies too easily, which can lead to unforeseen negative consequences.
- ๐ The speaker mentions the importance of understanding the capabilities and limitations of AI, especially its current inability to achieve general intelligence or 'super intelligence', which is still a work of science fiction.
- ๐ Fadel stresses the need to focus on the probable applications of AI rather than the possible ones, advocating for a pragmatic approach to leveraging AI's current capabilities.
- ๐ซ He argues that education systems need to adapt to the digital revolution, modernizing the curriculum to include more relevant subjects like data science and computational thinking.
- ๐ ๏ธ The speaker calls for a reevaluation of what is taught in schools, suggesting that traditional subjects should be supplemented with modern disciplines to prepare students for the future.
- ๐ค Fadel suggests that AI can assist in personalized education by providing teacher support, allowing educators to focus more on local adaptations and individual student needs.
- ๐จ Creativity is discussed as a human trait that, while AI can assist in incremental innovation, the leaps in imagination that lead to groundbreaking ideas are still uniquely human.
- ๐ The importance of motivation and a sense of purpose in students is underscored, with AI helping to identify and support projects that align with global challenges and personal interests.
Q & A
What is the main concern Charles Fadel addresses in the field of AI and education?
-Charles Fadel's main concern is the potential for anthropomorphization of AI in education, where people might overly trust and believe in AI systems due to their sophisticated interfaces and capabilities, leading to a lack of critical thinking and reliance on technology.
What does Charles Fadel mean by 'overly anthropomorphic' in the context of AI?
-Being 'overly anthropomorphic' refers to the tendency to attribute human characteristics to AI systems, which can lead to an overestimation of their capabilities and a misplaced trust in their outputs.
What is the significance of the transition from symbolic AI to neural networks in Charles Fadel's career?
-The transition signifies the evolution of AI technology from limited processing power capable of handling only three layers of neurons to the current capabilities of handling thousands of layers, reflecting the significant advancements in AI and its applications.
Why does Charles Fadel emphasize the importance of not expecting general intelligence or super intelligence from AI systems soon?
-Charles Fadel emphasizes this because he wants to highlight that current AI systems are still narrow and specialized, lacking the ability to generalize and reason across different domains, and thus should not be mistaken for having human-like general intelligence.
What is the 'engineering phase of AI' according to Charles Fadel?
-The 'engineering phase of AI' refers to the current stage where AI is being developed and applied to solve specific problems, as opposed to the scientific phase which involves the foundational research and theories of AI.
How does Charles Fadel view the impact of technology like SMS and Twitter on society?
-Charles Fadel views the impact of technologies like SMS and Twitter as having subtle but significant societal effects, such as changing communication habits and potentially undermining democracy, highlighting the need to be aware of the long-term consequences of technological advancements.
What is the 'zigzag boundary' Charles Fadel mentions in relation to AI capabilities?
-The 'zigzag boundary' refers to the unpredictable and non-linear limitations of AI capabilities, where AI can perform exceptionally well in some areas while struggling in others, indicating the complexity and the need for careful consideration of AI applications.
Why does Charles Fadel argue that we should focus on the probable rather than the possible when discussing AI?
-Charles Fadel argues for focusing on the probable to ensure a grounded and practical approach to AI development and application, avoiding the pitfalls of overhyping and misunderstanding the current capabilities and limitations of AI.
What does Charles Fadel suggest as a 'wise insurance policy' for education in the face of AI advancements?
-Charles Fadel suggests that a wise insurance policy is to develop versatility in students, providing them with a broad range of capabilities and a strong base of knowledge and skills, enabling them to adapt to various situations and challenges presented by AI and the changing world.
How does Charles Fadel view the role of schools in a world with advancing AI?
-Charles Fadel views schools as centers of stability, which are crucial for nurturing students' abilities and sense of purpose. He emphasizes that schools should not disappear but rather evolve to better prepare students for a world with AI.
What is Charles Fadel's perspective on the necessity of modernizing the disciplines taught in schools?
-Charles Fadel believes that modernizing the disciplines is essential, advocating for the inclusion of modern subjects like data science, social sciences, and technology alongside traditional disciplines, to better prepare students for the future.
Outlines
๐ง Anthropomorphism and AI's Impact on Education
Charles Fadel, a global education thought leader, discusses the dangers of anthropomorphizing AI and the tendency to overly trust technology due to its human-like features. He emphasizes the importance of understanding AI's current capabilities and limitations, highlighting the shift from symbolic AI to neural networks with thousands of layers. Fadel also touches on the importance of addressing the real work of integrating AI in education, rather than getting lost in the hype cycle. He warns against the potential for AI to be misused or misunderstood, especially in the context of K-12 education.
๐ The Evolution and Challenges of AI in Society
This paragraph delves into the evolution of AI, from its early days with limited processing power to the current era of large datasets and specialized processors. The speaker discusses the progress of AI from knowledge representation networks to large language models, noting the punctuated equilibrium of technological advancement. Fadel also addresses the subtle societal impacts of technology, such as SMS leading to Twitter and the potential for technology to undermine democracy. He stresses the importance of being aware of these impacts and the need for caution in how we integrate AI into our lives.
๐ค The Current State and Future of AI Capabilities
The speaker clarifies misconceptions about AI, stating that general intelligence or super intelligence is not imminent. He describes the current phase of AI as an engineering phase, characterized by the ability to process vast amounts of data and perform complex tasks. However, he also points out the limitations of AI, such as its need for data, tendency to hallucinate, and brittle reasoning capabilities. Fadel advocates for a balanced view of AI, one that leverages its capabilities while verifying its trustworthiness.
๐ The Role of Education in the Age of AI
Fadel discusses the importance of education in preparing students for a world with AI. He argues that schools are not going away and that they must adapt to provide a stable environment for students. Education must evolve to teach not just traditional subjects but also modern disciplines like data science and computational mathematics. The speaker emphasizes the need for a strong foundation in skills and character, as well as the development of a broad range of capabilities to prepare students for an unpredictable future.
๐ Modernizing Education for the Digital Revolution
The speaker calls for a modernization of education to reflect the realities of the digital revolution. He questions why traditional subjects are still emphasized over modern disciplines like technology, engineering, and social sciences. Fadel suggests that education should be more about adaptability and versatility, preparing students to be Renaissance individuals with both breadth of knowledge and depth of expertise. He also discusses the need for professional development and assessments to make the teaching of 21st-century skills actionable.
๐จ Creativity and the Co-Creation with AI
Fadel explores the topic of creativity, suggesting that AI may be capable of incremental innovation but lacks the human ability for leaps in imagination. He uses the example of the progression from single-blade to multi-blade razors to illustrate how AI can excel at incremental analogies. However, he argues that AI cannot replace the human capacity for creative leaps, and education should focus on nurturing this ability in students. The speaker also touches on the importance of co-creating with AI, using it as a tool to enhance human creativity.
๐จโ๐ซ Personalized Education and Learning with AI
In the final paragraph, Fadel discusses the potential for AI to support personalized education, allowing teachers to focus on local adaptations and individual student needs. He mentions the development of chatbots trained on education research to assist teachers in the classroom. The speaker also talks about the importance of student motivation and the role of AI in helping students engage with real-world problems, such as the UN's Sustainable Development Goals. Fadel concludes by emphasizing the need for a nuanced understanding of AI's role in education and the importance of not anthropomorphizing it.
Mindmap
Keywords
๐กAnthropomorphic
๐กArtificial Intelligence (AI)
๐กHype Cycle
๐กKnowledge Representation
๐กNeural Networks
๐กGeneral Intelligence
๐กTransfer Learning
๐กHallucination in AI
๐กPunctuated Equilibrium
๐กEducational Technology
๐ก21st Century Skills
Highlights
The importance of not being overly anthropomorphic when dealing with AI, as it can lead to misplaced trust.
AI's current state is in the engineering phase, not the scientific phase, emphasizing practical application over theoretical development.
The progress in AI has been punctuated by periods of hype followed by the settling of reality, highlighting the need for grounded expectations.
The potential dangers of anthropomorphization, drawing parallels to the unforeseen societal impacts of SMS and Twitter.
The human brain's tendency to take shortcuts and the risk of relying too heavily on AI, leading to reduced critical thinking.
AI's current capabilities in pattern recognition and processing, with examples like AlphaFold's protein folding breakthrough.
The distinction between narrow AI and the broader capabilities of language models, which can process diverse data types.
The limitations of AI, including its data hunger, hallucination tendencies, and brittle reasoning capabilities.
The hype cycle of AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) and the need for a reality check on its current and near-future capabilities.
The potential of AI to transform various sectors through specialized algorithms and corpora of data, emphasizing the need for adaptability.
The challenges of forecasting new job roles and the rapid adaptation of both employers and employees to technological changes.
The need for education systems to focus on developing versatile and adaptable skills in students, rather than just knowledge.
The importance of modernizing educational disciplines to include technology, engineering, and social sciences alongside traditional subjects.
The concept of '21st-century skills' and the need for professional development and assessments to make these skills actionable.
AI's role in incremental innovation and its potential to assist in the creative process, while acknowledging human superiority in leaps of imagination.
The necessity of co-creating with AI, focusing on how it can enhance human creativity without promoting laziness.
The significance of student motivation and personalized education, using AI to support teachers in adapting to individual student needs.
The potential for AI to support teachers with education research, providing real-time assistance in the classroom.
The vision of learning with machines, where AI can help with personalized learning and catching up for students who need additional support.
Transcripts
shaping the future keeping us
[Music]
[Music]
human Global for
Liv for
fatal let me now switch to English to
introduce him he is the founder and COO
of the center for curriculum redesign we
would love to hear more from his
expertise on the vision of the impact of
the AI in the education in general and
in particular in the K12 Charles fedal
is a global education thought leader an
author a f futurist we can say too an
inventor and he's also an expert for AI
at the OAC CD so praise Charles welcome
you can now take this state thank
you thank
you so well I'm a human intelligence um
I'm here to mention to you that one of
the things we have to face is being
overly
anthropomorphic when we deal with these
things because we tend to trust them too
much just because it has a nice face and
quite honestly an unreal body uh right
I'm sure women will say wait a
second um we we have the tendency to
overly believe some of the Technologies
we create so there's always a hype
moment where we're all excited and there
cool toys like this that show up and
then reality settles and then the real
work starts so we're going to be talking
about what the real work is is about um
I've been lucky enough in my career to
be involved with AI since okay I'm going
to disclose my age
1989 when as uh Mark was saying earlier
uh the whole world was going into
symbolic AI because we did not have the
processing power at the time my AI
company neural networks only had could
compute only three layers of neurons now
we can compute more than 5,000 layers
ERS we have massive databases we have
specialized processors and the world has
changed but we also have to keep in mind
that progress is always this punctuated
equilibria we had knowledge
representation networks and symbolic AI
in the 80s then in the two 2010s it took
30 years for the processing capability
to catch up to use neural networks
efficiently and then another decade to
get into large language
models again all due to large data sets
and now we're moving into this uh
situation of AI systems which going to
describe in a second what we're not
going to see anytime soon is general
intelligence or super intelligence and
I'll explain why in a moment but you
know we really need to worry about the
here and now and the enormous
capabilities of the here and now so this
is the engineering phase of of AI now
it's not the scientific phase of AI now
so I'm grateful that organizations are
paying attention to the um problems of
the future perfectly spot on I wish we
had done that with social media quite
honestly uh and we're still letting
social media run
crazy but when I was talking about the
dangers of anthropomorphization and so
on is because a lot of the problems we
have come from things we do not suspect
many years ago I was involved with SMS
you know for cell phones what was the
problem you know we had a little bit of
bandwidth between voice channels what
harm can happen with 140 characters sure
5 cents or charact or a SMS or whatever
so we deployed
SMS 10 years later your daughter cancels
a a a meeting with you at the last
minute because she can Via SMS thank you
at the supermarket and she doesn't show
up another 20 years and we have Twitter
and now we can undermine
democracy so these are the subtle
situations that emerge out technology
that we have to pay attention to our
brains are lazy by good evolutionary
design our brains are 20% of the energy
of the body consumption for 5% of the
mass so the brain is exquisitly tuned
to be as lazy as possible as frequently
as
possible and so that's why we judge
people on their faces very quickly we
judge how they're dressed
Etc our brain takes shortcuts and the
enormous danger that very few people are
talking about is how we're going to be
taking these shortcuts into believing
toys believing the hallucinations that
these sophisticated toys are going to
give
us how students will take the shortcut
to think less rather than more and
that's an enormous challenge ahead of us
because it's always easy to take the
easy way
out
okay so very quickly I'm going to
explain the differences between what had
happened 10 years ago and what's
happening now and why this is so
important we you know technology already
can do enormous computations and they
can really deal with spaces that are
incredibly big you know the three
complexity is 10 to the 535 so 10 with
535 zeros worth of
possibilities obviously no human can do
this here Alpha fold was able to figure
out how proteins fold which was
extremely timec consuming for humans so
when it comes to pattern processing
recognizing a pattern and applying it
modern AI is fantastic
IC but this was narrow because it was
only tuned to a game or a specific
problem to solve this was narrow machine
learning but what has happened with the
emergence of language models the
boundaries are much bigger because they
suck up enormous data
sets and second they can also suck up
different data types mathematics and
history not just go or chess or protein
so as a result they're capable of both
expertise and transfer they can look at
the situation and see an
analogy which a human may not be able to
see so they're incredibly capable
systems but they still have problems
they're hungry for data they we don't
know how they converge to a solution
they still
hallucinate very often they'll give you
they'll site a paper that doesn't exist
with all that do exist so it's very
sneaky it did that to me the first time
like I don't I recognize all these
authors but where are the papers very
sneaky and it's really brittle when it
comes to reasoning it does not
generalize a lot of different things and
it can generalize some very well and so
you have to be really careful about the
strange boundary about what he can and
cannot do it's not a simple boundary
it's a a zigzag all over the place so
it's up to us to figure out how to
harness these capabilities but keep in
mind these things we cannot trust it's
very much like uh Arms Control trust but
verify same should be applied here here
you go Mark trust that verify for for
AI so I was telling you that the
generalized intelligence and so on was
uh was overly overly hyped and this is a
gardner showing that AGI is reaching its
peak hype gen is at the peak hype and
they're going to go back down and we're
going to do a lot of work the same way
that autonomous vehicles are now in
reality mode sure they can drive on a
straight line in Oklahoma but good luck
driving at the pl delal in Paris at rush
hour
so reality check
so AGR is hype super intelligence is
still sci-fi and I'm not the only one
saying this even these
guys are saying this problem is we
confuse the possible with the probable
so I'm here as an engineer to focus on
the probable not on the possible there
are plenty of people who are looking at
the the possible and hedging against
that that's wonderful I'm here to
Leverage The Enormous capabilities we
have and they're enormous because we
have plenty of different llms we have a
lot of algorithms that are changing we
have Corp corpora of data that are being
verticalized like for education for
health care for finance Etc we have much
faster Hardware that's coming on that's
why uh Emily there was able to speak so
quickly there's a technology called Gro
that allows you to have almost realtime
uh responses
and then we can link a bunch of data
sets
together this is incredibly powerful you
don't have to wait for AGI to say wow
what are we going to do with all this
and this is what's evolving
fast so even if GPT 5 starts plateauing
which in my opinion it will because
again it's going through its S curve
it's going to start plate until we
change to a different type of algorithm
or we start merging algorithms
so don't expect gbt 5 to be massively
better even if Sam Altman says so
because he's a sales a
Salesman but this is already enormous
and we have to figure out what to do
with all of this so here's the problem
you know we're always
behind imagine a soccer player that's
constantly chasing chasing the ball
sorry football player American football
player that's constantly chasing the
ball and that's the situation where
we're all always get caught into and
that's why I'm delighted to have been
working already withk because there's an
opportunity for Independent Schools to
move ahead and show the rest what can be
done and not be at the lagered side of
traditional education systems public
systems of course we've all seen a lot
of different research coming from many
different Horizons this is from the IMF
and it talks about exposure to Ai and so
on but this research is not very precise
we really do not understand what jobs
are made of when we make these big uh
big pronouncements what we do is we
confuse tests with tasks with
jobs just because you can answer a test
like Pak or Pisa the oecd doesn't mean
that you can do the task just because
you're doing the task doesn't mean you
can do the aggregation of tasks with the
coordination and the adaptation that all
of these tasks
need so we have this uh overly
simplifying mindset which is called in
Psychology the done in Krueger effect
where what we don't understand very well
we
tralize for example every night I watch
brain surgery on YouTube for
fun you know we all have our fun and so
I met a surgeon just two weeks ago a
gastro enterologist ologist and I said
hey I can uh I can do brain surgery on
you now I know how to do it all you have
to do is you cut you you drill you open
you cut you suck you close you're
done that's how naive we are when we
think about a job in general and so in
reality whether it's a teacher or a
neurosurgeon it's a lot more complicated
to do the job than to do the task than
to do the test and so a lot of the
debate we've seen so far are very
superficial and that's what drives me
crazy is that people say oh AI cannot
create oh AI can creat oh I can do this
very superficial
conversations and that's why we
basically spend a lot of time in my team
going through and I'll show you the
results of this we also are terrible at
forecasting the emergence of a new jobs
terrible this was done by the world
economic Forum oops sorry
uh in 2017 looking at the jobs that were
created in the past 10 years that it did
not
forecast he was unable to imagine that
someone would ever want to be a YouTube
influencer really it's is that a job and
yes yes it is for our people not me or
an Uber driver you know these these
things were not around so we're terrible
at Imagining the new jobs
and we're also terrible at realizing how
fast people adapt this is both employers
and employees worldwide and these are
their main concerns and look they're all
talking about the same things they're
all trying to adapt furiously to this
new world so we underestimate the new
jobs we underestimate the adaptation we
overestimate what we don't understand
there we go so we have this sort of
situation and people start freaking
out so
there's no such thing as AGI takes away
all the job anytime soon and when we say
all the jobs that's really poorly
defined again the oversimplifications
that we see around the
world but that still means that we have
to deliver regardless even if even if
all the jobs were gone what are you
going to do with your 10-year-old are
you going to leave the 10year old at
home just trying to figure out the world
or are you going to send it send him or
her to a to a place where they can be
scaffolded with their
education where they have a safe place
where they can nurture their abilities
their sense of purpose so that
eventually they know how to work with AI
you're not just going to leave them at
home and at age 20 magically okay I'm
ready now no so education is not going
to disappear education is still going to
be here better done but still here all
the more importantly also as the world
becomes less and less stable School
schools are a center of
stability they have to be conserved as a
center of stability for the students
they maybe it may be the only thing that
they have that's permanent and stable in
their life so please let's not think
that schools will disappear and it also
means that we still have to prepare for
jobs partially at the high school level
and certainly yes at the University
level so that doesn't
disappear until of course AGI takes away
all the jobs I don't know 50 years from
now right now I'm not worried about
that and as Nas was saying earlier we
have you know she was quoting the
Industrial Revolution we are at the
digital Revolution
level and we invented Mass schooling at
the time and now what are we inventing
we're really sophisticating the
education we have this is not radical
this is ambitiously incremental again
not radical not disruptive but
ambitiously
incremental that means sure we have to
wonder about how do we teach better but
we also have to rethink should what
should we be teaching in the first
place if we have ai capable of helping
us on all sorts of things well what
should we be
teaching
okay well if you don't know what the
future holds what is a wise insurance
policy a wise insurance policy is to be
versatile so whatever the the whatever
is thrown your way you can always react
properly so you want to develop a broad
range of capabilities in the student
like a Swiss army knife and you can
always sharpen that that knife for a
given situation later but you have the
basics which means you're really a
Renaissance person you have breadth of
knowledge and you have depth of
expertise and you can add more expertise
like an M over time because you have a
strong base to begin
with so what does the strong base mean a
strong base mean paying attention to
modernizing the knowledge but also
paying attention to skills in character
meta learning all the quote unquote soft
skills that everybody talks about but no
one does anything in a systematic
way so we're talking about creativity
critical thinking Etc we're talking
about curiosity in ethics we're talking
about metacognition Etc
so when it comes to modernizing the
disciplines well why do we teach so much
trigonometry in mathematics and we don't
teach data science or we don't teach
discret and discrete and computational
Mathematics those are actually easier
mathematics
algebraically than a lot of algebra or
calculus why do we not do
that well because we're not used to
doing that but that's what should be
done
why don't we don't why don't we teach
world literature world history and I
don't mean world literature from a
Spanish or English perspective only I
mean literally Chinese Thai literature
Korean literature all the literatures of
the world why don't we teach even if we
teach performing art we teach acting
sometimes debate very rarely if ever
comedy or
improv so if the world requires you to
adapt quickly to situations don't you
want to be trained in improv that's how
you react fast someone asked a question
you know exactly how to react that's the
world we going to be living in and so
you have to pay attention to
adaptability where does that come from
from special sets of
disciplines same for visual arts okay
but you also need to add modern
disciplines because the old disciplines
go back to the Greeks the Trivium and
the quadri and the Middle Ages and so on
we have not left space for Technology
and
Engineering we have not left space for
social sciences except as options they
have to be
mandatory we also sometimes teach
entrepreneurship and business as options
it has to be
mandatory entrepreneurship is the job of
the
future social sciences if you need to
understand yourself and other
others for a better world why don't we
teach these things why is there only an
option again why so much of the
traditional disciplines and not the
modern ones and of course here with um
withk we we're developing modules for
clean tech and nanotech and we're also
developing modules for the modern
mathematics uh branches that I describe
so you're already doing something in
that respect and more next year
so now let's talk about competencies
when I wrote 21st century skills back in
2009 I was very happy to see that it
became a meme used around the world but
I became also very skeptical and
disenchanted because when we studied
this with Brookings we found out that
none of these jurisdictions
none was doing any professional
development or
assessments none everybody just sends
PDF to the teachers and say good luck to
you and everybody around the world has a
learner profile or a portrait of a
graduate or the goals of our school
sometimes with Latin even but it's not
it doesn't it doesn't hit it's not
actionable and the point here is to make
it actionable and so yeah yes we have
some some teachers some of the time
doing ad hoc things with the presence
and intent of these competencies but
we're going for Quality via professional
development and for evidence via
assessments that's where we need to get
to so I mentioned that we spent a lot of
time analyzing these things for every
single one of these competencies we have
a number of definitional subcompetencies
and for every single one of them we've
done an analysis of whether AI can be
good at Ambi pursuing ambitious Visions
despike risks can AI be leading with
initiative can AI engage with others etc
etc to decide whether or not AI was
going to be replacing or complimentary
to us so you see the level of analysis
that it takes rather than saying AI can
or AI cannot it's trivial we have to
really go into the
details and yes AI can be very fearless
and AI can be very tireless but that's
not the entire definition of courage and
resilience it takes a lot more than
that so you see that's the level of
precision that we need to get to in our
education systems where we analyze
things and we're precise about
definitions we're precise about goals of
what we want to
achieve let's talk about creativity for
a
second are is AI going to be more
creative or less creative than you
humans okay let's let's do a quick PA
who thinks that AI is going to be more
creative than
humans okay who thinks AI is going to be
less creative than humans that means
everybody else okay less creative than
humans what if I told you that 95% of
human Innovation was incremental and
that AI can do it I mean you have the
response right
here why because a lot of innovation in
the human domain is innovation by
analogy and by
extrapolation AI can analogize better
than humans actually and extrapolate
better
humans we are going to be filling a
database of all the patterns of the
world and then train the AI on how to
invent
next many of these inventions are very
incremental let me give you an example
there's an object that both men and
women use pretty much on a daily
basis the Raz are
blades
right razor blade
so someone comes up with two blades
right one blade to two blades someone
else comes up with three blades what do
you think AI is going to do analogy four
blades five blades six blades that's the
simple progression that you've seen even
Gillette and others do I think the
maximum is seven blades I don't think
there's room for your face
anymore seven blades you just go once
and you're done
but when it comes to the rotating the
pivoting blade that's different because
now it's no longer an analogy it's a
leap in
imagination and that leap in imagination
is what humans are still good at better
than
Ai and that's what needs to be
trained however even modart even Picasso
have a bunch of U mundane very average
Things That No One listens to or looks
at right mozar did a lot of stuff that
no one listens to but every once in a
while you come up with a flash of
Brilliance you cannot come up with these
flashes of Brilliance unless you go
through also the boring stuff the
incremental stuff so tough
question is AI more creative or less
creative is you should really we should
have said Charles as the wrong
question the question would have been
how are we going to co-create with AI
how can it help us create without making
us so lazy that we don't do the hard
part to come up with the flashes of
Brilliance so you see it's a complicated
answer every step of the
way oh by the way uh the reason why I
have so this is just one of my patents
as an example but this this is really
what I like it's a book called The Dot
Peter uh the Peter Reynolds the author
mentioned to me how he created that book
He's fell asleep with his hand like this
and on a piece of paper when he woke up
he there was a
DOT of
ink and so what I would have done I
would have just thrown it away Peter
being very creative he's like hm what
can I do with this and he thought of a
book describing the in Innovation
process for
children okay you see this is going a
little bit more than the normal it's
like a comedian comedians always do
things that we laugh about because we
recognize them it's just that we stopped
our thinking just before the funny part
and they make us discover the funny part
in our
thinking that's all all of
that so to I'm approaching the end we
have to pay attention to motivation of
students and in and indiv individualized
education personalized education that
means paying attention to the sense of
purpose of the
student and because AI has very limited
agency and no purpose at least unless we
surrender that agency but AI has an
identity the data sets the algorithms
the user interface already give it an
identity we think they're not but they
do they have an identity like this we've
given this an identity and you knowe
that I'm very careful of not calling it
her I'm calling it
it battle you have to battle
anthropomorphization every step of the
way
and so your purpose as a student whether
or not you have AGI is to do what you
love but also what you're good at what
you can be paid for unless you have
Universal basic income good luck with
that and what the world needs so that's
how you push the students to do a
project that has a purpose that can help
humankind and we have a database of 34
40 Projects on the UN sdgs the goal
Global challenges for Humanity the etc
etc so you can see how you can help the
student choose what they want to focus
on they want to focus on cyberspace or
blockchain or health issues or food or
whatever this is how you bring them to
help with a real world
problem lastly we're going to be
learning with the machines that means
that we can have teacher support via AI
so that teachers can focus a lot more on
local adaptations and personalized
learning that means that we're going to
have chatbot like the one we have
designed here which is trained on
education research because name one
teacher that can go to an education
school to a teacher college and remember
everything from p voty and everything
else and know exactly when to push it in
the classroom at the right moment and
have oh special needs oh Charles has a a
shortterm memory problem what do I do
what if we had the chatbot to
help and adaptive learning can help with
students catching up if they haven't
understood quickly
enough and that's another gain of AI
where the bloom to Sigma problem can be
helped we'll have to figure out what is
the amount of teacher
support going from teacher only to full
auto
depending on the
situations and that's it uh I don't have
time to go through this whole thing but
if you want to take a
picture please feel free to
download all right thank you very
[Applause]
much thank you very much Charles
thank you so much that was fascinating
you know he's traveling from the US um
to join us here today as well as our
next speaker I will introduce you um
right away before that H let's now take
a a step from
school we we have um seen this right now
um to universities we need to try to
understand how can we become from an AI
University and for that we have an
expert one of the most you know
interesting um experts on the world in
this specific um
Browse More Related Video
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/bEJ0_TVXh-I/hq720.jpg)
AI can do your homework. Now what?
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/3trbFXj7d2o/hq720.jpg?v=662a831d)
GEF Madrid 2024: Panel: Students's view of the Future on Education
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/MDoIOZAYR6s/hq720.jpg?sqp=-oaymwEmCIAKENAF8quKqQMa8AEB-AH-CYAC0AWKAgwIABABGHIgXSg_MA8=&rs=AOn4CLAzlFfmofZMZWah7S-j_GPMCYq1qQ)
GenAI + Education Welcome and Fireside Chat
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Rp3A5q9L_bg/hq720.jpg)
OpenAI's Greg Brockman: The Future of LLMs, Foundation & Generative Models (DALLยทE 2 & GPT-3)
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/ogcSQ-cFRVM/hq720.jpg)
Should we let students use ChatGPT? | Natasha Berg | TEDxSioux Falls
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/WXJ0f9bJuS4/hq720.jpg)
NO: GPT, Claude e gli altri NON SONO COSCIENTI. Propongo una soluzione.
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)