EPS 642 | MENGAPA ORANG TUA KITA BEBAL ?

Summary

In this thought-provoking speech, Guru Gembul critiques the misconception that Google is a primary source of knowledge and highlights the importance of understanding it as a tool for finding existing information. He argues that older generations often resist innovation and new technologies out of fear of losing their authority, stifling the potential of younger generations. Emphasizing the need for critical thinking and creativity, the speaker urges the younger generation to continue pushing boundaries, innovate, and shape the future, despite resistance from outdated systems and mindsets that hinder progress.

Takeaways

• 😀 Google is a search engine, not a source of information. It helps find knowledge but does not create or alter it.
• 😀 The misunderstanding that Google is a primary source of information highlights a broader lack of critical thinking and awareness.
• 😀 In developed countries, older generations pass the torch of progress to younger generations, encouraging new ideas and innovation.
• 😀 In contrast, in Indonesia, older generations often refuse to trust or believe in younger generations, hindering progress and innovation.
• 😀 Older generations sometimes discredit new technologies, like Google, out of fear that their authority or knowledge will be undermined.
• 😀 The tendency to glorify the past and dismiss the present or future leads to stagnation and failure to innovate.
• 😀 Feudalism in mentalities within institutions, even modern ones, prevents the free flow of new ideas and critical thought.
• 😀 Traditional beliefs that worldly knowledge is useless can prevent people from seeking practical solutions or advancing in society.
• 😀 Many students are trapped in outdated methods and teachings, unable to think critically or change the system they inherit.
• 😀 The lack of innovation and progressive thinking in Indonesia is evident in the fact that external ideas often drive technological advancements rather than local ones.

Q & A

What is Guru Gembul's stance on the use of Google as a knowledge source?

Guru Gembul clarifies that Google is not a source of knowledge itself but a search engine that helps users find information from credible sources. He emphasizes that Google only directs users to information written by experts, not a source of knowledge on its own.

Why does Guru Gembul think some older generations dismiss the use of Google for learning?

He believes older generations fear losing their authority to newer technologies and ideas, such as Google. This fear often leads them to undermine the validity of Google as a tool for learning and dismiss the younger generation's use of it.

How does Guru Gembul describe the mentality of older generations in Indonesia regarding innovation?

He criticizes the older generations in Indonesia for being unwilling to trust the younger generation with the responsibility of advancing the nation. Instead of encouraging innovation, they hold on to their own authority and dismiss new technologies and ideas.

What is the role of Google in scientific studies, according to Guru Gembul?

Guru Gembul explains that Google aids in finding sources for scientific studies by acting as a search engine. However, it is not a direct source of information or knowledge, but rather a tool for locating existing work created by experts.

How does Guru Gembul explain the relationship between older and younger generations in more developed countries?

In more developed countries, older generations trust younger generations with innovation and progress. They encourage them to create new ideas and solutions to advance society, which contrasts with the Indonesian tendency to control and suppress new ideas.

What does Guru Gembul say about the impact of feudalism on Indonesia's educational and social systems?

Guru Gembul criticizes the feudalistic mentality in Indonesia, where older generations resist change and innovation. This mindset hampers progress, as younger generations are discouraged from thinking critically or pursuing new ideas.

What does Guru Gembul mean by 'Agent of Change,' and why is it problematic in Indonesia?

The 'Agent of Change' refers to students or young people who are expected to bring about change in society. Guru Gembul points out that, despite this ideal, Indonesian students are often trapped in repetitive, outdated practices due to feudalism, leading to no real change over time.

How does Guru Gembul describe the state of Indonesian universities and student organizations?

Guru Gembul observes that many student organizations and universities continue to operate in the same outdated manner as they did years ago. Senior students impose old traditions on new students, preventing meaningful change and critical thinking from flourishing.

What is Guru Gembul’s critique regarding the glorification of the past in Indonesia?

Guru Gembul criticizes the tendency in Indonesia to glorify the past, particularly the achievements of previous generations. He argues that this romanticized view prevents the nation from moving forward and embracing necessary change and innovation.

What advice does Guru Gembul give to the younger generation in Indonesia?

Guru Gembul urges the younger generation to continue innovating, embrace new technologies, and think critically. He encourages them not to be afraid to challenge traditional ideas and to focus on creating new solutions for the future.