Erigo dan The Goods Dept Diisukan Paksa Karyawan Ganti Rugi atau Resign

Summary

A recent controversy involving Erigo and The Goodstep brands has stirred up Twitter, with accusations that 30 employees were forced to either resign or pay a hefty fine of 30 million IDR each due to missing merchandise. The issue began after a stock check revealed over 1,000 missing items, with the company offering no clear solutions other than demanding employees either pay or resign. The employees were later shocked to find they wouldn't be compensated for their work, further fueling the controversy. The situation raises questions about the handling of employee rights and the company's lack of transparency.

Takeaways

• 😀 Several days ago, a Twitter controversy erupted involving Erigo and The Goodstep over a claim that 30 employees were forced to resign or pay a penalty for missing goods worth millions of rupiah.
• 😀 The original claim was made by @dialarasatip, who suggested that the missing goods issue involved Erigo and The Goodstep, which led to widespread speculation online.
• 😀 The company conducted a stock opname (inventory check) in mid-October and discovered over 1,000 missing items, sparking the controversy.
• 😀 Operational factors such as errors with automatic door sensors, system discrepancies, and potential internal theft were discussed as possible reasons for the missing goods.
• 😀 Despite the presence of security measures like body checks and CCTV at the store, the possibility of internal theft was raised, though it was quickly dismissed as unlikely due to the strict security protocols.
• 😀 Employees were reportedly pressured into signing resignation letters or paying penalties amounting to hundreds of millions of rupiah, with no option for installment payments or salary deductions.
• 😀 Upon resigning, employees were informed that they would not receive their wages because they were held responsible for replacing the missing goods.
• 😀 The HR department, rather than being neutral, allegedly made disparaging comments about employees, claiming some had stolen and accusing others of being overly sensitive.
• 😀 The company's response to the situation was unclear, with no concrete evidence such as CCTV footage being provided to justify the missing goods claim.
• 😀 The situation has yet to be officially clarified by Erigo or The Goodstep, with the founder of The Goodstep claiming to be unaware of the details and waiting for an explanation from the board of directors.

Q & A

What is the main issue discussed in the transcript?

The main issue is about employees at Erigo and The Goodstep being forced to resign or pay compensation for missing inventory, with no clear explanation or proof of wrongdoing.

What caused the inventory shortages in the company?

The inventory shortages were attributed to multiple factors including external issues like automatic door malfunctions, system errors, and possible internal theft, though internal theft was ruled out due to security measures like body checks and CCTV.

How did the company respond to the missing inventory?

The company required employees to either pay compensation for the missing goods or resign without any clear proof of theft. They also requested employees to sign statements that they were resigning voluntarily.

What was the total compensation amount employees were asked to pay?

Employees were reportedly asked to pay around 30 million IDR each as compensation for the missing inventory.

Why did the employees find the situation unfair?

Employees found the situation unfair because they were forced to either pay a large sum of money or resign, with no evidence of theft provided by the company, and some were not even given their salaries after resigning.

What role did the HR department play in the situation?

The HR department was criticized for not being neutral and instead making derogatory remarks about the employees, even suggesting that some of them might have stolen goods without presenting any evidence.

What was the company’s stance on providing evidence of theft?

The company did not provide clear evidence such as CCTV footage, instead claiming that there was 'data minus' without giving any solid proof to back up their accusations.

What was the reaction of the founder of The Goodstep?

The founder of The Goodstep stated that they were not aware of the situation and were waiting for clarification from the company's directors.

Why were 30 employees involved in this situation?

All 30 employees were implicated in the situation because the company did not single out any individual but instead held the entire group responsible for the inventory shortage.

What are the concerns about the company's treatment of employees?

The main concerns are the lack of transparency, the absence of proof regarding the accusations, the forced resignations, and the unfair treatment of employees, including not receiving their salaries after resigning.