Past Simple | Past Continuous | Past Perfect in English conversation!

Summary

A bank robbery takes place at 9:00 PM, and three suspects are brought into question: Mr. Johnson, a man with an alibi that doesn’t quite add up; a woman who had been fired from the bank and was loitering around; and the security guard, whose shift coincided with the crime and whose actions raise suspicions. The investigation uncovers contradictions in their statements, pointing to a coordinated heist involving all three. Despite their denials, the evidence leads to their arrest, revealing a meticulously planned robbery. The case is a clear example of how alibi inconsistencies and overlooked details can crack a case wide open.

Takeaways

• 😀 The bank robbery occurred at 9:00 PM, and three suspects are under investigation.
• 😀 Suspect 1 was caught on security footage running away from the bank with a large bag at 9:05 PM.
• 😀 The bag Suspect 1 was carrying is suspected to contain stolen money, though they claim it was takeaway lasagna from a restaurant.
• 😀 Suspect 2 had been loitering around the bank all day and was fired from her job at the bank just prior to the robbery.
• 😀 Suspect 2 denies any criminal involvement and claims she was trying to meet the manager for an explanation after her firing.
• 😀 Suspect 3, the bank’s security guard, was on duty during the robbery and claims to have been patrolling when the crime occurred.
• 😀 The security cameras inside the bank stopped working at 8:55 PM, just before the robbery, and turned back on at 9:02 PM.
• 😀 The security guard, Suspect 3, cannot explain why the cameras stopped working and was unable to explain the timing of the crime.
• 😀 There were contradictions in Suspect 2's alibi, as she was seen multiple times near the bank before the robbery, even while on the phone with the manager.
• 😀 The detectives suspect all three suspects were involved in the robbery, as their alibis and explanations were inconsistent and suspicious.

Q & A

What happened at the bank last night?

The bank was robbed at nine o'clock last night, and there are three suspects connected to the crime.

Who are the three suspects?

The three suspects are: Suspect number one, who was seen running from the scene with a large bag; Suspect number two, who had been hanging around the bank all week; and Suspect number three, the bank's security guard, who was working during the robbery.

What evidence links Suspect number one to the crime?

Suspect number one was caught on security camera running away from the bank at 9:05 with a large bag, which is believed to be full of stolen money.

Why was Suspect number two acting suspiciously?

Suspect number two had been observed around the bank throughout the week, appearing worried and looking in the window at various times, raising suspicions about their involvement.

What was Suspect number three’s role at the bank?

Suspect number three was a security guard at the bank and was supposed to be on duty during the robbery, but the security cameras inside the bank stopped working at the time of the crime.

Why were the security cameras significant in this case?

The security cameras outside the building were functioning fine, but the cameras inside stopped working at 8:55, just before the robbery occurred. This raised questions about whether the cameras were intentionally turned off.

What did Suspect number three claim about the security cameras?

Suspect number three claimed that the cameras had been working fine earlier in the week and that they didn't know why the cameras stopped working during the robbery.

What was Suspect number one’s alibi for the time of the robbery?

Suspect number one stated that they were at the cinema with their wife, and the movie ended at 8:55. They claimed to have been running to the car when the robbery occurred, and the bag they were carrying was takeout from the restaurant, not stolen money.

Why was Suspect number two outside the bank at the time of the robbery?

Suspect number two explained that they were trying to meet with the bank manager to ask for a recommendation letter after being fired from the bank, and they were calling the manager when the robbery happened.

What did the police conclude about the three suspects?

The police eventually arrested all three suspects after piecing together evidence from their statements and behaviors. They concluded that the three suspects were all involved in the robbery.