El cruce entre Kast y Boric por Derechos Humanos en Chile

Summary

In this heated political discussion, various viewpoints on human rights and international relations are debated. The conversation touches on the United Nations' stance on human rights violations in countries like Venezuela and Nicaragua, with some leaders questioning the organization's credibility. Additionally, there are tensions surrounding Chile's domestic issues, particularly the 2019 protests, and the handling of human rights by local institutions. The discussion also delves into the role of political alliances, the importance of leadership in unity, and the responsibilities of presidential figures in attending national events, such as the military parade.

Takeaways

• 😀 The speaker expresses dissatisfaction with the United Nations, criticizing its inclusion of countries with questionable democratic practices and human rights records, such as Venezuela and North Korea.
• 😀 The speaker calls for a reformulation of the National Human Rights Institute in Chile, arguing that it is not fulfilling its purpose and should be closed.
• 😀 Human rights violations in Chile, particularly during the 2019 protests, are a significant point of debate, with some institutions labeling these as violations, which the speaker denies or downplays.
• 😀 The speaker emphasizes the importance of law enforcement, noting that resources should be directed towards controlling violent protesters rather than just reinforcing the police force.
• 😀 The speaker questions international human rights organizations for their selective attention, noting that violations in some countries are acknowledged while others, like Chile, are ignored or misrepresented.
• 😀 The issue of responsibility for the death of a person named Denis is raised, with the speaker criticizing those who quickly assign blame without clear evidence.
• 😀 The speaker disagrees with claims of human rights violations during the 2019 protests, asserting that any such claims should be properly investigated and judged by the courts.
• 😀 Gabriel Boric is mentioned as a figure who previously met with Daniel Jaule, and there is criticism of political threats and divisive behavior within their campaign.
• 😀 The speaker stresses the importance of unity in political campaigns, especially between the Communist Party and other factions, advocating for common convictions rather than threats or divisions.
• 😀 A question is raised about whether the speaker, when president, would attend military parades. The response emphasizes institutional responsibility and that such decisions will be evaluated in due time, with no room for personal bias.

Q & A

What is the speaker's view on the United Nations' involvement with human rights issues?

The speaker is critical of the United Nations, arguing that the organization includes countries that do not support democracy and regularly violate human rights. They suggest that the UN's stance on regimes like those in Venezuela, North Korea, and others is hypocritical.

How does the speaker feel about the closure of the current Human Rights Institute?

The speaker believes the current Human Rights Institute is not fulfilling its purpose and advocates for its closure. They propose a reformulation of the institute as a solution.

What does the speaker think about the human rights violations claims made about Chile after October 18?

The speaker denies that there were widespread violations of human rights in Chile after October 18, suggesting that some of the accusations are exaggerated and should be handled by the justice system.

What is the speaker's stance on the response to violence during the protests of October 18?

The speaker emphasizes that the response to violence should focus on controlling the violent individuals, not just allocating more resources to the police force. They express concern that human rights organizations have not addressed the actions of the violent protesters effectively.

How does the speaker react to accusations of human rights violations in other countries like Venezuela and Nicaragua?

The speaker does not agree with many of the accusations made about human rights violations in countries like Venezuela, Nicaragua, and Chile, arguing that some of these accusations are excessive and need to be verified through legal processes.

How does the speaker view the relationship between political parties in Chile regarding unity in campaigns?

The speaker criticizes the political behavior of certain candidates, especially highlighting how quickly some individuals, like Gabriel Boric, included others in their campaigns only to later undermine them. They stress that politics should be based on shared convictions rather than threats.

What is the speaker's view on the role of the Communist Party and other political groups in Chilean politics?

The speaker acknowledges that the Communist Party and other political groups, such as the Broad Front, have played significant roles in recent campaigns. They highlight the importance of unity based on common values, rather than divisive behavior.

What does the speaker say about the role of the President of Chile in attending military parades?

The speaker states that, as President, they would attend all official functions that are required, including military parades. They emphasize that such decisions are institutional responsibilities rather than personal preferences.

What is the speaker's response to allegations of threats being made within the political arena?

The speaker condemns the use of threats in political discourse and stresses that such behavior is inappropriate. They advocate for dialogue and collaboration based on shared convictions rather than divisive tactics.

What does the speaker suggest about the relationship between institutions and political leaders in Chile?

The speaker believes that political leaders must act within the framework of institutional responsibilities. They highlight the importance of fulfilling collective agreements and not allowing personal ambitions or conflicts to disrupt institutional goals.