Sanggahan ilmiah atas syubhat irja' Ust Abdurrahman Thayyib @sanggahsyubhattv2448

Summary

In this video, the speaker addresses the controversial topic of declaring someone a kafir (non-believer), focusing on the case of a doctor who allegedly permits zina (fornication). The speaker emphasizes the importance of not hastily labeling others as kafir, as this is a matter for Islamic judges, not ordinary scholars or laypeople. The discussion critiques a prominent scholar, Ustadz Abdul Rahman Toyib, for his view on this matter, and highlights the dangers of the murji'ah ideology. The video stresses the significance of adhering to established Islamic principles, such as the prohibition of zina, and the proper channels for issuing religious verdicts.

Takeaways

• 😀 The speaker begins by greeting the audience and expressing gratitude for another meeting, emphasizing the importance of continuing discussions about religious matters.
• 😀 A discussion follows on a controversial statement made by a doctor who allegedly legalized zina (adultery), with the speaker stressing that such acts are considered major kufr (disbelief).
• 😀 The speaker highlights the importance of caution when labeling someone as a kafir (non-believer) based on their actions, advocating that only qualified religious scholars, not ordinary individuals or dawah (preachers), should make such judgments.
• 😀 A reference is made to a previous video where a scholar, Ustadz Abdul Rahman Toyib, discussed not labeling people as kafir for actions like permitting zina, emphasizing that understanding and context matter.
• 😀 The speaker warns against the misunderstanding of religious rulings, especially regarding the kafir accusations, and mentions the importance of not hastily making such judgments.
• 😀 The speaker reflects on the importance of knowledge and proper guidance from religious authorities in resolving theological issues, specifically relating to kufr (disbelief) and the proper application of religious laws.
• 😀 The speaker critiques Ustadz Abdul Rahman Toyib's views, particularly his position on not labeling someone as kafir, suggesting that his views are based on a deviant understanding of faith.
• 😀 The concept of 'irja' (a theological belief that faith is separate from actions) is introduced as a central theme, with the speaker arguing that it leads to misguided views on kufr and belief.
• 😀 A detailed explanation is given on how certain actions, such as denying the haram (forbidden) nature of zina or other key religious practices, can lead to kufr, as understood by traditional Islamic scholars.
• 😀 The speaker concludes by emphasizing the importance of correct religious knowledge and understanding, cautioning against the spread of incorrect views and calling for repentance from those who may be misled by such beliefs.

Q & A

What is the main topic of the video discussed in the transcript?

The main topic revolves around the issue of whether a person who permits zina (fornication) is considered a kafir (disbeliever) and the responsibilities of scholars in addressing such issues.

What was the statement made by Ustadz Abdul Rahman Toyib regarding the issue of someone permitting zina?

Ustadz Abdul Rahman Toyib stated that one should not immediately label someone who permits zina as a kafir. He argued that scholars and the judiciary, not laypeople, should address such matters, as there might be misunderstandings or justifications involved.

What did the speaker in the video suggest about Ustadz Abdul Rahman Toyib’s approach to labeling someone as kafir?

The speaker criticized Ustadz Abdul Rahman Toyib’s approach, calling it incorrect and rooted in the murji'ah school of thought. He argued that it is essential to follow the sunnah and that the issue of labeling someone as kafir should be addressed with firm evidence and authority, not by individual opinion.

What is the position of the speaker on the concept of takfir (excommunication) in this context?

The speaker believes that making takfir is a serious matter and should not be done hastily. He stresses that only scholars or judicial authorities have the right to issue such a ruling, and it must be based on clear evidence.

What does the speaker say about the importance of hujjah (proof) in establishing whether something is kufr?

The speaker emphasizes that once hujjah (proof) has been established, such as through the Quran or established religious principles, a person who commits an act deemed kufr (disbelief), like permitting zina, should be considered as having crossed a line, and takfir can be validly applied.

How does the speaker address the issue of ignorance or misunderstanding in these matters?

The speaker acknowledges that a person may have misunderstandings or misconceptions that could lead to them permitting acts like zina. However, he stresses that once clear evidence and hujjah are established, it is no longer excusable, and the individual must be held accountable.

What is the relevance of the concept of murji'ah mentioned in the video?

The speaker refers to the murji'ah school of thought as problematic, particularly in how it deals with issues of faith and kufr. He believes that the murji'ah tendency is to delay judgment on matters of disbelief or sin, which he sees as erroneous and harmful.

What did the speaker mean when he referred to the actions of Ustadz Abdul Rahman Toyib as leading to a ‘fitnah’?

The speaker suggests that Ustadz Abdul Rahman Toyib’s teachings, particularly his views on takfir and murji'ah, could lead to fitnah (discord or mischief) among the Muslim community. He warns that such ideas might mislead others and distance them from the true teachings of Islam.

How does the speaker describe the correct way of addressing a person who permits zina?

The speaker insists that, according to Islamic teachings, such matters should be addressed through proper legal channels, not by individual judgment. Once proof has been established through the Quran and the sunnah, the issue should be handled by scholars or judges.

What warning does the speaker give regarding Ustadz Abdul Rahman Toyib's understanding of irja?

The speaker warns that Ustadz Abdul Rahman Toyib’s understanding of irja (the belief that faith is separated from actions) is dangerous and could lead to further misguidance. He advises that Ustadz Abdul Rahman Toyib should repent from this understanding to avoid deeper errors in his teachings.