RI'S SOVEREIGNTY IS THREATENED! QRIS MAKES AMERICA LOSE 960 TRILLION?!

Summary

In this video, the speaker discusses the importance of financial transaction data as a strategic asset for a country’s economic and political security. They raise concerns about the risks of foreign control over this data, specifically pointing out how countries like the U.S. could manipulate trade or resources based on transaction patterns. The speaker urges Indonesia to protect its payment infrastructure and negotiate with global giants like Visa and Mastercard, viewing them as mere bridges in the payment system. The video stresses the urgency of safeguarding financial data from foreign influence to avoid compromising national sovereignty.

Takeaways

• 😀 The importance of financial data is crucial, as it can be used to predict consumer behavior and influence economic and political decisions.
• 😀 Indonesia's reliance on financial transaction data makes it vulnerable to manipulation by foreign powers, especially the United States.
• 😀 Foreign countries, such as the United States, could use Indonesia's financial data to influence trade relationships, such as halting shipments of essential goods.
• 😀 The speaker stresses that financial data should not fall under the control of a foreign power, as it could be used strategically to destabilize Indonesia's economy.
• 😀 The concept of payment gateways like Curies is introduced as a neutral bridge connecting consumers and businesses, rather than a monopoly by one entity.
• 😀 Negotiations around Indonesia's financial services should focus on maintaining the independence and security of the country's payment systems.
• 😀 The speaker is concerned that exposure of financial data could lead to economic crises, such as shortages of essential goods like rice or meat during critical times like Ramadan.
• 😀 Payment systems should allow for flexibility, where users can choose between various funding sources, including digital wallets, bank accounts, and credit cards.
• 😀 The video calls for transparency in communication with international powers, particularly the U.S., regarding the role of Indonesia's payment systems.
• 😀 Geopolitical risks extend beyond Indonesia, with other nations like Algeria and Angola also facing similar pressures on their financial systems and sovereignty.
• 😀 The speaker encourages viewers to raise awareness and engage in discussions about protecting Indonesia's financial data from foreign interference.

Q & A

What is the main concern expressed by the speaker in the video?

The speaker is primarily concerned about foreign control over Indonesia’s financial data, particularly through payment systems like Mastercard and Visa, and the potential geopolitical and economic consequences that could arise from this control.

How does the speaker describe the role of payment systems like Curies in Indonesia's economy?

The speaker refers to Curies as a payment gateway that serves as a bridge between the payer and the receiver, facilitating transactions but not controlling the source of funds, which could be from a bank account, digital wallet, or credit card.

Why does the speaker emphasize the importance of maintaining control over financial data?

The speaker argues that if foreign countries, especially the United States, gain control over financial data, they could leverage this information to manipulate Indonesia’s economy, political decisions, and even influence national security.

What specific example does the speaker use to illustrate the risks of foreign control over financial data?

The speaker uses the example of foreign countries like India or Vietnam halting the shipment of essential goods like rice, which could cause an economic crisis, with foreign powers potentially using economic influence to destabilize the country.

What does the speaker suggest could happen if Indonesia's financial data were controlled by foreign entities?

The speaker suggests that foreign powers could manipulate Indonesia’s economy by tracking spending patterns and using this data to control crucial imports, like rice or beef, which could lead to economic crises and political instability.

How does the speaker propose to handle negotiations with foreign payment systems like Mastercard or Visa?

The speaker suggests that Indonesia should negotiate with Mastercard and Visa by framing the payment systems as bridges that facilitate transactions but are not monopolistic products, allowing flexibility for users to choose their payment methods.

What is the speaker’s view on the introduction of foreign payment systems in Indonesia?

The speaker is cautious about the entry of foreign payment systems like Mastercard and Visa into Indonesia, expressing concerns about economic sovereignty and the potential loss of control over critical financial infrastructure.

What does the speaker mean by 'curies' in the context of the video?

In the context of the video, 'curies' refers to a local Indonesian payment gateway that connects payers and receivers, allowing transactions through various methods such as bank accounts, digital wallets, and credit cards.

Why does the speaker reference the political and economic strategies of the United States?

The speaker references the United States to highlight the geopolitical risks of allowing foreign control over financial data, suggesting that the U.S. could use economic leverage to influence Indonesia’s decisions and even destabilize the country.

What are the broader implications the speaker suggests regarding Indonesia's sovereignty and financial systems?

The speaker warns that allowing foreign companies or countries to control Indonesia’s financial systems and data could lead to a loss of sovereignty, making the country vulnerable to external manipulation in both economic and political arenas.