NEW UFO WHISTLEBLOWER "Ben" Goes Public For First Time

Summary

In this video, the new UFO whistleblower 'Ben' shares his story about his involvement with UAP-related programs and his interactions with other notable whistleblowers. Despite maintaining anonymity, Ben reveals his firsthand experiences with UAP sightings, particularly orbs emerging from water in a geopolitically sensitive area. He also discusses concerns about Dr. Sean Kirkpatre, the former head of the Pentagon's Arrow office, allegedly having ties to a secretive legacy UFO program, which could create a conflict of interest. While there is no physical evidence, Ben's testimony highlights the ongoing secrecy surrounding UAP investigations and his commitment to uncovering the truth.

Takeaways

• 😀 A new whistleblower, named Ben, has come forward to discuss his knowledge of UAPs, though his identity remains hidden for security reasons.
• 😀 Ben served both in active duty and as a contractor, and his work involved access to information about UAPs, though he wasn't directly involved in UAP programs.
• 😀 Despite his indirect involvement, Ben has interacted with people closely connected to known figures in the UAP field, including those mentioned in Ross Coltart's book.
• 😀 Ben has been in contact with other prominent whistleblowers like Lou Elizondo, Jake Barber, and his team, sharing information and collaborating on the UAP issue.
• 😀 Ben has relayed his UAP-related knowledge to members of Congress, who are struggling to get to the truth due to being stonewalled by higher authorities.
• 😀 One of the key revelations in Ben's testimony involves former Arrow head Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick allegedly being involved with the UFO legacy program, which could be a conflict of interest.
• 😀 If Ben's claims are true, it suggests that Arrow, the Pentagon's UFO office, may have been operating under false pretenses, with ties to an existing legacy program.
• 😀 Ben describes witnessing and tracking multiple UAPs, including orbs coming out of water in a highly contested geopolitical area, suggesting significant military interest in these phenomena.
• 😀 The whistleblower community, including figures like Lou Elizondo and Ryan Graves, is portrayed as a united effort in seeking the truth about UAPs, despite differences in experience.
• 😀 Ben emphasizes the overwhelming evidence and testimonies surrounding UAPs, including both his personal sightings and corroborated accounts from others, supporting the need for further investigation.

Q & A

Who is the whistleblower mentioned in the transcript, and what is his role?

The whistleblower, referred to as 'Ben', is a former Department of Defense employee who has come forward to discuss his knowledge of UAPs (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena). His role involved working both in active duty and later as a contractor for the U.S. government, though the specific details of his position and security clearance level are kept confidential for security reasons.

Why is the whistleblower's identity kept hidden?

The whistleblower's identity is kept hidden for personal and operational security reasons. His voice is distorted, and his face is blurred in the interview to protect his safety and prevent potential retaliation.

What was the main claim made about Dr. Sean Kirkpatre in the interview?

Ben claims that Dr. Sean Kirkpatre, the former head of the Pentagon's All Domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), was involved in the UFO legacy program. This could represent a conflict of interest, as Kirkpatre was allegedly read into parts of this program while leading AARO, contradicting AARO’s mandate to resolve UAP cases scientifically.

What evidence does the whistleblower provide to back his claims?

The whistleblower has not provided physical evidence to support his claims, citing that such evidence is still not available for public release. Instead, he offers testimony based on personal experiences and conversations with others involved in UAP-related programs.

What did Ben reveal about his personal encounters with UAPs?

Ben shared that he had seen UAPs both in his personal life and during his service, though he did not provide specific details about the time frame. He also discussed his indirect involvement with others who have firsthand knowledge of UAP-related incidents.

What is the significance of the legacy UFO program mentioned by Ben?

The legacy UFO program, as described by Ben, is a long-standing initiative that may be influencing the current investigation of UAPs. Ben’s claim that Dr. Kirkpatre was involved in this program raises concerns about possible conflicts of interest and undermines the integrity of UAP investigations conducted by AARO.

What is AARO, and what was its supposed mission?

AARO, or the All Domain Anomaly Resolution Office, was established by the Pentagon to investigate UAPs (UFOs). The office’s mission is to conduct scientifically rigorous investigations into UAP sightings and phenomena, aiming to provide transparency to the public and Congress. However, Ben suggests that AARO’s investigations may be influenced by prior UFO programs.

How has the U.S. government responded to UAP-related whistleblowers like Ben?

Ben mentions that members of Congress are struggling to get to the truth of UAP phenomena due to resistance and stonewalling. Despite this, Ben relayed his information to Congress and has been encouraged to recruit other members to help push for transparency on the issue.

Why does Ben believe it is important to speak out about UAPs now?

Ben feels strongly that the overwhelming body of evidence regarding UAPs, including testimonies from numerous witnesses, should not be ignored. He believes that it is crucial to push for a public and honest conversation about UAPs, which he sees as one of the most significant issues of our time.

What criticisms does the interviewer express about the whistleblower's approach?

The interviewer questions why Ben and other whistleblowers choose UFO podcasts as their platform for disclosure rather than mainstream media outlets. The interviewer also raises concerns about the resources available to independently verify Ben’s claims and the need for physical evidence to support the testimony.