Author Behind Christopher Nolan’s “Oppenheimer” on the Scientist’s Legacy | Amanpour and Company

Amanpour and Company
20 Jul 202319:03

Summary

TLDRThe script discusses Christopher Nolan's film 'Oppenheimer,' which explores the life of physicist J. Robert Oppenheimer, the 'father of the atomic bomb.' It delves into his role in the Manhattan Project, the moral dilemmas surrounding the creation and use of nuclear weapons, and his subsequent fall from grace during the Cold War era. The conversation touches on parallels between Oppenheimer's time and current debates on technology like artificial intelligence, emphasizing the need for responsible innovation and policy.

Takeaways

  • 🎬 'Oppenheimer' is a Christopher Nolan film about the 1945 Trinity test, the first successful detonation of a nuclear device in New Mexico.
  • 🏆 The movie is based on the Pulitzer Prize-winning book 'American Prometheus' by Kai Bird and Martin J. Sherwin, which details the life and impact of J. Robert Oppenheimer.
  • 🔬 J. Robert Oppenheimer was a prominent American physicist who introduced quantum physics to the U.S. and became the scientific director of the Manhattan Project at Los Alamos.
  • 💣 Oppenheimer's role in the development of the atomic bomb led to both his fame and eventual downfall through a politically charged trial in 1954.
  • 🤝 General Leslie Groves, despite political differences, chose Oppenheimer for his ability to synthesize information and communicate effectively with non-scientists.
  • 🌏 The film explores the moral and ethical implications of creating a weapon of mass destruction, with Oppenheimer becoming a figure for arms control and international policy.
  • 🎭 Notable actors such as Cillian Murphy, Florence Pugh, and Kenneth Branagh portray key characters, including Niels Bohr, who emphasizes the new world created by the atomic bomb.
  • 🔮 The script and film highlight the foresight of scientists like Oppenheimer and Einstein in understanding the potential dangers of unleashing new technologies like AI and nuclear weapons.
  • 🚫 Oppenheimer's public stance against the development of the hydrogen bomb and his advocacy for arms control put him at odds with the defense establishment, leading to his public humiliation.
  • ⏳ The film and book underscore the ongoing debate about the use of nuclear weapons, with the potential for future conflicts and the importance of international control.
  • 🌐 The relevance of Oppenheimer's story to modern times is emphasized, drawing parallels between the nuclear age and current technological advancements, particularly in AI.

Q & A

  • What is the film 'Oppenheimer' about?

    -The film 'Oppenheimer' is about the 1945 Trinity test in New Mexico, where the world's first nuclear device was successfully detonated, and the race against the Nazis to develop the atomic bomb.

  • Who is the main character in the film 'Oppenheimer'?

    -The main character in the film is J. Robert Oppenheimer, portrayed by Cillian Murphy, who was the scientific director of the Manhattan Project during the development of the atomic bomb.

  • What is the significance of the Trinity test mentioned in the script?

    -The Trinity test was significant as it was the first time a nuclear device was successfully detonated, marking a pivotal moment in history and the beginning of the atomic age.

  • Who wrote the book 'American Prometheus'?

    -The book 'American Prometheus' was written by Kai Bird and Martin J. Sherwin, which the film 'Oppenheimer' is based on.

  • What was the role of General Leslie Groves in the Manhattan Project?

    -General Leslie Groves was the head of the Manhattan Project and chose J. Robert Oppenheimer to be the scientific director of Los Alamos, the secret city built for the development of the atomic bomb.

  • Why was Oppenheimer chosen to lead the Manhattan Project?

    -Oppenheimer was chosen due to his ability to synthesize information and communicate in plain English, along with his polymathic nature and charisma, which General Groves appreciated.

  • What was the aftermath of the atomic bomb's creation for Oppenheimer?

    -After becoming famous as the 'father of the atomic bomb,' Oppenheimer faced a public downfall during a witch hunt and kangaroo court trial in 1954, where he was publicly humiliated and became a non-entity.

  • What is the connection between the development of the atomic bomb and current discussions on artificial intelligence?

    -The connection lies in the ethical and societal implications of unleashing powerful technologies without fully understanding their consequences, and the need for public intellectuals to guide policy decisions.

  • Why was Oppenheimer's loyalty and security clearance questioned?

    -Oppenheimer's loyalty was questioned due to his past sympathies with left-leaning activities and the fact that his brother had been in the Communist Party, despite no evidence of him being a security risk or spy.

  • What was the significance of the meeting between Oppenheimer and President Harry Truman?

    -The meeting was significant because Oppenheimer tried to express his concerns about the bomb and the need for international control, but Truman's misunderstanding of the situation and his decision to drop the bomb led to a tense and abrupt end to the meeting.

  • What was Oppenheimer's stance on the use of the atomic bomb in World War II?

    -Oppenheimer was ambivalent; he was aware of the tragic human consequences but also believed that demonstrating the bomb's power could prevent future wars by showing the destructiveness of nuclear weapons.

Outlines

00:00

🎬 'Oppenheimer': The Nuclear Legacy and Its Impact

The script introduces Christopher Nolan's film 'Oppenheimer,' starring Cillian Murphy and Florence Pugh, which depicts the historic 1945 Trinity test in New Mexico. It highlights the race against the Nazis to develop the first nuclear device and the role of Robert Oppenheimer, the scientific director of the Manhattan Project. The film is based on the Pulitzer Prize-winning book 'American Prometheus,' which explores Oppenheimer's life, his contribution to quantum physics, and the tragic consequences of his work. The script also features a discussion with Walter Isaacson about the film's relevance to modern issues, including the control of nuclear arms and the ethical implications of scientific advancements.

05:00

🔬 The Atomic Scientist as a Public Intellectual

This paragraph delves into Oppenheimer's transformation from a physicist to a public policy figure advocating for arms control. It includes a poignant scene from the movie featuring Niels Bohr, emphasizing the responsibility that comes with unlocking the power of the atom. The script discusses the Greek myth of Prometheus as a metaphor for Oppenheimer's role in giving humanity the power to destroy itself. It also touches on the contemporary relevance of the film, drawing parallels between the nuclear age and current debates on artificial intelligence, and the need for scientists to engage in public policy discussions.

10:02

🏛 The Downfall of Oppenheimer: Politics and Security

The third paragraph examines Oppenheimer's political and personal struggles, particularly his loyalty and security clearance issues. It recounts his affiliations with left-leaning causes and the subsequent accusations that led to his public humiliation during a 1954 trial. The script also explores Oppenheimer's advocacy against the development of the hydrogen bomb and his policy differences with the defense establishment, which contributed to his downfall. The narrative includes a dramatic account of Oppenheimer's meeting with President Harry Truman, highlighting the president's misunderstanding of the proliferation of nuclear technology.

15:03

💥 The Moral and Philosophical Dilemma of Nuclear Warfare

The final paragraph grapples with Oppenheimer's conflicted feelings about the use of the atomic bomb in World War II and the moral implications of his actions. It discusses the influence of Niels Bohr's philosophy on Oppenheimer and the hope that the horror of nuclear weapons would prevent future wars. The script reflects on the ongoing gamble of nuclear non-use and the potential for future conflicts, especially in the context of current global tensions. It concludes with a call for international control and regulation of nuclear technology, echoing Oppenheimer's own warnings about the dangers of an uncontrolled arms race.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Oppenheimer

J. Robert Oppenheimer was a prominent American physicist and is often referred to as the 'father of the atomic bomb' due to his role as the scientific director of the Manhattan Project during World War II. In the video, Oppenheimer's complex journey from being a celebrated scientist to a figure brought down by political controversy is highlighted, illustrating the theme of the consequences of scientific discovery and its impact on humanity.

💡Manhattan Project

The Manhattan Project was a research and development program during World War II that produced the first nuclear weapons. It is central to the video's theme as it represents the culmination of scientific innovation and the ethical dilemmas it presented. The script discusses General Leslie Groves' choice of Oppenheimer to lead the project at Los Alamos, emphasizing the trust and tension between military and scientific objectives.

💡Trinity Test

The Trinity Test was the first detonation of a nuclear bomb in 1945 in New Mexico, marking a pivotal moment in history. The video uses this event to underscore the success of the Manhattan Project and the dawn of the atomic age, which carries profound implications for global security and warfare.

💡Nuclear Weapon

A nuclear weapon is a device that releases a massive amount of energy through nuclear reactions. The script frequently references the development and implications of these weapons, particularly in the context of the arms race during World War II and the subsequent Cold War era, highlighting the video's focus on the historical and ongoing challenges of nuclear proliferation.

💡American Prometheus

The term 'American Prometheus' is used to describe Oppenheimer in the script, drawing a parallel with the Greek mythological figure Prometheus, who stole fire from the gods and gave it to humanity. The book and the video use this metaphor to discuss the duality of Oppenheimer's role in bringing about a powerful technology that had the potential for both creation and destruction.

💡Arms Control

Arms control refers to the regulation of weapons and military forces, particularly in the context of nuclear weapons. The video discusses Oppenheimer's advocacy for arms control post-World War II, reflecting the broader theme of the responsibility of scientists and policymakers to manage the destructive potential of new technologies.

💡Public Intellectual

A public intellectual is someone who engages with the public on matters of intellect and policy. The script touches on the challenges Oppenheimer faced when he transitioned from a scientist to a public policy figure, emphasizing the tension between scientific discovery and its societal implications.

💡Kangaroo Court

A kangaroo court is a term used to describe a mock or biased judicial proceeding that ignores recognized standards of law or justice. The video references the 1954 trial of Oppenheimer, where he was publicly humiliated, illustrating the personal cost of being at the forefront of controversial scientific advancements.

💡Niels Bohr

Niels Bohr was a Danish physicist who made foundational contributions to understanding atomic structure and quantum theory. In the video, Bohr is portrayed discussing the implications of the atomic bomb with Oppenheimer, emphasizing the ethical considerations that scientists must face when their work has far-reaching consequences.

💡Artificial Intelligence

Artificial intelligence (AI) is the development of computer systems able to perform tasks that usually require human intelligence. The script draws a parallel between the nuclear age and the current era of AI, suggesting that we must learn from history and consider the societal impacts of new technologies, including the potential for misuse or unintended consequences.

💡Hydrogen Bomb

The hydrogen bomb, also known as the H-bomb or thermonuclear weapon, is a type of nuclear weapon that uses nuclear fusion to release energy. The video mentions Oppenheimer's opposition to the development of the hydrogen bomb, highlighting the theme of the moral responsibilities of scientists in the face of increasingly destructive technologies.

Highlights

Christopher Nolan's nuclear thriller 'Oppenheimer' starring Cillian Murphy and Florence Pugh is about the 1945 Trinity test.

The film depicts the race against the Nazis to develop the world's first nuclear device.

The movie is based on the Pulitzer Prize-winning book 'American Prometheus' by Kai Bird and Martin J. Sherwin.

J. Robert Oppenheimer was a physicist who introduced quantum physics to America and became the scientific director of the Manhattan Project.

General Leslie Groves chose Oppenheimer for his ability to synthesize and communicate complex scientific concepts.

Oppenheimer's journey from fame to public humiliation in a 1954 court trial is explored.

The film discusses the impact of Oppenheimer's creation on the modern world with Walter Isaacson.

Niels Bohr's understanding of the atom and his interaction with Oppenheimer is featured in the film.

Oppenheimer's role as a public policy figure advocating for arms control is highlighted.

The film raises questions about the responsibility of scientists in the development and use of new technologies.

Walter Isaacson discusses the relevance of the film to current debates on artificial intelligence and technology.

Oppenheimer's conflicted feelings about the use of the atomic bomb and its potential to prevent future wars are examined.

The film portrays the tension between Oppenheimer and President Harry Truman over the development of nuclear weapons.

The loyalty and security clearance issues that led to Oppenheimer's downfall are explained.

The film suggests a connection between Oppenheimer's story and the need for public intellectuals to guide policy on new technologies.

Oppenheimer's vision for an international atomic authority to prevent the proliferation of nuclear weapons is presented.

The film ends with an unresolved question about the future of humanity and the potential for nuclear conflict.

Transcripts

play00:00

Christopher Nolan's nuclear Thriller

play00:01

Oppenheimer starring Killian Murphy and

play00:04

Florence Pugh lands in theaters Friday

play00:06

it is about the 1945 Trinity test in New

play00:09

Mexico where the world's first nuclear

play00:11

device was successfully detonated

play00:13

we're in a race against the Nazis

play00:19

[Music]

play00:27

we have a 12-month Head Start 18. how

play00:30

could you possibly know that

play00:32

we've got one hope

play00:35

all America's industrial Mite and

play00:37

scientific innovation connected here

play00:40

secret Laboratory

play00:43

keep everyone there until it's done

play00:48

let's go recruit some scientists

play00:50

the film is based on the Pulitzer

play00:52

prize-winning Book American Prometheus

play00:54

written by kyberd and Martin J Sherwin

play00:57

bird discusses the Triumph and tragedy

play00:59

of Robert Oppenheimer and the impact of

play01:01

his creation on our modern world with

play01:04

Walter Isaacson

play01:06

thank you Biana and Kai Byrd welcome to

play01:09

the show well great to be with you

play01:11

Walter uh you and our beloved late

play01:14

friend Marty Sherwin wrote American

play01:16

Prometheus the Epic Pulitzer pies

play01:19

winning biography of uh J Robert

play01:21

Oppenheimer now it's the most

play01:23

anticipated film of the Year opening

play01:26

this weekend tell us first who was J

play01:29

Robert Oppenheimer well he was an

play01:32

incredibly fascinating American

play01:35

physicist who brought the quantum

play01:38

physics the new physics to America in

play01:40

the 1920s by founding the a physics

play01:44

department in Berkeley University of

play01:46

California

play01:47

and he then became he was chosen

play01:51

in a

play01:53

a very odd Choice by General Leslie

play01:55

Groves the head of the Manhattan Project

play01:58

to be the scientific director of Los

play02:00

Alamos this Secret City they built in

play02:03

the desert of New Mexico to build the

play02:06

gadget of what became the atomic bomb

play02:09

and then he uh you know his Odyssey is

play02:13

incredible he becomes

play02:15

America's most famous scientist in 1945

play02:18

as the father of the atomic bomb and

play02:21

then nine years later he's brought down

play02:23

in this and uh Witch Hunt of a kangaroo

play02:27

court trial in 1954. and publicly

play02:31

humiliated and becomes a non-entity it's

play02:35

an incredibly

play02:37

complicated story you mentioned General

play02:39

Leslie Groves tapping him to run the

play02:42

Manhattan Project in Los Alamos uh

play02:46

interesting scene in the book in the

play02:49

movie too with uh uh Matt Damon playing

play02:53

who was in Colonel Leslie Groves he's

play02:55

about to be promoted

play02:57

Tolman thinks you have integrity but he

play03:00

also strikes me as a guy who knows more

play03:02

about science than people and here you

play03:05

are

play03:06

you don't take much and Trust don't take

play03:08

anything on trust

play03:13

why don't you have a Nobel Prize aren't

play03:15

you a general they're making me one for

play03:17

this perhaps I'll have the same luck

play03:19

Nobel Prize for making a bomb Alfred

play03:21

Nobel invented dynamite

play03:25

so how would you proceed

play03:28

you're talking about turning Theory into

play03:31

a practical weapon system faster than

play03:34

the Nazis who have a 12-month Head Start

play03:36

18. how could you possibly know that

play03:39

so General Grove says I don't take

play03:41

anything on trust how in the world did

play03:44

he pick J Robert Oppenheimer to run the

play03:47

Manhattan Project

play03:49

well it was the most unlikely choice

play03:52

uh you know Oppenheimer and he were like

play03:55

oil and water particularly politically

play03:57

speaking Opie was a man of the left

play04:00

General Groves was rather conservative

play04:02

Gruff hard working

play04:07

determined General who wanted to build

play04:09

this this weapon of mass destruction and

play04:13

Oppenheimer is uh nerdy physicist but

play04:17

growth season Oppenheimer that he's a

play04:21

synthesizer that he's someone who can

play04:24

actually speak in plain English

play04:27

uh he's a polymath he's not only a

play04:30

physicist but he's someone who loves

play04:32

French poetry and

play04:34

the novels of Ernest Hemingway and uh he

play04:39

can he can explain things and that's

play04:43

something that Groves uh appreciates and

play04:46

he can see that there's something in

play04:48

Oppenheimer that is both charismatic and

play04:51

a young man filled with ambition

play04:54

uh and it turns out to be a brilliant

play04:57

choice you describe how he becomes a

play05:00

public policy figure talking about the

play05:03

need for arms control there's a great

play05:06

scene in the movie with one of my

play05:08

favorite historical characters Niels

play05:10

Bohr the great physicist who really

play05:12

understands the atom for the first time

play05:14

played by Kenneth Branagh one of the

play05:17

greatest actors of all times and he says

play05:19

you are going to have to deal with this

play05:22

once it's all over let's show that clip

play05:25

I'm not here to help Robert

play05:28

I knew you could do this without me why

play05:30

did you come to talk about after the

play05:33

power you're about to reveal will

play05:34

forever outlive the Nazis

play05:37

and the world is not prepared you could

play05:40

lift the stone without being ready for

play05:42

the snake that's revealed we have to

play05:43

make the politicians understand this

play05:45

isn't a new weapon

play05:47

it's a new world I'll be out there doing

play05:50

what I can but you

play05:51

you are an American Prometheus a man who

play05:55

gave them the power to destroy

play05:57

themselves and they'll respect that

play06:01

I love the phrase he uses you're an

play06:04

American Prometheus of course you title

play06:07

your book that uh

play06:09

tell me why being a Prometheus does that

play06:14

turn him into somebody who fights in the

play06:18

public policy front well well Prometheus

play06:20

of course is the Greek god who gives

play06:22

fire to man to man stealing it from Zeus

play06:27

giving it to man and then Zeus punishes

play06:30

him for for doing this and this is

play06:33

exactly what happened to Oppenheimer he

play06:36

gave him mankind atomic fire and then

play06:40

nine years later he was publicly

play06:43

humiliated and sort of tired and

play06:45

feathered in this kangaroo court because

play06:47

of his policy differences with the

play06:51

defense establishment something very

play06:53

poignant at the end of the movie sorry

play06:55

about the spoiler alert but after they

play06:58

tested and it works

play07:00

Oppenheimer starts to think maybe we

play07:03

were right we set ourselves on a path to

play07:07

destroy the world what did he mean by

play07:09

that

play07:10

well he means that uh he has given us

play07:15

fire atomic fire

play07:17

and uh the story is not finished you

play07:21

know will Humanity survive the atomic

play07:24

age well we're not sure

play07:27

uh we still have weapons of mass

play07:29

destruction we are still coping with

play07:32

living with the bomb just look at the

play07:35

war in Ukraine where Mr Putin has

play07:40

threatened to use tactical nuclear

play07:42

weapons uh so it's a question mark I

play07:46

think this film is

play07:48

so very relevant to our times

play07:51

it's partly relevant to our times

play07:52

because we keep unleashing new

play07:54

technologies and we don't worry about

play07:56

them quite as much as Oppenheimer and

play08:01

Einstein worried about having unleashed

play08:03

the bomb for example this comes just as

play08:06

we're debating artificial intelligence

play08:08

did you think there was some connection

play08:11

to sort of how we're going to deal with

play08:14

our Technologies oh absolutely and you

play08:17

know we're a society drenched in science

play08:20

and technology

play08:22

um and yet we don't seem to have many

play08:26

scientific gurus around

play08:30

scientists who are public intellectuals

play08:32

who can get up and explain again in

play08:35

plain English the choices the policy

play08:38

choices

play08:39

you know we need to figure out how to

play08:41

integrate these Technologies

play08:42

particularly something as revolutionary

play08:44

as artificial intelligence into a Humane

play08:48

Society uh and I think part of the

play08:53

Oppenheimer story and it's it comes

play08:55

across in the film brilliantly is that

play08:58

what happened to Oppenheimer in 1954 the

play09:01

public humiliation of America's greatest

play09:04

scientists

play09:06

a unfortunate message to all scientists

play09:10

to be aware of becoming a public

play09:12

intellectual beware of getting out of

play09:14

your Narrow Lane

play09:16

and talking about politics or policy

play09:19

because you could be tarred and

play09:21

feathered like Robert Oppenheimer was in

play09:24

1954. let's explain exactly what that

play09:28

problem was in terms of the loyalty and

play09:31

the security clearance it was because

play09:34

people were very afraid that the

play09:37

Russians had suddenly gotten the bomb

play09:39

and actually correctly they had gotten

play09:42

it from a spy at Los Alamos Klaus Fuchs

play09:44

not somebody Oppenheimer had hired but

play09:47

this was a a real scare and possibility

play09:52

Oppenheimer had been his brother had

play09:55

been in the Communist Party he had been

play09:57

generally sympathetic never a party

play09:59

member explain that to us

play10:02

yeah it's complicated you know they the

play10:04

they used the fact that he had been a

play10:07

man of the left he'd been sort of Pinko

play10:10

but not red he'd been sympathetic to

play10:13

some of the Communist party's activities

play10:15

like the uh desegregation of a public

play10:19

swimming pool in Berkeley and raising

play10:22

money to send an ambulance to the

play10:24

Spanish Republic cause in the during the

play10:27

Spanish Civil War

play10:29

um and so they used the fact that he had

play10:32

given money to the Communist Party

play10:34

although he'd never joined it himself

play10:36

uh to bring him down in 1954 but their

play10:41

real concern was not that he was a

play10:44

security risk

play10:45

or even a spy there was no real evidence

play10:49

of that uh but their real concern was

play10:53

that here the father of the atomic bomb

play10:55

beginning in 1945 just months after

play10:58

Hiroshima be had begun speaking out

play11:01

against Reliance on these weapons and

play11:04

specifically after 1949 when the

play11:06

Russians acquired an atomic bomb he

play11:09

spoke out against the development of the

play11:11

hydrogen bomb the super bomb

play11:13

and this was a threat to the budgets of

play11:18

the defense department to the budget of

play11:20

the Air Force and the Navy who wanted to

play11:23

spend more money on these weapons so the

play11:26

father of the atomic bomb Oppenheimer

play11:28

was becoming a

play11:30

a threat to their budgets and this was

play11:34

the real motivation to bring him down

play11:36

his policy differences with the National

play11:39

Security establishment one of the most

play11:42

interesting scenes both in your book and

play11:44

in the movie and I'll say in the movie

play11:46

it's exactly the way it is in your book

play11:48

is when Oppenheimer decides he has to go

play11:52

see President Harry Truman and he says

play11:56

I've got blood on my hands Oppenheimer

play11:58

says and Truman gets mad explain that to

play12:03

us and what Truman ends up saying

play12:05

well Oppenheimer went into the Oval

play12:08

Office with an agenda he wanted he

play12:11

wanted to take advantage of this one

play12:13

moment his meeting with the president to

play12:16

explain his worries about the bomb and

play12:20

how to contain it he wanted to make the

play12:22

argument for international control or

play12:26

coming to some kind of Arms Control

play12:28

agreement with the Russians and not to

play12:30

have an arms race

play12:31

and before he can make the argument

play12:34

really Truman interrupts them and says

play12:37

so Dr Oppenheimer

play12:39

when do you think the Russians are going

play12:41

to get this weapon and Oppenheimer

play12:44

replies well I'm not sure but in a few

play12:46

years and Truman again interrupts and

play12:49

says no I know never they're never going

play12:52

to get it and at that moment

play12:55

Oppenheimer understands that the

play12:57

president of the United States does not

play12:59

understand that there are no secrets

play13:02

that the physics is known by everyone

play13:04

and that it's a simple engineering

play13:07

problem and that any country however

play13:09

poor

play13:10

with whatever resources can indeed build

play13:14

these weapons and of course the Russians

play13:16

are going to get it you know they did

play13:18

have some spies at Los Alamos who helped

play13:21

them along uh early on but at some point

play13:27

the Russians were going to develop these

play13:29

weapons and so out of

play13:31

frustration

play13:33

Oppenheimer turns to Harry Truman and

play13:36

says sir you don't understand

play13:38

I have blood on my hands

play13:41

and of course this is exactly the wrong

play13:43

thing to tell Harry Truman the man who

play13:45

made the decision to drop two such

play13:48

weapons onto Japanese cities and so he

play13:52

becomes very offended the meeting ends

play13:54

abruptly

play13:55

and as Oppenheimer walks out and as you

play13:59

see this in the film it's

play14:01

as it's portrayed directly from the book

play14:04

uh Truman says to one of his aides I

play14:07

don't want to ever see that cry baby

play14:08

scientist ever again and he never did

play14:12

tell me about oppenheimer's conflicted

play14:14

feelings on whether or not we should

play14:16

have dropped the bomb and whether your

play14:19

feelings I've read about you over the

play14:21

years dealing with this issue whether

play14:23

dropping the Bomb by Harry Truman but

play14:27

also all the scientists there was the

play14:29

right decision

play14:31

so I'm Oppenheimer uh he he didn't

play14:34

actually select the target of Hiroshima

play14:37

or Nagasaki but he knew that the weapon

play14:40

was so large that it needed it that the

play14:44

only it needed a large Target and that

play14:46

meant a city not a military installation

play14:49

not a battleship it needed a whole city

play14:53

and he was very ambivalent on the one

play14:57

hand he was extremely aware of the

play15:00

tragic human consequences this is going

play15:03

to be used on a whole city in which most

play15:06

of the victims are going to be civilians

play15:08

and yet he was convinced of Niels Bohr's

play15:12

argument

play15:13

when he arrived in Los Alamos in the

play15:16

last day of 1943 Niels Bohr the great

play15:19

Danish physicist said Robert

play15:22

I have one question for you

play15:24

is it big enough

play15:26

is the bomb big enough

play15:29

so that Humanity will understand that it

play15:32

can no longer fight Wars

play15:35

will it end all wars and Oppenheimer

play15:38

convinced himself that you know the

play15:40

weapon had to be demonstrated in this

play15:43

war

play15:44

on a Target

play15:45

so that people would understand its

play15:48

horrible destructiveness

play15:50

and therefore the next four would not be

play15:54

fought with by two adversaries both of

play15:58

whom would be armed with nuclear weapons

play16:01

and that would of course be Armageddon

play16:04

so it's a very complicated even

play16:07

philosophical argument and how do you

play16:10

feel now because it's been almost 80

play16:14

years

play16:15

and in some ways the Niels Bohr

play16:18

Oppenheimer argument that if we use it

play16:21

it'll be so terrible we'll never use

play16:23

something like this again has held true

play16:25

for 80 years and yet also we wake up in

play16:28

the morning and think maybe Putin's

play16:30

going to do something how do you feel

play16:32

the resolution is so far well

play16:36

it's a it's a gamble isn't it uh and

play16:41

yes it's true we have not fought

play16:44

a war like World War II we've fought

play16:47

little Wars

play16:48

like Vietnam and Korea with great

play16:51

casualties but we haven't used nuclear

play16:53

weapons again we haven't had total

play16:56

warfare as we did in World War II so

play16:59

maybe Niels Bohr and Oppenheimer were

play17:02

right

play17:03

on the other hand in the course of human

play17:06

history uh

play17:10

it seems

play17:12

the odds are that these weapons will be

play17:15

used again unless we do what Oppenheimer

play17:18

suggested which was to essentially ban

play17:21

them and create an international Atomic

play17:24

Authority that would have the ability to

play17:27

Monitor and inspect every laboratory

play17:30

every Factory everywhere in the world to

play17:33

make sure that no one is building these

play17:35

weapons

play17:36

uh you know he he he was trying to make

play17:39

the argument that we need to control

play17:41

this technology so coming back again to

play17:45

artificial intelligence uh I think if he

play17:49

was with us today he would be making the

play17:51

same argument that we need to

play17:54

uh understand the consequences socially

play17:57

for Society of artificial intelligence

play18:00

and regulate it and he would be making

play18:03

the same argument today he'd be appalled

play18:05

that we had an arms race he'd be

play18:08

appalled that Mr Putin is threatening

play18:10

tactical nuclear weapons in the Ukraine

play18:12

and uh he'd be very fearful as I am

play18:16

today that someday we might actually see

play18:20

another nuclear war fought maybe not

play18:22

between Russia and America but between

play18:25

Pakistan and India uh you know they're

play18:28

both

play18:30

Nations who are enemies and they're both

play18:33

armed with nuclear weapons

play18:36

it's so I don't know the story is not

play18:39

over and uh it could still end badly Guy

play18:43

Bird thank you so much for joining us

play18:47

thank you Walter

play18:52

foreign

play18:57

foreign

play18:58

[Music]

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Related Tags
OppenheimerNuclear AgeManhattan ProjectAtomic BombHistorical DramaScientific InnovationCold WarEthical DilemmaPolicy DebateTechnological Impact