Buya Syakur Tak Tertarik Toleransi beragama. Toleransi Itu Benci yang di Simpan | Simak dan Fahami

Summary

The speaker critiques the concept of religious tolerance, arguing that it is an insufficient solution for societal harmony. Instead, they emphasize the need for equality, where all citizens, regardless of religion or background, have equal rights and opportunities. The speaker highlights how certain interpretations of Islam and other religious laws can perpetuate inequality, citing examples such as slavery and forced marriages. They argue that the belief in Islam's perfection has led to a rejection of necessary revisions or reforms. The speaker calls for critical thinking and human reasoning, suggesting that the closure of prophethood signifies humanity's transition to relying on their intellect.

Takeaways

• 😀 The speaker emphasizes that the concept of religious harmony in Indonesia should focus on equality, not tolerance. Tolerance, in their view, is a narrow concept often needed between individuals (e.g., husband and wife), but not in the broader societal context.
• 😀 Tolerance, according to the speaker, can hide hatred and lead to situations where minority groups feel indebted to the majority. This dynamic creates an unbalanced power structure.
• 😀 The speaker advocates for equality based on the law, where people of different religions, ethnicities, and backgrounds are all treated equally, without favoritism or discrimination.
• 😀 The idea of tolerance is critiqued as it perpetuates an imbalance, where minority groups are seen as inferior to the majority, creating a sense of indebtedness.
• 😀 The speaker discusses how the majority tends to dominate in any society and that this should not be accepted as the norm. They push for a more inclusive and equitable approach to governance and social interaction.
• 😀 The speaker rejects the notion that religious laws should be used to suppress minorities, particularly when the law serves the interests of the majority group.
• 😀 The speaker reflects on the Islamic belief that Islam is a perfect religion, arguing that this belief stifles progress and critical thinking within the Muslim community.
• 😀 The speaker compares the rigidity within Islam to other forms of complacency, such as people who stop striving for improvement once they think they've reached perfection (e.g., a rich person no longer working hard).
• 😀 The speaker critiques the misinterpretation of the Quranic verse declaring Islam as ‘perfect,’ arguing that this is a misunderstanding and that the true meaning is that humanity should now rely on reason and not expect continuous divine revelations.
• 😀 The speaker also criticizes the historical use of Islamic laws (such as those regarding slavery and marriage) to justify oppressive practices, suggesting that these laws were influenced by the political powers at the time rather than divine intent.

Q & A

What is the speaker's stance on religious tolerance?

The speaker rejects the idea of religious tolerance as it only covers narrow spaces, such as between a husband and wife, and instead advocates for equality in a diverse society. They believe that tolerance hides hatred and leads to a power imbalance where minorities feel indebted to the majority.

How does the speaker define the ideal societal relationship, as opposed to tolerance?

The speaker emphasizes equality, not tolerance, as the ideal societal relationship. They argue that equality ensures everyone has the same rights, such as freedom of worship, without any group feeling indebted to another.

What is the speaker's view on the relationship between the majority and minority groups in a society?

The speaker believes that majority groups tend to exert pressure on minorities, leading to an imbalance. They argue that a true societal framework should be based on equality, where no group, whether majority or minority, is disadvantaged.

What role does the speaker believe laws play in maintaining this societal equality?

The speaker argues that laws should promote equality, ensuring that individuals can practice their religion freely, build places of worship, and engage in communal activities without discrimination.

How does the speaker critique the view of Islamic perfectionism?

The speaker critiques the view that Islam is a perfect religion and cannot evolve, explaining that such a belief leads to stagnation. They argue that Islam, like any religion, should be open to reinterpretation and adaptation over time.

What does the speaker suggest about the interpretation of the concept of perfection in Islam?

The speaker suggests that the belief in Islam’s perfection stems from a misinterpretation. They believe the 'perfection' referenced in Islamic texts refers to a point where humans are expected to use their intellect, not to continue receiving divine revelations.

What example does the speaker give to show the misuse of religious beliefs for social control?

The speaker mentions the issue of slavery in Saudi Arabia and how religious justification was used to maintain it until the country was pressured by the U.S. to outlaw it, showing how religious interpretations were manipulated to suppress social progress.

How does the speaker discuss the issue of child marriage within Islamic law?

The speaker criticizes the practice of child marriage within Islamic law, specifically referring to how some interpretations allow for the forced marriage of young girls. They highlight the need for reform in religious interpretations regarding such practices.

What is the speaker's view on the closing of prophethood in Islam?

The speaker agrees that Muhammad is the final prophet but challenges the interpretation that this means Islam is complete and cannot evolve. They believe that the closure of prophethood is a signal for humans to use their intellect and reason in decision-making.

What does the speaker believe is the real message of the closure of prophethood?

The speaker believes that the closure of prophethood does not indicate perfection in Islam but rather signals that humanity should now rely on their reasoning and intellect to address new issues, as divine revelations are no longer being sent.