Eps 858 | TIGA ALASAN PRABOWO SUBIANTO BELUM LAYAK JADI PRESIDEN

Summary

In this video, the speaker critically analyzes Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto’s evolving stance on corruption and his approach to leadership. Initially, Prabowo strongly committed to fighting corruption, but over time, his statements and actions have shifted, reflecting a more lenient stance towards corrupt officials. The speaker expresses concern that Prabowo has compromised his earlier principles, especially in regard to holding corrupt individuals accountable. He suggests that Prabowo’s leadership is influenced by a small circle of advisors and that his empathy towards corrupt individuals undermines his understanding of the struggles faced by ordinary Indonesians.

Takeaways

• 😀 The speaker expresses frustration with discussing Prabowo and acknowledges that many people are tired of talking about the president.
• 😀 The speaker believes it is a national responsibility to critically examine the actions and policies of the current president in order to ensure Indonesia's progress and independence.
• 😀 The speaker suggests that Prabowo might be involved in corrupt circles, citing changes in his stance on corruption and his increasingly permissive attitude toward it.
• 😀 Prabowo's previous strong stance against corruption, including statements about chasing corrupt individuals to Antarctica, has shifted, with more lenient remarks like forgiving corruptors as long as the stolen money is returned.
• 😀 The speaker is suspicious of Prabowo's shift in rhetoric, suggesting that his earlier commitment to combating corruption has weakened due to the overwhelming presence of corruption in the government.
• 😀 A particularly alarming statement from Prabowo involves building a special prison for corrupt individuals on a remote island, a proposal that raises concerns about its true intentions.
• 😀 The speaker speculates that Prabowo's change in approach to corruption is due to the realization that corrupt networks are entrenched, even within the government, making it difficult to combat corruption effectively.
• 😀 The speaker compares Prabowo's softening stance on corruption to the luxurious treatment of corrupt individuals, highlighting the growing divide between the elite and the general public.
• 😀 The speaker fears that Prabowo's actions indicate he may be controlled by powerful figures within the government, rather than being an independent leader.
• 😀 The speaker concludes by criticizing Prabowo's lack of awareness of the struggles faced by the average Indonesian, including poverty and economic hardship, and his failure to empathize with the suffering caused by corruption.

Q & A

What is the main concern of the speaker regarding Prabowo's political stance?

The speaker expresses concern that Prabowo, initially known for his strong stance against corruption, has become more lenient and even permissive toward corrupt individuals as he gained political power.

How did Prabowo's views on combating corruption change over time?

Initially, Prabowo was vocal about aggressively pursuing corrupt individuals, even promising to go as far as Antarctica to chase them. However, over time, his statements shifted toward more lenient measures, such as offering forgiveness to corrupt individuals if they returned stolen funds.

What did Prabowo suggest regarding corrupt officials in March 2025?

In March 2025, Prabowo suggested creating a special prison for corrupt officials on a remote island, indicating a harsh but isolated punishment for corruption.

What was Prabowo's stance on asset confiscation from corrupt individuals?

Prabowo supported the idea of asset confiscation from corrupt individuals but emphasized that only the assets directly related to the corruption should be seized, not the entirety of the individual's wealth.

How does the speaker perceive Prabowo's response to corruption after becoming president?

The speaker believes that as president, Prabowo became more aware of the complexity of corruption, realizing that it was deeply entrenched within the political system, leading him to compromise with corrupt individuals instead of taking strict action.

What concern does the speaker raise about the potential creation of a prison on a remote island for corrupt officials?

The speaker worries that the remote prison might not be effective in deterring corruption, as it could be a facade to remove corrupt officials from public view while allowing them to continue enjoying privileges outside of the prison.

Why does the speaker suggest that Prabowo is out of touch with the realities of the general public?

The speaker argues that Prabowo does not understand the suffering of the Indonesian people, especially in terms of poverty, unemployment, and economic difficulties, and is more concerned with the welfare of corrupt officials and their families.

What does the speaker imply about Prabowo's leadership style?

The speaker implies that Prabowo lacks genuine leadership qualities and is instead controlled by powerful figures within his inner circle, making him more of a puppet leader than a strong, independent president.

How does the speaker describe the economic situation in Indonesia under Prabowo's leadership?

The speaker highlights the economic struggles faced by the people of Indonesia, including high unemployment, insufficient holiday bonuses (THR), bankrupt businesses, and a weak economy, which the speaker attributes to widespread corruption.

What criticism does the speaker have regarding Prabowo's stance on the involvement of corrupt officials' families?

The speaker criticizes Prabowo for expressing sympathy for the families of corrupt officials, suggesting that he does not grasp the broader social consequences of corruption, such as the negative impact it has on the families of victims and the general public.