Komunikasi Buruk Presiden Prabowo dan Para Menterinya | Bocor Alus Politik

Summary

This video script explores the ongoing communication challenges within the Indonesian government under Prabowo Subianto’s leadership. It highlights how ministers face difficulty accessing Prabowo directly, causing delays and confusion in policy implementation. The script also touches on the strained relationship between the president and his cabinet, the lack of transparency, and the negative impacts of poor communication on public trust and government effectiveness. The conversation delves into specific issues like the PPN tax change and the mismanagement of government policies, all stemming from unclear and inefficient communication practices.

Takeaways

• 😀 Communication between ministers and Prabowo Subianto is hindered by intermediaries, leading to inefficiency and misunderstandings.
• 😀 Sri Mulyani and other ministers face difficulties in directly discussing policies with Prabowo, often relying on intermediaries, which delays decision-making.
• 😀 The government's failure to clearly communicate changes, such as the VAT increase, created confusion and led to last-minute delays.
• 😀 There is a lack of transparency regarding BUMN shares and related issues, causing uncertainty among investors and businesses.
• 😀 The government's failure to explain its policies to the public and stakeholders, including investors, exacerbated the situation, resulting in public unrest.
• 😀 President Prabowo's communication style has been criticized for being aggressive, which has affected the behavior of his subordinates.
• 😀 The use of harsh language by Prabowo, such as 'dasmu', has hurt public relations and created a divisive narrative around the government.
• 😀 Poor communication at the top level is mirrored by government officials, with many ministers reluctant to speak without explicit approval from Prabowo or the palace.
• 😀 There is a sense that Prabowo's leadership is characterized by a 'command politics' approach, leading to a lack of initiative or direct communication from government officials.
• 😀 If Prabowo does not open up communication channels with his ministers and allow for more direct dialogue, the government will continue to struggle with inefficiency and public dissatisfaction.

Q & A

What is the main issue discussed in the video regarding communication in the Indonesian government?

The main issue discussed is the breakdown in communication between President Prabowo Subianto and his ministers, leading to inefficiencies and confusion in government decision-making and policy implementation.

Why are the ministers struggling to communicate effectively with President Prabowo?

Ministers are struggling to communicate directly with President Prabowo because he prefers to work through a select group of close associates, which creates a bottleneck in communication and decision-making.

How does the lack of direct communication affect the implementation of government policies?

The lack of direct communication leads to delays in implementing policies and difficulties in translating Prabowo's objectives into actionable government programs. Ministers are often forced to wait for approval or instructions from Prabowo or his close circle before moving forward.

What is the role of Sri Mulyani in the communication breakdown?

Sri Mulyani, the Minister of Finance, faced difficulties in communicating with Prabowo, especially when dealing with issues like the proposed 12% VAT increase. She had to rely on indirect channels of communication, making it harder to address urgent matters.

How did the proposed 12% VAT increase contribute to the communication issues?

The proposed VAT increase led to confusion as there was no clear communication from Prabowo's side, and businesses were left uncertain. This resulted in last-minute changes and significant disruptions, with businesses raising their prices in anticipation of the new VAT rate.

What are some of the key criticisms of President Prabowo's leadership style?

President Prabowo is criticized for his authoritarian leadership style, where decisions are centralized, and communication is controlled by a small group around him. This lack of openness prevents a free flow of ideas and hampers the effectiveness of the government.

How does Prabowo's leadership style impact the ministers and their ability to perform their roles?

Prabowo's leadership style creates an environment where ministers are hesitant to act independently and often wait for his approval before making decisions. This undermines their ability to take initiative and leads to inefficiencies in governance.

What was the reaction to Prabowo's harsh language and public statements, such as calling critics 'foreign agents'?

Prabowo's harsh language and labeling of critics as 'foreign agents' created a hostile atmosphere. This rhetoric has been criticized for polarizing the political environment and discouraging constructive criticism, further compounding communication issues within the government.

How does the video suggest that Prabowo's communication approach affects his subordinates?

The video suggests that Prabowo's communication style sets a negative example for his subordinates. If the president uses harsh language and suppresses open dialogue, his ministers and other officials tend to imitate this behavior, leading to a lack of transparency and communication within the government.

What does the video imply about the overall state of governance under Prabowo?

The video implies that the state of governance under Prabowo is chaotic and inefficient. The breakdown in communication, coupled with his authoritarian style, hampers effective policy implementation and leads to confusion among both government officials and the public.